User talk:Coolperson177/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so by clicking the "contact me" link above and starting a new topic there.

hello

--12.191.57.81 (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I left a welcome message on your talk page, you'll want to check that out. Coolperson177 (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Helo LilMarshmallowFace111 (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About non-admin closures of AfDs

Hello, Coolperson177. Thanks for attempting to do non-admin closures. But you should be careful not to do closures that you do not have the tools to implement. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion of peace, the consensus was to delete the article, then redirect it. But you closed it as a simple redirect. That was not the consensus. I have reopened the discussion, deleted the article, and then created the redirect. It's best to do NAC closures only on non-controversial or non-complicated results such as Keep, especially at first. If you have any questions or need any advice, just ask. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Sorry. I wasn't aware of the difference. Thanks for telling me. --Coolperson177 (talk) 19:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of QuickSun Technologies

Hi, Why are you deleting the QuickSun Technologies article? I would like to tell you that QuickSun Technologies is an Indian Financial Company based in Gurgaon, India and the company served 30 state in India. And I work in the company and it is a big corporate company. I have attached the reference on article. Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag on the page. Thankyou Raebareli Area (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly consider it. Raebareli Area (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raebareli Area! I want to clarify that I didn't put it up for speedy deletion. I nominated it because I was unclear of the notability of the organization. For an organization to be notable, it must be covered in multiple news sources. If you have more sources, please do add them to the article. Please comment at the discussion page if you oppose the deletion of this article, but don't remove the tag, that's disruptive. Thanks! --Coolperson177 (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bugger off, me human (w/o any firther text)

As me posted. Now, if you're Scotish, you're exempt. Yours, sincerely Fossa _?! 01:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, this edit. You're welcome. --Coolperson177 (talk) 13:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The German humans deleted me article on Burnistoun, can you help me? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjzfX0eKGtY Fossa _?! 23:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my content

Ok to start love the username and you were right to delete my content I was just seeing how long it took for someone to take my edit down, 😇😈 LilMarshmallowFace111 (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LilMarshmallowFace111! I'd suggest you go to our introduction page to learn more about contributing to this website. --Coolperson177 (talk) 20:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of refs

Hey! I noticed that you added refs to Super Mario 64 however you ddin't use the {{cite web}} (or similar) template which (as far as I know) is required (or at least recommended) to be used in a ref. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blaze The Wolf. I was adding content from journals, and there is a special template for that, {{Cite journal}}. {{Cite web}} is only for content from websites. --Coolperson177 (talk) 22:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I knew there was a similar template that would be more appropriate which is why I said "or similar" because I really only know of Cite web. Just figured I'd remind you to use the appropriate template. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uncapitalization of hub

Hello! Just figured I'd elaborate a bit more on why I uncapitalized hub. Hub isn't an acronym for something which is usually why something would be written in all caps. It might be shot for something but I can't really think of what it would be short for at the moment. Hub is simply the word used to describe a main area of a game that lets you access all other levels of the game, similar to a world map in Super Mario World. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just looked "hub" up in a dictionary and that makes sense now. Thanks. --Coolperson177 (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I saw it when viewing what was changed in one of your edits and I was just like "why is hub in all caps?" and so I fixed it, but didn't catch the 2nd instance of it being in all caps. Not meaning to be rude but is English not your native language? (it's ok if it isn't, you can still edit English Wikipedia) ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is. --Coolperson177 (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. Again, I'm not meaning it as an insult. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your edits to Super Mario 64 which have improved the article even in minor ways. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks! I'm planning to eventually get it back up to featured article status, although it may take a while. --Coolperson177 (talk) 14:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I'm excited to see you bring it to FA status again! ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	…for significant expansion of Super Mario 64. Elominius (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you, too! --Coolperson177 (talk) 19:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning another user with 4im

Was what that user did deserving of a 4im warning? SoyokoAnis - talk 20:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, that was a level 3 warning. Also, they vandalized here. --Coolperson177 (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, see their edit filter log. --Coolperson177 (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. SoyokoAnis - talk 20:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dino RM

Thankyou for closing Talk:Dino (disambiguation)#Requested move 24 November 2021 but you cut and pasted the talk page meaning that the edit history was left at "Talk:Dino (disambiguation)" while the content of the talk page was at "Talk:Dino". If you can't complete a move please list it at WP:RMT, thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love Train - O'Jays.jpg

I appreciate your closure as "no consensus" on File:Love Train - O'Jays.jpg, but do you think that's the right decision? I just saw one keep vote with inadequate justification and one comment. --George Ho (talk) 04:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my justification was that it was repeatedly being relisted by admins after the first !vote, and since almost nobody else was sharing their opinion after the last relist, the discussion failed to reach a consensus. If that's wrong, I'm sorry; my intention when making these closures is to clear out the backlog. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 05:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your closure and your clearing out the backlog, but I'm still unsure whether the closure was right or wrong. The result would be either just as you concluded (usually by an admin), or the image would be deleted, which you're unable to do so, regardless of only one "keep" vote. --George Ho (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC); edited, 05:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, since I can't comment any further on the closure, if you don't wanna undo the closure, then I'll just create a newer, clearer nomination referencing the 1st nomination. George Ho (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if you want to get more input, that's fine. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 13:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Super Mario 64

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Mario 64 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jibreel23 -- Jibreel23 (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Jibreel23 isn't doing another review. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 17:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Super Mario 64

The article Super Mario 64 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Super Mario 64 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your anti-vandalism work at Stuart Attwell & Happy New Years! Jerm (talk) 15:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Super Mario 64

The article Super Mario 64 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Super Mario 64 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thank you for giving me reliable information with no errors at all, Legobot! </sarcasm> — Coolperson177 (t|c) 00:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi Coolperson177. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 03:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Super Mario 64

On 12 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Super Mario 64, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Super Mario 64 has been the subject of medical literature showing a correlation between habitual playing of 3D platformers and increased grey matter in the brain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Super Mario 64. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Super Mario 64), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your significant expansion of Super Mario 64 which lead to it becoming a good article. Jibreel23 (talk) 15:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry your review got called poor. You can use Jaguar's review as a reference if you want to review more good article nominees. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 16:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Coolperson177: It is no problem. My review was not as thorough as Jaguar's. Thanks for the reference, I will be sure to use it in the future. - Jibreel23

DYKSTATS

Hey, coolperson177! I noticed your contribution to Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics :) I appreciate it! Unfortunately, there's a snag there—when articles get lots of views on dates that aren't the DYK date, they are subtracted out from the number of views the hook gets. So, for example, here, while the article gets 5,707 on its DYK date, it also got an average of around 1,150 views per day in the couple of days proceeding it. If you subtract those out, the number of views is equal to 5,707–1,141.5=4,565.5, which is a little below the 5,000 mark needed for inclusion. I'm really sorry about that! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice that in the rules. It's fine. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance with article

Hey! I have a feeling you're busy with improving Super Mario 64 right now, however when you get the chance, would you mind helping me out with Euro Truck Simulator 2? I'm not quite wanting to go for a GA quite yet, however I do want to get to that point eventually. Right now I'm just improving the article based on what's in the peer review. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: When I get the chance, sure, I'll try to help. I have a question for you though: Do you think this section of the Super Mario 64 article should be removed? I have someone at the FAC page suggesting that it's trivia and I want to see if I can get a consensus. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 18:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. If it seems like something that would be notable enough to be mentioned then it needs to be changed from a list format to prose. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Super Mario 64

Congratulations, Coolperson177! The article you nominated, Super Mario 64, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 00:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think the hardest part was finding the URLs to verify all the sources, although it wasn't as bad as you describe it. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 01:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter Million Award for Super Mario 64 FA

	The Quarter Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Super Mario 64 (estimated annual readership: 355,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]