User talk:CoolGuySlate

CoolGuySlate, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CoolGuySlate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Gershom Bartlett moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gershom Bartlett, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hi CoolGuySlate! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Rock and roll that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rock and roll

Please do not add material without quoting a reliable source. We have another article on Origins of rock and roll, and - if sources can be found for your material - it would be better placed there, rather than at the main Rock and roll article. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gershom Bartlett

Hello, CoolGuySlate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gershom Bartlett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gershom Bartlett has been accepted

Gershom Bartlett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Cenk Uygur, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—C.Fred (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sam Hyde, you may be blocked from editing. "In an odd turn of events", "This contrasts with the usual hoaxes regarding Hyde"... come on, that's not "adding information", as you claim in the edit summary. It's adding comments. Please don't do that. Bishonen | tålk 08:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC). Bishonen | tålk 08:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believed it was worthy of mention as almost every other hoax regarding hyde has accused him of negative actions, often even terroristic or hateful in nature. This hoax was almost a polar opposite.

I understand that you believed that, and you may be right in your belief, but you can't add it unless you cite a reliable source that shares that belief, and that says explicitly that there's such a contrast with the kind of negative actions that Hyde is usually accused of. Wikipedia only summarizes what reliable published sources say. You are not a reliable published source.

Note also that you have been repeatedly asked to sign your posts on talkpages. You do that by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. That will turn into your signature and a timestamp when you publish. Bishonen | tålk 20:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

You've been told before, please stop marking non-minor edits as minor

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 11:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI re the Washington Post

The article says "The newspaper has won 69 Pulitzer Prizes, the second-most of any publication (after The New York Times). It is considered a newspaper of record in the US. Post journalists have also received 18 Nieman Fellowships and 368 White House News Photographers Association awards." It's considered a reliable source here. Whereas "Due to persistent abuse, Breitbart News is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used. The site has published a number of falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories. The 2018 RfC showed a very clear consensus that Breitbart News should be deprecated in the same way as the Daily Mail. This does not mean Breitbart News can no longer be used, but it should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability. It can still be used as a primary source when attributing opinions, viewpoints, and commentary. Breitbart News has directly attacked and doxed Wikipedia editors. Posting or linking to another editor's personal information is prohibited under the outing policy, unless the editor is voluntarily disclosing the information on Wikipedia." Your opinion doesn't matter, nor does mine. As for Biden, again, that's your opinion not backed by reliable sources. And of course you should know Cortez isn't a Senator. See the reply on my talk page. And please sign your posts. Doug Weller talk 17:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:CoolGuySlate

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:CoolGuySlate has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To explain this point further: your userpage was in violation of WP:COPYARTICLE, and its creation appeared not to comply with the copyright requirements outlined at WP:CWW. If you'd like to explain what you were hoping to do with the content that was there, I'd be prepared to outline a more appropriate way in which to do it. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flatpicking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Waller. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]