User talk:Constituto

Welcome!

Hello, Constituto! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This is Constituto's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Kolby (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ross Kolby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ross Kolby, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Constituto! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Kolby (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ross Kolby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ross Kolby, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Constituto. You have new messages at CASSIOPEIA's talk page.
Message added 11:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Constituto! You created a thread called Declined article. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ross Kolby

Hello, Constituto. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ross Kolby".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dr Belling in Nunndalen.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Belling in Nunndalen.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Dr Belling in Nunndalen.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Belling in Nunndalen.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:CASSIOPEIA. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 13:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Jecubed. I am sorry if I have made an edit that is not correct. I am not sure which you mean? I try to do all edits according to the Wikipedia standards. Could you please specify what edit I did wrong, so I can be sure not to do a similar one again? Constituto (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ross Kolby, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please work on the draft that you recovered from deletion rather than submitting another copy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Constituto/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Constituto/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Constituto/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Constituto/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Kolby has been accepted

Ross Kolby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Constituto. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Blablubbs|talk 11:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blablubbs|talk. Thank you for your message. I do not have an external relationship with Kolby, just an interest in his art. I am quite new to this, so I may have edited uncorrectly, and I in case apologize for that. Best, Constituto (talk) 11:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for responding. What prompted you to write about him? And, if I may ask, is there a reason you almost exclusively edit on weekdays at times that match European working hours quite well? Blablubbs|talk 11:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I can answer that very accurately, in fact. I am very into civil rights and racism topics, having close black friends. Kolby's 1998 painting of a black pope was the first I saw of him and really touched me. It made me interested in his art long ago, and I came to know much more of his artworks. I too live in Norway, so I naturally work at daytime. I work with design and I discovered Wikipedia, finding it interesting to edit a bit. I am now working on an article about another Norwegian artist, in the street art genre. I hope this may answer your questions. Best, Constituto (talk) 11:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to give you my full name, Blablubbs|talk, and my email address. If you would wish, you may contact me also in that way? I sincerely wish to contribute here in a professional way, and do not want to cause any work for you. Best, Constituto (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Blablubbs|talk. Was that clarifying it a bit? I feel bad about my editing has led to a problem, so I wonder how we could sort this out? Is the fact that I have made edits at daytime the problem? I have like many people had less to do at my work the last Corona year than in many years, and I have had lots of spare time. I have tried to make my edits according to how I have found other Wikipedia articles and understood the rules, and I don't really know what I could have done diffirently. Regarding the new artist article I work on, I now don't know how to proceed as someone could say I know this artist too. Which I don't. How may I correctly write about living people in my own country to avoid getting a COI tag on the article? I have enjoyed editing and would like to do more, and I of course wish to do all as correct as possible. I would be grateful if you could you advice me on this. Best, Constituto (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in your real life identity. However, could you please explain your relationship to EditNor (talk · contribs)? Blablubbs|talk 20:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Absolutely, I know EditNor back from my my studies. He joined Wikipedia some time ago, and we plan to edit together also on the new article I mentioned to you. I hope it is OK to know and edit together with other Wiki contributors? Best, Constituto (talk) 12:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this OK, Blablubbs|talk? I don't want my edits to lead to tags on articles, so it would be good to sort out if anything needs to be done and in case what? Best, Constituto (talk) 15:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constituto Can you please clarify how this is your own work? CUPIDICAE💕 16:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Back in 2019 I contacted Norwegian photographer Paal Alme who took the photo and got his permission to upload it on Wikimedia Commons. He gave up any rights to the photo. But I was then not aware that an email from him with the standard Wikimedia text stating that he would free the image to Wikimedia shold have been sent to them. As you see a byline states that he has taken the photo. Back then I was all new to Wikipedia editing and believed it was enough to get permission from a person and then upload an image on Wikimedia. I now see that I should have uploaded it in another way, and I will now of course contact Alme again so he can write the standard email to Wikimedia so all is in order for this photo.

Let me be clear about a thing: I have done all my editing in good faith. I have sincerely tried to contribute here at Wikipedia. When you are new errors can occur. Things can be done in a wrong way, and that is how we learn to edit correctly. I was contacted by another Wiki editor who put on a tag at the article and initiated a dialogue but now has stopped replying to me. That is not how we should communicate in here, I think.

And now I see that you have removed a great part of the Ross Kolby article, calling it "spammy nonsense". I am somewhat surprised that you edit in this manner. I found that text to be explanatory, neutral and based on the Norwegian reliable sources and references. Now it is not much left of the article. I see on your user profile that you are dedicated to the BLM movement. Did you also find the text about Kolby's painting on the racism topic - The Black Pope - to be "spammy nonsense"? It's theme is directly associated with the BLM movement, but you removed it alltogether. I try to be respectful, polite and patient in my editing, communicating and learning here at Wikipedia. Can you please clarify why you edit in a manner where you delete great parts of a carefully and seriously written text and call it "spammy nonsense"? I have great respect for all the experienced editors in here, and I try to learn and do all correct. But I find it dicouraging and uneccesary to use language as "spammy nonsense" when editing in here. Who is to say what is "spammy nonsense" or not? I really think it is important to be respectful towards oneanother in here. Best, Constituto (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blablubbs What is the status of this matter now? Is Praxidicae’s clean up of the article sufficient for the COI tag’s demand of such? Or is anything else needed? As I have said I never wanted to cause any problems with my editing, so it would be good to sort out if more needs to be done. I don’t really know how I can further contribute to solve this, apart from if what's ultimately needed is that I refrain from editing on this article again. Then I will agree to that, as I have no interest in causing or being in a conflict here at Wikipedia. Best, Constituto (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Constituto. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]