User talk:Cognissonance/Archive 1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit summaries

Hi Cognissonance,

Earlier today you reverted some of my edits on the article Horizon Zero Dawn, for no apparent reason. Assuming good faith, I think that was not intentional and I've redone my edits.

What I do find inappropriate, are some of your edit summaries. Coincidentally we've also edited the article Resident Evil 7: Biohazard recently and I noticed some of your edit summaries on the article's edit history.

January 29: "not duplicate you idiot"
Also January 29: "fucking grammar"
February 1: "grammar fucking"
February 12: "fucking add sources that confirm your claims"
February 20: "I hate all of you"
February 21: "fuck off"

Calling someone an idiot is a clear violation of WP:NPA, while "fuck off" can also be seen as a personal attack. While Wikipedia is not censored, I see no reason to use the word "fucking" in an edit summary. I'm not sure if you're doing okay, because less than a week ago you changed your user page to "I hate it here". Maybe you're going through a rough time, but don't forget Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. Wikipedians like you and me voluntarily edit articles. The occasional vandal or anonymous user that is not familiar with editing guidelines might make a mistake or add something inappropriate, but I doubt they'll ever read your edit summary, let alone think it is meant for them. I hope you just had a bad day and that edit summaries like that will soon be a thing of the past.

Kind regards, soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Soetermans: It's just a social experiment bro. Cognissonance (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hope your experiment is finished, because an offensive attitude like that is not suitable for Wikipedia. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it up and your experiment will be on a short hiatus. Consider this your final warning. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 21:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jauerback: Did I trigger you too? Wow, this is a sweet gig! Cognissonance (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Resident Evil 7

See this. --uKER (talk) 02:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adrift gameplay.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Adrift gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review trade?

Hi Cognissonance. Thanks for your edits at Jill Valentine. If you weren't aware, the article is currently nominated for peer review. I've noticed you have Resident Evil 7: Biohazard nominated for GAN. Would you like to trade reviews? I'll review RE7's nomination if you provide comments on Valentine's peer review. No worries if you're too busy or not interested though. Freikorp (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Freikorp: Was indeed aware. Already started the peer review actually. Doing minor edits as I descend. Won't be long now. Cognissonance (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I'm going away for the weekend so will probably start my review on Monday. Let me know if you'd rather me review one of your other GANs, otherwise I will go with RE7. Freikorp (talk) 14:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I think going with Resident Evil 7 is most fitting. Cognissonance (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always keen to trade reviews. I've just nominated a biographical article nominated for FAC. See here. Considering reviewing an FAC can take more work I'll happily review 2 of your GANs in return. Naturally I'll go through with this regardless of whether your review ends up supporting or opposing my nomination. But as always no worries if you're too busy or not interested. Freikorp (talk) 11:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not up for a review right now. Cognissonance (talk) 11:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Freikorp: If you need review trades in the future hit me up. Biographies may be out of my league (wrote most of Joss Whedon, which is not GA-worthy), but otherwise I'm fine. Cognissonance (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great. Freikorp (talk) 03:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cognissonance. Jill Valentine is currently nominated for FAC: see here. I would really appreciate your comments on the nomination. It has a lot of support but it had a lot of support at the previous nomination and it still failed pretty much because of the concerns of one editor who has some rather unusual opinions. In return for your comments, regardless of whether they support, oppose or are neutral, I would happily review another one of your articles. As I've noticed you don't currently have anything nominated at GAN I'd be happy for you to just contact me the next time you do and I will review it immediately. Cheers. Freikorp (talk) 03:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Freikorp: I hope my support wasn't too weak to actually count. I had read through the article before you asked me and the only thing that stuck out were additions concerning you-know-what. Anyway, now that I'm high on pain killers, it occurs to me how much I want The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to reach GA status. All I need is for someone like you to tell me what is missing from the article, searchable information that I can find sources for. I will ask the Guild of Copy Editors to smooth it out as well. Cognissonance (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good. The coordinator removed the opinionated part of your comment but kept the support itself, which is all that matters to me. To be honest, I'm quite overwhelmed with how many comments the FAC has gotten in the last few days, though I would be very happy to provide a review of The Witcher 3 once things have quietened down a bit at my nomination. Cheers. :) Freikorp (talk) 02:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Freikorp: Thanks for that. I noticed the flood of comments, completely empathise. Take your time. Cognissonance (talk) 09:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Resident Evil 7. Déjà vu

See talk here. Cheers. --uKER (talk) 22:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 7: Biohazard

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Resident Evil 7: Biohazard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 03:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 7: Biohazard

The article Resident Evil 7: Biohazard you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Resident Evil 7: Biohazard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ReCore

Just for reference, why'd you undo my edit to ReCore's article? I provided reliable sources. But what made those less reliable for them to be reverted?Dohvahkiin (talk) 22:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These call the game an open world:

https://www.polygon.com/2016/9/12/12886642/recore-review-xbox-one-windows-10-PC

http://www.pcgamer.com/recore-review/

http://www.gamesradar.com/5-reasons-recore-is-basically-the-xbox-ones-zelda/

http://www.gameinformer.com/games/recore/b/xboxone/archive/2016/09/14/recore-review-game-informer-xbox-one.aspx

https://www.gamestm.co.uk/reviews/recore-review/

http://www.usgamer.net/articles/recore-pc-review

http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/09/15/test-chamber-the-best-and-worst-parts-of-recore.aspx

https://www.polygon.com/2016/9/14/12893126/the-bad-news-that-makes-you-want-to-buy-a-game

And these call it semi-open:

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/how-recore-evolved-from-its-anime-style-roots/1100-6443510/

http://www.pcmag.com/review/348265/recore-for-pc

https://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/2016/09/27/recore-review/1

http://www.gameinformer.com/games/recore/b/xboxone/archive/2016/08/23/recore-mixes-platforming-with-color-coded-combat.aspx Dohvahkiin (talk) 23:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the Metroidvania category, provided a source without any parameters, and I assumed most sources said it was a semi-open world. Cognissonance (talk) 01:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I thought I reference tagged that one, my bad.Dohvahkiin (talk) 02:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archive.is

Cheers for archiving more sources at RE7. Just letting you know as per this guideline, with Archive.is it's preferred on Wikipedia to use the long link as oppoed to the short one (i.e http://archive.is/2016.09.11-065720/http://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/gaming/704399/Resident-Evil-7-Ethan-Resident-Evil-7-Demo-release-date-Biohazard as opposed to http://archive.is/gzhkc). There's a bot that will eventually change the short links to long ones, but if less ones get made it will help reduce pressure on its backlog. :) Freikorp (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Freikorp: The short link is the only one that appears in the url box. How do I find or make the long links? Cognissonance (talk) 03:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right, so if you click on 'share' at the bottom and slight right side of the beige coloured banner it will give you the long link among other information. Freikorp (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Cognissonance (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Horizon Zero Dawn

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Horizon Zero Dawn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The1337gamer -- The1337gamer (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Horizon Zero Dawn

The article Horizon Zero Dawn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Horizon Zero Dawn for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The1337gamer -- The1337gamer (talk) 23:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Joris de Man at Game Music Connect 2013.png

Thanks for uploading File:Joris de Man at Game Music Connect 2013.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Watch Dogs 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Watch Dogs 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Remember Me (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Remember Me (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Remember Me (video game)

The article Remember Me (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Remember Me (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 06:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Horizon Zero Dawn

The article Horizon Zero Dawn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Horizon Zero Dawn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The1337gamer -- The1337gamer (talk) 06:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Remember Me (video game)

The article Remember Me (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Remember Me (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 08:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Watch Dogs 2

The article Watch Dogs 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Watch Dogs 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Resident Evil 7: Biohazard

On 15 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Resident Evil 7: Biohazard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game Resident Evil 7: Biohazard resolved to focus on survival horror as opposed to its predecessors' action-oriented gameplay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Resident Evil 7: Biohazard. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Resident Evil 7: Biohazard), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

You do not need to include the publisher when referencing periodicals. Linking to the work is enough since the work's article will identify the publisher, which in such contexts is not a major detail. It is more relevant when referencing a book (e.g., Yale University Press). I had taken publishers out of Dunkirk but saw that you added one for the runtime reference (which I appreciate you doing, by the way; was in a hurry). Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 11:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. –Cognissonance (talk) 12:26, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dishonored 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dishonored 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkirk

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Dunkirk (2017 film) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Dunkirk (2017 film). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 11:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Remember Me (video game)

On 2 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Remember Me (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game Remember Me was appraised by its developer as the digital view of human identity compared to its analog counterpart, Life Is Strange? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Remember Me (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Remember Me (video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dishonored 2

The article Dishonored 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dishonored 2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Horizon Zero Dawn

On 5 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Horizon Zero Dawn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game Horizon Zero Dawn was considered the most risky out of 40 concepts pitched for development? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Horizon Zero Dawn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Horizon Zero Dawn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Huh?. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Shenme (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vampyr

Hello, I've seen your edit on vampyr's article, you changed the semi-open world to open world. I'm not sure it's an open world game or semi-open world game, I just wanted to clarify my doubts. Thanks in advance! ☺ Pure conSouls (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pure conSouls: According to a recent interview, "We tend to say we have a semi-open world, which in fact is an open world ... We have four districts in the game. You can access these districts seamlessly". –Cognissonance (talk) 10:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply.😊 Pure conSouls (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dishonored 2

The article Dishonored 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dishonored 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dishonored 2 Emily gameplay.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Dishonored 2 Emily gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review of The Terrorists of Iraq

Thanks for your review of The Terrorists of Iraq !

I'm glad you liked the Christopher Hitchens reference !

Very very very cool username ! Sagecandor (talk) 20:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Dishonored 2

Hello! Your submission of Dishonored 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"the" PlayStation 4 vs PlayStation 4

Hello, Cognissonance. Sorry to disturb you but there are some users which are reverting my edit constantly on PS4's game articles. The reason for the edit war is whether to add or not to add "the" before PlayStation 3/4. I need your help to solve this matter as you already helped me various times before when I was a new user here. Thank you in advance! ☺ Pure conSouls (talk) 21:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pure conSouls: I was going to join the conversation about it, but the first reply was pretty much definitive. You should join though, as it does concern you. –Cognissonance (talk) 06:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

Hey man. I know I've reverted/reworded a decent amount of your Dunkirk edits in the last few days (maybe more or less than I think since the IP edits have been out of control haha) but I hope you don't think it's personal or I've got some sort of vendetta. Just trying to keep things basic and/or sourced as possible, and a lot of your edits (to me, at least) seem out of the ordinary (not to say wrong). Hope we're all good, as we need to remain strong together against the IP vandals and trolls of Wikipedia TropicAces (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TropicAces: All good. I hope we can come to a conclusion on the accessdate issue so that we don't end up with an all-out edit war. Mentioned you in the talk page. –Cognissonance (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IJsselmeer

Dear Cognissonance. The IJsselmeer is a naturally formed North Sea bay, formed by surge floods and rising sea levels in the Middle Ages. It is not artificial. So why revert to false information? Kind regards, Encyo (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Encyo: That is what the source says, simple as that. Changing it to "lake" to stop this back-and-forth editing. –Cognissonance (talk) 17:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is a rather unique situation, a bay closed off by a 32 km long dike. There simply isn't a proper word to describe it, not even in Dutch. We use meer (lake) for lack of a better word, even though it is not a 'proper' lake since it is not surrounded by land. But I'm glad the 'artificial' is gone since that implied that there was no lake before man made it. Encyo (talk) 18:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dishonored 2

On 22 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dishonored 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dishonored 2, a steampunk video game, had its anti-piracy software hacked by a group called SteamPunks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dishonored 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dishonored 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 12:28, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The "Year" in video games

Hello, Cognissonance. I need your help and opinion in the wikiproject video games regarding the "Year" of video games matter. Your one of those editors who knows a lot about wikipedia and its video game articles, that's why I'm asking you for your advise. Thanks in advance for helping me. 😊 Pure conSouls (talk) 13:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will lend my opinion, but please fight your own battles. –Cognissonance (talk) 16:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I can fight my battles very well! 😒

I just thought to ask your opinion as well, I didn't said to fight for me! And you didn't do that either. Pure conSouls (talk) 15:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dontnod Entertainment

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dontnod Entertainment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 03:41, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dontnod Entertainment

The article Dontnod Entertainment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dontnod Entertainment for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dontnod Entertainment

The article Dontnod Entertainment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dontnod Entertainment for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Dontnod Entertainment

Hello! Your submission of Dontnod Entertainment at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dontnod Entertainment

On 18 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dontnod Entertainment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game developer Dontnod Entertainment found success in narrative-driven games after their debut action game had poor sales? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dontnod Entertainment. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dontnod Entertainment), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 00:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:DougCockle.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DougCockle.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vampyr

@Cognissonace: “We tend to say we have a semi-open world, which in fact is an open world. Read more at https://gamingbolt.com/vampyr-interview-lead-designer-florent-guillaume-tells-us-everything-about-in-game-weapons-loot-factions-and-more#QTp0uoWkiP5HZRfX.99” The developers contradict themselves by stating this. The game cannot be both open world and semi-open world. A source where they call it open world and only only open world is needed. The other two sources also call it semi-open, and there’s an agreement that semi-open does not mean open world.Dohvahkiin (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Big if true. I really don't care either way. Cognissonance (talk) 02:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Dead Redemption 2.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red Dead Redemption 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2017, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages
- Main project – talk
- Project category – talk
- Portal – talk
VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
- Reference library – talk
- Newsletter – talk
- Video game images – talk

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 17:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert on Life Is Strange

how so? it's direct comments from the game's director Wumbolo (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wumbolo: It is original research. Find a reliably published source that isn't user-generated. Cognissonance (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I missed your reply, I apologize. Another editor said the source was reliable on another article so I messed up. Wumbolo (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt copyedit

Hello, Cognissonance. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 23:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Life is Strange: Before the Storm

So we’re just going to ignore the fact that the game actually has four episodes and pretend the fourth episode doesn’t exist are we?

Watchword: "bonus". Developers say it is separate from the main story. Cognissonance (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cognissonance. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

The article The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

The article The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 11:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dunkirk (2017 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dunkirk (2017 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 01:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dunkirk (2017 film)

The article Dunkirk (2017 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dunkirk (2017 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 21:21, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

On 10 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt was marketed as "Skyrim in a Game of Thrones sauce"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dishonored 2 Corvo gameplay.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dishonored 2 Corvo gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Life Is Strange: Before the Storm

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Life Is Strange: Before the Storm has been completed.

There is one minor issue I cannot resolve. In para 2 of the plot section the text says: "After the play, they decide to leave Arcadia Bay with the newly repaired truck..." so it appears the truck is fixed. In the 3rd para it reads: "Chloe contacts Frank, who agrees to meet her at the scrapyard. She repairs the truck there before Rachel arrives." This implies the truck was not fixed until this point. This contradiction should be resolved.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Life Is Strange: Before the Storm

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Life Is Strange: Before the Storm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Life Is Strange: Before the Storm

The article Life Is Strange: Before the Storm you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Life Is Strange: Before the Storm for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 14:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Life Is Strange: Before the Storm

The article Life Is Strange: Before the Storm you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Life Is Strange: Before the Storm for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Dunkirk (2017 film)

Hello! Your submission of Dunkirk (2017 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Life Is Strange: Before the Storm

On 25 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Life Is Strange: Before the Storm, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that because of the 2016–17 video game voice actor strike, voice actress Ashly Burch could not reprise her role in the Life Is Strange prequel, Before the Storm? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Life Is Strange: Before the Storm. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Life Is Strange: Before the Storm), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Love Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dunkirk (2017 film)

On 27 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dunkirk (2017 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2017 film Dunkirk was conceived in the mid-1990s when writer and director Christopher Nolan sailed with Emma Thomas across the English Channel, as did many small boats during the Dunkirk evacuation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dunkirk (2017 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dunkirk (2017 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Watch Dogs copyedit

Hello, Cognissonance. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Watch Dogs at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 21:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interstellar review

Hello, Cognissonance. I see you are planning to nominate the film for GA. Would you like me to review it if that's alright? — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: I'd appreciate it very much if you reviewed it. Nominating as soon as the Guild is done with copyediting it. Cognissonance (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interstellar (film)

Hello Cognissonance:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Interstellar (film) has been completed. It was in excellent shape and required only minor changes.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GA review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Twofingered Typist. You exceeded my expectations! Cognissonance (talk) 20:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I'm glad you're happy with the result. Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Interstellar (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstellar (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Normand Corbeil.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Normand Corbeil.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Normand Corbeil.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Normand Corbeil.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majora (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Interstellar (film)

The article Interstellar (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstellar (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Watch Dogs

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Watch Dogs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Watch Dogs

The article Watch Dogs you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Watch Dogs for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Watch Dogs 3

Hello, Cognissonance. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Watch Dogs 3, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

PamD 09:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Watch Dogs 3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Watch Dogs 3. Since you had some involvement with the Watch Dogs 3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 22:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Interstellar (film)

On 18 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Interstellar (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the setting of the film Interstellar was inspired by the Dust Bowl that occurred in 1930s America during the Great Depression? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Interstellar (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Interstellar (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heavy Rain

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heavy Rain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy Rain GA feedback

The Video game Barnstar

For constructive editing, building towards the GA of Heavy Rain. Very attentive, and willing to compromise for the good of the article.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cognissonance, I'd just like to thank you for your GA Nomination of Heavy Rain. I have now fully reviewed the article, and placed it for GA. LegoBot should update you on this soon. However, I'd also like to award you with this barnstar for your quick responses and willingness to update the article. I thank you for making the review process enjoyable, and making changes for the good of the article. If you have any feedback of my review of the article (This is only my second), please let me know. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate this Lee Vilenski. Thanks for doing your review by the book, especially adding the article to the Good Video Game Article roster (some forget to do that). Good luck with your future work! Cognissonance (talk) 10:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad to help Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heavy Rain

The article Heavy Rain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Heavy Rain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 10:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkirk (film)

Be wary of WP:OWN regarding this article. ISTM that quite a few of the edits you are reverting or removing are actually improvements, and all are good faith; it is good WP to work with other editors rather than simply return the article to its previous state each time. MapReader (talk) 17:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

just so it doesn't come out of left field, I undid the original table where it added additional merged rows with color background for the sake of aesthethics per the discussion that took place in WP:VG about tables.204.153.155.151 (talk) 13:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review!

Jpcase has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Just wanted to say thanks for conducting Le Building's GA review! Sorry that I wasn't able to respond at the time. :)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

P.S. I made a couple small grammatical tweaks - hope that's okay. Final year students at Gobelins still have their group thesis films shown as openers at Annecy, so to reflect that, I changed a couple sentences from past tense back to present tense. --Jpcase (talk) 15:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Jpcase, good work with the article! Cognissonance (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack for Dunkirk

Thanks for your editing at Dunkirk. In the absence of a main article for the soundtrack to this film I had added a short quote on the reception for the music in this film in the Music section. This was done in the thought that eventually this section will be split into its own article, only when a sufficient number of cites accumulate in this section. Should the cite I added be kept, or some version of it, in contemplation of an eventual split into a stand alone Soundtrack article for the film's music? JohnWickTwo (talk) 03:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnWickTwo: I'm not sure it is necessary to make a separate article, only because the pertinent information is already in this article. Cognissonance (talk) 04:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Heavy Rain

On 21 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Heavy Rain, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to compose the entire score for the video game Heavy Rain, Normand Corbeil was given two months, producing nearly 300 cues? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Heavy Rain. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Heavy Rain), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Observer Bloober logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Observer Bloober logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Observer (video game)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Observer (video game) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: I am very pleased with your changes, thanks so much! Cognissonance (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Good luck moving forward with this. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Observer (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Observer (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Observer (video game)

The article Observer (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Observer (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Observer (video game)

The article Observer (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Observer (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

I would be happy to translate this article for you. What exactly would you want me to translate? The 3-line title and 2-line text? Best, L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, L293D, Google Translate worked fine. There were just some confusing bits that I thought could be clarified, but weren't. Cognissonance (talk) 18:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Observer (video game)

On 8 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Observer (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game Observer stars Rutger Hauer, who also starred in Blade Runner, which influenced the game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Observer (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Observer (video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018 warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Detroit: Become Human. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sebastian James (talk)

afsd

adfs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.75.58.244 (talk) 19:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For being an absolute BEAST on video game and Chris Nolan film articles. Keep it up! JOE BRO 64 21:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64: Wow, nice thing to wake up to. I really appreciate this, thank you! Cognissonance (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reception section

You can add "copy-pasting quotes" to any reception section. It's not wrong. The wrong thing is that negative reviews are nearly equal as positive reviews. They show up as if the game received mixed reviews. That's why I want to add them. Also, "mishandling the historical and thematic allegories" is only can be seen in a few reviews (maybe one or two) but it is shown as a consensus. Is that right? Sebastian James (talk)

Around five, actually. Copy-pasting long quotes is inappropriate. If a criticism or compliment recurs twice or more it should be mentioned in the lead as part of a "general agreement" (or, consensus). I read through the reviews, paraphrased what they said, and didn't embellish anything. Not my fault the reviewers wanted to air out so many frustrations. Cognissonance (talk) 09:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that there was a rule like this for video games reception. Thanks for the info. Sebastian James (talk)