User talk:CodeLyoko/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

15:55:32, 21 February 2015 review of submission by Trowbridge Aikikai

• Trowbridge Aikikai (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Stanley Pranin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. I have made substantial additions to the referencing of my article Draft: Stanley Pranin which I think is in line with what is required. I haven't completely finished and I do need to tidy a few things up but I will resubmit in order to get some feedback, to check if I am going in the right direction.

I notice that another article about Pranin has been published. It is bare-boned and has only one reference which is to Pranin's own work, the very very reason mine was rejected. I must admit that I find that strange. But let's look at that later. Cheers Trowbridge Aikikai (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

05:22:17, 24 February 2015 review of submission by MELowePM

• MELowePM (talk · contribs)
  • User:MELowePM/Terre Haute Lodge No. 19, F&AM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! I don't want to be a nuisance, but I'm curious as to the specific language of the submission that needs to be changed to more appropriately meet the requirements? I attempted to summarize the source material as best I could, while still trying to keep the article on point: focusing on the subject's notability by emphasizing its position as the oldest existing organization in Terre Haute and Vigo Co.

The references are all published, secondary sources except one. "Thomas, et. al" was compiled by secretaries of the Lodge, consolidating multiple records into a single volume. It was cited as a central source, rather than tracking down individual references for the listed members. (Multiple masonic directories were published by a third party listing these individuals, but as the list spans nearly 150 years, the reference list would be twice as long as the article.) One might argue that "Gilbert" borders on primary, but he was a local historian who wrote his book as an analysis and interpretation of the the records in the archives of the Lodge.

The last line of the article is the is, perhaps, mostly an opinion. I'm happy to revise/remove this.

Again, I appreciate your feedback.

MELowePM (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

MELowePM (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The last line was a big problem, it just seemed to be over congratulatory, and " Terre Haute Lodge No. 19 has counted among its members, men of importance in both local and national affairs. Some of the most prominent members include[8]" could do with out the Prominent part. Also, with that list, why are those members so prominent, you need to explain that more. I would just try to make it a bit more neutral as you seem to be praising it in some sections. TheMesquito^buzz 06:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I normally do not like mosquitos, but those who are misspelled can be niced to have around from time to time ;)

Thank you for responding to users on my (backlogged) talkpage.

(t) Josve05a (c) 21:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc

I already edit my article and removed the youtube link

Thanks Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc. (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zulficar Moussa

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zulficar Moussa. You've reviewed this draft before. Thanks. APerson (talk!) 14:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I dont know why you removed my edit. and I have read your "article" about "parallel trade" in Hong Kong. I found your comments are extremely biased. You should include full information. Also, you are not telling the truth, YOU ARE LYING. Here is a quote from your words" Media reported that 95% of multi-entrance travellers were mainland parallel traders". And from the resources your provided, I opened it, the whole article did not mention how the identity of those traders like. It only mentioned "95% of those commuters were parallel trader". If you cant read Chinese, please do not try to translate it into non-sense. And also, from my resources, which is posted on a Chinese version of this topic, In Sep 7th 2012 to Mae 28th 2013, the Hong Kong custom had uncovered 4339 cases in total, arrested 4325 illegal traders. 231 of them were from Mainland, China; the rest of them, which is 4090 people were from Hong Kong, which means, 95% of parallel traders were from Hong Kong!! I dont know your intention, but I cant let people read this untrue statement with intentional biases in it. If you are trying mislead people, you should be ashamed about your behaviour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pestcide (talk • contribs) 17:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I personly have no clue what you are talking about, i reverted Editing tests on that page as the user was adding BOLD TEXT to the article randomly. If you have a problem with the artilce, you can always go to the talkpage of the Article. Thanks TheMesquito^buzz 17:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Awale-Abdi

I just added some edits... If you have no qualms with them, I'd like it left like that. Thanks, man. Seriously, we keep showing this Zekenyan evidence and sources and he just ignores what he's being shown. On the Walashma dynasty talk page-> he practically ran away after I showed up and shared clear sources tying them to Somali genealogies (some from Ethio-Semitic historians no less). He just wants to claim the dynasty was Argobba (not one source claims this particular origin ever, unless it's insane...) Awale-Abdi (talk) 05:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

All good, the addition of retarded is what caused it, but since then I have left it alone. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 05:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, that guy you mentioned called me "an idiot" more than once. I acted mostly snarky with him but didn't directly call him an idiot. Also, we didn't encounter each other on an edit page. He came onto my page and started a conversation (somewhat mocking me), I mocked back and then he called me an idiot and then I guess he decided to report me? Idk. But send him a warning too, please. He did plenty of "personal attacking". He also made fallacious statements about Somali genetics disproven by genetic literature I shared with him (that is also shared on this site); laughing at it and thinking I was an idiot for denying that Somalis lack any recent (Islamization caused) Arab admixture. Consider this me reporting him. Awale-Abdi (talk) 23:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

I have also warned him, but both of you are guilty of breaking the rules and need to step back from each other so you can all calm down. There is no need for Personal attacks. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 23:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

I agree and I do apologize profusely for losing my cool and being disrespectful... There is no excuse for that. I was just annoyed that he essentially 'came looking for a fight' and then more or less disregarded all of the clear evidence and sources I shared with him and went on to make an incorrect statement about Somali genetics. But again; no excuse for my behavior. But may i ask how far we can go with "personal attacks"? Is snarky sarcasm for example acceptable or does the very tone of someone's post fall under a certain amount of scrutiny? Anyway, I'll refrain from ever being disrespectful in the future. You have my word. Awale-Abdi (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Was my final message on his page to your liking? Awale-Abdi (talk) 23:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

The Trifecta of Awesomeness

		Splendiferously Mouldy & Wise Socratic Sandwich Award of the Order of the Unsung Goat For being both wise and generally awesome, always willing to lend a helping hand, and keeping the Wiki peace, you are hereby awarded this coveted trifecta of Wikilove. Yeah, that just happened.

Thank you for all of your help. I started this on your talk page, so I didn't have the opportunity to template it yet. I'd be more than happy to do so at your request. Thank you, again, for helping to show me the ropes, and displaying all of those qualities referred to above. :) Quinto Simmaco (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Incorrect Warning Message

You warned a user for removing AfD templates here, when it was actually an NPOV/unsourced content violation. I edited the warning on the user's talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Ah, dang! Must have misclicked on huggle, thanks for fixing! TheMesquito^buzz 01:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.177.234 (talk) 00:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

H. B. Beal Secondary School

Thanks for your work dealing with the stupidity going on with that article. It annoyed me so much that I deleted all of the revisions from when the mass attack started. I didn't want to give the students the satisfaction of saying "See what we did?". -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

No problem @Gogo Dodo: ! TheMesquito^buzz 00:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft: SAFID

Hi – thanks for reviewing the draft for SAFID. Could you tell me why you declined it? It was declined by Eurodyne before and I didn't agree with his reasoning (see that discussion here – a bit of a one-sided discussion as he didn't answer my question). His problem was that he doesn't think Q&As are independent sources. He directed me to an essay to illustrate this point, which is clearly tagged as being the opinion of some editors but not official Wikipedia policy. My sense has always been that if Q&As are in decent publications with editorial oversight and are used to support uncontroversial facts (in this case, what the company does and the type of products it makes) rather than to present opinions as facts, then they can be used. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. HOgilvy (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

@Eurodyne: Hello! While the article is not 'Official', most of us tend to use it to review articles. An article that is an 'interview' of sorts, like a Q & A, is not accepted as it is someone who works for the company talking about the company, who would have a bias. If you could find better sources than that, the article looks good and would likely get accpeted. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 19:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Sure but I'm not using them for things for which we need to worry about bias, only for the Products section and the second sentence in Origins and Expansion. Why would a company rep lie about the products they make? They're an air conditioning company and they make ducts, louvres, dampers, etc. as they're saying in the Q&As. I don't see why bias is therefore something we need to guard against in this case. I could get rid of "SAFID has developed a range of cylindrical ducts to replace traditional rectangular designs, allowing for more efficient airflow" from the Products section if that would help. Thanks. HOgilvy (talk) 20:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

hey bud, i thought my post was very constructive. Off topic but would have been very true in the time :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zekec1 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Defense Housing Corporation

You have it wrong. The Lanham act pertained to Trademarks and such things and was in 1946. The DHC was created in October, 1940 by FDR.

Here's the information: 234.5.4 Records of the Defense Homes Corporation (DHC) History: Established, October 23, 1940, to alleviate a housing shortage for defense workers. Transferred to the Federal Public Housing Authority of the National Housing Agency, February 24, 1942. DHL liquidation began, 1945. Assets transferred to the RFC for final liquidation, 1948. 68.185.167.184 (talk) 02:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

References

11:28:05, 31 March 2015 review of submission by Danchakit

• Danchakit (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Neeraj Mehta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have made the changes as per the suggestions. Please have a look and suggest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Neeraj_Mehta

Danchakit (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Why?

Why was I banned? Wackslas - Holler at me (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Pure Logic doesn't require a citation.

My statement was (paraphrasing myself) that "Theoretically, Many parents may assume their child is unique and special, or seek special status for their child, thereby assigning the title "Indigo" to their child because they love their child. Thus, it is logical (and follows) that this process of applying a unique identifying title to a child makes it more difficult to study the phenomenon of Indigo children. Since the phenomenon is self-reported, and many parents (and self-identifiers) see it as a badge of uniqueness, it stands to reason the difficulty in studying the phenomenon may be due to skewed self-reporting. Thus, the assumption that "Indigo" has no validity is biased because it has not considered the difficulties associated with studying the phenomenon."

THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE A CITATION.

NEVER DELETE MY EDITS AGAIN!

E V E R! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.240.118 (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your edit to that article, although it might be logical, does not mean that it was not opinionated and it still requires a source and, even if it had a source, would still be removed due to it being opinionated. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 04:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Request for ACC access

Thank you for your interest in ACC, during the normal checks for access requirements, I noticed you have not provided identification. This requirement is mandatory. If you still wish to help please submit you identification, and once logged at Identification noticeboard just poke an ACC Admin to continue with registration, no need to re-apply your current request will be re-activated. Hope to hear from you soon and again thank you for your interest. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I know. I submited my proof last night and am now just waiting on someone from the WMF to add me. Thanks for the message! TheMesquito^buzz 18:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Great, no problem. give us a poke once you're posted on the board. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 18:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done @Mlpearc: Done here by Jalexander-WMF. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 23:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Also pinging, @Stwalkerster: and @FastLizard4: TheMesquito^buzz 01:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

TheMesquito, thank you for interest in the account creation process. I have verified your Identification [1] and I have approved your request, welcome to the team. You may now access the interface here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You should also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! Mlpearc (open channel) 02:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Agreement

I, TheMesquito, do agree to the ACC guide, as listed here Wikipedia:Request an account/Guide . Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 02:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

User PavelStaykov

The User PavelStaykov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is not willing anyhow to understand what other editors are telling him, nor is willing to constructivelly edit or join the discussion. He continues with such behavior even after my final warning and I'm not willing to act as a bad guy and report him to the incidents noticeboard. Could you join the discussion at his talk page, or see by yourself what can be done? I contacted you as previously in March you already warned him at the talk page. (Besides, was the my (or by editors in general) use of warnings acceptable and recommended?)--Crovata (talk) 00:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for getting things right. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Lixxx235 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I pinky swear I'll stop nominating the flood of people that I have been recently... after I nominate TheMesquito :P. TheMesquito (talk · contribs · count · logs) is an incredibly hardworking member of this community. With just under 4000 edits, he may not have the highest edit count, but he puts so much effort into each edit and spends time to make sure he gets it right. TheMesquito is a Huggler, and he's not always the fastest, his reverts are all high-quality and assume good faith while not missing vandalism. He reviews AFCs, participates in discussions, and promptly and civilly responds on his talk page, and is a wonderful person to converse with. TheMesquito truly is one of Wikipedia's unsung great editors.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

TheMesquito

Vandalism Fighter

Editor of the Week for the week beginning May 5, 2015

an incredibly hardworking community member. Lots of effort to "get it right". High-quality reverts, AGF, and vandalism patrol and still a pleasure to work with.

Recognized for

Reviews AFCs and civilly participating in heated discussions.

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 20:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your service to Wikipedia, and congratulations on the award! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for taking the extra time to "get it right". . Buster Seven Talk 22:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
• Congrats! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 02:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Account creator right

Hold tight, I need to contact the tool admins before granting you the right. Sorry for the confusion. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

As I see above, Mlpearc has clearly endorsed this request. Re-granted. The template, to be procedural:

After reviewing your request for the account creator right, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: Just for the record, everything above is in regards to giving access to the ACC tool, not the ACC bit. I have not looked through TheMesquito actions on the tool, TheMesquito has been around long enough (a few weeks) to need the flag. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@Mlpearc: It was endorsed on WP:PERM/ACC by Doctree (talk · contribs). Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 19:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Good enough for me, I wasn't objecting, just clarifying. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Did not think you where, just wanted to clear it up also! TheMesquito^buzz 19:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Indeed. To be clear, moving forward I'll explicitly get verification before granting the right. Sorry again TheMesquito for the confusion and cluttering your user rights log :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Axact

Hi. Would you mind adding a talk page comment explaining your addition of an {{undue}} tag at Axact? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration case opening

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Redirect

Why don't you just add the "banned" template to a user talk, instead of replacing the content, and then even redirecting it? - Please revert at least the redirect. If redirect, then from user to talk, not the other way round. This has been discussed at length before. A talk page such as User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz informs our readers better than a template only. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done I was also told elsewhere that would probably be better, so i just added the two templates to the talkpage with all the content restored. TheMesquito^buzz 07:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I like that! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Trout!

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

(For clarity, this is for Special:Diff/670777871 @ Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyberpower678.) Sorry, you basically invited those of us on IRC to do this... Just make sure to wash out the trout smell before heading back over to the village . Cheers! L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I have to ask... how exactly did a plug-in change "Buttchased" to "Buttchased"? Although, your !vote was the highlight of my night (a sad reflection on my lack of a life as I'm studying for the bar exam). Inks.LWC (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Google search Butt to Butt plugin, it basicly replaces the word butt with the word butt, but it messed up an affected a text box. TheMesquito^buzz 05:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

This might be my favorite diff ever. Thanks for the laugh, Mesquito! MJ94 (talk) 03:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

DFW Amon Carter Edit-a-thon

You're getting this because you're listed as a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth and have some fairly recent edits in your contribution history.

If you're still in the DFW area you might want to keep your eye on this and consider participating:

Amon Carter Museum edit-a-thon

I've volunteered to serve as their editing assistant / technical advisor to help the folks who show up (many of which are apparently going to be Wikpedia newcomers) with how to edit. More experienced hands would certainly be useful if this project gels. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC) (Not watching)

Amon Carter Museum Edit-a-thon Update

The date of the upcoming edit-a-thon at the Amon Carter Museum of American Art in Fort Worth has been changed to October 10, 2015. An event page for the event should be forthcoming shortly. I'll be serving as the technical adviser for the event and your participation would be very much appreciated. I'll let you know when the event page is up. TransporterMan (talk) 18:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC) (Not watching)

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 December

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 20:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

ATTN: TheMesquito

Thank you i am the President and sole owner of legitimate incorporation in which we choose to publicly display, for other professional sources to review and or social supporters of our brand to better identify with. What is the problem and how do we reinstate our recently deleted page, and its content as it was shown in its last previous state? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poorstar (talk • contribs) 18:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

I believe the date you have on the Sheena Easton page in her Grammy nominations are in correct.. I could be wrong but I feel confident that I am correct.. I changed the date to correct the error. I thought this was a page where anyone can edit. Why are you singling me out and calling me a vandal? Not a good thing to say or assume Mosquito..

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.39.64.38 (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, TheMesquito!

Happy New Year!

TheMesquito,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

right place to respond

4give me, not the right place, no prob your revision my edit, but the point needs to be considered: most technical articles are pitched at way to high a level, with way to much jargon that article was a good example — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

16:07:49, 21 March 2016 review of submission by CaLP communication

• CaLP communication (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Cash Learning Partnership (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am a volunteer for the Cash Learning Partnership. I've made some edits to the draft CaLP page according the comments which have been made on it before. I'd like to see if those edits qualify the page to be created. Thanks!CaLP communication (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

ACC inactive list

Hello, CodeLyoko. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Inactive list.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mlpearc (open channel) 15:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your User Page

I fixed some boringness on your user page, LOL Meth-addict (talk) 07:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

My sincere apologies, TheMesquito. I accidentally blocked your account instead of the account that was trolling your user page. I have of course unblocked your account. Again, please accept my apologies for the mistake. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheMesquito. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Dreaded 45 day list

Hello Mesquito, just here to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Ohman, I thought I logged in! TheMesquito^buzz 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

NP, thanx - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Dreaded 45 day list

Hello , just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:00, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Dreaded 45 day list, again

Hello , just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface to avoid account suspension. If you know you're not going to be active it's best to suspend your account, then you just poke a tool admin to re-activate it, just let me know which way you want to go. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Request on 09:23:23, 19 September 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by MrNikovic

• MrNikovic (talk · contribs)
  • User:MrNikovic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This material is my own taken from the www.niva.se official page. Melodicrock.com has published this with my permission. I must be able to use my own info, do I ?

MrNikovic (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Help me! Live chat

I need help with getting unblocked from live chat. The reason I was blocked was because I was not listening so please I want unblocked. SparkyHelper (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Disabled helpme, since this seems to be directed at TheMesquito and not a general request for help. Primefac (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

SparkyHelper, as I said in the place you asked last, the ban from the IRC help channel is temporary. You're not banned any more. Please make sure you don't cause the same issues again. Huon (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Help me! Live chat 2

No not IRC, I mean greenhouse live chat when I go there it says "Your reported hostname [107.196.245.154] is banned:" I want it unbanned I am sorry for not listening next time I will listen and follow directions SparkyHelper (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

We are in no way affiliated with greenhouse live chat, and thus cannot help you. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

ZNC & hexchat

Thanks again. With hexchat (under Crouton on Chromebook) I can indeed see the saved channel buffers. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Is your ZNC server down or do I need to investigate other reasons that I can't connect? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

All seems to be working again. Thanks. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TheMesquito. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Flag

Hi, TheMesquito.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Would you please consider heading over to PERM and requesting it? (check the flag requirements HERE)
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Acc interface

Hello TheMesquito, just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface to avoid account suspension. If you know you're not going to be active it's best to suspend your account, then you just poke a tool admin to re-activate it, just let me know which way you want to go. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, CodeLyoko. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

• Sent an email because I see you haven't edited for 3 months, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Account creator

I have removed your account creator status for inactivity per the request of Dane, an ACC admin. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TheMesquito. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)