User talk:Meth-addict

September 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meth-addict (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seriously? It was one edit made as a joke in the non-article namespace. All of my actual article edits have been, as far as I can tell, constructive. Please unblock me or at least make it not indefinite block. Sorry for the disruption and I won't joke around on others' user page again. Meth-addict (talk) 08:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Huon (talk) 22:44, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have discussed your block with the blocking admin. It is important that you should appreciate that there is no place within Wikipedia for jokes; also, we are not happy with your chosen username, which would itself have been a reason to block you had that not been done already. But we are prepared to consider an unblock if you agree to change your username, and to stop trolling on the IRC channel. Use {{unblock-un}}, with the appropriate agreement as text in your request. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]