User talk:ChristinaIpavec

Zayo Group

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Much of the spammier parts of the text were unreferenced. Denver Business Journal (as per 2012, 2013) without dates, title or weblink is useless. Incidentally, "Accomplishments" seems to be scraping the bottom of the barrel a bit. "We are big in Boulder" impresses no one, and "big in Colorado" isn't much better. National or international recognition is one thing, being supported by local media is another
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You have the above mentioned "Accomplishments", but nothing on criticisms of the group. The text concentrates on what you are selling, employee numbers are relegated to an infobox and financial stuff to a bunch of external links, so we are not even given profit/turnover figures. There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections, and invitations to click through to your website are not acceptable
it's also spammy that almost the only wikilinks you have put in are to your own companies. I think it's possible that, say, internet might have an article. If your customers are too non-notable to have a Wikipedia article, it's probably not worth listing them.
as we are a business—You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

I've seen worse, and I'll restore the text here shortly for you to work on. I'll make a couple of minor MoS changes to headings and bolding. If you want my comments at any stage, let me know Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's done. I should have said that bulleted lists are undesirable, write in normal prose. I made these minor formatting changes, cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, ChristinaIpavec, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Zayo Group. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zayo Group (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zayo Group.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 05:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zayo Group (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zayo Group.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ChristinaIpavec, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zayo Group has been accepted

Zayo Group, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Caruso (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adyoo3 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Caruso and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adyoo3 (talk) 03:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]