User talk:Chrismorey

This is Chrismorey's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Chrismorey, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Chrismorey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Chrismorey, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. Please bear in mind that we are all people (except for the bots), even I am a person. As such, please treat us all with respect.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page, or ask ata the Teahouse, a collection of experienced editors.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Teahouse - a good place to ask questions, your queries will be answered by an experienced editor
Adopt-a-user - consider getting adopted, that it, getting an experienced editor to help you around

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia
The step by step way to edit - a guide on how to edit, starting with the very basics
Develop an article - help an article go from a stub class article to something more

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Getting started:

Requested articles - a list of articles requested by other users
FAQs - a list of questions that many new editors have before they start to edit
The perfect article - a list of things which the perfect Wikipedia article contains

Tips - a list of links to important pages about starting editing
A tutorial - another guide on how to edit

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

The Sandbox is useful if you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills. You have your own, personal one, located here

Chrismorey, good luck, and have fun. – Mat ty.007 14:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Chrismorey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mat ty.007 14:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grigory Ordzhonikidze may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Tiflis]], but is also reported as having qualified only as a medical orderly. <ref name="conquest">{{cite book

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for clarifying the article Doctrine of inherency! Happy editing! Edcolins (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ternac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

checked link & it's to Buffalo NY 121.99.21.212 (talk) 21:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fantastic art may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

be considered as being part of Fantastic Art, include the [[Symbolism (arts)|Symbolism]] of the [[Victorian era, and [[Surrealism]]. Art based on classical mythology was been a staple of European

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Manufacturing test requirement design specification may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The MTRD is usually developed by the manufacturing [[test engineer]]s) and presented to the program managers. The schedules and deliverables are then reviewed by

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iris Murdoch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

his aims may be as deviant as grooming his daughter for incestuous sex. Examples include: Blaise (''The Sacred and Profane Love Machine''], Randall (''An Unofficial Rose''), Lucas (''[[The Green Knight (novel)|The Green Knight]]''),

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Chrismorey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 01:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Chrismorey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Technical 13 (talk) 01:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Man and Wife (novel), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Armadale and The Woman in White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hide And Seek (1854 novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armadale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Iris Murdoch, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Football hooliganism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baby Zaman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bangladeshi

Football hooliganism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cracovia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Football hooliganism copy edit

Hi Chrismorey. I'm a coordinator of the Guild of Copy Editors, and I've just had a quick look at Football hooliganism#Europe, where' you've placed a {{copy edit-section}} tag. Copy editing addresses things like spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph flow and the like, not content issues such as those reflected in the other tags you placed there. It isn't really worth copy editing until the content is reasonably stable, so I'm going to remove that tag for the time being and place a {{GOCEreviewed}} template on the talk page. This doesn't mean we won't do it, just that some time in the future would be better than now. I hope that's OK. Best regards, --Stfg (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thanks for your reply on my talk page, and for accepting this. I've made a proposal at Talk:Football hooliganism#Proposal to split about splitting the article, in the hope that it will be easier to address the POV problems there if the article is of a more manageable size. Your views there would be welcome. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 16:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Callistophytaceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axillary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

British English

Hello Chris. Re your edits on Accrington F.C., please be aware that in British English, club can be both plural and singular, and is generally the former when referring to football clubs. Many singular nouns that are suggestive of a group of people (club, team etc) are commonly treated as plurals in British English. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you don't agree about "club" being plural, but it's a fact that it is, and it's certainly not unencyclopedic or informal in any shape or form. I completely agree with you about rooting out cliché-laden fan material from club articles, but this issue is not one of those problems. Number 5 7 23:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And if you want to comment on the Luxembourg issue, your comments are more than welcome at Talk:Luxembourg general election, 2013. Number 5 7 23:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The singular is not preferable - a simple search like the one performed by that person does not distinguish between the context of the usage. For instance, it would pick up the sentence "The former Spanish youth international's most recent club was Exeter City" as being "club was". I also noticed you used the word "it" to describe the club - whilst was and were are used alternatively, "it" sounds incredibly awkward and should never be used. Anyway, if you intend to continue with your stance, please discuss the issue on WT:FOOTY - as you can see from the response to your initial post and your edits being reverted by editors other than myself, other editors have also opposed your usage of the singular. Thanks, Number 5 7 11:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dead Secret (novel), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hide and Seek and The Woman in White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 4 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Proposals for a Palestinian state page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Computer University, Pyay may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Basic Computer Application Course (leading to Certificate) (8 months}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Offering adoption

Hey Chrismorey, I'm MrScorch6200 and I am offering you adoption! If you would like me to adopt you, please say so! --MrScorch6200 (t c) 08:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I'd almost forgotten about my adoption request. I've been editing away and picking up the basics, but it would be great to have an experienced editor whom I could consult - so yes, please adopt me, whatever the formalities are.

I'm based in New Zealand, am a retired IT consultant, and regard my self as a generalist rather than an expert in a specific domain. One area I've taken some interest in is football (soccer) and I've noted that English football has more than its share of illiterate articles and opinionated editors. I've done a bit of cleanup and disambiguation too, but not very systematically.

One question I have - how does one search for a character string in the text of an article? The Help says that a key combination such as Ctrl-F should do it, but it doesn't on Firefox which I use. As an example, for disambiguation, it's clearly desirable to be able to find the ambiguous word or phrase without reading through the whole article. Chrismorey (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I'll get the adoption process going.

I am a regular editor, WP:DRN assistant, rollbacker, reviewer, new page patroller, and on the WP:GOCE.

~~Apparently, FireFox just dropped support for ctrl+F. Maybe a quick Google search will help you out. (Try ctrl+T)--MrScorch6200 (t c) 20:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

I downloaded the latest FireFox (25) to try it out, and it works. The bar pops up on the bottom of the browser. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 20:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks I've tried it & see the box Chrismorey (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adoption

Hi, I've created this page for you and my other adoptee. Please view it, bookmark it, and fill out anything it asks under your user name. Thanks. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 01:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC) This is a general message; sorry that it is not personal.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Heuvelmans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legends (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

removed "reportedly organized by Hamas".

Hi, I have removed "reportedly rganized by Hamas" from the lead since, as far as I can see, the reference only says Israeli PM states that they were organized by Hamas. See Background section for more details. Kingsindian (talk) 03:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the article says that a Hamss operative in the West Bank has admitted planning the kidnap and murder under instructions from Hamas in Gaza, and was himself responsible for buying the block of land in which the victims were buried. The operative is named (I have the clipping but not in front of me). I would therefore like you to revert your removal. I am aware that the article has tried to cast doubt on the Israeli version, but unfortunately for the pro-Hamas crew at WP, Israel got it right on this occasion Chrismorey (talk) 05:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please do not mark the insertion of content as minor as you did here,[1] particularly as that article is on a contentious subject matter and is under sanctions. See Help:Minor edit. Thanks. DrKiernan (talk) 06:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry Morton Stanley's first trans-Africa exploration may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

these lakes and rivers were connected to each other and the Nile. [Richard Francis Burton|Burton]] thought that Lake Victoria could have a southern inlet, possibly from Lake Albert, meaning that

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Three Perils of Woman has been accepted

The Three Perils of Woman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding image to The Three Perils of Woman

Great work overall, though it could use a little broader sourcing; I linked a suggested book on Scottish Lit at the bottom. Also poking around GoogleBooks for more scholarly critique would be good.

In any event, good enough to publish. If you can lay hands on an image of the original frontispiece, or any illustrations, or whatever else, being clearly pre-1923 they're out of copyright, and an image would make a good addition to the article. See WP:Images for instructions. Nice work! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Hogg Three Perils Woman title page.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hogg Three Perils Woman title page.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Native plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indigenous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Voidxor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Absolute block signalling, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 05:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EMS Group (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EMS Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Outokumpu page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

SBF 120

added links pointing to ADP, BIC, GTT, Bollore, Saft and Rubis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WestRock Company (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha Monarch was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WestRock Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

♔ MONARCH ^{Ask me} 22:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OMX Nordic 120 (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jaaron95 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OMX Nordic 120 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:EMS Group concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:EMS Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EMS Group

Hello, Chrismorey. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "EMS Group".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OMX Nordic 120 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:OMX Nordic 120, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:WestRock Company

Hello, Chrismorey. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "WestRock Company".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:OMX Nordic 120

Hello, Chrismorey. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "OMX Nordic 120".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have many issues with WP's handling of business-related content and no longer wish to participate in sterile debates about 'notability'. IF WP were even slightly more consistent in its handling of closely-similar topics, there might be some point; but the apparently ad-hoc approach to decision-making by individuals of widely-differing views, who clearly do not communicate with each other, renders any attempt to achieve balanced coverage pointless. If it's really bugging you, delete it 121.98.69.189 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hemingway's third posthumous novel

The third posthumous novel from Ernest Hemingway would be True at First Light, by way of Patrick Hemingway's editing, and described by Ralph Blumenthal in The New York Times with "...Ernest Hemingway returned home to Cuba and began work on a long biographical novel." "A New Book By Hemingway; Blend of Life and Fiction Tells of African Bride" August 24, 1998 [2]

I don't have any specific sources to hand at 6 AM, but it is typical of Hemingway that his life provided the material for his fiction.

I am posting to your talk page because there is a formatting error on the Hemingwat talk page that causes the RfC close to propagate through any new section—I can't figure out the problem right now. I own five Hemingway bios plus other refs, but these really don't cover publication at the late date of 1999. The publication of TaFL was controversial—you can get a flavor at True at First Light. — User:Neonorange (Phil 10:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chrismorey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chrismorey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - gender and sexuality

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American politics

Please do not call other editors terms like "anti-Trump zealot". Such a battleground mentality is not conducive to creating an encyclopedia.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]