User talk:ChrisTheDude/Archive 3

1915 FA Cup Final

Thanks for adding the photo to this page. It really helps add atmosphere. By the way you don't look that much of a div with Mr Cascarino. I have a photo of me with David Wilkie (swimmer) that I hope never sees the light of day and I certainly wouldn't have the courage to put on my talkpage Gmac101 (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Bruce

Have a reference ;-) how a plc conducts its business

Thing is, "Wigan" never did confirm anything. Dave Whelan mouthed off in the paper, as have Gold/Sullivan, but neither website said a dickybird. Trouble is, one tends to go with the momentum of media waffle with a managerial appointment where a player transfer wouldn't be added until he'd had his picture taken in the shirt. That's why I prefer editing historical stuff, at least that way you can generally tell verifiable from fiction. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toffee management FLC

Damned that was quick...! Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Priestfield

It's good enough for me to support already, but one more quick query. From doing a couple of searches I've found a number of references to the poor standard of the pitch from four or five years ago - heavily sanded, resembled a ploughed field, string of recent matches postponed, and it appears that the problems were severe enough to result in the drainage system being replaced. Do think it is significant enough to merit a mention? Oldelpaso (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jim McAlpine

Hi - as part of my project to create articles for Southampton players I have added Jim McAlpine. As he played his last two seasons at Gillingham, can you add anything to the article? Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA result

I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:

Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux (talk) 11:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yay. Well done Chris. Give me a shout if you need some help with your first few steps...! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Gillingham fan as an admin? Oh the horror. Well done tho, get you and your fancy extra buttons. Foxhill (talk) 11:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am as horrified as Foxhill ;) Well done and congrats!!! Woodym555 (talk) 12:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, your honour. Though if you're expecting respect from us mere mortals... ;-) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff Chris, well done. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Almost certainly the only promotion to come to the Gills this year (or for many to come). Well done. UTG Kevin McE (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on becoming a new admin! To learn a little about how to work your new tools, check out the New admin school. To display on your user page how long you have been an admin, just post the userbox string: {{User:EVula/Userboxes/admin since|year=2007|month=11|day=26}} Also, please consider adding your username to Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 19:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! A worthy addition to the roster. -- Alexf^{(Talk/Contribs)} 12:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks?

I didn't say anything personal to him. I just told him to stop deleting the article for no reason other than he didn't like what was being written. Its all true as I provided evidence for so I didn't see what his problem was.BadboyIain (talk) 16:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Pulis

Also, why have you deleted the stuff about Tony Pulis? If you can re-write it in a more neutral tone then please do so but its all true. I think its important for people to know how he was recieved at the club. If you can't think of a better way to write it then I'm going to re-add it in the near future. BadboyIain (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus christ. We're all adults; is 'fuck off' actually 'extremely out of order'? Is everyone on wiki so highly strung up that a swearword deeply offends them (not aimed at you; please don't have a go at me about personal attacks)? Are you satisfied now that I've provided enough evidence that you can leave this article alone and draw a line under all this? BadboyIain (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ShootCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ShootCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Woodford United.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Woodford United.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Margate

Hey, I'm a bit maxed out at work and won't be in-wiki for long today, but I'll get to your PR asap. I don't think you'll have a problem with the black links, not as far as I'm concerned. You're right that you have to keep in-line with WP:BIO as well so you're damned if you do, damned if you don't.... More soon. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, done now. Hope they help. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Gavin Donoghue

Hi, i would greatly appreciate it if you could try leaving some comments on Wikipedia:Peer review/Gavin Donoghue/archive1.Thanks.--Sunderland06 18:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preistfield FAC

Hurrah, good work. The Rambling Man 08:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hartsdown Park

I've added some review comments here, hope they of use! Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You probably ought to archive the PR now you're putting it up at GA. I'll take the review shortly. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The article breezed it after the peer review. Well done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SCPFLeague.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SCPFLeague.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stadium image

Hi. I'm making an image for the plan for KitKat Crescent, and was wondering what font you used for the one for Priestfield. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coventry City FC

Hi Chris, i'm doing the Coventry article at the mo, using all different kinds of sources to help me get the facts right. I attempted to edit the article, but thought it best to start a-fresh, as the article did not make any sense, and is confusing. Any help would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woggle eye (talk • contribs) 13:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOTD

You are the nominator of a WP:FL that was promoted in the last month. I am inviting you to participate in nominations and voting in a List of the Day experiment I am conducting at WP:LOTD.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rationales

Hi. :) I saw your deletion of Rhys G Evans in the deletion log and just wanted to remind you not to let the article content show if the article may be an attack page. Given the nature of that one, I suspect it may have been. Since the deletion log hangs around after the article is gone, the attacks remain visible as well. Happy editing, and thanks for joining the ranks of CSD handlers. We certainly need them. :D --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WsM FC

Thanks for your note about Weston-super-Mare A.F.C. & well done for all the work you've put into this. It is certainly getting to a "B" class but still lacks citations for lots of statements. Why not go to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset talk page & ask others to help or reclassify?— Rod ^talk 17:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I left this on the wrong talk page. User:GauchoDude left an unsigned message on my talk page from "Chris" about WsM FC & I looked at the page history & saw your edits. I've put a note on GauchoDude's page explaining the error - sorry.— Rod ^talk 08:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A.F.C. Kempston Rovers

I already made a major change to the team article based on the club template set by Wikiproject Football and I assure you that it's a wonderful article and ready for people to add more information now, plus that if it's good enough to take the "stub" tag off, so be it! Rakuten06 (talk) 19:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stanleybadge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stanleybadge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		Football (soccer) barnstar
		For your work adding photos to county cup articles Robotforaday (talk) 12:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andover FC

Hi Chris. That's a very good point you made about the references. I'm onto it (although it mostly be after the holidays now - that me done for the year!). B e t t i a ^{t a l k} 16:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you thought about adding to your collection of stars with a featured topic?

Whilst scouring around bored today I had a thought, WP:FOOTY has featured articles, featured lists (even a stray featured pic on commons) but as yet, no Featured topics. Looking through the criteria for these it seems like the collection of Gillingham articles may be a bit of a shoo-in if those that aren't featured could get GA or could be excused under the caveat that "Items that cannot achieve a high rating due to their limited subject matter have passed an individual audit for quality." Have a look and see what you think, of course I'm much too lazy and distraught by the current financial status of my beloved STFC to be bothered in helping, but I thought I'd recommend the FT to you if you're looking for a new challenge. Foxhill (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin Donoghue

Thank you for rating the article, i have already put a request in for it to be copy-edited. Thanks. Sunder land 06 22:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that if the article's english and the tags were sorted out it could be GA. Sunder land 06 22:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane

Heya. A while ago I took a look at Brownhills for you - I was wondering if you could possibly return the favour and leave some notes about this article on its talk page? Thanks either way :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome - thanks. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 12:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FT nomination

Don't worry about the nom, I have archived it all now. I think Gillingham would be the way to go, though not if I beat you first with AVFC. ;) Only got one history article to do now, though it is taking some time and I'm off on hols soon. WP:FOOTY will soon have several potential FTs, no rush. Warm Christmas regards. Woody (talk) 14:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA don't do lists, FL is the only way up for lists. ;) Woody (talk) 14:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They don't do lists under the reasoning that a list is either complete or it is not, so FL is the only way to do them. It will do fine at FL, a good peer review should clean up all the problems. I will take a look at it now. It is not as if there isn't a precedent to follow. Woody (talk) 14:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Priestfield and PDL

As I understand it, the agreement is in place for the sale: I avoided changing the infobox as I believe that the sale has not yet happened (though whether we will be told when it is complete is debatable). Thanks for formatting the citations. Is the ref to the Xtn festival OK without any citations: I remember it clearly (they were setting it up as we were queuing in the stand for Wembley tickets), but I cannot remember who the organisers were to find any further details or web refs. Kevin McE (talk) 14:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin Donoghue

1. a. This should be sorted out in the copyedit i've requested.

2. b. This should be done soon through a match proramme Gazh is sorting out.

2. c. As 2. b.

3. b. I dont know, but his major contribution to the match was missing a penalty that could have resulted in sending them out which it eventually did.

4. Should be done in copyedit, shouldn't it?

6. Cannot find any pictures maybe you can help me.

And also thanks alot for your time. Sunder land 06 23:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me find some pictures of him. Sunder land 06 23:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at it again as the copyedit has been done, i'm waiting for the date of the programme to cite the parts with [citation needed], so without them do you think it could make Good Article. Sunder land 06 14:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football Article review requests

Hi you see to be a well established member of the WikiProject Football so I was wondering if you could take a quck look at a couple of articles I'm trying to get to featured status: James Milner (1a seem to be the main issue here) and Leeds United A.F.C. seasons (curently under a PR). No9 rush just when you can find the time. Thanks. Buc (talk) 20:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverton Town F.C.

Hi. It has been suggested that the above article, which you prodded, be merged with Wolverton A.F.C. If this is of interest to you, please discuss at the Wolverton Town F.C. talk page. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 22:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Players needing infoboxes

Hi, i was looking through and saw your user page, i made the infoboxes for Billy Hughes, Karl Elsey, Dave Smith, Ralph Miller, Joe Hinnigan, Ray Bailey, George Jacks, Simon Ratcliffe, Mark O'Connor, Roy Proverbs, Peter Shaw, Paddy Sowden, Matt Bryant, Dave Shipperley, Harry Ayres, Ronnie Bacon, Dean White, Gordon Riddick, Pat Terry, Bill Brown, i couldn't be bothered to do the rest, they don't have much info i only realised the reference contained the info when i looked at it, sorry. Sunder land 06 23:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MidEssexLeague.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MidEssexLeague.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MidHertsLg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MidHertsLg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HuddLeague.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HuddLeague.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flockalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flockalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DoncLeague.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DoncLeague.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Erith & belvedere.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Erith & belvedere.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Erithtownbadge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Erithtownbadge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BeckenhamT.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BeckenhamT.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DorsetLeague.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DorsetLeague.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crvena Zvezda RM

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous RM and Afd debates and seem to be literate in the subject matter, could you please close this RM. It's been hanging around for ages, apparently overlooked. Cheers! BanRay 10:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LALeague.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LALeague.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KevinMouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KevinMouse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lordswood FC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lordswood FC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LOGOWMRL.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LOGOWMRL.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HBFC.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HBFC.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hythe town.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hythe town.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ludlow Town FC.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ludlow Town FC.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your bad JPEGs

I can try to do something, but I need to be at home to work on it, so I can't start it before tonight (right now I'm at work). --Angelo (talk) 08:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Drawing4562563657365865846.svg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Drawing4562563657365865846.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current featured noms

Hey Chris, just back from holidays and I noticed you've got two featured noms running. I managed to miss both PRs but I'll try to get onto to providing comments to you as soon as possible. Hope you had a good holiday period... work tomorrow, yuck. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chris, reviewed Stocksbridge, next one coming soon. I've left some comments on the talk page (rather than the FAC page, since I missed the PR, don't want to bloat the FAC), hope some of them are useful, let me know. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chris, List of Gills bosses now reviewed, again I've left comments but not so many and they're at the FLC. Let me know when you want me to review both again! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All good, but I think you now need a ref for Pulis misconduct...! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, new graph. Nice one! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stocksbridge logo

I've just completed and uploaded the SVG version of the current logo (it can be still improved, though), you can find it at Image:Stocksbridge_Park_Steels_FC_logo.svg. --Angelo (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SteelsOldCrest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SteelsOldCrest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Steels.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Steels.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Featured topic

Yeah, very nice. I'll have a better look when I get to work but that looks like a winner! I may need to do some work on ITFC, only need to get the history and Portman Rd up to (at least) GA and I'll be on your heels! The Rambling Man (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gills

Oldest player? --Dweller (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hessenthaler? Oh, and I've added some stuff at the PR for you! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Featured topics

Hey. Seeing Gillingham's success, so far at least, at WP:FT, I wondered whether you feel York City and its related articles would pass this? Only part of the criteria that seems a bit obscure is the use of "featured articles", which I'm assuming is referring to featured content in general? Hope so, anyway. And I'll be taking a look at Gillingham FTC soon! Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill White (footballer)

Per WP:BLP, what was your criteria in declaring him dead? Was someone younger declared the oldest of a category he's in (ie. So and so born in 1908 was the oldest living member of this club, therefore White must be dead)? Cheers, CP 17:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOTD

In the last month, you have created a new WP:FL. From what I can tell, you are a veteran and have produced others in the past. Congratulations! You may be aware of WP:LOTD and have probably heard from me in prior months. We are experimenting with selecting Lists of the Day so similar to the current WP:TFA and WP:POTD features that run on the main page. I am invite those who have created new FLs in the last month to participate.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papua New Guinea fixtures and results

Hi, I have started to expand the page - perhaps you would be good emough to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papua New Guinea fixtures and results, please? TerriersFan (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RAMSlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAMSlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WyrleyRangers.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:WyrleyRangers.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhitstableTown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WhitstableTown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SotonLeague.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SotonLeague.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sevenoaks FC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sevenoaks FC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds seasons FLC

Something to look at should you have the time. Possibly the most controversial list WP:FOOTBALL has seen for a while! We had a superb PR (makes a change!) so hopefully the FLC should fly. I'd be interested in your views! All the best The Rambling Man (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA: Alexf

I have been nominated for an RfA. If you haven't done so already, I would appreciate if you could go and comment on this page: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alexf. Thanks and happy wiking! -- Alexf^{(Talk/Contribs)} 12:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]