User talk:Charles Nsugbe

June 2023

Hello, I'm ContributeToTheWiki. I noticed that in this edit to Nsugbe, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ContributeToTheWiki (talk • contribs) 07:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Ifediora, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onyebuchi Chris Ifediora Foundation (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Onyebuchi Chris Ifediora Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charles Nsugbe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onyebuchi Chris Ifediora Foundation (July 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:30, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Charles Nsugbe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Charles Nsugbe, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jdcomix (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. It will not be possible to review this until you have chosen which references you will use. WP:BOMBARD is not useful to anyone

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Charles Nsugbe/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello Charles Nsugbe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Charles Nsugbe. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Charles Nsugbe|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out.

I wish to declare that I have no conflict of interest and have never been paid or compensated for any articles I have edited on Wikipedia.

I have been a passionate contributor for few years, driven by my desire to ensure that important topics are accurately represented on the platform.

As a lecturer at a reputable university, writing is one of my passions. I have authored textbooks on various subjects and contributed to multiple publications in reputable journals.

Regarding the current topic, I live in a community with several beneficiaries of the OCI Foundation. It was through their activities and impact in my area that I became aware of the organization.

My research on the foundation is what informed my contributions to the topic on Wikipedia.

I wish to emphasize again that I have never received any compensation, cash gifts, or incentives for this write-up, nor do I personally know the management of the foundation.

Please feel free to reach out if you need any further clarification.

I look forward to continuing my contributions to Wikipedia.

Thank you.

Charles Nsugbe (talk) 01:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please fully review and then answer the COI and PAID message that has been left on your user talk page before editing again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Charles Nsugbe/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out.

I wish to declare that I have no conflict of interest and have never been paid or compensated for any articles I have edited on Wikipedia.

I have been a passionate contributor for a few years now, driven by my desire to ensure that important topics are accurately represented on the platform.

As a lecturer at a reputable university, writing is one of my passions. I have authored textbooks on various subjects and contributed to multiple publications in reputable journals.

Regarding the current topic, I live in a community with several beneficiaries of the OCI Foundation. It was through their activities and impact in my area that I became aware of the organization.

My research on the foundation is what informed my contributions to the topic on Wikipedia.

I wish to emphasize again that I have never received any compensation, cash gifts, or incentives for this write-up, nor do I personally know the management of the foundation.

Please feel free to reach out if you need any further clarification.

I look forward to continuing my contributions to Wikipedia.

Thank you. Charles Nsugbe (talk) 01:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]