User talk:Chaitanya kalra

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Soul, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Soul for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sikhs, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Southeast Europe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 09:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Rashtriya Sikh Sangat for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sikhism, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sikhism was changed by Chaitanya kalra (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870798 on 2023-04-23T09:03:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are about 1 femtometre away from an Arbitration enforcement block. Stop disrupting Wikipedia. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. MrOllie (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Sikhism. Meters (talk) 05:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:MrOllie. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Enough. Don't erase or modify other editors' talk page posts, and don't make personal attacks. Meters (talk) 05:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enough warnings

You have been blocked for a month for persistent disruptive editing, vandalism, and personal attacks. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 13:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Please stop disruptively editing Sikh articles on Wikipedia

User Chaitanya kalra, you have just recently been blocked for a month for "persistent disruptive editing, vandalism, and personal attacks". It seems you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia by removing sourced content and adding unsourced content into pages. If you continue down this road, I will seek further actions be taken against your activities on Wikipedia to prevent further damage to the project. I implore you read-up on relevant Wikipedia policies before making further edits. ThethPunjabi (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Admin noticeboard notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ThethPunjabi (talk) 03:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Punjabi people

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Punjabi people appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]