Jump to content

User talk:Cerebral726/Archives Pre-2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Fit/ fitted

Hi. I noticed you reverted my edit in which I changed the word 'fit' to fitted as the sentence was in the past tense. I am fairly familiar with US/ UK English but I of course did some research. I would not normally change from one variety to another. I genuinely had no idea that 'fit' was used as a past simple in US English. I have learnt something new! Sorry about that.NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

No need to apologize, glad you learned something new! Cerebral726 (talk) 16:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry...I should have done my update in one step...if you want to hold off on manually re-adding county links, I'll have them updated in a few minutes. 3Idiot (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Cerebral726, you won the race! Looks good for today. I almost have the Excel formula figured out to include those links next time I run the automatic generation...and hopefully the left-align style too. Maybe I'll find a way to get your eyes on it before tomorrow's update. The latest update to the data visualization on the ISDH site makes it tough to get the county-level data from there...but it accelerated my plans to automate the generation of that table anyway. 3Idiot (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

I figured out how to do the left align style in excel, had to use CHAR(34) instead of an actual quotation mark. With Counties in A, cases in Column B, and Deaths in Column C, my formula is:
 ="|- "&CHAR(10)&"|style="&CHAR(34)&"text-align:left;"&CHAR(34)&"|[["&A2&" County, Indiana|"&A2&"]]||"&B2&"||"&C2
Hopefully that's what you were looking for. Also, it is quite frustrating that they don't have it in chart form now, even if we automate it as much as possible through excel. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Laporte County, Indiana is flagged as a miscapitalization. Should be LaPorte County, Indiana. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Time travel

[1] - how is that a source dated 2016 is being used to cite information from 2020? See WP:HIJACK. -- GreenC 17:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Fair point. I didn't add that they were open, I just tried to fix the poor phrasing and inadvertently hijacked, but that was definitely a bad error. Found a couple sources and added them. Thanks for noticing and notifying me. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Oh no problem thanks for the graceful response and article improvement I happened to see it on my watchlist, take care. -- GreenC 01:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hello Internet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hello Internet, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Internet (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Talk

You mentioned multiple people reverted my change. I stand by my original edit. Not sure the best way to move forward with this but open to your suggestions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Username679 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

You'll want to go to the Kari Byron Talk Page, hit "New Section", and write why you think your use of "wed" and "union" is better than "married" and "marriage". That will start a discussion about whether that change is worth making. However, since multiple people have reverted your change, it seems clear that consensus will be in favor of the more commonly used, and more accurate term "marriage". In the mean time, it is important you leave it as it is in line with WP:STATUSQUO.

Daniel Craig (James Bond) orders Vesper with wrong recipe in Casino Royal

You removed my comment about Daniel Craig ordering the cocktail "Vesper" with wrong recipe. Mr Craig says "Two measures of Gordon's Gin" instead of three measures. My comment is easy to check for anyone who has the film or who searches for the scene on YouTube. Maybe my comment that the balance of the drink is lost with that recipe and it becomes bitter is less valid as it can be seen as a personal taste.

When the movie scene is mentioned in the article, do you find it uninteresting or wrong to mention that the recipe given in the film differs from that in the book and in the wikipedia article?

QV (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The reason I removed your edit was because it included commentary like "unfortunately" and personal opinions on the taste of the drink. If you had a source, it would be interesting/valid to include how the drink differs in the movie/book, but you need a source as you there is strict policies against WP:OR. --Cerebral726 (talk) 12:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I added the information about Daniel Craig ordering with a different recipe again, now following your instructions above, without the use of "unfortunately" and personal opinions on the taste of the drink. How it is said by Daniel Craig in the movie is very easy to check by anyone who has the film or who searches for the scene on YouTube. QV (talk) 07:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

I just looked up the scene and Daniel Craig clearly says "3". So the fact is incorrect and uncited. You won't be able to find a source to support the claim, since there is no inconsistency between the movie and the book. Also important though, your new edit did not fix the issue of doing WP:OR. It's one of the Wikipedia:Core content policies, so it's important you read and understand it before trying to make any similar edits. --Cerebral726 (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry!

Oops, I've just reverted some pending edits on Bo Burnham, and only after I clicked the button I noticed there was your valid edit also in the queue. Apologies! --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

HA! No worries at all! Thanks for the apology though, and thanks for keeping the article clean. --Cerebral726 (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I've restored your edit (well, made it again) in a pitiful attempt to make good. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Numberphile podcast article

See my response on my talk page (keeping discussion all in one place). Thank you for your help.--Toploftical (talk) 19:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

I assume you have seen my latest response. Thanks again.--Toploftical (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
A Barnstar of appreciation
A barnstar for the thoroughly professional job you did on the page Numberphile! A joy working with you!--Toploftical (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

James Grime

James Grime is a frequent presenter on Numberphile. A page with that name has been repeatedly deleted. There are quite a few red links to James Grime in WP (but for all we know, some interested party created them; see Wikipedia:Link farm.) His buddy Matt Parker has a page and nobody seems to have a problem with that.

Ignore all this if you have no opinion about it. Otherwise, see the discussion on my Talk Page--Toploftical (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
Awesomely thorough references, particularly on the Rhett & Link article. Thank you for doing that, it is extremely appreciated, and rare to see done! Happy Tuesday! — The King of Mars «talk» 17:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Question About Beer Helmet Edit

Hello,

I host a small podcast over the history of hats, and am looking into the history of the beer helmet. I noticed your edit on the party hat page. I was wondering what brought you across that page, and why you decided to look more into it and edit out the reference to Jeremy Gumbo? I have found the same information as yourself, but am hoping you would be willing to share what brought you to the page (and the beer helmet aspect) in the first place?

Thanks so much!

DTAHpod (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)DTAHpod

How fun! In a fun bit of coincidence, I am interested in the article because I am one of the primary contributors to another podcast's article The Anthropocene Reviewed. The podcast involves rating things from the current geological epoch (largely dominated by humans) on a five star scale, and in the 29th episode, he reviews 17 things, including beer helmets. I wanted to link to beer helmet, and when I went over to that article, I noticed it was pretty subpar so I wanted to improve it.--Cerebral726 (talk) 12:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Tulsa Fire Department

You deleted my addition to the Tulsa Fire Department article for grammar and reference reasons. I added 2 local news links about Protecfire and 1 link to the official Protecfire website. So that shouldn't be an issue. Jackson3423123 (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

My main issue was with the formatting and grammar. The news article was fine, though please use proper citation formatting such as this: <ref name="PRTulsa">{{cite news |last1=Trotter |first1=Matt |title=Tulsa Airport Authority Approves Fire and Rescue Contract with Wisconsin Firm |url=https://www.publicradiotulsa.org/post/tulsa-airport-authority-approves-fire-and-rescue-contract-wisconsin-firm#stream/0 |access-date=15 September 2021 |work=www.publicradiotulsa.org |language=en}}</ref>
Additionally, the sentence "During his first year as chief, Tulsa Fire Department as left Tulsa International airport fire operations to a Wisconsin firm protecfire." has multiple issues, including a redlink that does not seem necessary. I apologize, since I know you were acting in good faith, but with the way they were added, I felt they couldn't stay in the article until it was fixed. --Cerebral726 (talk) 18:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

NYT crossword

Hi Cerebral! Just a heads up, since you seem to be monitoring the Will Shortz page, that the IP that's been disrupting that page and Joel Fagliano with POV/UNDUE information has been blocked. If they start harassing you for cleaning up after them, please don't hesitate to seek admin help. Best, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited! Environmental Justice editathons in Indianapolis & Bloomington

Bloomington
 Upcoming events around Indiana - Nov. 1: Environmental Justice editathons
2 locations: Indianapolis & Bloomington (and virtual option)
IUPUI

You are invited to join us for a multi-site editathon organized by Indiana Wikimedians at IUPUI University Library in downtown Indianapolis and the Herman B Wells Library at IU Bloomington (with virtual option). Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors, with faculty subject matter experts, will collaboratively improve articles on environmental justice in Indiana and globally. Join us at either location or virtually!

Tuesday, November 1st from 11am-4pm, at...

Visit the meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC).)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Cerebral726,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Cerebral726,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Cerebral726,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12232 articles, as of 04:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

July 28: You're invited! Food Deserts & Food Policy in Indianapolis editathon

 Upcoming Indianapolis event - July 28: Food Deserts & Food Policy

You are invited to join us at Ruth Lilly Law Library for an edit-a-thon on Food Deserts & Food Policy hosted by Ruth Lilly Law Library and United States National Agricultural Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on food deserts, nutrition, and related local and federal food policy.

  • Thursday, July 28th from 11am-4pm, in Room 235G, Inlow Hall, 530 West New York St. Indianapolis, IN 46202.

Visit the Wikipedia/Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic, Jere, & Jamie

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis

Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride Indy

You are invited to join us at IUPUI University Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by IUPUI University Library, and supported by the Central Indiana Community Foundation—where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:

11am–4pm at IUPUI University Library, Ashby Browsing Room.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! In-person WikiConference North America Meetup in Indianapolis!

 Nov. 11-13: WikiConference North American Meetup!
IUPUI University Library (and around Indianapolis)

Registration is now open for WikiConference North America 2022 (Nov. 11–13) held jointly with Mapping USA! If you would like to experience this virtual event in-person, you are welcome to join our meetup in Indianapolis! We will be meeting at IUPUI University Library for the weekend, with AV set up for conference streaming and presenting (for those who've submitted proposals).

Anyone is welcome to join, we will have some light refreshments and are planning evening activities. Feel free to join us for an activity, a day, or the whole weekend. Please let us know you are coming via the meetup page and please register for the conference. We will share more about in-person activities on the meetup page as they are finalized.

Visit the WikiConference North America site for the schedule and visit our meetup page to sign up and learn more. And don't forget to register for the conference!

—From the Wikimedia Indiana team!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 17:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC).)

Regarding changes to Steve Zaragoza‎'s Wikipedia Entry

Hello, as an initial heads up, this situation might have resolved itself, as Ms. Nicole has removed the original Instagram post regarding the sexual misconduct accusations against Mr. Zaragoza. However, the reference I made initially on the page was mirroring what I've seen on other celebrity pages regarding sexual misconduct allegations, as well as the verbiage I used, which I was very careful to make informational and not accusatorial. I am in contact with Ms. Nicole about the removal of the video, so I'll update once I know more, but the initial video might have been taken down due to legal reasons involving the two of them, so it might end up making more sense just to keep my edits off the page for now until more is found out about this case. --ruffsnap (talk) 13:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate you coming to the Talk Page to start a discussion! Regardless of your good neutral phrasing, the important part of your edit missing is having a reliable source, especially on a WP:BLP and regarding a controversial matter. An Instagram video of an accusation is far from a RS, so I'd recommend that you do not add any content regardless of the outcome of your conversations with Zaragoza's accuser unless you have a strong secondary source discussing the accusations. --Cerebral726 (talk) 14:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  • So again, I was basing on how I sourced it off of what was on other celebrities' pages who have been accused of sexual misconduct. There was at least one that used a social post as the source, I can't recall the exact example right now, I just sort of googled around #metoo'd celebs basically. I could link to Mr. Zaragoza's social media response posts to the accusations if that adds legitimacy to the sources as having both sides represented better or something. But I mean I think there's value, if not MORE value in having first-hand accounts from the actual people involved vs. a more traditional news or blog article-type source that you/Wikipedia might view as more "valid" or "legitimate", as they would just recount what was said in those videos from both sides anyways. --ruffsnap (talk) 17:48, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  • If you find controversial additions such as sexual assault allegations on other articles only sourced to primary sources, it may be best to remove it. The relevant policies here areWP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:ABOUTSELF which specifically disallow the additions you are wishing to make. It's not a both sides things, and adding in another non-reliable source would not fix the issues I'm bringing up. Having verifiable, reliable sources for articles, especially for biographies of living people, is a core policy of Wikipedia. Understanding those policies and their importance by reading the policies I linked would be a good idea. There are strong reasons we do not rely on first person accounts in this way on Wikipedia. --Cerebral726 (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I do get where you're coming from, I just don't fully agree when it comes to things like sexual misconduct and #metoo stuff. I had to do my due diligence to question your edits somewhat as not being done through Zaragoza trying to "clear his name" so to speak, as his agency has already been doing to some degree with making sure things get buried, and likely involved in having Nicole's video taken down on Instagram as well. --ruffsnap (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm just telling you what the Wikipedia policies are. If you don't agree with them, that is fine, just as long as you don't violate them. If you wish to continue editing Wikipedia (which I genuinely hope you do), it is critical you abide by them. I understand you want to cover something important in the way you see is right, but this speculation and use of primary sources (or no sources) is never going to be suitable for Wikipedia. I'll leave it at that. --Cerebral726 (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I get ya, we'll just have to agree to disagree - but either way your last edit is the way Zaragoza's page will stand, so I guess you've technically won in that regard lol. Again, I'll add an updated comment here if I hear anything more from Nicole's (or Zaragoza's) people. Peace for now. --ruffsnap (talk) 17:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Anthropocene Reviewed

On 6 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Anthropocene Reviewed, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on his podcast The Anthropocene Reviewed, John Green reviews velociraptors, a hot dog stand in Iceland, and bubonic plague? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Anthropocene Reviewed. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Anthropocene Reviewed), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

File:The Anthropocene Reviewed Podcast Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Anthropocene Reviewed Podcast Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Numberphile

Regarding User:TipsyElephant's Proposed deletion of Numberphile (I am the creator of Numberphile). I do not see a Proposed deletion/dated tag (YET). I see that you have responded and added some refs. Is there anything I should do? Thanks so much cerebral one.--Toploftical (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Toploftical, I removed the Proposed Deletion (WP:PROD) and added some sources, so unless someone starts a WP:AFD, the article will remain. If you're looking to help keep the article from deletion should someone nominate it for that, you can find more strong sources that are specifically about the channel, as opposed to its content. That would help improve the quality of sourcing of the article. --Cerebral726 (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks--Toploftical (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Purdue Colors

Hello, I've started a discussion about Purdue University's colors on the talk page if you'd like to join. Thought I'd let you know and discuss it so and edit war doesn't start, though I will admit I did revert it back to old gold and black while we build some consensus. Invinciblewalnut (talk) 20:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For cleanup & maintenance of Wordle (video game) and related articles. Thanks! eviolite (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
@Eviolite:, Thank you very much, you're very kind! Great work to you as well. --Cerebral726 (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis

Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 24, 2023: Wiki Loves Pride Indy

You are invited to join us at Spades Park Branch Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by the Wikimedians of Indiana User Group with support from the Central Indiana Community Foundation. Together, new and experienced Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on LGBTQ+ topics, individuals, organizations, and legislation in Indiana.

2 pm to 5 pm at the Spades Park Branch of The Indianapolis Public Library.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians of Indiana User Group

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 16:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Indiana Politics & Government Editathon on Saturday, May 13

Upcoming Indianapolis event - May 13: Indiana Politics & Government 2023

It's been an eventful state legislative session in Indiana, and local elections took place this week, so we have lots to cover! You are invited to The AMP at 16 Tech in Indianapolis for a Politics & Government editathon to improve write articles about local political and government topics of interest and improve information about local officials, candidates, elections, and legislation. Come join us at this fun venue, with free parking and refreshments provided!

11am–4pm The AMP at 16 Tech in Indianapolis, IN.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians in Indiana User Group

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC).)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Cerebral726,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

March 17: You're invited! Indiana Women in the Arts editathon

 Upcoming Indianapolis event
March 17: Indiana Women in the Arts

You are invited to join us at Newfields for an edit-a-thon on Indiana women in the arts, co-hosted by Wikimedians of Indiana and IUPUI University Library.

Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on women artists and artworks of Indiana.

Visit the Wikipedia Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC).)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Cerebral726,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Cerebral726,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Advice for a newbie!

Hi there! I'm new to Wikipedia and have just written my first article on Alabama literature. In it, I discuss John Green and Looking for Alaska. I saw that you've recently edited the John Green article and that he's clearly someone who interests you, so I was wondering if you could take a look at my article and give me any advice that you have? Thank you! CatVallejo (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

The article looks like a good start, content creation is a large task and it seems like you added a ton. A few points I would raise:
  • The article needs a lot more reliable sourcing throughout the text. Some paragraphs have no sources at all. Make sure your sources are reliable and don't cite the book you are talking about as the direct source for the information. Anything that isn't backed up by a source could be removed, so have them after each sentence or group of sentences backed up by that source.
  • There are a few phrases that are written like a personal essay. "Now a cultural phenomenon, Forest Gump...", try to avoid that. The current phrasing seems to presume knowledge that the reader has a la "We all know Forrest Gump now, but...". It could be better phrased by describing the impact the book had, especially on Alabama literature.
  • Use American English, aka ostracized (not ostracised), recognized (not recognised), etc.
  • If you need to link something like Harper Lee's, use [[Harper Lee]]'s, not [[Harper Lee|Harper Lee's]]
Finally, I would most recommend going over to Wikipedia:Peer review, where people do much more extensive overviews. I would start working on sourcing first while you wait for someone to respond to your request, which you can make here: Wikipedia:Peer review/guidelines. --Cerebral726 (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much, your notes are really helpful, I will absolutely get to work implementing all of them. I would never even have considered something like using American English, I'm Australian so it didn't even cross my mind! Again, thank you. CatVallejo (talk) 05:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Cerebral726. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Still watching?

Still watching me out, right? 😏 [a]

  1. ^ Diffs:
    Mineral
    [May 24, 2022, 17:09][May 24, 2022, 14:46]
    Sandstone
    [May 25, 2022, 15:26][15:23][May 24, 2022, 17:03][16:59]

AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 08:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Like before, I saw one of your edits (Sandstone) in a topic that interests me and wanted to see if you made similar edits in similar topics. I chose to make a few fixes to grammar and phrasing that I found, leaving the intent of your edits intact and improving upon them. Cerebral726 (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Nine campuses

Thanks for your ongoing attention to Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis. The user editing from an IP address is probably an IUPUI person (as am I). Their edits on School of Medicine's research dollars and Carnegie, etc ... sort of outs them as having insider knowledge. In the IU system, we tend to think of IUB, IUPUI, + the 5 regional campuses = seven. Weirdly enough Fort Wayne and Columbus get lumped in with IUPUI as "regional centers" ... not campuses. (Nonetheless, those "regional centers" do have "campuses.") See: https://www.iu.edu/about/locations.html I'm fine though with sticking with nine campuses. -- Jaireeodell (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Cerebral726

Thank you for creating Morgan Eckroth.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tested.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tested.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tested.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

Please do not remove words that use the ʻokina or kahakō in Hawaiʻi-related articles where they appear in the article body. Per MOS:HAWAII, this is the preferred use as the inclusion or omission of any ʻokina or kahakō can radically alter the meaning of a Hawaiian word.

Since many established Hawaiʻi-related articles do not include ʻokina or kahakō in their respective titles (e.g. Oʻahu), and moving an article just to include ʻokina and kahakō has been disfavored on Wikipedia, piped links are routinely used so that the appropriate spelling can be used within an article. Mahalo, Musashi1600 (talk) 11:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification, I appreciate the kind tone. I wasn’t aware of that guidance. I saw a lot of the additions had been made by someone who was changing article titles without discussion to include them, so I was a bit overzealous in reverting the related additions. I’ll make sure to follow that in the future! Cerebral726 (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cerebral726/Archives_Pre-2023&oldid=1169168397"