User talk:Cb Olusa

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Olusa (October 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Tagishsimon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: First, this seems to be written by the subject, which is a problem - see WP:COI. Beyond that, I'm not seeing any real notabilty, nor do I see any prospect of notability. Sorry. Bye.

Tagishsimon (talk) 01:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not fair Cb Olusa (talk) 05:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cb Olusa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 01:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Christopher Olusa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Christopher Olusa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 02:43, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir any specific reasons for the deletion? Cb Olusa (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akin (British R&B Duo) (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akin (British R&B Duo) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tola Awosika (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tola Awosika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 15:30, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Solomon Olaolu Kevin, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 09:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, Cb Olusa, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Bolaji abegi (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cb Olusa. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal 1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cb Olusa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to express my deep disappointment and concern regarding the sudden blocking of my three-year-old account without any valid reason. The accusation that I am "Bolaji Abeg" is entirely false and unsupported by credible evidence. In fact, the evidence presented is not only shallow but also baseless. As a loyal contributor to Wikipedia, I have always adhered to the platform's guidelines and policies. It is unfair and unjust to block me from accessing Wikipedia, especially when there is no concrete evidence to support the claims made against me. Furthermore, I take great exception to the suggestion that I am attempting very hard to create a page for Christopher Olusa. While I do not deny my interest in creating content related to this individual, I strongly believe that this should not be a reason to block my account. What's more disturbing is the apparent pattern of targeting and discrimination against Black people on this platform. As a community that prides itself on promoting knowledge, inclusivity, and diversity, it is imperative that we address and condemn such biases. In light of these circumstances, I respectfully demand that my account be restored immediately. Failure to do so will lead me to believe that this action is racially motivated and discriminatory. I look forward to a prompt resolution to this matter and a chance to continue contributing to Wikipedia in a fair and unbiased environment.

Decline reason:

We do not consider chatbot-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. I am curious how you got the AI to make spurious accusations of racial bias. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cb Olusa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please forgive my first appeal, I was so upset and decided to use gpt to reduce the tone of my anger, I would like to say that, I introduced Bolaji Abeg to wiki and we know each other and sometimes coordinate and I sincerely apologize for this, now I know it is a grave offense. I don't get paid to create articles and I believe wiki is a safe space for all races. Thank you

Decline reason:

You share an IP address, so I think it's more likely you are the same person. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cb Olusa (talk) 07:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]