User talk:Caspal

Welcome

Hello, Caspal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Aristophanes68 (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Concern regarding Draft:Het Sinterklaasjournaal

Hello, Caspal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Het Sinterklaasjournaal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Leo Canjels article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 08:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

• For starters the dutch Wiki page about mr. Canjels say's he's born in Princenhage . Since "Princenhage" didn't have a English article, it probably wasn't mentioned in English. the local new website of Princehagen named it in a memorial article . . also the football magazine "voetbal international" mentions it in an article about his passing. . greetings Caspal (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Haagse Beemden moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Haagse Beemden. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

I understand the importance of sources. What I did is translated the Dutch article into English. I assumed that the Dutch article had been fererified. I did my best to resource new sources because the links in the Dutch article don't exist anymore. Caspal (talk) 07:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haagse Beemden has been accepted

Haagse Beemden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sloterdijk. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

WK AdoptieKids moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to WK AdoptieKids. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

the sources are the newspaper article and the homepage of the tournament. They are in dutch. if you let me know witch things need to be pointed out in the article. I'll fix a link but it's stil in dutch Caspal (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I've found and added sources all in dutch I'm afraid. with these I hope I've met the required provenance of the content of the article Caspal (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Chassé Theater moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chassé Theater. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 13:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

good day, I just translated the Dutch article witch unfortunately has no sources either. but working for the theater foor 27 years I know the story. I will try to find backup for the claims. Caspal (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I've found and added sources. with these I hope I've met the required provenance of the content of the article. Caspal (talk) 18:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chassé Theater (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chassé Theater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Caspal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

sorry I don't understand. at first I just translated the Dutch article witch had no reference at all. by now I've added 7 reference like the architecture yearbook, the link to the architect Hertzberger, the history story's on the Chasse Theater webpage and a few english references. I also found the interview wicht architect Hertzberger from 1995. I have no idea what the references of Wiki should behold. Caspal (talk) 07:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

For notability according to the most common guideline, WP:GNG, we need to see significant coverage, directly of the subject and not some indirectly related matters, in multiple (3+) secondary sources that are both reliable and entirely independent of the subject and of each other. Secondary sources means newspapers, magazines, books, TV and radio programmes. But even if the sources are secondary, their coverage may not be: eg. an interview (in the case of your draft, the interview of the architect) is a primary source, as it is the person talking about their own work; similarly, articles based on press releases or other publicity materials are primary, even when they appear in a typically secondary publication, because they are the issuer of the press release telling the world about themselves. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

tanks for your thanks for your answer. I am curious why a distinction is made between the different wiki languages ​​and articles. In addition to the press and the architects' yearbook, there are probably more references to be found, but I expect they will have the same source. the Dutch article has no sources at all. I also sometimes see fewer or no references besides the homepage in the English-language articles. the architects' yearbook is almost a blueprint of the building and could be a conclusive source in itself. I will save the information and see if I offer it again in the future. Caspal (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WK AdoptieKids (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WK AdoptieKids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)