User talk:Canekangaroo
February 2021
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rebecca (novel), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. That's a useful addition, but I'm afraid all such statements of fact must be accompanied be a citation to a reliable source MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Daphne du Maurier, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The commentary on du Marier's relationship to the gothic is interesting, but needs to be accompanied by citations to reliable sources MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello! Canekangaroo,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Gothic Revival architecture
[edit]With sincere apologies, I rolled back your addition to the above. Sorry, fat fingers. That said, I did mean to undo. You are absolutely correct regarding the links between architecture and literature, but I firstly wonder if it is an essential addition to what is already a long article. Secondly, I’ve tried to significantly improve the sourcing in the article, as it was weak before. So if you want to re-add, and I certainly won’t oppose, could you find a reliable source as a cite.
All the very best. KJP1 (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
The article The College of Animal Welfare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Vocational institute, does not appear to pass WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 14:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Museo Africano moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Museo Africano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Battle for Oz
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Battle for Oz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 747pilot (talk) 04:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- The nomination for Speedy deletion has been removed, as the criteria did not apply to the article. David notMD (talk) 11:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of The Battle for Oz for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Battle for Oz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of M Pepper Langlinais
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on M Pepper Langlinais, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Asperger/Autism Network
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Asperger/Autism Network, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 17:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 3A Japanese propaganda movement has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hatchens (talk) 15:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Pusat Tenaga Rakyat (Indonesia) has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nyanardsan (talk) 04:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Rengasdengklok Incident has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nyanardsan (talk) 08:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Some baklava for you!
[edit]
|
Hi thanks for creating The Grave (Play) which I’ve just reviewed. If you ever need any help with something please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:Museo Africano
[edit] Hello, Canekangaroo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Museo Africano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Museo Africano
[edit]
Hello, Canekangaroo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Museo Africano".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm Binksternet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Chimney Beach seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Museo Africano
[edit]Hello, Canekangaroo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Museo Africano".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Russian Fort Elizabeth. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rajballabh
[edit] Hello, Canekangaroo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajballabh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as The Burn (Natchez, Mississippi). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rajballabh
[edit]Hello, Canekangaroo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajballabh".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rajballabh
[edit]Hello, Canekangaroo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajballabh".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberty Hall (Oakland, California), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lodge. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hearst Gymnasium for Women, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Garlands and Florentine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Hearst Gymnasium for Women. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Lincoln Theater (Los Angeles). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)