User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Callmemirela. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Spinningspark
Callmemirela, why did you revert an edit by another user on my talk page? If you had a good reason for doing this, you should have explained in the edit summary. If it was a mistake, perhaps you would like to self-revert. SpinningSpark 09:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Spinningspark: Hello. I reverted because the message was rather random and the user had been leaving vandalism-like messages on other talk pages. If you want it to be restored, you can revert me. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 15:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what point the user is making, and it might possibly be off-topic chat, but it does vaguely relate to articles I have recently been editing or reviewing. I'm usually grateful to those who patrol my talk page and fix vandalism, but even if this post were off-topic, I don't see that it rises to being vandalism. Also, looking at their other posts, I don't think editors have been selected at random. I'm quite capable of deciding what posts to remove as off-topic myself and would rather things like this are just quietly ignored. If you really thought this was vandalism, you should have marked the edit summary as such and warned the user. Deleting their posts without explanation is confusing to me and off-putting to a new user. SpinningSpark 16:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Spinningspark: As I have said, you may revert me if you want. It is your talk page. I apologize for any confusion I may have caused. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 16:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what point the user is making, and it might possibly be off-topic chat, but it does vaguely relate to articles I have recently been editing or reviewing. I'm usually grateful to those who patrol my talk page and fix vandalism, but even if this post were off-topic, I don't see that it rises to being vandalism. Also, looking at their other posts, I don't think editors have been selected at random. I'm quite capable of deciding what posts to remove as off-topic myself and would rather things like this are just quietly ignored. If you really thought this was vandalism, you should have marked the edit summary as such and warned the user. Deleting their posts without explanation is confusing to me and off-putting to a new user. SpinningSpark 16:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "like" in titles, a question in which you previously participated at "Love Me like You Do". Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 04:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- @LlywelynII: Thank you for informing me. I will comment as soon as I can. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 07:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ApprenticeFan work 02:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- @ApprenticeFan: Just a little notice: this message was unnecessary. I have the article on my watchlist and I would had known that you answered. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 03:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Dirty Grandpa box office
I haven't edited the Dirty Grandpa page since the first warning. I saw it edited with the foreign page too but didn't change it or alter it since. I have better things to do than math on a box office page haha... TropicAces (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)tropicAces
- @Callmemirela: This diff says otherwise. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 17:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- yeah, my bad, I went back and checked and remembered I did do the overall figures. That's on me. Like I (edited) said, I won't touch it again. TropicAces (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)tropicAces
Happy New Year, Callmemirela!
Callmemirela,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~~--Tenebrae (talk)
WikiCup 2015 March newsletter
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.
Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by MPJ-DK (submissions), Hurricanehink (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), and Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)
Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for helping with Loudon Park Cemetery today. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Say exactly where is the literal copy of the text that you say there according to copyright?
Because if it says here, specify in which paragraph it was copied?
As because the text it was copied with my arguments and not on that page. --186.84.46.227 (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Please keep in mind that not all copyright text come from the source they indicate. Now, for the copyright, please refer yourself to the table below:
Your edit | Intimidated by the dark secrets of attractive, tormented young entrepreneur Christian Grey, Anastasia Steele decides to break with him and embark on his career after being hired in an editorial in Seattle. But desire for Christian still dominates each of their thoughts, and when he finally proposes to resume his adventure with new parameters for the two, Ana can not resist. then resume their torrid and sensual relationship, but while Christian fighting his own demons of his past and realizes that it is truly in love with Anastasia, Ana must confront the anger and envy of women that preceded it without giving him time even to assimilate everything that happens and make the most important decision of his life and the changes involved, their commitment to Christian Grey. |
Source #1 | When unworldly student Anastasia Steele first encountered the driven and dazzling young entrepreneur Christian Grey it sparked a sensual affair that changed both of their lives irrevocably. Shocked, intrigued, and, ultimately, repelled by Christian’s singular erotic tastes, Ana demands a deeper commitment. Determined to keep her, Christian agrees.Now, Ana and Christian have it all—love, passion, intimacy, wealth, and a world of possibilities for their future. But Ana knows that loving her Fifty Shades will not be easy, and that being together will pose challenges that neither of them would anticipate. Ana must somehow learn to share Christian’s opulent lifestyle without sacrificing her own identity. And Christian must overcome his compulsion to control as he wrestles with the demons of a tormented past.Just when it seems that their strength together will eclipse any obstacle, misfortune, malice, and fate conspire to make Ana’s deepest fears turn to reality. |
Source #2 | Daunted by the singular tastes and dark secrets of the beautiful, tormented young entrepreneur Christian Grey, Anastasia Steele has broken off their relationship to start a new career with a Seattle publishing house.But desire for Christian still dominates her every waking thought, and when he proposes a new arrangement, Anastasia cannot resist. They rekindle their searing sensual affair, and Anastasia learns more about the harrowing past of her damaged, driven and demanding Fifty Shades. |
Source #3 | Daunted by the singular tastes and dark secrets of the handsome, tormented young entrepreneur Christian Grey, Anastasia Steele has broken off their relationship to start a new career with a Seattle Independent Publishing House (SIP); but desire for Christian still dominates her every waking thought, and when he proposes a new arrangement, Anastasia cannot resist. They rekindle their searing sexual affair, and Anastasia learns more about the harrowing past of her damaged, driven and demanding Fifty Shades.While Christian wrestles with his inner demons, Anastasia must confront the anger and envy of the women who came before her, and make the most important decision of her life. |
- The use of the words are too similar. It's easy to copy-paste your edit into Google's search bar and see the similarity it shows.I hope this clears everything. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 00:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the note
Thank you for the note. Just to be clear, I wasn't canvassing. I am asking for help at me articles being repeatedly targeted by one user. New to this world. AM (talk) 04:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ashleymillermu: Yes, you were canvassing. Please read WP:CANVASS. It consists of inviting/informing users of discussions in a biased way, like you did on talk pages. That is canvassing and such actions are condemned on Wikipedia. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 10:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
What TVCAST says
Hi Mirela, MOS:TVCAST says to not give episode counts. It does not say not to give which episode(s) an actor appears in. If an actor only appears in a few episodes (1–3), it is helpful (and permissible) to give which ones they are. There was a discussion about whether or not to include them, but no consensus was found against it. Thanks. —Musdan77 (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Michael Palardy
Hi. Thanks for patrolling new pages, and essential and under-appreciated task, but your tags on Michael Palardy were not right:
- WP:CSD#A1 is for articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article, but the subject was clear - this guy Palardy. You could make a case for WP:CSD#A3 no content since there is only the infobox, but there is enough in it to show that this is a potential article.
- WP:CSD#A7 - playing for the Carolina Panthers is a claim of significance, in fact it is enough for notability under WP:NGRIDIRON.
This may seem like nitpicking, but it's important to choose the right tags, so that the newbie author understands how to do better next time. The best thing to do here was probably {{subst:Prod blp}}, giving the author a week to add a reference and, hopefully, some content. What I have done is, move it to Draft:Michael Palardy and tell the author what it needs.
Keep up the good work! There is good advice for speedy taggers at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: Oki doki. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 May newsletter
Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.
Round 2 saw three FAs (two by Cas Liber (submissions) and one by Montanabw (submissions)), four Featured Lists (with three by Calvin999 (submissions)), and 53 Good Articles (six by Worm That Turned (submissions) and five each by Hurricanehink (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), and MPJ-DK (submissions)). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by Adam Cuerden (submissions) and five by Godot13 (submissions)). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) scored 265 base points, while The C of E (submissions) and MPJ-DK (submissions) each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with MPJ-DK (submissions) completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Cas Liber (submissions), broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Shailene woodley and jessica luca's races
Could you add both Shailene and Jessica's race on both of their articles and add each of the source from ethniccelebs.com. I'm not familiar to everything on wikipedia. It's always important to know or add someone's race, if you can. Oh and by the way, could you fix the timeline table on the article for the haves and the have nots tv show, you know the table that shows which season a character was main, which season they appeared in, etc. Thanks! Zhyboo (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Zhyboo: Ethnicelebs is an unreliable source and will therefore not be used. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 12:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Actually it is realiable, in certain occasions. Most of the stuff on the site is. Zhyboo (talk) 00:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Zhyboo: No, it is not. The site even claims itself to be false and fake. Please see the discussion I opened on a noticebaord. Your understanding of reliable sources is very misleading. Please see WP:RELIABLE. Secondly, just because you believe it is reliable does not mean it actually is. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 00:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Well find some reliable source!!!! And why does ethniccelebs claim their stuff to be false? Zhyboo (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Zhyboo: I don't know. That's not my problem. Secondly, adding this content is not my job. Per WP:BURDEN, you are responsible of finding reliable sources yourself, not me. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Though some of their stuff is false, some of its true
On ethniccelebs, they said actor Jacob artist had an African-American father and polish mother, turns out on another website, it's true. He has a Black dad and polish mom. And Shailene is mixed with black and creole and jessica luca's stated she really did have a Black dad and white mom, and ethniccelebs said not EVERYTHING may be accurate, but some of it is, so don't start an argument with me and just add the source back, it's realiable because both stated their races, and jessica said it herself, it's either you or someone else, because I've never learned how to add source, I'm new to certain things! Zhyboo (talk) 01:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Zhyboo: I have said before, and you refuse to listen, EthniCelebs is unreliable. Period. If you have any concerns over this, please take it to a noticeboard. I am not going to add to the source. It's not my responsibility. "So don't start an argument with me"? Really? That comment was really unnecessary. You are not the king/queen of Wikipedia, so please don't give me the impression of such. Plus, don't tell me what to do. Either you add yourself or not at all, I am not doing it. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
You were the one acting like the queen of Wikipedia when I went to ashley, asking her to add source. Like I said, some of the stuff is factual, on the website, some of it isn't. So I guess the fact that not everything on ethniccelebs is factual, that's what makes it unreliable. 😐 Zhyboo (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Zhyboo: May I ask exactly how I was acting as the Queen of Wikipedia? After being told that EthniCelebs is unreliable, you went on to post on somebody else's talk page asking same thing you did to me, which constitutes of bordering of violating WP:CANVASS. I am just abiding by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. EthniCelebs is unreliable and that's final. Until you find a reliable source, the content will not be added. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm pushing your buttons, really???
By the way I'm a guy and to the fact that you're a female, I'm not trying to upset you or push your buttons. Anyway, I'm not trying to push your buttons, in general, i keep asking you how is it unreliable when some of the information is true in the site. I just wanted a simple answer, that's all, and I won't mention it again. Zhyboo (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)