User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Callmemirela. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Montreal Canadiens season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrei Markov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
11:12:53, 8 September 2015 review of submission by Muzzawb
Hi there
thanks so much for taking the time to review my submission. this is my first 'create page' and I would value your input. I have read the wikipedia policy on original research and need some help in where i need to improve the sources. All of my sources are primary sources - either printed books and journals from libraries and universities, or from contemporary newspapers or local government publications, and i have listed these in the references.
Could 'original research' be referring to information that I sourced from contemporary newspaper reports online? This information was not directly referred to in the books and journals i mentioned above. It was information I located. I was trying to be careful in not creating new information, synthesising published material and only using information that directly supported the submission. I would really appreciate your feedback on where I may have gone wrong here.
I'm very happy to do the necessary edits/improvements - could you provide me with some examples in my submission so I know where I need to make the edits and I can then apply to rest of submission.
Thanks again for your time.
Muzzawb (murray)
Muzzawb (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Austin P. McKenzie, American actor
Hi @Callmemirela: ! I just took at look at Austin McKenzie's article Draft:Austin_McKenzie_(actor) and took the liberty of "fixing" it in general. I made sure all references were from news outlets and removed all references to sites such as IMDB. I was also able to validate that he did his broadway debut recently. Could you help provide me with some additional guidance to understand what kind of additional information would be needed to get this article approved?
Also, thanks for the article on the Fosters :)
neokbron (talk) 03:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
21:43:05, 17 September 2015 review of submission by Gitlocker
Dear Mirela, You rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Persian_Chess for too much primary references. This variant is mentioned in the encyclopedia of chess variant. This source is sufficient for a chess variant to be notable. Encyclopedia of chess variants is an independent source and is NOT a "primary source" for Persian Chess. There are many chess variant in the Wikipedia that are referring to this encyclopedia as the one and only reference, please have a look at the chess variants page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_variants The majority of these variants are less notable, less played and less recognized in comparison with Persian Chess. Unfortunately your reason for rejecting this page doesn't seem to be valid. Thanks for your time, but there is nothing more I can do. Gitlocker
Gitlocker (talk) 21:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Review of submission: Draft:Twist with the Ventures
You rejected my article: Draft:Twist with the Ventures for "Previous issues not addressed.". Since this is my first article, I need to learn more about your reasoning. First, when originally submitted, I had only one reference. The original reviewer "Primefac" cited the lack of "reliable references", indicating that the one I used was The Ventures own website; and that references needed to be independent. I added many others and two of them were eliminated because I could not use Wikipedia pages as references. I understand all of this now, but that still left five other references; so in my opinion, I had addressed previous issues. What else can I do to improve this article, specifically regarding the "Previous issues not addressed". Thank you in advance for any advice or guidance that you can provide. Frankzappatwin (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Fifty Shades, Controversies, Reversion
Again with the reverting edit. I've brought it up on the talk page, if you'd like to discuss it, it's there. I don't know why, last time, you said that you didn't know what I was talking about, it has clearly marked it as having been reverted by you. I'm more than happy to discuss it on the "Talk" page, so it's there to be discussed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savcam500 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Passengers (2016 film)
Hello Mirela! Thanks for informing me about the filming, which just started. It's good to see you from Canada, because I really wanted to go there for study, but my application for study permit just got rejected from the Embassy 3 days ago. I hope you're doing well, and how's the Jane the Virgin? I mean, I've not seen a single episode yet, is it watchable/good? --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 16:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Captain Assassin!: No problem. I admire Jennifer Lawrence, as per my infobox, so I stay in touch in what she does here and there. I am so sorry you were rejected. What were you going to study in? And where? I plan on applying to McGill for Nursing. I do watch Jane the Virgin. I personally love it. It's very comical and it contains the elements of surprise from every direction. I did not see the season finale coming in any way. I was expecting for Jane to just give birth and that would be it. I was so wrong. I recommend it. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 23:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I like Lawrence as well. I was planning to study Digital Film & Video at the Art Institute of Vancouver, but unfortunately it would be a dream now. I will apply again after two years for Canada or States. Hmm, I'm going to start watching the series soon. Thanks for your cooperation. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 01:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
How do I fix the issue you turned my article down for?
Hi, Mirela!
On September 17 you declined my submission located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kamala_Devi_McClure.
I'm a newbie at this, so please forgive me for probably overlooking the obvious! Your reason was "Previous issues not addressed." And yet there was only one issue the first time, and that was an excessive amount of sources. I had about 72 citations, and was worried that there were too many; so I reduced it to 15 and deleted some material.
I was under the impression that documentation is important. So I do have have external and internal (Wikipedia) links for those who seek additional facts.
Kamala Devi is very important in her field of expertise, and I'm totally frustrated that I can't seem to finalize a submission!!!! I've read the rules and have tried to follow them. But clearly I'm missing something.
Would you explain to me what I'm doing wrong so I can correct it? I'd really love to have this article published on Wikipedia. :-)
Thanks, Mary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mvanmeer23 Mvanmeer23 (talk) 20:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
How do I fix the issue you turned my article down for?
Hi, Mirela!
On September 17 you declined my submission located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kamala_Devi_McClure.
I'm a newbie at this, so please forgive me for probably overlooking the obvious! Your reason was "Previous issues not addressed." And yet there was only one issue the first time, and that was an excessive amount of sources. I had about 72 citations, and was worried that there were too many; so I reduced it to 15 and deleted some material.
I was under the impression that documentation is important. So I do have have external and internal (Wikipedia) links for those who seek additional facts.
Kamala Devi is very important in her field of expertise, and I'm totally frustrated that I can't seem to finalize a submission!!!! I've read the rules and have tried to follow them. But clearly I'm missing something.
Would you explain to me what I'm doing wrong so I can correct it? I'd really love to have this article published on Wikipedia. :-)
Thanks, Mary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mvanmeer23 Mvanmeer23 (talk) 20:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
About List of Programms Broadcast By Hungama Tv
Why List of programms broadcast by Hungama Tv Page Gonna Delete? Atrebute PokeFan (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Atrebute PokeFan: It's written in the box at the top of the page. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hungama TV
Please Don't Delete any information this is are real. Aman33445 (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Aman33445: Stop it. This is enough. First of all, you don't own page, so everyone is free to remove any content. Second off al, most of the conten you add is unsourced which is a big no-no. You want advice? Here it is: stop adding unsourced content and stop asking people to remove information. It's not your decision; it's the community's. I'm done with you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 12:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
DC Comics on TV
Can you help me find any reliable sources for this page Draft:DC Comics on TV, please? Fusionem (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising and Selena Gomez
There seems to be a lot of info about her being in this film including a reference just after the film name in the intro, her mention as starring in the lead and referenced mention in the production section. Given your edit summary "Rv, no mention of her being given a role or just a cameo appearance; all we know is she just filmed.
" you may wish to make the rest of the article consistent. I'm not generally following this article, I was just cleaning up after an IP vandal when I came across it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: Oh, I understand. I thought you were apart of the article. All we've known so far is that Selena Gomez has filmed for the film. That's it. Is it a main role? A cameo? A minimal role? We don't know. That's why adding her is rather unsourced. She should only be added until she is confirmed a role of any kind in the movie. I hope that makes it clearly? I am open to suggestions. I will clean the article in regards to this. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 1 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the The Infiltrator (2016 film) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Reversion of my edit
Why you have reverted my edit on list of programs broadcast by cartoon network India page? What is wrong with my edit? Utkarshshah6 (talk) 02:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Utkarshshah6: I made a mistake once I read the source. I apologize. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 02:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Request on 08:54:04, 29 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by NutsAboutTravel
Hi,
Thanks for taking time to review, could you please be a little more specific in highlighting offending sales type text. For me it doesn't read as a sales message so I am blind. A few pointers will go a long way in helping me resolve these issues.
Thanks
NutsAboutTravel (talk) 08:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Notability Issues
Hi there,
This is the 3rd time this page has been turned down for notability issues. Can you suggest improvements to the page and sources? The section for notable achievements indicates honors and recognition for the organization's economic impact to Alberta and Canada.
I have replaced internal with external and the external sources are from published media.
Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TECTERRA
Shane Harper page
How is Bridgit Mendler confirming it HERSELF on VIDEO PROOF for an interview not a valid source? Also, I have 4+ reliable articles that have CONFIRMED the split. Please, change it. The Bridgit Mendler page has been already updated by the community. Please make a change to the Shane Harper page, the split is confirmed. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.110.151 (talk)
- No, I will not change it. That is not my job. Your job is to find a reliable source. J-14 is a gossip website. WP:GOSSIP. Find a real article, such as People, Daily Mail, etc. Not YouTube as well. What you consider a reliable source is the opposite. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 12:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015: The results
.svg)
WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.
This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is 
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. 
Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.
Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to 
Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.
A full list of our award winners are:
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
Cas Liber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
West Virginian (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
Calvin999 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
Rationalobserver (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
Harrias (submissions) wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.- Rodw (submissions) wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.
We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup Award
November 2015
@Callmemirela: Hello, Callmemirela! It is nice to meet you. Your help in improving the page for Criminal Minds (season 11), specifically the episode section, is much appreciated!I'm glad you kept me on my toes about putting the episode summary in my own words, so as not to violate any copyright laws; for that I'm quite grateful to you. Criminal Minds is, by far, my favorite show and I love to help keep fellow fans informed.
However, in my entire time editing Criminal Minds pages - which has been a little while; while I am fairly new to Wikipedia, this account was created with the (2) at the end because my previous account of the same name was inaccessible because I forgot my password lol - I have not once, by any editor, been asked/required to provide refernces for the production codes. Title, writer, director, and air date absolutely require references! But the production code is usually confirmed in one of the references whether it be title, writer, director, air date or any combination therein, added to the fact that the air dates can help determine the order in which the episodes will air, they are almost always confirmed.
Although, I have come to understand there can be an exception in which the production codes can serve quite useful! This is when episodes air out of order, an example of which would be in Season 10, 1006, "Boxed In", was aired before 1005, "If the Shoe Fits", because "Boxed In" was the Halloween episode and it was scheduled to air on 11/05 whereas "If the Shoe Fits" was scheduled to air on 10/29; to resolve this, they merely switched their air dates, however, the production codes remained the same, therefore letting people know that they were aired out of order to accommodate Halloween. In that case, I believe it was briefly required to include references with the production codes. That, however, was the only time I've ever been required to provide a reference for a production code.
I've posted references for all of the upcoming production codes to satisfy your need for me to do so and prove to you that I would not post those codes without knowing that their validity can eventually be found through other references. In conclusion, I absolutely agree with you that I needed to avoid violating copyright by denoting the summaries in a vernacular (lexicon; vocabulary; my own words) more unique to me, basically, to make them be more so in my own words, but I don't agree that the production codes need referencing. You are the first person who has ever asked me to do so. I do want you to know, though, that I always use reliable references for my episode title, writer, director and/or air date contributions, and that I take copyright violation (avoiding it!) very seriously!
I really appreciate your willingness to help make the page as accurate as possible; that is my objective as well. I just don't think that it is necessary to reference the production codes, since all episodes have aired in order, thus far, and we (the fans) have been given no reason to believe they won't continue to do so. When it is required due to scheduling changes, I'd be happy to post it. I hope we can resolve this minor misunderstanding. Happy editing! Bef3481(2) Bef3481(2) (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Bef3481: Hello. I reverted your edits because, yes, the production codes were unsourced. Not every episode has follow-up codes. For example, Episode 1 has 1101 then episode 2 has 1102, but episode 3 has 1106 (made up, not realistic). I checked the sources you added, and they didn't include any production codes, unless of course the main source is The Futon Critic or any press release at the RTitle section. Everything in an episode has to be cited, except the summary and if RTitle is cited to give everything (date, director, writer, etc.). I work on a lot of TV show articles, and I know this from experience. I hope this clarifies what I told you? Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 00:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mirela
Hi ! Whalestate (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Whalestate: Hello. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 20:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Mirela, is everything good? Whalestate (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Whalestate: Yes. How about you? Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Mirela, oh good, thanks. (thanks). gtg. Whalestate (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Whalestate: As much as I appreciate the gesture of asking about my well being, but may I ask you to stop using my talk page as a form of chatting? Talk pages aren't meant for that, mostly warnings, suggestions, questions about editing on Wikipedia, etc. Thanks. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Chicago Med and invitation on a proposal
I appreciate that you rephrased that part of the episode plot summary of Chicago Med. The reason I had been removing that part is because it had a viewers POV which is not really allowed.
Listen. You are invited to the MOS/Film discussion here, regarding about release dates in year in film articles. BattleshipMan (talk) 02:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)