User talk:Zhyboo

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Annie (2014 film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Annie (2014 film) was changed by Zhyboo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853298 on 2015-04-24T00:19:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Annie (2014 film). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not add original research, or change numbers without citing new references. Binksternet (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Replacing inappropriate level-3 warning message with level-1 informative message: Hello, I'm Alsee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alsee (talk) 02:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Keep up the helpful editing. The warnings up above are excessive.

At Wikipedia we sometimes have a bad habit of being too rough on new editors. We have a policy WP:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers, and it seems you're a bite victim. The warning templates up there were too harsh. The wiki-idea is that people can jump in and learn as you go, there's a lot to learn, and mistakes are OK because they are easy to revert.

I'm not sure exactly what triggered ClueBot (a software program) revert your Annie (2014 film) edit, but you made a LOT of changes in a single edit and the software detected that some bits were different than how we want articles to be. Cluebot isn't smart enough to fix just the "wrong pieces" and keep any good changes that you added. It just reverted the whole thing.
The blue-notice about edit warring is supposed to be important helpful rules information, but even a friendly-warning was probably a bit much when you made only a single partial revert to the Annie article, especially when you were reverting a bot, and especially when you were making a good faith effort to seek compromise. You did nothing wrong.
My main concern is that seriously should NOT have gotten that red-exclamation-point block-warning for a single edit to Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor. Red ! warnings are supposed to be for people who persistently and knowingly engage in disruptive behavior after being warned about it. It is particularly ironic that you got warned for adding unsourced information to that article when almost the entire article is unsourced. Here's the deal on that.... all information that gets added to articles is supposed to include a source to Verify that information. (Read the top section of that wp:verify link, and you can skim to any other parts that seems interesting.) Basically, if someone adds unsourced information, and everyone thinks it's probably right and valuable, sometimes we let it stay in the hopes that someone will improve the article and add the proper sources for it. But anyone may remove unsourced information at any time for any reason. Anyone could write anything into an article, the way we keep the encyclopedia reliable is by ensuring readers (and editors) can check that the information comes from a Reliable Source.

By the way, I saw your help request at Administrator's Noticeboard. The thing you asked about is already fixed, but if you need help in the future either ask on the article talk page or post "{{help me}}" (without quotes) on your own talk page along with your question. Some random volunteer will see the help request.

I'll add our standard Welcome template below. It contains a number of links that are really helpful for getting started. There's a huge amount of info behind those links, you can just skim to whatever parts look helpful to you. Alsee (talk) 02:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, per Alsee. @Zhyboo:, you've had quite a rough start here, but I think you are having quite a nice time, no? ^∞😃 Target360YT 😃^∞ (talk · contribs) 02:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Zhyboo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Alsee (talk) 02:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Boy Next Door (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Boy Next Door (film) was changed by Zhyboo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870632 on 2016-02-23T21:41:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Lucas

You may not be able to find a source for that info. If you can't, it needs to stay out of the article. This is all from WP:Biographies of living persons. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts

I have blocked your account User:Zeedavis as checkuser confirms you are using it contrary to policy. Please ensure that you are editing from a single account and use dispute resolution as opposed to edit warring.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LOVE AND HIP HOP

Wait, stop changing the supporting to recurring! Cast members are Main, Supporting and Guest. we have to keep to wiki rules. Supporting is after lead in traditional casting heirachy (above recurring) which is what suits the cast members who are nearly in every episode but not in the opening creidts. Thanks. 05:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 05:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 05:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)05:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Pinchofhope (talk) 05:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity and descent

Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS for additional information. Any such addition will be reverted until the necessary requirements for inclusion are met.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theme music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Haves & the Have Nots

Sorry, I was not able to get internet access for the entire day after making that edit. I am at my spot now so I can respond to you. As for the Maggie thing, I assume she's a goner, but I'll leave your edit in for the time being. A part of me feels she's not TRULY dead, a very SMALL part of me. As for the table, I'll go ahead and try to fix that. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. - Jabrona (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected Mitch's part on the table and listed him as "recurring" in Season 3. Oh, and if you make a mistake in anything you write to me, you don't have to point it out to me. You can just edit it and then it goes unnoticed. I wouldn't even know unless I were to check through my history, haha. ;D - Jabrona (talk) 23:31, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Single-camera setup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

empire

"Could you please add Leslie uggams who plays Leah walker to the table of cast members. She was promoted to the main cast for the third season Zhyboo (talk) 03:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

I cant i only use a phone to edit, my computers broke"

ok but i don't see any article talking about it Judor92 (talk) 22:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NeNe Leakes season 8 RHOA

Hey I noticed you have changed multiple pages regarding NeNe Leakes. Leakes returned to The Real Housewives of Atlanta season 8 as a guest star and not as friend/recurring capacity. See Bravo [1] for confirmation of the cast, only Morton and Whitfield are listed as friends. Also the press releases for the season have stated this as well. Kelege (talk) 06:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Empire (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LHH tables

Um no that not "fine"??? This isn't characters its a reality show with real people, these casts have main, supporting and guest. Its even in VH1 press releases. Three categories. NOWHERE ELSE in the entire wiki page do they use the term supporting as a "fake guest stars" or whatever you are talking about. Why are you pointlessly changing this now and especially siding with a random anonymous user who has decided to change it? I'm changing everything back. Pinchofhope (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would really prefer you stay away from the LHH pages if you keep trying to change the format every few months. We can't come to one conclusion (and have an agreement with multiple users) and then have you turn around and try and change it all over without even properly discussing it. We tried the four categories before and got in trouble with mods for "stylising" the lists so much so the main, supporting, guest is the most accurate and the most in line with Wiki rules. Like I said VH1 consider those cast members "supporting" not recurring or especially not the random guests as "supporting". I feel like I've been repeating the same thing to you for the past year, I thought you understood. Please let them be. The format is good as it is right now. Pinchofhope (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You wasnt repeating that to me, it was to ashley, i never consider guest stars as "Supporting", ashley did that. And recurring is not a fictional term by The say. Zhyboo (talk) 04:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the "way" Zhyboo (talk) 04:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boo! A Madea Halloween

Her name doesn't appear on the film's first parody poster. Going by that billing, I removed her name before I uploaded the most recent poster. HENDAWG229 (talk) 03:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Her and liza's name were both added to lastest movie poster, originally both not giving their names featured, but then were added sometime later, so now they're both also recieving star billing. But yeah i understand, i noticed that too. Zhyboo (talk) 04:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When the bough breaks

Thanks for adding a plot summary Chili z (talk) 03:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, but actually I got Target360YT to add it for us, since see both mentioned it in the talk page, I thanked him already. 😃 Zhyboo (talk) 12:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Real Housewives of Atlanta

I don't changes to the friend staus as links on housewives timeline is necessary, after the links are added the color is awful and I forget it says friend because it's really forgettable. You want people to actually notice the timeline and they you like it, it's definitely not noticeable. (75.109.249.79 (talk) 07:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC))[reply]

@75.109.249.79: In regards to "The color is awful" to be quite frank the color is washed out like the coloring of "guest" and "main" and is much more suitable. The template you're suggesting is a lot darker and looks to be the feature, when in fact, the recurring cast members aren't. The links can be removed, I don't care, but the template is a lot more appropriate. The edits you're suggesting to be quit honest seem outdated, which is confirmed when you claimed "They've been like that for years." The current way it's done is a lot easier to read, the link/text contrast works better on the current template. Kelege (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the coloring is more clearer that way. Like "main" and "guest" use a lighter shade of green and blue, we use a lighter shade of red for recurring or friend. That suits it better. Zhyboo (talk) 19:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zhyboo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Married to Medicine (season 4)

Please write a sourced page. Xx236 (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Married to Medicine (season 3)

It's not a page and it'll be removed.Xx236 (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created the page so that one of the other users could finish it off, because they need their on season articles. I agreed i would created the pages and he would finish them off. Zhyboo (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you left a message before just planning to make that decision without an explanation Zhyboo (talk) 13:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a decision, but my experience. As far only you need the season articles, but you don't write them.Xx236 (talk) 06:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Rivera.m.e may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. TJH2018 talk 22:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to create a page, I had to do that in order to leave her a message, but thank you. :) Zhyboo (talk) 22:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rivera.m.e

A tag has been placed on User:Rivera.m.e requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Edit to userpage not from user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TJH2018 talk 22:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RHO Notes

I really think it's redundant and overkill to include "notes" on each episode a housewives joins and departs. It states in the overview and casting if they join after the premiere and the season they don't return to it is also stated their departure. If a housewives leaves during filming or is removed from credits it is already stated as well. I don't think there should be notes o the episode lists of the cast-members appearances. It's all too trival and unnecessary. I'd personally suggest you undo the edits. Kelege (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just was adding notes like in the pages for love and hip hop and basketball wives. And as it was difficult trying to add the notes, it seems difficult to undo them. If its redundant could tou revert them back. At the moment I only can make mobile edits, until I'm near a working computer. Zhyboo (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LHH episode lists

I think the "(cast member) is absent for one episode" type lists are getting too much. We can't have that and then the "(cast member) does not appear" notes in the episode list, it becomes too redundant. Anyone can quickly look at the episode notes and count how many episodes the cast member has missed so it seems unnecessary. I'll try and figure out a way to include both but I think I'm going to have to remove one or the other. Pinchofhope (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor copyright problem

The material you added to the plot description was very close to that at IMDb (a copyrigh twebsite), and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't from imdb, it was revealing the plot. You're suppose to include the full plot. Zhyboo (talk) 01:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Mindy Project.

Hi there! Thanks for helping me out on the One Tree Hill page a while back. Would you be able to help me out again on The Mindy Project page? Another editor is reverting my character table I had made for the article for the reasons of "false" information being displayed. By that, he means 1) an actor appeared as a guest before being promoted to a series regular in the same season and 2) an actor was only in two episodes - apart of the main cast, nonetheless - before departing the show in one season. He states notes should be displayed for these, however, I find it redundant seeing as countless numbers of characters have done this on countless shows, so why should we add in redundant notes? I have set up a section for discussion on the talk page however, he just keeps reverting instead of discussing like he should. So would you be able to take a look and throw in your two cents when you can? Let me know :) Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I have these troubles myself Zhyboo (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LHHATL6 press release

Where is this press release? Link me, thanks Pinchofhope (talk) 04:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

also fyi I'm rewording the episode notes, using the line "After appearing as a guest star, (cast member) is upgraded to a supporting cast member" ONLY for supporting cast members in the first episode of the season, while everyone else who appears after episode one with "this episode marks the first appearance of (cast member) as a supporting cast member". The upgraded thing seems weird for Kim, Judy, Erika, Juju etc because technically their contracts were upgraded at the start of the season. Pinchofhope (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. Zhyboo (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do we get pages protected again? I'm sick of the troll on the Atlanta season 6 page, who can we get help with cause its getting out of hand now Pinchofhope (talk) 23:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, I've BEEN sick of them! Kelege did leave a link to prevent vandals on your talk page from when I mentioned them to you, maybe check with that one. Zhyboo (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm AlexTheWhovian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Alex^TW 02:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zhyboo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zhyboo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Love & Hip Hop edits

Hey can you please hold off on changing the format of the season pages? I don't understand why the episode notes need to be expanded, its getting too long and unnecessarily detailed. "Although credited, (cast member) does not appear" is perfectly fine and I don't think it should be changed. Also if we are changing the episode listings for each cast member, it should be either "6/12" or "episodes 1-2, 3-4" etc, not both, or else it will overcomplicate the page. Most season pages on Wikipedia don't even have cast lists so we need to be careful not to go too crazy with the format changes. I'm thinking of simplifying it to just "(cast member) (number of episodes)" rather than episodes 1-2, 3-4 but I want to fix the cast pages first.Pinchofhope (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's fine. Thank you Zhyboo (talk) 03:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]