Jump to content

User talk:BokicaK/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, BokicaK/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dick Clark 14:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: The Many Dream Journeys of Meme

It doesn't read very well and it is difficult to understand what the article is describing. Also, no reliable sources are reference nor are any real-world relevance and context given. While the latter two are common among other anime articles, we like to avoid repeating these mistakes with the newer articles. --Farix (Talk) 14:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Montenegro

So not even you live in Montenegro, huh. ;) I think Wikipedia is the only place with 50 Montenegrin Wikipedians (or several naughty ones and a lot of sockpuppets), among whom only one lives in Montenegro. :D --PaxEquilibrium 22:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Novi Sad

Nisam stigao ranije da ti odgovorim na poruku. Trenutno nemam vremena da prevodim te članke na engleski, ali ako nađem vremena videću da li mogu nešto prevesti. PANONIAN (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Mapa CG

"Možeš li da nacrtaš novu mapu podele Crne Gore po nahijama"

Pa sad, sa tehničke strane gledano mogu, ali mislim da trenutno nemam dovoljno slobodnog vremena da to uradim jer treba malo više rada na toj mapi. Ako nađem vremena nacrtaću tu mapu, ali ništa ne obećavam. PANONIAN 12:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Tenis

Pa rado bi se prihvatio tog posla, ali ja nemam vremena da se obavezujem na nista po netu. I ovo što uradim je random. Ja sam inače jako loš u organizaciji vremena, pa sam pogub skoro uvek. Mada mogu doći na portal, stavio sam ga u bookmark, da nešto napišem, ubacim i sl... ali ne mogu da obećam neku stalnu aktivnost na portalu :) --Göran Smith 19:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for BokicaK: 17% for major edits and 14% for minor edits. Based on the last 115 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Kosovo

Hello. There's a discussion and vote going on at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology as to whether or not it's better to use Kosovo rather than Kosovan or Kosovar in the Wikipedia articles. You've contributed to Balkans articles in the past and I thought you might have an interest. Cheers. 16:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, BokicaK! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.


--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

slike

Imam problema sa obradom one .svg mape. U ilustratoru su se skroz promenile boje i zadebljale granice iako nista nisam dirao. Svejedno sam postavio taj fajl gde je Kirgistan protiv.

I ovde treba da se postavi slika odozgo 2008_unrest_in_Serbia sa skupa gde se vidi koliko je ljudi bilo ali ja nemam moju a sve novinske su isuvise male da bih nalepio tag da sam ih ja slikao (sto sam primetio da neki rade). Ako uspes da nadjes molim te postavi --Avala (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


Tuđman request move

Hi

Can you help me with this discussion? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Franjo_Tu%C4%91man#Discussion

--Anto (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


Diacritics-arbitration

Hi

I intend to send this argument about spelling the south Slavic names (Franjo Tuđman ,Novak Đoković etc. ) here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration

It seemss it's the only solution! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aradic-en (talk • contribs) 21:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tuzla_column.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tuzla_column.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


Miljevci Plateau

The guy was a Serb paramilitary(Chetnik).it should be mentioned.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


It should be mentioned because Chetnik paramilitaries were responsible for almost every crime in the Balkans. In ww2 there was a difference in killing of a Wehrmacht soldier and a SS troop.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Because he was a paramilitary who was caught during the Free Miljevci Operation.Because in the nearby area serb paramilitaries were responsible for the Lovas massacre and the Skabrnja massacre.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Why do you assume that?I never said it was OK.But in WW2 numerous SS troops were executed who weren't directly involved in crimes. And it is always stated wether the person was a Wehrmacht soldier or a SS troop.

Personaly i think that killing of SS bastards was OK.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


That was in reaction when arguing with some serb ultrannationalists on Srebrenica Genocide article.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tuzla_column.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tuzla_column.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 06:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Imena tenisera

Ima li šanse da se nešto pokrene? Već su mi se javili ljudi koji su zainteresovani za promenom. Slabo poznajem ovdašnju situaciju po pitanju pokretanja glasanja. --Pockey (talk) 13:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

On green lights

Saw your comment at Pokrajac's talk page. All I did was revert bad moves - the names were correct, they'd been there for over 2 years without a single complaint on their talk pages, and there hadn't been sufficient discussion. While I will strongly advocate keeping diacritics as an editor, I'm not in charge of anything here, just another admin, and my action shouldn't be seen as a green light for any other (unless it's in fact a continuation of the same action, i.e. resetting back any I somehow missed). Anything else requires consensus and I wouldn't suggest using the current debate as a means to achieve any other renames which may be controversial. Indeed, it was the precise non-controversiality of these ones that allowed me to act. Orderinchaos 13:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm in full agreement with you. My own position is pretty much what is contained in the proposal at User:Iricigor/UE. I was just urging caution with regard to seeing my corrective action as a green light for anything. Orderinchaos 16:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

hu:Magyar–török háború (1521–26)

Szervusz! Ezt a cikket készülök a magyar wikipédián kiemelté tenni. Ehhez kapcsolódóan van sok csata ami a mostani Szerbia és Horvátország területén zajlott. Próbáltam kapcsolatba lépni a délszláv wikiken szerkesztőkkel, hátha tudnak forrásokat keresni és nekem közölni, de nem kaptam segítséget. Te tudnál segíteni? Doncsecz (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Was bewilder the category, that Hungarian Wikipedians. Awfully sorry! Doncsecz (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposal to amend WP:UE

I just made a draft of a proposal to amend WP:UE to avoid "reliable source" misuse. Take a look and tell me what do you think. Admiral Norton (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Bombing of Belgrade in World War II

Can you give a rationale for the split that you proposed for Bombing of Belgrade in World War II. Reply at Talk:Bombing of Belgrade in World War II. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Stole Aranđelović

Hi. Thanks for helping with the correct name of this actor and adding to his filmography. I see you come from Yugoslavia and work on the Serbian wiki. Is it correct to categorize this actor as a Serbian actor (instead of a Yugoslavian actor)? Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Lugnuts (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Albert_dock_at_night.jpg (see my question on the Help desk

You uploaded this image last summer, but it appears to be a copy from an earlier image uploaded in April. Did you migrate this to the Commons and forget to change the authors name in the template? -Mgm|(talk) 12:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Montenegro

Out of the blue, I'd say 1296 - Mulutin's edict to the Saint Vranjina monastery (Lake Skadar).

However, the online mixup (if your result is googling) might be the old website of the Montenegrin government ( http://www.montenegro.yu/podaci/geografija.htm ). And thus, loads of others called upon this and took it over. Remember also, that Milutin was an Uros as well - this might be significant to the problematic.

I promise I'll respond to you tonight, I shall contact my sources and try to get a hold of some big and old books by then.

As for the latter, yeah, I have most of them. Why? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't see anything POV, but to tell the full truth, I haven't seen much of the article myself really (didn't have the time for it).
However, I do think that the article should really use 3-4 more references (for the long historical part), to be a featured article. I, perhaps, might be able to help you with that, also... --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I couldn't agree more, but Wikipedia is such - it requires that such a long section should have a corresponding number of references at least. Search for the things that are not a part of common knowledge about Montenegro (for anyone who possesses decent knowlege).
Oh, and I did that which you asked me back then, in case you missed. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 10:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Pomoć!

Molim te, obrati pažnju na par članaka takođe!

To su:

Ulpiana, Pančić's Peak‎, Šarplaninac‎, Đeravica‎, Šar Mountains‎, i naravno manastiri... Šarplaninac pogotovu, ubacuje neki citat koji nije uopšte relevantan za ovaj članak, ne zna se šta navodi...

Ne znam kome još da se obratim, ali vidi, zamolio bih za watch, imam užasnih problema sa tim jednim idiotom, baš neću da mu popustim! User:Illyriandescendant... Hvala puno, unapred!!

Tadija (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

pomoć

Bojane, molim te reci neku lepu reč za ovu promenu...

Talk:Tromegja,_peak

Hvala, pozz, Tadija (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stjepan Filipović

Rado bih pomogao jer sam čuo za Filipovića (iako moja generacija to više nije učila u školi), no izgleda da se taj IP neće smiriti dok mu ne nađemo neke izvore o Filipoviću. S time ustvari imam problema. Admiral Norton (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

To je bar lako: ako započne edit war, revertati ćemo ga pa prijaviti na WP:ANI/3RR. Admiral Norton (talk) 17:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Re

pa ne vraćam se uređivanju članaka, jer mi je dosta da se raspravljam sa svakakvim budalama, ali pošto vidim da moje mape ni posle 2 godine niko nije dirao, onda se svakako vraćam crtanju mapa. a kakve mape misliš da treba nacrtati? PANONIAN 09:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

nisu u pitanju samo rasprave, jer pre nego sto sam otišao sa Vikipedije nekoliko hrvatskih i mađarskih korisnika su se udružili protiv mene (čak sam video da pričaju o tom udruživanju u privatnim razgovorima), pa su počeli da me progone, da prate moje izmene i onda da menjaju sve što ja promenim, a na kraju su pravili i lažne korisničke naloge sa kojima su sami sebe vređali i onda optuživali mene administratorima da su to moji lažni nalozi i da ih to ja vređam i da me treba zbog toga blokirati - sa tako bolesnim ljudima je stvarno nemoguće ovde raditi, pogotovo zato što ne postoji sistem da se takvom ponašanju stane na put i to je velika mana ovog projekta. što se tiče mapa, trenutno planiram da nacrtam mape svih opština vojvodine, zatim da popravim neke moje ranije mape sa čijim kvalitetom nisam skroz zadovoljan, a onda ćemo videti šta ću raditi dalje. inače, u Beočinu sam bio nedavno poslom, da sam znao da ti trebaju slike, slikao bih, ali sada ne znam kada ću opet ići tamo. pozdrav. PANONIAN 22:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
iskreno, nemam sad ni toliko vremena za rad na Vikipediji kao ranije, jer sada imam mnogo više obaveza u životu. ako stignem možda nešto novo i napišem (evo danas sam sredio članak o Novom Naselju na sr Vikipediji jer je bio stvarno kratak). Inače, ako baš hoćeš da središ članke o Novom Sadu na sr Vikipediji, imaš na en Vikipediji materijala o tome koji možeš da prevedeš (na primer u člancima o delovima grada). i da pitam i ja tebe nešto: jel znaš možda gde mogu naći mapu granica srezova u Vojvodini 1931 godine? PANONIAN 20:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Re

I can make such maps, of course, but since I am bussy with other things right now, you will have to wait a while until I find time for that. PANONIAN 20:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: NS

Bulevar Cara Lazara, slikano je sa Limenske strane, a zgrade su Grbavica :) Zar nisi ti iz NSa :P --Göran S (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

tj, zeznuo sam se, hehe. :) To ti je raskrsnica Bulevara Jase Tomica i Rumenacke, znaci Detelinara je to. Mada nemoj tu sliku koristiti, posto te kuce sa leve strane vise nema, a i to gradiliste sa desne strane ne postoji, posto je zgrada je vec izgradjena. Slikacemo ponovo, ako treba. :) --Göran S (talk) 13:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

wikipedia.org in English

Hallo,BokicaK

may I remind you,that you are at wikipedia.org,the English page. So any contributions should be written in English, in respect to English speaking readers all over the world. Thank you for cooperation.--Speidelj (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Whatever... -- Bojan  20:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Najljepša hvala!--Speidelj (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Podgorica

Well, I could add some information on the Medieval Age & fix it up.

As for that, if I see, that has already been solved over at the Serbian Wikipedia (J. Erdeljanovic). --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Izgubišmo...

E, jeb'ga.. --94.250.46.190 (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello BokicaK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 316 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Božidar Delić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Vujosevic

I added Montenegrin-Serbian. I hope that is good to stop this war? Rave92(talk) 18:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Cultural Property of Great Importance

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Cultural Property of Great Importance articles or that you are in some way connected to Serbia and Cultural Heritage. I thought you may be interested in joining
WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Serbian Cultural Property of Great Importance. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You. Tadijaspeaks 19:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for joining! See Project main page for more information, or ask me! All best!

Cultural PropertyThis user participates in
WikiProject
Cultural Heritage of Serbia.

You may use it on your page, or just leave it here! :) --Tadijaspeaks 19:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 22:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Zdravo Bane

Vidim da je započeto glasanje na Wikipediji da korisnik Željko T. postane admin. Molim te izjasni se. A, onda da li mi možeš pomoći da članak IMH Belgrade unapredim, i posle stavim na glasanje za dobar ili sjajan. Imam i problem oko članka Psihijatrija danas, molim te pomozi mi. Pozdrav --Aleksa Lukic (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nenad Manojlović

The article Nenad Manojlović has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PoeticVerse (talk) 04:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

o

hello my brother, kako je Filip Pejković --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I predict you will soon banned here. Enjoy while you can. -- Bojan  Talk  03:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

koliko mi traje blok na srb. wiki --Стефан Немањић (talk) 10:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Are you here administrator --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Da li je aktivan Rastko Pocesta --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
neka, neću ja da se svađam sa njim, želeo bih samo malo da porazgovaramo. pošto sam blokiran na srp. viki, malo sam je prelistao, i video sam da je pisao članak o sebi. a reci mi da li se aktivirao skoro --Стефан Немањић (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC).
samo da ti kažem, na srpskoj vikipediji mi je obrisan članak Oštrivojevići, ar razlog je besmislice. Oštrivojevići jesu bili srpska dinastija, pogledaj www.youtube.com/JovanDeretić i poslušaj Deretića da vidiš šta će da ti kaže --Ћофи (talk) 17:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I trebalo je obrisu clanak. Dosadjivanje sa Dereticem je prelilo casu, zbog toga si/ćeš biti blokiran. -- Bojan  Talk  17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

da li bi mogao da me oslobodiš blokade jedno vreme, da pitam nešto jednog korisnika, a ako nećeš, odna bih te molio da mu ti ostaviš poruku korisnik je Nikolaslivka, a vezano je za deretića --Ћофи (talk) 14:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

May Overthrow

I like the aftermath section you added to the article. It looks much better now. I rated it C-class. With more work, it could be easily rated B-class.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you so much for the barnstar, I really appreciate it!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Black Hand

I have posted the question of Black Hand's formation date over at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. Hopefully someone will provide an accurate answer. If it was indeed formed in 1911 as Wikipedia's article says, we'll have to change the wording on the May Overthrow as well as releated articles.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

hitno

molio bih te da pitaš korisnika Nikolaslivka, na srb. wiki. ,da li može da pita Deretića ko su Amerikanci, i da mu kažeš da Filip Pejković pita. Molio bih te, hitno --Ћофи (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

ja bih pitao bih ja sam, ali sam blokiran --Ћофи (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)--Ћофи (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
onda mi skini blok na srp. wiki. ja cu sam da ga pitam, pa me blokirajte opet --Ћофи (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
ma neću da uređujem članke, pišem knjigu, samo me odblokirajte da mogu da kažem nešto Nikolaslivka --Ћофи (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

nisi fer. Pišem knjigu, radim kao koautor na knjizi, i sad zbog tebe ne bi mogao da kontaktiram Deretića. Srećom snašao sam se. tebi hvala ni na čemu. samo reci Pocesti, ako se skoro aktivira, da hoću da razgovaram sa njum. hvala ti puno --Filip Srbin (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Jebote Rastko Pocesta vise. Mogu da mislim na sta lice te vase knjige. -- Bojan  Talk  08:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Alo

zbog ove psovke, biću prinuđen da te prijavim administratoru jer se osećam ugroženo. Mi bar nešto i radimo, a živo me interesuje žta će od tebe da bude --Filip Srbin (talk) 10:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad that You reported me. I somehow believe You would be blocked eternally. -- Bojan  Talk  10:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
ovo ti neće tek tako proći. već sam se žalio na tebe na srp. viki. očekuj oduzimanje administraorskih prava. hteo sam da te pitam, pre nego što si me blokirao, i time zloupotrebio administraotrsko pravo, da se angažujemo na nekom zajedničkom prjektu, ali avaj, budali ne vredi objašnjavati --Filip Srbin (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I'll repeat: I'm glad you reported me, now everybody will pay attention on you. You would be banned here, too. -- Bojan  Talk  11:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Pitanje

da li je Rastko Pocesta, isti kao i korisnik Don Rastko Pocesta --95.180.20.197 (talk) 18:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

svojim potezom na srp. wiki. si još jednom dokazao da zloupotrebljavaš funkciju --Filip Srbin (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

M'rš. -- Bojan  Talk  15:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

aj me odblokiraj da pitam nešto Nikolu Šljivića --Filip Srbin (talk) 10:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Vote

You should explain your vote in few sentences, as per propositions of the vote. Only votes will be no useful. --Tadijaspeaks 13:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Montenegro national basketball team edit war.

I highly suggest you get the guy blocked for using so many sock-puppets - the joy of using dynamic IP addresses. *snicker* Judging from the IPs' contributions, it seems to me that the IPs belong to none other than Rave92. Perhaps take it up to the Administrators' noticeboard? Cheers! --Kilibarda (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:AIV.

Hey, I blocked the three IP addresses you listed for 48 hours each; I'll have to trust you that they were actually vandalizing since I've no clue as to the topic, so I thought I'd warn you that this one still has unreverted edits. By the way, just as a note for the future, if you could report the IPs using three different requests, that'd be a bit easier for us admins (and I imagine the bot might run into a problem if we don't block all of them or something, not sure). Cheers, · Andonic Contact 08:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, in most cases flags do denote citizenship. · Andonic Contact 08:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
He seems to be skipping around articles, so I semi-protected for three days; in this case shorter protections to the articles he attacks are probably preferable to long protections, since he'll probably not be in short supply of targets and we don't want half the Balkan sports articles on wikipedia protected for a month if we can avoid it. · Andonic Contact 14:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Ah okay, didn't know that was the case; I've added the three pages to my watchlist for now. I don't know how flagged revisions work either, I just came back after a two year retirement. >.< · Andonic Contact 14:58, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Added as well. · Andonic Contact 16:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Want me to protect again? · Andonic Contact 20:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Alright, I'll give you a couple of months on each article then. Might as well. · Andonic Contact 23:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Did I miss any? Montenegro national basketball team, PBC CSKA Moscow, Template:PBC CSKA Moscow, Template:Montenegrin National Basketball Team roster. · Andonic Contact 23:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

File move to commons

Can you move this file to Wikimedia Commons using some bot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Novi_sad_quarters_depresija.jpg PANONIAN 12:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

E, ako možeš prebaciti i ovih nekoliko fajlova:

To su jedine mape koje sam ja radio a da još nisu prebačene sa en Wiki na ostavu. Kad ih prebacimo, zamoliću nekog administratora da ih ovde obriše. PANONIAN 19:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Bugojno

Shit may happen everywhere, but for a small obscure town, don't you think this story of the teenager and the puppies is worth mentioning? EclecticEnnui (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Serbian war crimes split

Hi there. You contributed to Talk:Serbian war crimes/Archive 1 when the article was still a big mess as a whole. Now it's split into three, which may or may not be salvageable. So please do apply your comments to the new articles Serbian war crimes in the Balkan Wars, Serbian war crimes in World War II, Serbian war crimes in the Yugoslav Wars. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

invite to discuss Kosovo geographic names

I am working on a list of issue and a stragtegy for the names of places in kosovo , User_talk:Mdupont#Naming_and_status_of_Kosovo_pages I would like to invite you to take part and comment, have seen your activity of kosovo articles in the past. Thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

May Overthrow

Hi BokicaK -- Thanks for your note. It is very difficult to learn a foreign language well enough to write in it. It is certainly impressive, considering the difficulty of the English language, that you have grasped the language enough to write what you have. Nonetheless, it still needs to be copy edited by a proficient English speaker, and because of some of the text is unclear, it requires someone who is also knowledgeable in the subject matter. Alternatively, any English speaker could go through the article point by point with you and ask questions regarding what is unclear. Personally, I could try to do that, but I'm about to go on a trip for the American Thanksgiving holiday. As far as the title goes, it may well be that even though Serbian uses a different word for "coup," that's still the best translation in this case. We need to find out what English-language historians who have written about Serbia call the event. -- Mwalcoff (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Forward converter drawings

I created and downloaded some images onto the talk page of Forward converter . Let me know (on the article's talk page) if these help you, hinder you, have errors, etc. Any other suggestions or comments are welcome. Thanks, BillWvbailey (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

How would you know that it is a forward converter by looking at a photo of it? It could as well be a Flyback converter or (I've done this too) both simultaneously, i.e. using both the forward-derived current as well as the flyback-derived energy-as-current -- I've got 5 operating on my back porch right now. Given that a flyback converter is much simpler, what you think should be a forward converter (such as a cell phone charger) might not be one, after all. If you want I could photograph my little converter (works on a 1 1/2 volt battery, is similar to what the US calls a "flashlight" or the Europeans call a "torch"). But also, such a photo is not terribly representative. I used to work for a company that built forward converters (double-forwards) that operated at kilowatt power levels, for plasma cutting, and they weighed about 20 kg. BillWvbailey (talk) 19:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I will give you a picture. You can be free to use it or even copy the circuit (if you want the circuit -- I will give you only the photo at first because . . . . we may be offending the guardians of "Original Research".) I will do this tomorrow, when the sun is shining (it's night now, and it's snowing). Cheers! Bill Wvbailey (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The picture(s) are at the article now. Get them quick before the OR police come along and complain. BillWvbailey (talk) 18:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Hello there - thank you for linking up commons on many pages - however would it be possible for you to add them above page footers in the future. As editors are having to move the template up from this layout to this layout. Again thanks for your editsMoxy (talk) 07:25, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HelenTheBouchard

Hello. I apologize for creating mess, I never started checkuser case on en.wiki. You are first active checkuser that I stumbled upon, can you look up into the request? -- Bojan  Talk  06:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've taken a look, and blocked the account. Don't worry about the format of the case pages, they are admittedly rather complicated. :)
Cheers, Amalthea 11:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Radmanovic

The reason for my edit is that people keep going back and forth between calling him Serbian and calling him Bosnian. A good, clear source would certainly be helpful. Zagalejo^^^ 22:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

Lybia_and_POV

Hi there.

I noticed your comments [1] [2] regarding the news item, on Wikipedia talk:In the news, and I added more comments and asked for an admin to look at it [3].

The discussion was moved [4] to Wikipedia:ERRORS#Lybia and POV [5] - where it would get faster attention [6] - and now, the main page has been changed [7]. I hope you think that the change resolves the problem you raised. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  18:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

You wrote on my user talk page, Thanks, but i'm not still satisfied. -- Bojan  Talk  03:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC).
I am not sure what you mean. Is this about the ITN article? Would you like me to help with something? Please let me know. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  10:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Sasha Pavlovic

What should we list as Pavlovic's nationality - Serbian or Montenegrin? Zagalejo^^^ 20:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

Read FINA rules

Talk:Water polo at the 2011 World Aquatics Championships – Men's tournament. Sebjarod (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka

Since there is an ungoing edit war going on on the Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka article, it would be helpful if your additions provided reliable sources. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Proposed deletion of Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka

The article Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Invitation

Invajtujem te da glasas na Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montenegrin alphabet. Ziveo srpski jezik! --93.87.8.45 (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Iako je glupost, nema smisla brisati. -- Bojan  Talk  04:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

User:Autobot

I have blocked this account because it is an unapproved bot account. Once it gets approved through the WP:BAG, another admin can unblock the account.--v/r - TP 13:37, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

No, I don't when it's rocking a {{bot}} template calling itself a legitimate bot account.--v/r - TP 22:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, BokicaK. You have new messages at TParis's talk page.
Message added 23:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

v/r - TP 23:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC) x2

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

Ruđer Bošković

Pošto nisam registorvan, zamolio bih te da vratiš podatke o Ruđeru i reference o njegovm srpskom poreklu, a tome možeš da dodaiš i izjavu srpskog predsednika za hrvatske medije.

Takođe, možeš da dodaš i redirekciju za Astronomsko društvo Ruđer Bošković iz Beograda (Astronomical Society "Rudđer Bošković") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.93.29 (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Hvala unapred!

www.vjesnik.hr/Article.aspx?ID=2CDE06FB-A0B1-455D-ABD0-BBE345B33A8E 03:30, 18 January 2012

To sto kaže Tadić ili što bi rekla Jadranska Kosor ne znači ništa. Treba ti jaci izvor. Ja ti mogu prevesti nesto. Iz nekog razloga Vikipedija mi ne dozvoljava da sad napravim redirekciju. Ne znam da li to ima veze sa SOPA. Napravicu kada ovo prodje. -- Bojan  Talk  04:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

SR Wiki

Jel ću imati neke šanse da mi se smanji blok na SR Wiki? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 23:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Kolike su šanse kad se promenim da mi se smanji blok? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 23:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Kako da ih ubedim? Ako pišem članke kao anoniman da li će mi se to priznavati? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 23:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Izvunuću se svima samo mi reci kome trebam tačno. Kako da postavim korisničke kutijice na EN Wiki? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 00:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Bosnian Barnstar of National Merit
For your cleanup work and help on Bosnian geography articles and ex-Yugloslavia! Keep it up! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Can you also remove the brackets from the intro where applicable like this? Thanks! Keep up the good work and happy editing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

We could really do with new maps of the Serbian and Bosnian municipalities. File:Serbia Temerin.png for instance would look far better on the svg type map of Serbian which appears in the pin maps but with municipalities outlined and then the municipality shaded in red. The pink and other strange colours are ugly, I'm sure you'll agree. I'll have to enquire into that. Like this although red rather than yellow!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Tough one that, not sure. But Kosovo appears to be accepted by every nation as independent except Serbia. I'd say the NPOV would be affected more by including Kosovo on the map as it would look pro-Serbian, especially as the UN recognizes it as independent. Personally I dislike seeing nations splitting, not to mention the problem it causes on wikipedia with having to adjust things! I'd say shading in the Kosovo outline in a different colour would be the best thing to acknowledge Serbia's dispute but still outlined as separate.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Howz this? . Should be easy to create locators from there.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Like File:Municipalities of Serbia Sombor.png. Don't know though if I have the patience to do the lot but I'll see, it certainly won't all be done in one day!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Mmm Template:Infobox Serbia municipality prevents me from changing it. I think it should be converted to standard infobox settlement to allow flexibility.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I am aware that you would simply have to change the parameter for image to feature the maps as long as they are consistent. I'll see what I can do, can't promise anything.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Good news is that I've made all the maps. just have to muster the energy the upload the remaining 132 maps. If you could be here tomorrow to change the template to switch maps I'd be grateful. I'll hopefully load most later tonight.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

There's 160 maps here. I've made the switch and boosted to 250px, same size as the pin maps.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Give me a list of ones needing doing and I'll look into it this week.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I haven't got any tools though for making quality maps. They'll have to be duplicates of the current.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

English

Please use English per WP:SPEAKENGLISH. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Problem sa šablonima

Primetio sam da postoji problem sa prikazom slike u nekim šablonima koje si stavljao u članke. Na primer, u članku Maglić je prethodni šablon prikazivao sliku (pogledaj staru verziju članka: [8]), dok se u novom šablonu ta slika ne vidi: [9]. Probao sam to da popravim u članku Mokrin i jedino što sam uspeo je to da sliku izvadim iz šablona. Možeš li da popraviš taj problem? PANONIAN 05:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Drugi problem je da novi šablon ne pokazuje ćirilične nazive, vidi staru i novu verziju šablona. PANONIAN 05:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Mislim, nemoj se ljutiti, ali trebalo bi da prekontrolišeš svoje izmene u člancima gde si zamenio šablon "Geobox" sa "Infobox settlement" i da popraviš ove probleme, jer su sada neki članci ostali bez slike i bez ćiriličnog naziva. PANONIAN 05:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Nisam video tvoj odgovor pre mog zadnjeg komentara. Mislim da nije problem samo u ta tri članka, jer samo te sam pogledao - problem verovatno postoji svugde gde je stavljen šablon "Infobox settlement" (ukoliko je u prethodnom šablonu postojala slika ili ćirilični naziv). PANONIAN 05:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hm, što se tiče šablona za naselja Srbije, umesto kolone "Municipality" treba da stoji "Municipality or city", jer neke bivše opštine sada imaju status gradova. Možeš li to da promeniš pomoću bota? PANONIAN 17:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Takođe bi mogao i za naselja van Vojvodine da dodaš kolonu za statistički region, kao i da kod naselja Vojvodine umesto "Province" piše "Region" (odnosno da kolona "Region" postoji kod svih naselja Srbije). Tako stoji na sajtu Vlade Srbije: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/pages/article.php?id=45625 PANONIAN 18:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Pa svakako, odradi to kad stigneš, nije problem ako bude u maju. Što se tiče novih statičkih regiona, oni su značajni najmanje koliko i okruzi (a suštinski i više od okruga, jer su veći po površini i broju stanovnika). I sami okruzi nisu oblici lokalne samouprave već upravna područja vlade, kao i statistički regioni. U suštini, Srbija ima 5 statističkih regiona, od kojih Vojvodina, Kosovo i Beograd imaju svoju samoupravu, dok je preostala dva regiona nemaju. Međutim, ta dva regiona se tretiraju isto kao Vojvodina, Kosovo i Beograd. Evo pogledaj zvaničan dokument sa popisa - strane 5 i 6: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf - to je službena administrativna podela Srbije i tako i mi treba da uradimo ovde (jedino ne bih koristio podelu Srbija Sever i Srbija Jug, jer se na sajtu Vlade pominju samo 5 regiona kao primarna podela Srbije: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/pages/article.php?id=45625 ). Ja ću u međuvremenu "peške" uraditi ovo u par članaka koje budem sređivao, a ti posle sve ostalo možeš srediti sa botom (kad nađeš vremena, naravno). PANONIAN 05:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

U suštini, ovo su stvari koje bi po meni bot trebalo da odradi: [10], [11]

  • da ubaci i latinično i ćirilično ime naselja u infobox
  • da kod naselja Vojvodine zameni "Province" sa "Region" (ili da doda tu kolonu ako ne postoji)
  • da kod naselja van Vojvodine doda kolonu "Region" i da pomeri okruge i opštine u kolone "subdivision_type2" i "subdivision_type3"
  • da doda okrug i opštinu tamo gde nema
  • da kod opštine zameni opis "Municipality" sa "Municipality or city"
  • da ubaci članke o naseljima u kategoriju opštine u kojoj se nalaze i kategoriju za naselja za svaki okrug: na primer, naselje Đala treba da bude u kategorijama "Novi Kneževac" i "Populated places in North Banat District", dok bi kategorije "Populated places in Vojvodina" i "Populated places in Serbia" trebalo da se isprazne i da se naselja razvrstaju prema okruzima (a za to već postoje posebne podkategorije)

Nadam se da ovo nije previše posla za tebe ili za bota. :) PANONIAN 06:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, što se tiče regiona, pogledao si PDF dokument sa popisa? Tamo su naselja upravo razdeljena na način o kome govorim. Znači, jedino je pitanje ovde da li treba ili ne treba da koristimo podelu koja se koristi u zvaničnim dokumentima. Ne slažem se da bi to izazvalo zabunu, jer valjda ljudi treba da nauče novu teritorijalnu podelu Srbije? Naravno da ljude zbunjuje ono što ne znaju. Ajde ovako, pošto je Vojvodina i statistički i administrativni region, da kod Vojvodine napišemo "Region / Province", a kod ostalih samo "Region"? Hm, Beograd bi takođe bio poseban slučaj, jer su tu region i okrug jedno isto, pa mislim da kod naselja Beograda ne treba da postoji kolona "District" već samo "Region", a umesto "Municipality or city" bi trebalo da stoji samo "Municipality". PANONIAN 06:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Pa evo nešto ovako recimo: [12]. Je li to OK varijanta? PANONIAN 07:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Eh, ali to je netačno. Statistički region i autonomna pokrajina su jedan isti administrativni nivo. Znači pogledaj dokument: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf Ovo su administrativni nivoi:

  • Srbija Sever
    • Vojvodina (i statistički region i autonomna pokrajina)
      • Severni Banat (okrug)
        • Novi Kneževac (opština)
          • Đala (naselje)

Znači Vojvodina je statistički region koji ima status autonomne pokrajine i upravo bi dupliranje tih kolona izazvalo zabunu. PANONIAN 07:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Evo, pogledaj kako tu stoji za Beograd: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf

  • Srbija Sever
    • Beogradski region (statistički region)
      • Beogradska oblast (okružni nivo)
        • Beograd - Barajevo (opština)
          • Arnajevo (naselje)

Dokument dakle obrađuje sve administrativne nivoe i na primeru Beograda se vidi da su i nivo statističkog regiona i nivo okruga uzeti u obzir (iako predstavljaju potpuno istu teritoriju). Suprotno tome, nije posebno prikazan nivo autonomne pokrajine, što znači da je autonomna pokrajina isti administrativni nivo kao i statistički region. PANONIAN 08:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

U suštini prvi administratrativni nivo bi ovde bio Srbija Sever / Srbija Jug i nemam ništa protiv da ubaciš i to u šablon ako želiš (mada mislim da može i bez toga). PANONIAN 08:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
E jbg, očigledno se ne razumemo. Jel možemo onda naći neki kompromis? Recimo da kod Vojvodine imamo samo kolonu "Province", dok bi kod naselja u drugim delovima Srbije pisali "Region". Može li tako? Upotreba dve kolone za Vojvodinu bi izazvala potpunu zabunu. PANONIAN 12:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Pa već sam ti predložio kako da rešimo problem Beograda. Ja mislim da treba da se pridržavamo ovog dokumenta: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf Nije to "samo statistički" dokument, već on tačno odražava teritorijalnu podelu Srbije. Dakle, u tom dokumentu ne postoje odvojeno autonomna pokrajina Vojvodina i statistički region Vojvodina i samim tim bi bilo netačno da imamo posebne kolone za to, na osnovu čega bi ispalo da je statustički region Vojvodina podređen autonomnoj pokrajini Vojvodini - ja ne vidim osnovu za takvo tumačenje. Sa druge strane, kod Beograda imamo okrug, koji je podređen regionu, a oba imaju istu teritoriju. Ja zato mislim da je i kod Vojvodine i kod Beograda najbolje spojiti te iste teritorije u jednu kolonu gde bi kod Vojvodine imali "Province / Region", a kod Beograda "Region / District" (ili možemo izabrati samo jedan opis od ta dva). Stvarno ne vidim osnovu u zvaničnim dokumentima za korišćenje dve kolone za Vojvodinu. PANONIAN 12:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Koga da pitamo? PANONIAN 08:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
OK, you are free to ask whom you want. PANONIAN 09:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Duja is not active since 2008: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Duja Can we, anyway, reach compromise? Perhaps to have a single line in which we will use description "Province" for places in Vojvodina and description "Region" for places in other parts of Serbia (while term "Region" will not be used for places in Vojvodina). Is that acceptable for you? PANONIAN
I am proposing this as a temporary compromise until we find proper solution how term "Region" should be used in the case of Vojvodina. PANONIAN 19:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Rajković

Hi, can you please explain what's going on here? A disambiguation page should only have (disambiguation) in the title if necessary, i.e. in this case, if there's a main article or a redirect to a main article on one particularly well known person called Rajković. Since there isn't, is it okay to remove the speedy tag and reverse the move? - filelakeshoe 09:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, so just create the article over the redirect, deleting the redirect isn't necessary. Best, - filelakeshoe 14:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Bokica, you are invited!

Thank you Bokica for your contributions in the newly established project! --(talk) 01:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pekara, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Hello BokicaK. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pekara, Bosnia and Herzegovina, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant hoax. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 13:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Vikipedija (EN) - Clanak o talijanskom koncentracionom logoru na Rabu

Bojane, zovem se Pavle i zivim u Kanadi, a javljam vam se jer sam vas nasao medju osobama koje su editovale clanak.

Moj otac Aleksandar Lebl iz Beograda, bivsi logoras sa Raba i novinar koji je cesto pisao o logoru, nedavno je procitao Vikipedijin clanak i u njemu nasao niz netacnosti. Od mog oca (koji ima preko 90 godina) ne mozemo ocekivati da uci Vikipedijina pravila i sintaksu, pa bih vam bio zahvalan ako biste preporucili nekoga s kim bismo mogli da stupimo u kontakt i posaljemo ispravke.

Moja adresa je plebl-at-cogeco-dot-ca; bice mi drago ako nadjete vremena da se javite.

Pozdrav,

Pavle Lebl 24.150.198.75 (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

I can teach you how Wikipedia works. Every article has its own talk page - in this case Talk:Rab concentration camp. You should list all errors and false information there. -- Bojan  Talk  02:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Image license

Just a quick question about an old image upload of yours on the Serbian wikipedia. Somebody uploaded an image here pointing to an old upload of yours on sr-wp (sr:File:1997-YUG Jugovic.jpg), where you stated that images from the national football website http://www.reprezentacija.rs were generally licensed under GFDL. Could you please let us know how and when that license was granted and where it can be found? Thanks, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

We have permission from that website, but it is unclear did they have right to give us images. I uploaded the photo before I became suspicious on that issue. Since then I didn't upload any image from that website, I deleted dozens and replaced them with images from Commons. -- Bojan  Talk  05:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for the quick reply. In that case I guess we shouldn't rely on the assertion. Is there any on-wiki discussion of the case somewhere to look up? – Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Funeral of Josip Broz Tito, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages House of Flowers and Willie Brandt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death and funeral of Josip Broz Tito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death and funeral of Josip Broz Tito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karađorđevo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Uprising in Serbia (1941)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Uprising in Serbia (1941). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Republic of Užice. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Republic of Užice – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

G'day, the article you have created may well be needed. However, until some consensus has been reached on how it fits into the existing Republic, Operation Uzice and Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia articles, please don't substitute it as a link in all the various articles. Happy for you to add it, but don't replace other links with it. Perhaps you would like to join the discussion I have started over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yugoslavia/Operation Bora? Thanks. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 04:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Jimbo Wales

IP user from Hungary doesn't like your userboxes, lol. Please see User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#offensive_communist_symbols.--В и к и T 18:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yugoslavia in War 1941-1945, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SOE and RTS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Serbian help needed

Hello BokicaK, I'm contacting you because we need some Serbian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Serbian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


Category:Medieval Israel

Category:Medieval Israel, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. trespassers william (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Pomoć

Pozdrav! Vidim da uploaduješ određene slike domaćih političara, pa bih te zamolio za pomoć, potrebna nam je bolja slika za izborni box od ove Đilasove postojeće (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_parliamentary_election,_2014). Nama stalno skidaju slike sa Wikimedije. Ako imaš vremena pomozi :) (User:Nikgudz) 02:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Pozdrav opet. Ne znam da li si primetio ali na stranici onoj za izbore u Srbiji 2014. učestao je spam korisnika koji se potpisuje kao ElectPareti o nekim samo njemu znanim izmenama u infoboksu (o koalicijama koje na prethodnim izborima nisu postojale već su napravljene nakon njih, 2012. godine). On je prilično uporan u toj nameri spamovanja pa te molim da ga, kao neko sa velikim iskustvom na vikipediji, prijaviš (ili šta se već radi u takvim slučajevima), jer se ja i dalje ne snalazim dobro u tim stvarima :) Zahvaljujem unapred. (User:Nikgudz) 21:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Izvini na smetnji opet, ali ovaj problem koji sam izložio iznad i dalje je aktuelan i širi se i na ostale stranice izbora u Srbiji. Ako ikako možeš reaguj. Hvala.(User:Nikgudz) 19:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Bojane, ovaj tip (ElectPartei) je jako uporan u postavljanju netacnih izbornih rezultata, i to vise ne samo na stranici za izbore 2014. Tvoja pomoc bi bila veoma dobrodosla, bilo bi dobro da se ovo vise zaustavi. Izvini zbog gnjavaze, ni meni nije drago sto sve ovo traje danima. (User:Sundostund) 21:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Da budem iskren, Bojane, meni njegovi stavovi uopste nemaju smisla. Na primer, tretira sadasnju koaliciju oko SNS-a kao da je postojala i na proslim izborima, pa kaze da je SNS osvojio 84 mandata 2012, a tadasnja koalicija oko naprednjaka je osvojila 73 mandata. Slicne stvari je radio i na clancima o nekim ranijim izborima... Po njemu, ispada da su stranke Rasima Ljajica i Vuka Draskovica bile u koaliciji sa naprednjacima i 2012, sto je totalno netacno. Te njegove konstrukcije unose prilicnu zabunu, ako mene pitas. (User:Sundostund) 14:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

references

I think that references you recently introduced do not work. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 06:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

I.e. Dimitri Progoni and Fine.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 06:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
There are other authors in that article for which it does not work (Kristaq...). The same issue is with almost all other articles, i.e. Dušan's Code and Malcolm, Oraovac...--Antidiskriminator (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
It is fine with Malcolm and Oraovac, but not with Sindik, Cirkovic, Stempin... It takes a lot of time to switch from one referencing format to another and there is some rule, if you want I can find it and present it here, that in one article one referencing format should be used, based on the consensus of the editors. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I found it. Its WP:CITESTYLE and WP:CITEVAR. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I did not question your intentions. I just thought it is better to point you to this issue before you continue with more changes to more articles.
I am not very skillfull with references but I am uncertain if you "templatized Harvard citation style" when you changed <ref> to Harvard referencing. WP:CITEVAR says: To be avoided: Switching between major citation styles, e.g., switching between parenthetical and <ref> tags--DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Disputed

Template:Disputed says:

First add a new section named "Disputed" to the article's talk page, describing the problems with the disputed statements. Then place

at the top of the disputed article. If the talk page discussion is not in a section named "Disputed", use

(for a talk page section named "Disputed information", use

in the article). If there is no talk page, the tag won't refer to it (in which case it's recommended to consider whether the tag should be there, since there is no reason given). Articles using this template as shown above are placed into Category:Accuracy disputes.

There is no active discussion about dispute at Communist purges in Serbia in 1944–45. --DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ariel (Robotech)

The article Ariel (Robotech) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) and Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska

WikiProject Republika Srpska
Project Icon
Project Icon
Hi, BokicaK, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Republika Srpska and the Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up.

WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!


--DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

weisenstar

File:The golden head Tibetan mastiff.jpg best user
for me your the best User in Wikipedia! DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yul Brynner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Smirnov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Đorđe Lašić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plav. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BokicaK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference template changes

I see you are making a number of reference template changes to articles. While harvnb is a useful template, a large number of the references you are changing have links which should go to the full reference, that don't work. (Hohum @) 19:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent edits

I'm curious about your recent edits on some of the Western Desert articles, why harvnb? I can do sfn but I've never got the hang of harvnb. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 20:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Oh and if you have a page like User:Keith-264/common.js this, with importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js'); all of your edits on Operation Goodwood have Harv error: link from #CITEREFWilmot doesn't point to any citation. in red on the footnotes. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 20:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to do more of this, perhaps you could sound out opinion on the milhist talk page first to see who wants to join in and then get agreement on ways and means? It would save wasting effort. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 07:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbian National Basketball Team roster

Template:Serbian National Basketball Team roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BokicaK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:BokicaK|<font style="background: black" face="Courier" color="white">'''&nbsp;Bojan&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User_talk:BokicaK|<font style="background: white" face="Courier" color="black">'''&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;'''</font>]] :  Bojan  Talk 

to

[[User:BokicaK|<b style="background: black; font-family: Courier; color: white">&nbsp;Bojan&nbsp;</b>]][[User_talk:BokicaK|<b style="background: white; font-family: Courier; color: black">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</b>]] :  Bojan  Talk 

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BokicaK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your opinion - List of Serbs?

I would like to hear your opinion on this matter - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Serbians

Thank you.

Mm.srb (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Turan Hunters moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Turan Hunters, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develope the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 10:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Re: Help

By all means. I won't be really finished with them until I finish with their acolytes and HW is restored to a sane state, and that may take a while, but if you happen to have a concrete example, I could take a look right away.

There is an example that has been recently pointed out to me: this is a bad edit. Whether that's generally understood or not, I don't know. GregorB (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I meant examples from sr wiki - in case you already have something in mind that would benefit from an outside comment, ping me and I'll see what I can do. GregorB (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Milivoj Jugin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Milivoj Jugin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 02:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milivoj Jugin has been accepted

Milivoj Jugin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

buidhe 04:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Invasion of Yugoslavia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sušak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop

I noticed that as soon as I explained why are you wrong at Milovan Đilas you edit warred at Milovan Đilas and followed me to revenge me at article I recently created - Drvar uprising. That kind of behavior can be seen as disruptive violations of core vikipedia policies. Please be so kind not to continue or repeat this kind of disruptive behavior. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drvar uprising, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trubar and Javorje (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Case Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volujak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

PL

Zdravo Bokice, I have created the article on our hero Petar Leković. It's currently a stub, so if you can/would like to add more information, that would be great. Ty, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Petar Leković

You added a short reference to 'Narodni heroji Jugoslavije 1982' in that article, but there's no corresponding full citation. Could you add it? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

DOTY articles

Hi. All new entries in DOTY articles must have a reliable citation that backs up the date. See Wikipedia:Days_of_the_year#Direct_citations. This was decided in July 2018 but it is a long process to correct them all, so there are still older entries that don't have them yet, and we haven't got around to doing the year articles although you'll find that all entries for 2020 have citations. In time, all unverified entries will be deleted. Have a look at the history of any date article and you'll see it happening. Deb (talk) 15:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

347.220 edits on all wikipedia projects

Hi,

You had:

  • 347.220 edits on all wikipedia projects
  • admin privileges on sr.wiki for many years
  • admin privileges on many other wikipedia projects

There is no doubt that you know that you are walking on very thin ice when you are edit warring at Milovan Đilas and demonstrating IDHT behavior against multiple other editors, including me. Additionally, your comment So, Hague, Shepherd, a Croat and Slovenian dudes know better than former partisans and chetniks, and Yugoslav historians who were also contemporary and in vicinity of these events? might be seen by someone who does not AGF (not me of course) that you drew a conclusion about other people, based on their ethnicity.

Based on all the above I conclude there is a possibility that you got sick about everything on wikipedia. I know that you belong to a small group of editors who hate my guts at sr.wiki and en.wiki but please consider my advice to take a rest or retire for a while instead of going out in a blaze of glory. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

I noticed that you continue with adding uncited material and also removing reliably sourced material from Balkans articles like this diff although you were recently warned because of such editing pattern (diff). Please be so kind not to repeat this behavior. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Please read WP:HIJACK. You have already been informed that if you think some reliable sources contradict some well cited assertion you should follow wikipedia policies (such as wp:npov) and add a new cited assertion, without removing or changing the existing well-cited assertion. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Velimir Terzić

Hello, BokicaK,

Thank you for creating Velimir Terzić.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

George Skrigin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, George Skrigin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Savo Orović moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Savo Orović, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

BLP

Having in mind your wikipedia experience I think there is no doubt you know that misusing wikipedia to attack live people, like you did with this edit (diff), is serious violation of WP:BLP. Having in mind your earlier issues on the same topic on other wikipedias, I would strongly advice you to avoid this kind of behavior in future. Best regards, --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Meeting in Divci moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meeting in Divci, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BokicaK/Archive_1&oldid=1240487721"