User talk:Blueberrysrinivas

October 2016

Hello, I'm Falcon Kirtaran. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sofia the First— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FalconK (talk) 11:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FalconK (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VKK (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VKK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:VKK, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:VKK

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "VKK".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Thestatementandruew.png

Thanks for uploading File:Thestatementandruew.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Thestatementandruew.png

A tag has been placed on File:Thestatementandruew.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://circle.myactivesg.com/circle-news/articles/spores-1st-ever-wwe-signing-sean-tan-never-doubt-yourself-work-hard-on-achieving-your-dreams-and-it-will-pay-off-one-day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Dante Chen's birthday

Hi, I noticed that you have included a date as Chen's birthdate. However, do provide a source to it. Until then, we will take the approximate year based on existing sources. Just to let you know, there are a couple of vandals changing the birthdates of various Asian media personalities. Without a source detailling his exact birthdate make the page an easy target for vandalism. Cheers – robertsky (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deeptha Khanna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deeptha Khanna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 13:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deeptha Khanna has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deeptha Khanna. Thanks! – robertsky (talk) 13:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Statement

Please note that disambiguation pages like The Statement are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

If you would like to write an article on Andruew Tang, writing over an existing page is not the way to do it. Please read Your First Article. Leschnei (talk) 13:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deeptha Khanna

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deeptha Khanna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ring of Rebirth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ring of Rebirth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please provide independent reliable secondary sources for the article. RoR's youtube links are considered primary sources and would be considered original research as well. Thanks Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as a followup to the the notice above, the conflict of interest I am concerned is the many articles you have created on professional wrestling in Singapore. Will appreciate if you can declare if you have any COI with them. Thanks. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have not been paid by anyone at all. I am just a big fan of professional wrestling in Singapore and wanted to add information about it to Wikipedia. I have naturally attended many shows and conversed with these wrestlers in person, however, I was not asked to create pages of wikipedia but simply did it out of my own hobby. Does this count as a COI? Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for the late reply. Your personal interest will not count as a COI and in fact the reasons for how many wikipedia articles are created. Generally if an editor has a narrow range of interest, eventually the question will come up asking whether is there any COI. Thank you for your contribution! Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. A curious point that your username leads to someone working as a SEO role in a digital agency offwiki. Any connections that we should be aware of? – robertsky (talk) 07:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, going to be honest not sure what SEO stands for? Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 17:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am not working at all - I am 21 and currently studying? I'm not sure what the connection between Blueberry (my favorite fruit) and my name leads to someone working in some sort of agency. Slightly concerned as to why my personal information is being called into question? I write about pro wrestling in Singapore, because I am Singaporean and a pro wrestling fan. But I have also written about Indian promotions, and many cricket articles, players and stadiums. Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not personal information being called into question, but a potential professional one. Coupled with the pro-wrestling edits coming from your account (heavy use of primary sources, uploads of copyrighted images, etc), overall, it has the hallmarks of someone who has WP:COI or is an WP:UPE. If you are who you are described, it is an unfortunate coincidence, and I apologise for that. If you google search your username, in both the words joined and separated, you maybe able to see from where I am coming from. – robertsky (talk) 17:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I see your perspective! Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 17:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, yes I see that linkedin profile! Totally understand how that may seem peculiar. Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kenneth Thexeira

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas,

Thank you for creating Kenneth Thexeira.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A few more reliable sources talking about Kenneth Thexeira willhelp in achieving notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Justanothersgwikieditor}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but there are some secondary sources all ready there, by reputable ones such as business times. Not sure if I can find more? Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ring of Rebirth has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ring of Rebirth. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Thexeira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kenneth Thexeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Additional note: The article relies on mostly on primary sources, such as videos from SPW's youtube account and sports stats website, cagematch for statements here. This article written as now, is editorialising the youtube videos and cagematch sources. – robertsky (talk) 13:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what do you mean by editorialising? All content expressed in this article, explicitly took place in videos or articles. Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'editorialising' maybe too strong a word. how about, 'reporting'? We rely on secondary sources for the reporting, we don't do the reporting on Wikipedia. – robertsky (talk) 17:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understand! Was unaware of the importance of secondary sources, will utilize them more often in future edits. I was under the assumption that primary was better, but I stand corrected. Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ring of Rebirth (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Poor quality sourcing. Probably not submitted intentionally by creator.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ring of Rebirth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 11:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenneth Thexeira

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kenneth Thexeira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 22:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Thexeira (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kenneth Thexeira instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Thexeira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Solo Sikoa

Hello, Blueberry. I explain my editions. Per por Manual of Style, we include major keypoints of the wrestler career. The key points and highlights are given by sources. However, Cagematch it's just WP:ROUTINE. They include every match in the world. I don't see why his match against Carlito is notable for his career or holding an independent title that has no article. If we do this, we can just create articles with not clear definition about what's notable, since the fact are choosen by the editor and not by the sources. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HHH, yes I understand your point. I do believe his independent circuit career should have some form on this article (as present in the article of every WWE wrestler who had an independent career). I have greatly shortened it and put all of the main information under an "independent circuit" section Blueberrysrinivas (talk) 21:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Continental Wrestling Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Continental Wrestling Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continental Wrestling Entertainment (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth Thexeira

The article Kenneth Thexeira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This wrestling organisation does not meet the standard of notability set out in NCORP. This criteria states that significant coverage addressing the subject directly and in depth is required. Almost all sources both within the article and online contain only brief, passing mentions. Most sources available only briefly mention the name of the organisation in discussion of a wrestler currently associated with the organisation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grapple MAX

The article Grapple MAX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable promotion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenneth Thexeira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth Thexeira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Thexeira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please review your source usage

I removed the source you used on the page for Omos. This is becuase it is listed as unreliable and therefore can not be used. It would appear that you need to review the list and familiarise yourself with the list of sources that can not be used or are limited in usage. See here for the list, including sources that are reliable. Thank you. Addicted4517 (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

An article you recently created, Draft:Ring of Rebirth, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 20:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RoRlogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RoRlogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Singapore Pro Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Lee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kenneth Thexeira has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kenneth Thexeira. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 16:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Thexeira (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Carpimaps were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youtube is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Thexeira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ring of Rebirth (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Contents produced by the company and interviews are all primary sources, and can not be used as sources. Similarly, sites that did not cover the subject in depth or never mentioned it at all can not be used to prove the subject's notability. Multiple significant coverage from independent and reliable sources are needed to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ring of Rebirth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Varun Khanna

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Varun Khanna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Varun Khanna

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Varun Khanna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kenneth Thexeira

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kenneth Thexeira, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ring of Rebirth

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ring of Rebirth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ring of Rebirth

Hello, Blueberrysrinivas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ring of Rebirth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Singapore Pro Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalisto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]