User talk:Bkissin/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bkissin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Minref
Hi. I saw in your review of Draft:Juan de la Luz Enriquez (locality) you had declined on the basis that the draft didn't meet the minimum standard for inline citations. As recently discussed the 'ilc' reason should be used in limited circumstances described in WP:MINREF, generally for biographies of living persons. It would be better to use 'submission is improperly sourced' instead. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Albert Reuss declined on grounds of copyvio when this issue has already been resolved
Hello Bkissin I am very distressed that you have declined my article Draft:Albert Reuss on the grounds of copyvio, as this issue was resolved some time ago. I wrote the artuk article myself, and have taken the necessary steps to ensure that I can quote from it. Please see the comment below sent by RHaworth to Shadowowl and Primefac
Susan Soyinka was very puzzled and bemused when she was told that she could not use her own words in this article on the ArtUK website. The problem has now been corrected by the addition of Creative Commons and GFDL licence tags at the bottom the page. Primefac, Shadowowl and everybody else, please allow those words to be used here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
There are still a few referencing issues to be resolved, but otherwise I hope this article can now be accepted, particularly as you made quite a favorable comment over 3 months ago, and I have spent that entire time trying to improve my article. I would be most grateful for any help you can give.
SusanSoyinka (talk) 20:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Albert Reuss
Bkissin These are the words at the bottom of the artuk article, which are the exact words I was advised to use by a wikipedia editor. The editor at ArtUk kindly agreed to insert them:
"The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)."
With regard to your comment about my sources:
"I will say that the article is well sourced, but it needs to be inline citations at the particular pieces of information, rather than on the headings of each section. Bkissin (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)"
I have used plenty of inline citations. Where I have used citations for the heading, it is because that entire section is covered by that citation. Would you prefer these to go at the end of the section?
--SusanSoyinka (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I fixed my link!
sorry i didn't know how to make a proper link. I went to the Teahouse and solved it. Thanks for pointing that out. :) Huff-Slush 21:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huff slush7264 (talk • contribs)
Draft review Floris Visser
Dear Bkissin, I am requesting a re-review on the article draft of Floris Visser, for I got the following reaction by you ": This submission appears to be taken from https://www.operamusica.com/artist/floris-visser/biography#biography. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here."
The claim that the text appears to be taken from operamusica.com is simply not true. For operamusica.com clearly states a very old biography of director Floris Visser. Next to that: this specific biography of opera director Floris Visser on operamusica.com was taken from an old biography by Alferink Artists Management, his management worldwide, and the copyright on this lies with Alferink Artists Management. For while creating my contribution to Wikipedia I was in contact with Alferink Artists Management to get the latest and updated biographical material of director Floris Visser and specifically got it copyright free, to avoid any copyright claims, but also to check whether the information on operamusica.com (and other websites) was correct. For a lot wasn't up to date anymore according to other sources, so I rewrote most of it, added much from my own sources, triple checked a lot - note I used: over 70 sources & references -, and also left a lot out, otherwise the article simply would have gotten too long. So again: I was anyway forced to rewrite a lot, but the "source-biography" by Alferink Artists Management I specifically got copyright free. So my question now is: how should I proceed? I followed all the guidelines to my feeling, and did not violate any copyright rules. Please advice me, for this is my first contribution to Wikipedia, and I don't really know how to proceed at the moment, which I find a huge pity after all the hard work I put into creating this article. All best wishes, Giovannihofmann
Dear Bkissin, I hope this message finds you well. I would like to ask for your advice and help. After our contact on the page/article Floris Visser above, you moved it onto Wikipedia, thank you very much for that. I believe you agreed that I made my statement concerning the copyright clear. After that I got quite aggressively approached by another user who first stated I had a conflict of interest since I resolved the copyright issue with Alferink Management as stated above. After this was resolved - like with you - ; the user suddenly put the page on the speed deletion list and now it is gone. While I specifically referred to our contact and messages above. a. I am of course shocked how rude people can be in destroying months of works, but also b. how aggressive, unjust and slanderous these accusations and actions were. Is there anyway we can retrieve the page and where can I file an official complaint against this user? Very much obliged, best wishes, Giovannihofmann — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giovannihofmann (talk • contribs) 16:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Giovannihofmann: Hi Giovanni, Greetings to you. Understand that you are upset as you created page has been deleted (Floris Visser) so quickly. Wikipedia considers copyvio as a serious matter as it entails legal implications. Under Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, articles that infringe copyvio would be nominated for speedy deletion. Upon checking there are 3 articles involved which your article seemed to copy from, respectively 85%, 33% and 33% respectively of your article content. I have only reported the 85% article. I could not read the article now as it is deleted by DGG (admin). You have contested this nomination and sought help on four different talk pages (Floris Visser talk page, Article for Creation Help Desk, Bkissin's talk page and my talk page), for such I will move this conversation and the links to your talk page for consolidating all the "talks" in one page for DGG to assess and evaluate the validity the copyvio deletion. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I think you unjustifiably rejected my article ("Melissa Martínez (fighter)")
You argued that 'Combate Americas' is not a "top-tier" MMA organization. That promotion has several top ranked fighters, not just regionally (in regions with hundreds of athletes), but world-level-wise. To cite some examples of fighters that belong to the 'Combate Americas' roster, that are top-ranked fighters by very well-recognized websites (like Tapology, Sherdog, Fight Matrix): Érik Pérez, ranked #33 bamtamweight in the world; Kyra Batara, ranked #20 atomweight in the world; and Melissa Martínez herself (the martial artist the 'draft' was created about), who is ranked, at strawweight, #9 in Latinamerica (amongst 268 fighters), #2 in Mexico, and #79 in the world; plus, she's a national champion in several martial arts; and she's a world champion in kickboxing, winning second place in the Worlds - Wroclaw, Poland (60Kg Womens division)... So please, let me create this page. I hope you understand. And also, have a good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andymman (talk • contribs) 15:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think your anger is misplaced. I didn't reject your article at all. I left a comment on the article because I wasn't sure whether the subject fit the Wikipedia requirements. In fact, in order to help your case, I brought in an expert from the MMA Wikiproject to give me a better idea before making a decision. It was a different user who rejected the article. That being said, submitting an article to Wikipedia can be a long process of trial and error, and it is important to take a positive attitude when dealing with other editors. Bkissin (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
John Hennessey Draft
User:michael.ramos1 Hi, you rejected my article on automotive tuner and racer John Hennessey. The first time I submitted it with the articles and publications he appeared in and I cited and listed them, the page was deleted for copyright.
Now, you are telling me, that there isn't any proof of his notoriety. I am in a catch-22 here. John Hennessey is a notable American automotive tuner. His builds have won awards and notoriety--a simple Google search would prove this. For example his Dodge Exorcist holds a speed record as fastest muscle car. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramos.michael1 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Guardian Bikes draft
Hi, you approved my article for Guardian Bikes and then thirty minutes later it was tagged by Edidiong(talk. Can you explain what happened, as speeedy deletion seems harsh for a legitimate stub. Any way that this can be fixed, or advice for how to get the stub back up? Thanks! Scruitineer (talk) 22:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
AfCs
Thanks for you excellent work here, which is very much appreciated. Not that you are doing anything wrong, but I have two suggestions about things that I've recently learned:
When an article is promotional as well as having a non-notable subject, it is now possible to give both reasons. I do this whenever it applies, because to some extent promotionalism can be the more critical of the two, and giving it as a reason also discourages the usually promotional editpr from trying to continue with essentially unaltered versions that do not fix the main problem
At this time of year, we will get many articles that are school projects. Sometimes the project has students work on it in their sandbox, instead of off-wiki. Doing that is probably not a great idea, but we don't want to prescribe how other people must conduct their projects. (And some faculty get unreasonably angry if we appear to interfere with them when we don't really have to.) If it seems like the article is still being worked on, it's better to leave int in Sandbox space. If it's being worked on but is already ready for mainspace, sI sometimes suggest they move it to draft and submit it. If of course it has not been worked on for a while (as is likely to be the case by August), then if it has any possibilities, I certainly move it to draft space -- and if it is good enough, accept it.
Hope this helps DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- As a note, the second decline reason needs to be manually input with
|reason2=
with the reason one of the decline codes. Primefac (talk) 13:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)- Primefac,there have been some improvements. The second reason no longer has to be entered manually. After entering the first reason, leave the cursor after the first reason, and select another. If necessary, click preview again to see both. Works about 90% of the time. DGG ( talk ) 15:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks DGG and Primefac! :) I had no idea I could add a second reason! DGG, as for the school project issue, the sandbox in question had been submitted to the AfC list, and so I was merely trying to move it to the draftspace as we would any other article. I definitely see your point, though. I'll try to be a little more discerning when applicable. Bkissin (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
JT Patten Draft
Hello. You recently Declined a posting for J.T. Patten, Author. We believe we have addressed all issues to include citations and notoriety. Sending this note if you re-review to see if J.T. Patten (true name Scott Swanson) should be considered for Military Wiki since the author is a highly regarded thought leader and that community with linkages to many notable Wiki subject personalities that he collaborates with in the writings. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EscapeYourRealityPress (talk • contribs) 18:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Coldharbourstores draft
Coldharbourstoresfan (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Hi Bkissin, you rejected my article on the British band coldharbourstores. I based my article on a similar size British group, whose notability is also similar: Epic 45 - who do have a wikipedia page, which if anything has less notability. The sources for that band are almost identical. Why are the author for the Epic 45 page's sources and notability acceptable and mine for coldharbourstores are not? Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks Coldharbourstoresfan (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
B.Li Draft
Hello. You declined a editing for B.Li, Author. It may due to the improper citation. However, I saw my article has published on 'Taobao' page with almost the same content. could you please help me to explain it? why my work can be seen after your decline? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LI BING (talk • contribs) 16:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
RE: submission at Articles for creation: Silk Way West Airlines (June 14)
Hi Bkissin,
Silk Way Airlines and Silk Way West Airlines are two separate airlines with their own registrations with international authorities. They have their own IATA and ICAO codes and have two distinct call signs.
Silk Way Airlines: IATA Code ZP ICAO Code: AZQ Call Sign: SILK LINE
Silk Way West Airlines: IATA Code 7L* ICAO Code: AZG Call Sign: SILK WEST
Sources: IATA
Thanks,
Tinysparrow (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bissin,
One other note, Silk Way West Airlines provides service to the USA while Silk Way Airlines does not according to their flight schedules.
thanks,
Tinysparrow (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Jan de Keyser
Hi. I see you accepted Jan de Keyser out of AfC. From what I'm seeing it doesn't seem like he meets WP:NPOL given WP:POLOUTCOMES. What am I missing? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:09, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- You make a good point Barkeep49. I had accepted a Belgian politician earlier who was a former member of the House of Representatives and a lobbyist for the Azeris but now also Mayor. The original article is up on the Dutch Wiki, though that's more of a WP:OSE cop-out than anything else. I think the argument becomes "Does Oostkamp count as at least a city of regional prominence to survive an AfD", as mentioned in WP:POLOUTCOMES. That is difficult to say, and by all means if you want to put the article up for AfD for not meeting WP:NPOL, I'll totally understand. Partially I'm trying to clear the backlog and some battles aren't worth dying over. Bkissin (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks that's helpful, I'd have likely draftified it as part of WP:NPP and your context is helpful. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Request on 16:57:17, 15 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by LuckyNumber85
Thanks for the comments. The coaster is currently built, however I understand that it may not be notable enough for wikipedia. However another coaster in the area The Branson Coaster that should have equal notability has an even less thorough article than the one I provided. My preference would be that both articles remain, because I think they are of interest, however I don't think I should be held to a different standard than the author of articles like that. Thanks for your time.
LuckyNumber85 (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for being so understanding LuckyNumber85! There is an important rule around Wikipedia saying that "Just because other stuff exists, doesn't inherently mean that another thing should have an article". That being said, this provides you with an opportunity. I'll accept the Mountain Coaster article if you improve it to the standards of other roller coaster articles, and then we can work on improving the Branson Coaster article together. Bkissin (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Michał Tyszkiewicz
Hello Bkissin, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Michał Tyszkiewicz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. LinguistunEinsuno (Linguist111) 20:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies Linguist111. I viewed it as an unambiguous WP:AUTOBIO. If you know of a better CSD code for that, I'd certainly be open to hearing it. Bkissin (talk) 20:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- No worries. Autobiographies don’t qualify for CSD per se, but the page looks like it would be more suitable in the creator’s userspace so you may want to consider discussing with the creator about userfying it. Cheers! LinguistunEinsuno (Linguist111) 20:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hey Linguist111, thanks for your help. I was contacted by the original editor over Wiki E-mail, who asked for it to be Speedy'd, so I've added a G7 tag to the page. Bkissin (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- No worries. Autobiographies don’t qualify for CSD per se, but the page looks like it would be more suitable in the creator’s userspace so you may want to consider discussing with the creator about userfying it. Cheers! LinguistunEinsuno (Linguist111) 20:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Added notable source
For the draft, 'Draft:Deji Olatunji (ComedyShortsGamer)', I have added a new notable news source/article specifically talking about the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duffy2509 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Chele Farley
I'm not sure what else you want me to add - Chele Farley is the only nominee for a major national party in a United States Senate election - this isn't some local city council election. She's been covered in Politico, The New York Post, the NY Daily News, Newsday, and many other local NY publications across the state. She's the GOP nominee and millions of New Yorkers will want information on who she is before election day, and one of the first places many people start looking for that is here on Wikipedia. YankeesFan85 (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what else you want me to say. Here's a similar situation with a Democratic candidate for US Senate in Maine. If you want to try to appeal to a different editor or have assistance on trying to get this article submitted, ask for assistance in the Teahouse or the Articles for Creation Help Desk. Bkissin (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why does this not qualify as "notable" coverage? Like I said, she's had entire articles and profiles about here in mainstream news sources. Here are a few examples. What about these fail to meet notability standards? These aren't just passing mentions, these are entire articles about her and her candidacy YankeesFan85 (talk) 14:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- There may be a case for general notability. However, all of these articles focus on her candidacy, which gives off the impression that she is notable for this one event. Unfortunately, my opinion isn't going to change on this one. Like I said before, you'll probably have better luck trying to convince another editor. Bkissin (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why does this not qualify as "notable" coverage? Like I said, she's had entire articles and profiles about here in mainstream news sources. Here are a few examples. What about these fail to meet notability standards? These aren't just passing mentions, these are entire articles about her and her candidacy YankeesFan85 (talk) 14:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Sarah Morey
Is there a reason you moved Sarah Morey out of draft space? The article relies heavily on primary sources and the subject seems to fail WP:BIO1E. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Personally, I see a mix of both primary and secondary sources here. The History of Massachusetts blog, the Baker and Hill books, etc. As for WP:ONEEVENT, go ahead and submit it for AfD. There are plenty of other accusers and victims of the witch trials who have articles, but that's really more of an WP:OSE excuse than anything else. Bkissin (talk) 13:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Google Local Guides
Hello, you declined my article and said that it could be merged into Google Maps. Can you help me out doing this? Thanks. Aggarwala2727 (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Absolutely Aggarwala2727! Thanks for getting in touch and being so nice about it! Do you see the section on the Google Maps page where it says Google's use of classic Google Maps? Edit that section, Go to the bottom, and paste in the information about Local Guides. I'll keep an eye on it today just in case the format needs to be tweaked. I hope that helps! Bkissin (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Cedar (band) draft
Hi, you recently declined the creation of a page relating to my former band Cedar, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cedar_(band). This page is strewn with inaccuracies and is libelous, please delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.167.99 (talk) 18:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Byteball
Hi Bkissin, I understand you've declined the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Byteball page, since then I just came to the scene and wanted your opinion on the editing I have been doing. Could you please take a moment and look at the page and guide me :) thank you.
- I appreciate you coming to me for advice O0Traveller, and for being so nice about it! :) Unfortunately, I'm probably not the best person to ask about this topic, because I don't know a lot about Cryptocurrencies and what makes one crypto more notable than another. Additionally, I think there are far too many people out there who are trying to promote their cyrptos on Wikipedia, when they could be gone in a matter of weeks. If you can find another editor at WP:TEAHOUSE who can give you a better idea, they might be a better source. Bkissin (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
It was written by non-Koraens (foreign students in my class), so shouldn't be biased. Can you accept and publish it? Thanks! PS. After publication, there's a fr interwiki to be added: fr:Scandales politiques en Corée du Sud. TIA --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Draft:James Stunt
Hi Bkissin,
Thank you for your very quick review of this submission, although I would take issue with your contentions and would also reiterate that there can be absolutely no, reasonable doubt that the subject meets the Wikipedia criteria for notability, as shown by the wide range of significant coverage in trustworthy, high quality sources that was cited with my submission.
All 18 sources are obviously independent, of high quality and reliable. To suggest otherwise is nothing short of being factually incorrect and even verges on showing deliberate bias against the subject. By way of example, the credentials from a selection of two of these sources are as follows:
Spear’s Magazine – http://www.spearswms.com/james-stunt-net-worth/ – Multi-award-winning wealth management and luxury lifestyle media brand whose flagship magazine has become a must-read for the ultra-high-net- worth (UHNW) community. It is also required reading for the affluent financial services community, including the bankers, lawyers and family offices who advise the wealthy. Since its launch in 2006, Spear’s has established itself as Europe’s leading wealth management authority
Apollo Magazine – https://www.apollo-magazine.com/james-stunt/ – Founded in 1925 and published monthly, Apollo is one of the world’s oldest and most respected magazines on the visual arts. The Apollo 40 Under 40 is a selection of the most talented and inspirational young people who are driving forward the art world today.
This is before you even consider globally renowned news organisations and newspapers such as BBC News, The Guardian and The Telegraph.
In addition to the above, were the subject not as described in my submission, none of these sources would have published the stories concerned. It is highly dubious to try and claim that coverage by these sources is insignificant, especially in the light of Wiki's notability criteria, which states : If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. So the various permutations of my 18 selected sources more than meets this benchmark.
Whether you like him or not, the subject is unquestionably a successful, entrepreneur of ultra-high-net-worth, as well as being a philanthropist who owns some of the most coveted art in the world, often making donations to public causes, as well as owning collection of rare classic cars and contributing to the highest echelons of British politics. This and much more places the notability of the subject beyond any genuine and reasonable doubt.
I believe the above satisfactorily responds to your arguments and I now intend to resubmit my relevant entry about the subject.
Respectfully Yours, SFP18 SFP18 (talk) 09:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Just letting you know that although you declined creation of this template, Ggdivhjkjl created it anyway and deleted this text at Types of marriages. I think some will argue that the template has issues, including POV issues. The age field should at least include "Adult" with a pipelink to the Marriage article, since child and teen marriages are not the only marriages by age. The template also doesn't yet include same-sex marriage. But I'll leave this template topic up to others. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
The McClure Twins Resubmission
Hello Bkissin,
Hope all is well! 16 days ago you declined my draft for the McClure Twins page due to the fact that it "read more like an advertisement". I revised the draft and resubmitted it the next day. The draft has been awaiting review for two weeks and I wanted to if there was something that could be done to expedite the process.
Thank you for all of your help thus far!
Best, LaWr123 (talk) 07:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Suggestion to clean up head of talk page
I've worked through the pathway for the [[Guardian Bikes}} article from Scruitineer (talk · contribs) article you accepted at AfC then subsequently speedied by a user by a user now blocked and ultimately deleted following AfC. Scruitineer appears to be an inexperienced user who I noticed left an unanswered question at the top of your talkpage ... to help prevent other inexperienced users doing the same can I respectively suggest you housekeep the top of your user talk page and consider adding one of the Template:User Talk Pages at the top of the page ... perhaps Template:User talk for example. Careful and experienced users including sockpuppets and paid editors will likely know to post at the bottom already. Thankou.Djm-leighpark Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Can you please accept my draft
My draft has plenty of sources from the news. Look up Rebecca Ann Sedwick on google and you can see many news websites describing the whole incident that caused it. The amount of references makes Rebecca notable for her suicide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous1941 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Request on 21:15:25, 10 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Kzampog
Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my submission. I had no chance to replace the copyrighted content with a citation, as my draft was immediately deleted. Would it be possible to regain access to the deleted content, make the necessary modifications and resubmit for review?
Thank you.
Kzampog (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Josh Welle
Josh Welle is the Nominee for Congress in the 4th congressional district of NJ. How is he not notable enough for wikipedia? His la best seller book has a wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Shadow_of_Greatness His opponent in the democratic party primary has wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Keady His republican opponent has a wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Smith_(New_Jersey_politician) All 4 of the other Democrats running for congress in nj have wikipedia pages
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmattar (talk • contribs) 20:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
HABITAS request for feedback
Hi Bkissin,
Could you please provide some feedback on why you rejected the HABITAS entry? I made every effort to be as neutral as possible and all the facts are backed up by 3rd party references/publications.
I would love to make changes or improvements but unless I missed something, I do not see any specific areas for improvement. I cross referenced the article with other similar initiatives such as Soho House or NeueHouse and I see no difference.
Thanks for your help! Anni3carter (talk) 22:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Brandon Taylorian article rejection
Dear User:Bkissin
This new section is relating to your rejection of the request to publish Draft:Brandon Taylorian. I need to take some time to address your concerns with the article's creation and publication.
It seemed your main concern was in relation to the notability of the subject. The subject's notability can be derived from the ability of the young person in subject to become a published author at the age of nineteen and to have founded his own company that is linked to his book series.
All references provided focus on Brandon Taylorian entirely, and involve direct discussions of him and his work rather than simply mentioning him, which seemed to be another of your concerns with the article.
You did also mention in your review that the article was biased. I must protest this statement as I have been very careful in my rewrite of the article and thought that I had surely removed all potential bias.
I very much look forward to hearing back from you regarding these issues with the article so that we may eventually achieve its improvement and publication.
I'm also referencing in User:RHaworth as he guided with me just over a month ago in trying to improve the article for publication. RHaworth, hopefully you see some improvement in the style, the wording, and the referencing of the article in comparison to your last encounter with it?
Kind regards,
Jessemillette (talk) 18:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Request on 15:51:39, 26 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Nopirlonoparty8
Hello, my article for Alberta First was rejected because it is too similar to the Freedom Conservative Party of Alberta article. Alberta First requires its own article because it is a completely separate party from the Freedom Conservative Party. When I removed the Alberta First portion from the Freedom Conservative article it was immediately changed back, so I re-wrote an Alberta First article and when that one gets published I would remove the Alberta First portion from the Freedom Article. The Freedom Conservative Party is a new party and bears no relation to Alberta First. Thank you for your time. Hopefully I will here from you soon.
Nopirlonoparty8 (talk) 15:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Theoretical behaviorism
Reviewer seems VERY confused. Article is NOT a copy of B. F. Skinner's 1950 paper. You can reply to jers@duke.edu Thanks, JS Rayner111 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Tariq TEE-M Mirza notes
Thanks for the note, Bkissin. The source for Tariq's top 10 hit, as well as the many articles written about him in Pakistan's national press, date from 2005 to 2008 before those publications kept good online archives. I can provide scans of the physical articles, including the top 10 listing. Where should I send them? Many thanks.
Ericwestwood (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Looks like we came to the same conclusion at almost the same time on Draft:Gareth_Rhodes - is it ever possible to approve a draft and then send directly to AfD? I think this one would benefit from further discussion. SportingFlyer talk 02:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- I saw it happen with a draft about a bike company I approved. I'm not sure if we should move it from draftspace if we're unsure of its viability, especially if an AfD discussion already exists. We may also get criticism from people suggesting we have a political agenda for approving this particular candidate. I'm fine if you want to approve it and then AfD it, but I definitely have concerns. Bkissin (talk) 02:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- That makes sense to me, especially considering the candidate lost the primary, there's probably not going to be a lot of additional coverage going forward. Probably best to wait for someone else to take a look at it. Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 02:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't even realize he lost the primary! If that's the case, then it absolutely should be declined. I thought he was the Democratic nominee, but I just looked it up after you told me! Bkissin (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- It wasn't immediately clear from the article - I was so focused on the sources I didn't see that he lost! SportingFlyer talk 02:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't even realize he lost the primary! If that's the case, then it absolutely should be declined. I thought he was the Democratic nominee, but I just looked it up after you told me! Bkissin (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- That makes sense to me, especially considering the candidate lost the primary, there's probably not going to be a lot of additional coverage going forward. Probably best to wait for someone else to take a look at it. Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 02:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bkissin, I understand you've declined https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Good_News_(2019_film) page. I have added significant independent coverages. Could you please provide some feedback on why you rejected the same. The film is just announced and what ever data was there, I have cited all those and moreover I will added more references when the film will hit the theater.
I have resubmitted it for your review.
Thanks!! Risu43 (talk) 08:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Jake Clifford
Hey matey, that was me who submitted it, I think I accidently did it twice, haha. Cheers though! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Revivous (talk • contribs) 00:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- No worries Revivous! Thanks for the article! Bkissin (talk) 00:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey Bkissin
I'm still working on my article and improving it. Please don't delete it yet. I am doing my very best. Please! Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalaboomsky (talk • contribs) 03:33, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Please review page
Please review my page Dragme IDE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manjeet.tss (talk • contribs) 06:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
AfC copyvio
FYI, you approved Peter N. Steinmetz today, which contained copyrighted material. Please make sure you check for this before setting articles loose in mainspace. Natureium (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies Natureium! Last time I checked User:SQL/AFC-Ores, I didn't see the article come up. I was viewing the article on the basis of WP:NPROF. I'll be sure to run any article that I see as a possible CV violation. Bkissin (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Orient Shield exercise
Orient Shield exercise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
What was the basis on which you accepted this draft? There are a grand total of 2 references in the article, and neither of them even mention the subject. Bradv 18:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Bradv, upon google searching I was able to find a variety of other sources on the exercise, which fit the notability test for me. However, I did have an internal debate about whether or not to accept the draft given the number of sources referenced. Please be mindful or your tone when interacting with other editors, and assume good faith. In the future, you are more than welcome to join the team at WP:AFC and accept and decline articles yourself. We could use all the help we can get when working through the backlog. Otherwise, if you feel that the current article should be PROD'ed, then go ahead. Bkissin (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies if my tone was off — I was merely asking on what basis this was accepted. I am a reviewer at AfC as well, and I usually either get the author to add references before I accept the article, or I add the other sources myself if they are available. So when I saw this I was curious and didn't want to take any further action without checking with you. Bradv 22:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- No worries! I added a few more references to the article, including one that is not specifically tied to the military. Hope that helps. Bkissin (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies if my tone was off — I was merely asking on what basis this was accepted. I am a reviewer at AfC as well, and I usually either get the author to add references before I accept the article, or I add the other sources myself if they are available. So when I saw this I was curious and didn't want to take any further action without checking with you. Bradv 22:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Draft: Maccabi USA Page
Hey Bkissin,
Hope you are doing well. I was wondering if you could give any constructive feedback to my draft. You originally commented that if I fix one thing that it should be good to accept. However, another user denied my submission. It would be greatly appreciated if you could spare a minute to take a look.
Hartilli (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Crazy Russian Dad
Dear Reviewer -- you have declined my submission of the article Crazy Russian Dad and I wanted to follow-up:
1. You mentioned these are passing mentions. I disagree - as the article states, Crazy Russian Dad's main fame is within the Russian emigree circles, and as such is covered in the Russian-oriented sources, and not necessarily in the "mainstream" ones.
2. You mentioned that the sources are not independent of the subject. That is certainly not true - all references listed are independent publications that have no relations whatsoever to Crazy Russian Dad.
3. Here are a few additional references I did not include - can you please take a look if they help solidify the article:
- List Building Blog https://www.listbuildinglifestyleshow.com/095/
- Rashkin Report https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/rashkin-report/e/49058916
- Video Interview on Life.ru (Russian Television channel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdoNBBRoONE&feature=youtu.be
Please consider and let me know how to proceed with the draft you declined. Thank you in advance,
- I have updated and resubmitted the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shmuel.zweinstein (talk • contribs) 15:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Shmuel.zweinstein (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Dear @Bkissin:. I have made the changes and resubmitted the article. Will you be re-reviewing it? I'm not sure about the protocol. It has been a few weeks and it has been quiet. Please advise!
Hello! Could you review the draft again after my comment? Thank you Dinosaurussia (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Jive Shikisha
Hi There, I'm a little confused as to why the above has been declined? The page is a normal 'album' page for the artist Robin Scot - who has his own page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Scott_(singer)
As well as pages for his first two albums: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York%E2%80%93London%E2%80%93Paris%E2%80%93Munich and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Official_Secrets_Act_(album)
...under his pseudonym 'M'
And the source cited was from his official website.
Any feedback which could remedy this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
JoeCovenant (talk) 01:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
received email of user created and was declined the publishing to Wikipedia
How could I contact the person of information of a name known not of me directly?
Joe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.224.137.80 (talk) 13:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Rear_Admiral_Ravindra_Jayanti_Nadkarni
08 Sep 2018
Copyrighted material? What are you talking about man? Material is from publicly posted website of government of India. How can that be copyright? If that is the case, 90% of wikipedia should deleted. You are being a mall-cop just because someone made you an editor. People like you are the information Nazis.
Signed JLARXY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlarxy (talk • contribs) 05:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
AfC for Draft:Hurricane Florence (2018)
I have removed the redirect on Hurricane Florence (2018) as requested, but this does not make it possible for a non-administrator/reviewer to move the page. When attempting to move the page myself, I notice a large red comment stating that we must not manually move it, as it is necessary for page history to move with it. If you have the ability to move the page with its history, that would be greatly appreciated, otherwise I will temporarily re-redirect the mainspace article as to not leave a blank page. Thank you. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 23:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Yosef Haim HaCohen
Hello. I see that you accepted this draft and moved it to Yosef Haim HaCohen. Can I ask whether you investigated the copyvio issue that I had flagged? Cordless Larry (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Cordless Larry! I probably should have reached out to you as opposed to DrStrauss on this article, seeing as he has since left the website. I tried my best to do a re-write of the Biography and His Students sections of the article, so those should be generally OK CV-wise, and have been fixed with INCITE when necessary. I'm not sure how to approach the section about publications. I think my main goal was to fix the WP:WEASEL and promo language that DrStrauss mentioned in his comment, as well as clean up some of the citations. In looking at the talk page for the article, did anyone get back to you about receiving a faxed copy of the information? I tried googling the Magazine in question and was unable to find it. Bkissin (talk) 13:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- No they didn't, unfortunately. I'm not sure how adding citations fixes the possibility of copyright violation (although it would help avoid the problem of plagiarism), but your rewriting will hopefully have ensured that the text is no longer identical to whatever the source of the translation was. Maybe we should have a go at rewording the publications section too, just to be sure? Cordless Larry (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- I definitely agree! I wasn't sure whether to have it there at all, because I was concerned about how to make the section not come off as promotional, but I will try my best.Bkissin (talk) 21:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- No they didn't, unfortunately. I'm not sure how adding citations fixes the possibility of copyright violation (although it would help avoid the problem of plagiarism), but your rewriting will hopefully have ensured that the text is no longer identical to whatever the source of the translation was. Maybe we should have a go at rewording the publications section too, just to be sure? Cordless Larry (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
On Innovation Culture review
Thank you for the review. Gradually, I am beginning to get a good grasp how articles must be written on here.Gmli82164 (talk) 22:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Gmli82164
- No worries, Gmli8164. It takes us all a long time to figure out how to write good articles. Definitely seek help from the Teahouse or other editors and they will be more than happy to help you. Writing for Wikipedia is different than writing on another site. Because we are an encyclopedia, our main concern is not to write persuasively (to try and convince someone that something is good/bad) but instead to write the information in a way that educates the reader, but remains in a neutral point of view. This can be difficult, and even some of the best editors struggle with it from time to time. Remember to cite your sources and choose reliable sources when you are citing references. Good luck with everything and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 23:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Draftiran 2025 horison
I had to trsnslate alltext frpm scratch Less than 50% is copied Submit draft iran 2025 horizon main article Fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/سندچشمانداز۱۴۰۴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.215.174.194 (talk) 02:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
i will edit article justt submit draft DO I HAVE TO DO I HAVE TO TALK FRENCH WITH YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.254.86.34 (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
resubmitted and edited5.219.69.144 (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Draft; iran 2025 horizon vision Redone by wikipedia administrator cleaned of the above-noted copyright violation and its history redacted 5.75.25.133 (talk) 07:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I've noticed that you stated that the draft was declined because it's about an athlete and the submission didn't meet the notability guidelines. I wanted to say that the article is about a football club playing in the Egyptian Second Division, not an athlete. Just wanted to say this in case you didn't noticed it. I've also submitted the draft for review again. Thank you. Ben5218 (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ben5218! I did notice what the article was about. According to Wikipedia's notability guidelines for sports-related articles, This guideline does not provide any criteria for the presumed notability of sports teams. Teams are expected to demonstrate notability by the general notability guideline. According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability also gives guidelines on teams and football clubs. Wikipedia also has guidelines for soccer leagues they consider to be fully professional. In its current form, your draft doesn't meet any of those guidelines. Bkissin (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I was just confused because you stated that the draft is about an athlete and not a football club. Also I thought that Egyptian Second Division would be considered notable, but seems like I was wrong. Thanks for your time! Ben5218 (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- No worries Ben5218! When reviewing drafts, there are only a few options to tag a particular draft, and the comment about Athlete notability is the closest to WP:NSPORT. You could try to see if you can make the article pass the general notability guideline, but that can be tough. Thanks for understanding! Happy editing! :) Bkissin (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I was just confused because you stated that the draft is about an athlete and not a football club. Also I thought that Egyptian Second Division would be considered notable, but seems like I was wrong. Thanks for your time! Ben5218 (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hemant gupta7/sandbox
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Hemant gupta7/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Anti-corruption
I just saw that you decline my submission of Draft:Anti-Corruption and suggested integrating it into the article. Anti-corruption is a disambiguation though, which made me believe that merging an article with a disambiguation might not be the most appropriate way forward, as it would basically be only a replacement. I would have assumed that moving the disambiguation might be the better approach but also do have to admit that I might not be fully aware of the relevant policies in this specific regard. Best regards --WiR IACA (talk) 06:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, that's the reason/history behind this article! I was wondering why such a big topic was in draftspace. I'm not exactly sure what to do. I think you made the right move bringing it over to draftspace. I'll leave a comment on the draft and get another editors opinion. Thanks for reaching out WiR IACA! Bkissin (talk) 16:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your reply! --WiR IACA (talk) 07:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I saw the discussion on the article draft and was thinking what to do. Do you think that there might be anything I could do, in order to facilitate the process? Best regards, --WiR IACA (talk) 08:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
copyright issues
Thanks for your feedback and appreciate the comments concerning copyright. As we are talking biographical information I didn't think that this would be relevant in this case. However, I rewrote the entire page to be different from my Faculty page. Not sure how the review will work now but just wanted to let you know. Cheers Yasserelsheshtawy (talk) 01:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Allianz_Kenya .Actually we need to create a new brand page on behalf of Allianz, i am officially associated with brand ALLIANZ and hold copyright. I will add more content on this page and resubmit, is it viable. i have seen many other brands having their dedicated pages on wikipedia. i have already added content on Allian#Kenya prior and now we intent to create a new page dedicated specifically to KENYA. Your Advice is highly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.196.55.187 (talk) 04:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Zego
Sorry to bother - would it be possible to get some specific guidance on what language sounds like an advertisement / which sources are deemed to be unreliable?
Many thanks :) (Milesgeorge86 (talk) 12:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)).
Your submission at Articles for creation: Parti culinaire du Québec has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Deletion of my page "Emperor Maximilian Prize"
Hello Bkissin,
you deleted my newly created page "Emperor Maximilian Prize" due to copyright reasons yesterday evening.
Actually I can't see any violations, as the page where I copied the main ideas from is being owned/edited by myself...(https://www.kaisermaximilianpreis.at/en/Public-Tender)
So, I guess the deletion was a misunderstanding, am I right?
In case that I am maybe mistaken, could you please give me some advice how to handle with this problem in the correct way? (as I am a new user on Wikipedia)
Best regards Michael C. Wolf (talk) 10:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
feedback please on Taoist Cowboys draft article
Hello. I'm wondering if you could please give me some specific feedback on the sources I'm citing? The Rentfro anthology features a chapter on the band and mentions of them in several other chapters. The Turczyn article and other Metro Pulse and Mercury and other retrospective articles are specifically about the band, not passing mentions. Or is there some other problem with the article or with these sources? (I'll watch this page, but you could post on my draft article's Talk page if you prefer.). Thank you! Troutfang (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the specific feedback on my Talk page. Very helpful. I appreciate it.Troutfang (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to know why our post was declined for unreliable sources. If our source is approved but not the content, how can we improve our page, so it will be approved? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Iron_Shield_Networks
I used the Department of Veteran Affairs as my source.
Also, I would like to know why this page does not have any references but was approved as it seems references are very important to be listed on Wik: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validas
Thank you for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaida821 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Declined Page- Iron Shield Networks
Hello,
I would like to know why our post was declined for unreliable sources. If our source is approved but not the content, how can we improve our page, so it will be approved? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Iron_Shield_Networks
I used the Department of Veteran Affairs as my source.
Also, I would like to know why this page does not have any references but was approved as it seems references are very important to be listed on Wik: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validas
Thank you for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaida821 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Because it relies on only one source. Take a look at TigerSwan as an example. It has a variety of sources from reliable publications that offer coverage that is independent of the company, meaning that they aren't press releases by the company, or written by someone in the company or taken directly from the company's website. Additionally, 1-2 sentences does not make a quality article. Plus "our post"? Are you involved with this company? If so, you should probably read Wikipedia's policies around conflict of interest and paid editing. Finally, thank you for bringing up Validas. Just because other stuff exists does not mean that everything gets a Wikipedia article. You are absolutely right, the article for Validas has no references and reads like it was copy-pasted directly from the company website. I have made sure that it will be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. Bkissin (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Talk:James V. Brown Library
The James V. Brown Library is NOT on the National Register of Historic Places. Dbrigandi (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Shoot! That stinks! Usually NRHP listed sites are notable enough for an article. I think the draft article for the library is on the right track, and it looks like you put a lot of work into it. I'll take another look at it for you. Bkissin (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Ekata deb
I was already in the newspaper. Kindly type ekata deb nasa in Google, u can get my updates Ekata Deb (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Ekata! A few notes:
- Look at Wikipedia's policy for writing about yourself and Wikipedia's policy around Conflict of Interest
- None of the claims made in the article have been referenced by reliable sources
- I would look over Wikipedia's guidelines for who is notable enough to have a wikipedia article
I hope that helps. Bkissin (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Muzzafarpur shelter home rape case draft
Hi. I saw your comment on the draft I had created: Draft:Muzaffarpur_Shelter_Home_Rape_Case. Since another article about the same topic was accepted (Muzaffarpur_shelter_case), I will simply copy my article contents to the existing one and redirect the topic. Thanks. Breakfastisready (talk) 17:42, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- That's a great idea! Thanks Breakfastisready! Bkissin (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Image tagging
You would have to remove all the images from the draft and then tag them one at a time. I deleted them all and warned the uploader. Saves time. Thanks for catching it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)