User talk:Breakfastisready

Welcome!

Hello, Breakfastisready, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Muzaffarpur Shelter Home Rape Case, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Muzaffarpur Shelter Home Rape Case

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Muzaffarpur Shelter Home Rape Case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.news18.com/newstopics/sexual-abuse.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law and the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umar Khalid

Hello. In regards to your comment on Talk:Umar Khalid:

Why exactly has this page been protected? Umar Khalid has been involved in Dalit protests, was in the news from being suspended from JNU and is the son of Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas. He keeps getting mentioned on news debates by Arnab Goswami He seems notable enough to be mentioned. I don't think the only reason of him being notable is far from just being in the JNU controversy. Many other wiki pages mention his name. Breakfastisready (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Umar Khalid was creation protected after having been repeatedly created. You can start Draft:Umar Khalid by going to Wikipedia:Your first article. Let me know if you need any help. Sam Sailor 07:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Breakfastisready (talk) 20:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Umar Khalid has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Umar Khalid. Thanks! Catrìona (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umar Khalid has been accepted

Umar Khalid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of cliscep

Hi there. I undid your use of a cliscep source on the Jordan Peterson page. This is because the source is only a group blog, and so is a self-published source (WP:SPS). If the claim is found in more reliable sources, then it may be appropriate. I suggest you take a look at the linked policy and see for yourself. Happy editing! Jlevi (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jlevi: Hi. The source is actually just a transcript of an interview. Do you think the video itself be an acceptable source for this edit? Breakfastisready (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]