User talk:Berber.Enjoyer2

This is Berber.Enjoyer2's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor: this is probably notable but has a few issues.

You have some unsourced paragraphs and sections (the Consequence section, for example), please cite using a reliable independent source.

The Negociation section (which should be spelt Negotiation) is written inappropriately. Wikipedia should never pose questions to the reader, instead simply paraphrase what reliable independent sources state about a topic. Check WP:NPOV.

You can break up the longer bits of text into paragraphs, and remove the colons after the year subheadings too.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Berber.Enjoyer2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://journals.openedition.org/cdlm/8011#ftn62. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 16:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Berber.Enjoyer2! Your additions to Draft:The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. .

Your submission at Articles for creation: American-Algerian War (1785-1795) (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor: we need to see inline citations so every statement has a source. Please read WP:INCITE and if you need help, follow the instructions at WP:INTREFVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American-Algerian War (1785-1795) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Fort Saint Elmo (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Great Siege of Malta#Capture of Fort St. Elmo instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capture of Fort Saint Elmo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

|reason2=|details2=|comment=|sig=yes}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: American-Algerian War (1785-1795) (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American-Algerian War (1785-1795) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almohad-Ayyubid War (1187-1188) has been accepted

Almohad-Ayyubid War (1187-1188), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American-Algerian War (1785-1795) has been accepted

American-Algerian War (1785-1795), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 12:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Zsohl. I noticed that in this edit to Algerian–American War (1785–1795), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zsohl ^(Talk) 16:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Actually i removed the content because another page just exist about it, it was my old draft that was better because it's the real name of this War :)Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bombardement of Tripoli (1728)

Hello, Berber.Enjoyer2,

Thank you for creating Bombardement of Tripoli (1728).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please cite your sources inline.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Berber

Hope you're doing great! You have beaten me on this article Idah War (1515 – 1516), I actually planned to create it. I have moved the article to a more appropriate location, Igala–Benin War (1515 – 1516). Nice job man! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,first,thank you for your message but i have a question,why did you change the name of the war ?Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Berber.Enjoyer2 Hi there! The war was between the Igala Kingdom and the Benin Kingdom that is why I had to retitle it. Source I have consulted all acknowledge that it is more appropriate to call it Igala-Benin War. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Berber.Enjoyer2 and @Vanderwaalforces, can anyone provide the page numbers for the books and journals cited? This will aid in more verification. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 08:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans I have formatted the references now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bombardment of Tripoli (1728) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bombardment of Tripoli (1728). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because absolutely no inline citations make the whole article unverifiable, despite the 'sources and bibliography' section. The facts in the article require attribution to a reliable source.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate account

Hi Berber.Enjoyer2, can you explain the purpose or status of your other account, Berber.Enjoyer? Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 01:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,yes it's normal i forgot the password of this account so i decided To create an new one(i tried to reset the password but i didn't have e-mail on this account)Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for the clarification. Please make sure to read and review Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry, to make sure you don't accidentally misuse multiple accounts. If you don't use the other account again in the future, there should be no problem. For your convenience, I have added a template on your other account's page (User:Berber.Enjoyer) to clarify that it is linked to you and so that you are in compliance with Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses (in that link you'll also find a link to other templates you can use instead if you want). Let me know if you have any questions about this. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Operation al-Aqsa Flood

Hi, I believe there is already a page for this at October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict. If this is a duplicate, do you mind blanking and redirecting to the other page? Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,yes i was doing the page then in didn't saw that she was already existing(talk)^{Ping me!} 19:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish-Algerian war

Hi Berber.Enjoyer2, is there any connection or communication between you and Seniorjackfr? Because both of you created separate articles about the exact same subject within mere hours of each other: Swedish-Algerian War of 1791 and Swedish-Algerian War (1791–1792). R Prazeres (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,no there is not i just saw his page but it was desastrous and full of errors(he don't know the subject) so i decided to create the page.One of the biggest error of the page Swedish-Algerian War of 1791 is the date.Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for your clarification. I will leave a new comment on Talk:Swedish-Algerian War (1791–1792) so that a solution can be discussed there. In the future, however, if you see an article that has problems you should improve it (and discuss disagreements on its talk page if necessary) rather than creating a duplicate article, which makes more problems. R Prazeres (talk) 18:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by North8000 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for you work. However, an article on this topic alreade exists as Dutch-Algerian War (1716-1726) You have a lot of good material and sources here. Suggest adding whatever you can to Dutch-Algerian War (1716-1726) Sincerely,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Dutch-Algerian War (1715-1726) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

North8000 (talk) 19:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Berber.Enjoyer2, you already created Dutch-Algerian War (1716-1726), why did you create a second one? This makes more than once that you have done something similar. R Prazeres (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Sorry it was a old draft I don’t know how to delete it 😓

Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, don't hesitate to ask for help if you're not sure how to do something. To avoid making other reviewers accidentally waste their time, please try to check that you haven't submitted any other obsolete drafts. You should be able to unsubmit them I believe. Old drafts will be deleted automatically if you stop editing them for 6 months, but there's also an easy process to delete drafts that you can follow here. I hope that helps in the future. R Prazeres (talk) 17:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Fort Saint Elmo (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Great Siege of Malta#Capture of Fort St. Elmo instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit this without discussion on Great Siege of Malta's talk page, as it is already covered in better context there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capture of Fort Saint Elmo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bombardment of Tripoli (1728)

Hello, Berber.Enjoyer2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bombardment of Tripoli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of Fort Saint Elmo

Hello, Berber.Enjoyer2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of Fort Saint Elmo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! Thank for the message I forgot this page. I think it should be added I left a message on the talk page of the page Great Siege of Malta :) Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 17:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Battle of al-Asnam. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Berber.Enjoyer2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Berber.Enjoyer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited his page because I know him we work together on Discord and other social media and he helped me to use Wikipedia ! You can use your tool and you will see that we have 2 different IP , please considerate this message.Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That still violates WP:SOCK, though. See WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 19:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Berber.Enjoyer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, but I'm not quite following your point. This isn't my 'second' account. The only other account I had was Berber.Enjoyer, for which I lost the password. An admin has already clarified this situation. Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, multiple simultaneous requests. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please tell which admin clarified this. 331dot (talk) 19:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: See the section entitled "Alternate account" higher up on this page. The user who "clarified this" is not an admin, though.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello for how long I will be block ? Berber.Enjoyer2—-(talk) 16:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your block is indefinite. It will not expire automatically and will remain in place until you convince an admin it should be lifted. --Yamla (talk) 15:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Berber.Enjoyer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As for the situation regarding the modification made to the user page user:ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ, I want to clarify that it was a misunderstanding. The intention was solely to add the term "Algerian" alongside "Moroccan" to acknowledge the historical significance of the Almohads in Algerian history. Upon examining the revisions of the user's previous page, I fail to see how user:ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ could be considered my second account. While there may be some similarities, such as the similarity in our names, with theirs being "Aylen" and mine "Aylan," it's worth noting that "Aylan" is a common name in Algeria. Additionally, our ethnic backgrounds differ; I am of Kabyle descent, whereas the user's ancestors are Arab-Turkish (Khoulighouli). I hope this clarifies the situation regarding the potential "second account" user:ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ.Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked; procedural decline since this can't be discussed here. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , it’s been a day that I left this message I hope it will considered ! Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Berber.Enjoyer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have still no reply for my unblock reason , I know this is a mistake and I want to create new articles and do some modifications please so can an admin study my case. Thank you !Berber.Enjoyer2 (talk) 10:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

STOP making multiple simultaneous unblock requests. It's abusive. If nobody's responding, that's your problem. Your unblock request is not sufficient to convince anyone. You may rewrite or remove your single open unblock request but starting a new request (or, as here, two new requests) just wastes everyone's time. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've just reverted their latest creation of another unblock request and revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Fort Saint Elmo (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Geardona were:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Great siege of Malta#Capture of Fort St.Elmo. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capture of Fort Saint Elmo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 11:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #88067

UTRS appeal #88067 has been declined. — Newslinger talk 01:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]