User talk:Benpring112

This is Benpring112's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Lupano 2 (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

please place the references at the facts they are used to reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danny Lupano 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danny Lupano 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Benpring112! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randy Mavinga has been accepted

Randy Mavinga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagleash (talk) 23:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @eagleash, thank you so much for the quick and easy approval. I've just submitted a new application. If you have any spare time, I'd love if you could try and pick it up please? No worries if not of course!

Regards,

Ben.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Messemo Junior Bakayoko has been accepted

Messemo Junior Bakayoko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Benpring112,

Please sign all of your talk page comments, otherwise, editors have to go look at the page history to find out who left a comment. Using four tildes will leave your name and the date and the time of your comment. See the end of this message for my signature.

If you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion for Mark Randall (footballer). When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in your sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse. Don't just delete it, find a reliable source to back up it up and include that he was found not guilty. Mako001 (C) (T) 22:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benpring112 (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mako001, it's on one of the references attached that he's not guilty. It's pointless being on there seeing as it can tarnish his name if read incorrectly. I would like it removed imminently please as it really does serve no purpose and can only effect his name in a negative way.

Thanks

Benpring112 (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Mako001, please can you confirm that this has been removed?

Ben

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bradley Ash, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source and should not be cited in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benpring112 (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me. Have edited accordingly.

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benpring112 (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me. I won't cite again. Thanks again.

Benpring112 (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James John Taylor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James John Taylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James John Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nehme₁₄₉₉ 09:23, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please can you confirm to me what seems to be the issue with the article James Taylor?

Regards Benpring112 (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the deletion discussion, thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 10:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kobe Chong

Hello, Benpring112

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kobe Chong, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales^Parley 19:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kobe Chong

The article Kobe Chong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I agree that this doesn't currently pass either guideline yet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi Benpring112, Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#The Sun regarding use of the newspaper The Sun as a source. Thank you for your contributions Josey Wales^Parley 22:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kobe Chong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kobe Chong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobe Chong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Josey Wales^Parley 22:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bradley Ash

The article Bradley Ash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 11:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vincent Harper

The article Vincent Harper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 11:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bradley Ash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley Ash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Ash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Giant Snowman 12:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vincent Harper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vincent Harper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Harper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Giant Snowman 12:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Lupano 2 (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danny Lupano 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danny Lupano 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 17:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Danny Lupano 2

Hello, Benpring112. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danny Lupano 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danny Lupano 2

Hello, Benpring112. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danny Lupano 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]