Jump to content

User talk:Bejinhan/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
I hereby award Bejinhan The Working Woman's Barnstar for their help reviewing files for Wikipedia Loves Art. Kaldari (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Possible Dook Resolution

Hi Bejinhan,

I may be reading DukeEgr93's last comment too liberally, but I think we may be moving toward resolution at the Dook mediation page. Can you please review his last comment and reply as you see fit? Thanks. —Noah 16:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Heyy :]

Thank you. I'm sorry for leaving it so long I was so confused I didn't know what to do. If your still offering than thasnk again. I'll talk to you if i need you. In college right now :] Assyria hightower (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

Dook Mediation

Hi Bejinhan... I believe the positions on the Dook mediation case are drawn pretty clearly at this point. What do you think? —Noah 19:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight newsletter

Hi there. Just a really quick, short note. You're currently listed as a spotlight participant, here, but you are not on the list of people who want to get the newsletter. If you want to receive updates about spotlight, then please add your name on this page. If not, no further action required, and I won't bug you about it again. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  15:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

Rights of women

Hi we're doing a rights of women time line for drama. You wouldn't happen to know where I could get info like this from would you? As soon as I have some spare time I will complete the tasks. Thanks, Assyria hightower (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight Newsletter - October

The Spotlight Newsletter, Issue III : October 2009

Join the collaboration, in the IRC chat room!
Wikiproject
After great success with Marco Polo (and his sheep!), Dry ice went pretty well. USS Massachusetts (BB-59) was challenging, and with Monkey, the project faded: Battle of the Nobles and Oil got little attention. 		We need your help! Spotlight is a collaboration - it works really well when lots of people get involved. It doesn't matter what skills you bring, because between us, we can do great things. Even if you make one, simple edit - if 100 people do that, we'll have made significant progress, and we all benefit by learning from each other.
Current article
This time, we've created a brand-new article, and between us we're confident of achieving a Did you know... on the main page, and work towards getting the article rated as C-class or B-class.
 Father Aengus Finucane died on 6 October at the age of 77; he was an Irish priest who did lots of work helping refugees of world conflicts, and was the head of the charity Concern. There are plenty of reliable sources, so it should be easy to write this - so please help out by editing the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stop press: Aengus Finucane just appeared on the main page

Home · Suggested articles|Current Article · Next Article · Change Subscription · Unsubscribe

Heyy!

Hey how's it going? Haven't talked to you in a while so thought I might bust in and make an appearance! Marx01 Tell me about it 02:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I saw that on Gaia's page... It really is rather sad to see such a good editor (semi-)retire. I hope she's doing well though :D. So you're mainly on IRC? What's that? Haha sorry I just kinda do random edits and help my adoptees when they need it. I should probably change my wikicat sign to a wikignome... I hope to start editing more ravenously soon though. Marx01 Tell me about it 23:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

Editor review archived

Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarmtalk 00:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

Excuse me, I wish to state the reason the La Carretera article is short is that I do not have enough information, but that will change as time passes. I ask you to hold on your hurry to delete this page. Thanks. Julio Puentes (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Did I forget to thank you? ..

Bejinhan ,Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 174 in support, 2 in opposition and 1 neutral votes. Special thanks goes to RegentsPark, Samir and John Carter for their kind nomination and support. I am truly honored by the trust and confidence that the community has placed in me. I thank you for your kind inputs and I will be sincerely looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas ( including my english ;) ). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). Have a great day ! -- Tinu Cherian - 06:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Disabling editprotect

Why did you disable this editprotect request? Did you mean to disable it? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

...And indeed this one. Are you aware that these have not actually been processed yet? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Dook Mediation

Hi... I have a question on the Dook Mediation page. Thanks, —Noah 22:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

Edit war at NOM

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Organization for Marriage. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

November 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 06:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bejinhan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to contest this block because I think that I've been blocked unfairly. What was I doing wrong? User talk:FatherTruth was making un-neutral point of view edits in the National Organization for Marriage article and I was reverting him because of that. I also left warnings on his talk page and he refused to listen. Not only that, in my edit summary, I also asked him to explain his reason for those edits. He refused by not doing so. In fact, I wasn't the only person who was reverting him. How can I allow such edits to be done on such an article? BejinhanTalk 12:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:3RR is pretty clear on this point, and I see five reversions of substantially the same content. Keep in mind the block is to avoid disruption. This doesn't mean the edits you were reverting were correct edits; you've gotten caught in a policy issue. You would have been better to report the editor to WP:AN/I, as unfortunate as that advice is.  Frank  |  talk  12:29, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Criticism on Thanvi

Greetings, Thanks for your reply, but I am not adding criticism, but I want to add the context and actual text of the given controversial Fatwa by him, is it violating the rule ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibne.adhi (talk • contribs) 12:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes I want to copy exact context of his given gatwa from the public domain, as this is creating controversy on himself. --Ibne Adhi (talk) 07:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RadioFan

I have provided answers to the questions and would appreciate your thoughts on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RadioFan.--RadioFan (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!

To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.

It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:

  • Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
  • Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
  • Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
  • Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
  • Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
  • Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
  • Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
  • Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
  • Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
  • In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.

If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew talk at 03:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

A piano keyboard encompassing 1 octave Hello, Bejinhan! This is just a note thanking you for participating in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with a total of 93 support !votes, 1 oppose and 3 editors remaining neutral. While frankly overwhelmed by the level of support, I humbly thank the community for the trust it has placed in me, and vow to use the tools judiciously and without malice.
KV5 (Talk • Phils)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

Comment

Any reason you just created User:NJA? I was about to rename someone to that. MBisanz talk 07:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

Happy Christmas!

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

LouriePieterse is wishing you Happy Christmas! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Yuletide, Litha, Eid, Mōdraniht, Diwali, Hogmanay, Wren's Day, Hannukkah, Kwanzaa, Lenaia, Festivus, Jonkonnu, or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

"The greatest gift they'll get this year is life." ~ Bob Geldof & Midge Ure

Spread the hugs & cheer by adding {{subst:User:Deliriousandlost/happy christmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

Sorry I am a little late... :( LouriePieterse 08:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow!

Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

False warning

WTF?!? You'd better look again at my one-and-only edit to the King Standish article.[1] Adding a source and removing the DB tag is hardly vandalism. Once you've done that, you can go back and remove the warning from my talk page. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

You're suffering from a misconception - removing CSD tags is not limited to admins. Anybody except the creator can do so, hopefully after addressing the problems. If you're going to try and warn editors, perhaps you could actually read the tags. "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." Where does it say anything about admins only? Gee, it doesn't. The tag you used is also for real people, not fictional, so your use of it was wrong to begin with. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 04:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

WikiCup 2010 January newsletter

We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to Hungary Sasata (submissions), our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than Pennsylvania Hunter Kahn (submissions) and New Orleans TonyTheTiger (submissions) (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to Isle of Man Fetchcomms (submissions)- his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

DYK for Bia National Park

Updated DYK query On February 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bia National Park, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Hello, What changes would you suggest to article AutoDock do be sure that speedy deletion criteria could be lifted?Wojcz (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter

Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to Hungary Sasata (submissions), our round one winner (1010 points), and to Pennsylvania Hunter Kahn (submissions) and New Orleans TonyTheTiger (submissions), who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). Connecticut Staxringold (submissions) claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), Geschichte (submissions) claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points), Jujutacular (submissions) claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and Republic of Ireland Candlewicke (submissions) claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bejinhan/Archive_2&oldid=1166522577"