User talk:Bebel2024

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bebel2024! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 15:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Case (April 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bruce Case

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Bruce Case, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Attack" is perhaps a bit of a misnomer here, but it is on English Wikipedia not allowed to state that people have committed a crime without a conviction, and the whole article is written as if the named suspects are already convicted of murder. Fram (talk) 14:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ola eu n postei o artigo como um atack e sim contei os fatos vou revisar e modificar eiu peço desculpas Bebel2024 (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Celso Daniel. Fragrant Peony (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

e por casua que eu já fiz o caso Bebel2024 (talk) 17:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rubio Case

The article has been moved to draft because it is so badly written that it needs a review before being placed in mainspace. Deb (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok vou revisar Bebel2024 (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bruce case

Same with this one. Deb (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok vou revisar Bebel2024 (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rubio Case (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This might be real but with how its written it makes it seem like a joke.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rubio Case and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bebel2024! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce case (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs notability beyond local news and need to show lasting impact. Are there other incidents that refer to this one as a reference?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruce case and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Case of the black bitch" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Case of the black bitch to the article Preta case has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 28 § Case of the black bitch until a consensus is reached.

I'm struggling to assume good faith on your part here, but given your apparent very modest command of English, and considering what the literal translation from Portuguese of "female dog" into English is, it's just barely conceivable that you chose this title innocently as a direct, literal translation from the Portuguese, without understanding the rather explosive racial undertones and attack nature of the title. I'll keep my judgment on that score in abeyance for the time being, but if you wish to comment on deleting the redirect (i.e., the original title you created for this article) then feel free to weigh in at this Rfd. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Raluca Case

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Raluca Case, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Filó Case

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Filó Case, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raluca Case

The article Raluca Case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A spat on YouTube is not an unusual or notable incident

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 08:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Filó Case

The article Filó Case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not ready. Move to Draft space for general rewrite?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 10:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Case

A tag has been placed on Bruce Case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Is not notable, WP:A7

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 15:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 17:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

e por casua que eu fiz o caso Bebel2024 (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English language Wikipedia, please communciate in English, and as I have said at WP:PNT please work on tidying the articles you are creating before making more.--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please sign you posts, this is becoming disruptive--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi, please don't link dates (or common terms). Tony (talk) 07:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop linking the dates — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 14:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOEDITSECTION

Please stop creating articles with NOEDITSECTION set — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 14:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mercia Nakashima case

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mercia Nakashima case, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mercia Nakashima case. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Articles should not include NOEDITSECTION — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 16:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:May 2023 crimes in South America

A tag has been placed on Category:May 2023 crimes in South America indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sota case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sota case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sota case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crimes in Spain

Hi, I see you added the category "Crimes in Spain" to a couple of cases on my watchlist. This is what's called a parent category, in that it already contains the other categories for the page. One would go on Category:Crimes in Spain, then Category:Murders in Spain, then finally "Category:[Year] murders in Spain", which is already on the page. Unknown Temptation (talk) 10:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Filó Case moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Filó Case, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:April 2023 events in Brazil

A tag has been placed on Category:April 2023 events in Brazil indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Thefts in Brazil

A tag has been placed on Category:Thefts in Brazil indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bruce Case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Case

A tag has been placed on Bruce Case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The article accuses a living person of a crime (murder) which didn't take place; I believe this is a violation of Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2010 in Sao Paulo

A tag has been placed on Category:2010 in Sao Paulo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cases of femicide in Brazil

A tag has been placed on Category:Cases of femicide in Brazil indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 02:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Crash of the Embraer EMB-721 prefix PT-EGI in 1980

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Crash of the Embraer EMB-721 prefix PT-EGI in 1980. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Barra do Garças air disaster. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Barra do Garças air disaster. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ... discospinster _talk 19:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

eu errei, eu não sei que teve o caso Bebel2024 (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Killing of João Alberto Silveira Freitas

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Killing of João Alberto Silveira Freitas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 15:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bebel2024, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Portuguese; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Portuguese? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Mathglot (talk) 19:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bem-vindo(a)!

Olá, Bebel2024, bem-vindo(a) à Wikipédia! Apesar de esforços para melhorar a Wikipédia serem sempre bem recebidos, infelizmente suas contribuições não foram escritas em um nível de inglês bom o suficiente para ser útil. Você parece ser mais familiarizado com o Português; sabia que existe uma Wikipédia em português? Talvez você prefira contribuir lá em vez de aqui. De qualquer forma, bem-vindo(a) ao projeto e obrigado(a) por seus esforços! Mathglot (talk) 19:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bebel2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FUI BLOQUEADO POR IP MAS NÃO FIZ NADA DE ERRADO GOSTARIA DA REMOÇÃO DO BLOQUEIO POR FAVOR Bebel2024 (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Killing of João Alberto Silveira Freitas

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Killing of João Alberto Silveira Freitas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rape victims in Brazil has been nominated for merging

Category:Rape victims in Brazil has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 02:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crimes in Salvador has been nominated for deletion

Category:Crimes in Salvador has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bruce Case

Hello, Bebel2024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruce Case, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rubio Case

Hello, Bebel2024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rubio Case, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Filó Case

Hello, Bebel2024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Filó Case, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mercia Nakashima case

Hello, Bebel2024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mercia Nakashima case, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bruce Case

Hello, Bebel2024. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bruce Case".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rubio Case

Hello, Bebel2024. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rubio Case".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bruce case

Hello, Bebel2024. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bruce case".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filó Case

Hello, Bebel2024. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filó Case".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joanna Marcenal case

Hello, Bebel2024. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joanna Marcenal case".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rafael Mascarenhas case

The article Rafael Mascarenhas case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The account that created the page, Bebel2024, has been indef-blocked in both pt-wiki, en-wiki for creating woefully deficient articles about day-to-day incidents with no merit beyond [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper WP:NEWS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]