User talk:Bbarmadillo/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bbarmadillo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Paid editing
I see you have disclosed your paid status on Micah Altman, but you have not yet disclosed link(s) to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services as requested earlier. Please do so before making any further edit per WP:PAID to comply with full disclosure guidelines. GSS (talk|c|em) 03:46, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- @GSS: Such kind of disclosure seems to be outside of (on top of) what's required by WP:PAID. If you think otherwise, please highlight where WP:PAID specifically require to "post links to all active accounts at websites where paid Wikipedia-editing services are advertised". --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- See the second last paragraph of "how to disclose" section that reads
Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services
. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:48, 11 August 2019 (UTC)- @GSS: Thank you for clarifying it. Link added to main page. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- There appear to be substantially more jobs listed on your Upwork account than are listed on your userpage. Can you please review and update the list of paid contributions on your userpage to reflect all paid work that you have undertaken on Wikipedia (if you could also format it in a more human readable manner, that would also be appreciated, but it's not required - disclosure of all of your clients is, however). Yunshui 雲水 08:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yunshui: 1) Not all of my jobs are Wikipedia related, some of them are general editing and copywriting 2) Some of my jobs are pure consulting and did not result in any Wikipedia posting. 3) As such, the current list reflects all paid contributions 4) Good point about making the list more readable. It was in fact, until some recent changes in formatting. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- There appear to be substantially more jobs listed on your Upwork account than are listed on your userpage. Can you please review and update the list of paid contributions on your userpage to reflect all paid work that you have undertaken on Wikipedia (if you could also format it in a more human readable manner, that would also be appreciated, but it's not required - disclosure of all of your clients is, however). Yunshui 雲水 08:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @GSS: Thank you for clarifying it. Link added to main page. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- See the second last paragraph of "how to disclose" section that reads
Your submission at Articles for creation: Quality Logo Products (August 21)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quality Logo Products and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quality Logo Products, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Bbarmadillo!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zava has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Lapablo (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)- @Lapablo: Thank you for reviewing this draft. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bbarmadillo It was well sourced, keep it up.
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Muñoz, Nueva Ecija
A tag has been placed on Category:People from Muñoz, Nueva Ecija requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steven (Editor) (talk) 01:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Micah Altman has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)- Bkissin thank you for reviewing this. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Women in Red
Hi there, Bbarmadillo, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have another experienced editor interested in contributing to the project. As you don't seem to have much experience in writing biographies about women, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 07:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joanne Wilson (December 13)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joanne Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joanne Wilson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Reversade (December 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruno Reversade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bruno Reversade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Willbb234 thank you for reviewing the draft. Can you be more specific with your feedback? What exactly needs to be changed? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- I also double-checked WP:NACADEMIC to understand your comments on WP:NPOV and would like to know where exactly he doesn't meet these points? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Just guessing, but I imagine things like "In 1998, Reversade joined the University of Western Ontario (Canada) for a B.Sc. degree under an international student exchange program with the Joseph Fourier University (France)." are the problem. This is just inflated bullshit hype that replaces the simple statement "He studied at the University of Western Ontario." And you do not even communicate the fact of how long he studied there, or whether he got the degree. Instead, you try to focus on name-dropping. Your writing inflates many basic items in the article to their maximal bullshit potential (aka puffery), and is not encyclopedic writing. Stop trying to inflate things like you're trying to sell a chocolate bar: on Wikipedia we just call it a chocolate bar. Neutral descriptions mean dropping the hype and puffery. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- In response to your question on my talk page, yes that is the kind of problematic writing noted above. Other examples would be "forgoing his doctoral training" he "became the first recipient of" (neither of which are in the source cited) rather than simply "He received a ..."; or "Work performed in his laboratory has led to" rather than just "His laboratory has ..." - there are quite a few more. Be concise, be neutral, be factual. There is also no reason to have the awards in a table rather than a list, personally I think that also looks like puffery. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- ThatMontrealIP and Melcous, thank you for your detailed feedback. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- In response to your question on my talk page, yes that is the kind of problematic writing noted above. Other examples would be "forgoing his doctoral training" he "became the first recipient of" (neither of which are in the source cited) rather than simply "He received a ..."; or "Work performed in his laboratory has led to" rather than just "His laboratory has ..." - there are quite a few more. Be concise, be neutral, be factual. There is also no reason to have the awards in a table rather than a list, personally I think that also looks like puffery. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Just guessing, but I imagine things like "In 1998, Reversade joined the University of Western Ontario (Canada) for a B.Sc. degree under an international student exchange program with the Joseph Fourier University (France)." are the problem. This is just inflated bullshit hype that replaces the simple statement "He studied at the University of Western Ontario." And you do not even communicate the fact of how long he studied there, or whether he got the degree. Instead, you try to focus on name-dropping. Your writing inflates many basic items in the article to their maximal bullshit potential (aka puffery), and is not encyclopedic writing. Stop trying to inflate things like you're trying to sell a chocolate bar: on Wikipedia we just call it a chocolate bar. Neutral descriptions mean dropping the hype and puffery. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- I also double-checked WP:NACADEMIC to understand your comments on WP:NPOV and would like to know where exactly he doesn't meet these points? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
February with Women in Red
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Secoo has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Zanhe (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)- @Zanhe: Thank you for reviewing this! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Eric Schulz concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eric Schulz, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Reversade has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)- @Sulfurboy: thank you for reviewing it. I removed AfC comment, but please feel free to recover it if you feel that it is somehow needed. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AfC notification: Draft:Moonfare has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: SK:N (April 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SK:N and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SK:N, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Moonfare (April 28)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moonfare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moonfare, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Schulz (professor) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum (talk) 04:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)- Zanimum thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 11:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joanne Wilson has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)- Zanimum thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rybakov Foundation
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
1292simon (talk) 04:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)- 1292simon thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 06:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Bochner has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)- @Olaf Kosinsky: thank you for reviewing it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Bochner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russia national hockey team.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Creatio has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~ Matthewrbowker Comments · Changes 17:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)- @Matthewrbowker: Thank you for reviewing and accepting this. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: BUX (brokerage) (October 20)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Terje G. Simonsen has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)- @Theroadislong: thank you for reviewing and accepting it!
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging