Jump to content

User talk:Bbarmadillo/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BUX (brokerage) has been accepted

[edit]
BUX (brokerage), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MrClog (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MrClog: Thank you for reviewing it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December with Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old North Church (Marblehead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Congregational Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music Business Worldwide has been accepted

[edit]
Music Business Worldwide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

  Kadzi   (talk) 20:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Kadzi: Thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joanne Wilson

[edit]

I can't help thinking that the article is considerably excessive in view of the accomplishments. Perhaps it could be fixed by not including mere listings as awards, (and converting the table into a list--because of accessability problems tables are deprecated unless necessary), i'm moving those items in the bibliography that discuss her into references in the usual format, , and possible decreasing the rather extreme number of references, too many of which are barely disguised PR, and from sources which are mainly devoted to publishing press releases. I couldd o it myself, but you probably could do it better DGG ( talk ) 06:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created a thread at WP:Cleanup. Not sure that I can do it with the right attitude. -- --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music Business Worldwide has been accepted

[edit]
Music Business Worldwide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DGG: Thank you for reviewing and accepting it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A New Year With Women in Red!

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Blue Ocean Cleanup has been accepted

[edit]
Big Blue Ocean Cleanup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantic306: Thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. Seasonal greetings to you! I wish you all the best in 2021. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FarmWise has been accepted

[edit]
FarmWise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 07:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hatchens: Thank you for reviewing and accepting it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bbarmadillo, I've accepted it but not reviewed it. The article still needs to get reviewed by a reviewer. Wishing you all the best. - Hatchens (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

Hello Bbarmadillo, I have seen that the published page Stefano Fantoni is marked for cleanup. I am new to Wikipedia and I was wondering if the issues of "cleanup" and "lead" have already been solved, or when they will be addressed. Rfantoni (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rfantoni you better ask these questions at WP:CLEANUP page. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bbarmadillo thank you for taking care of the page about Stefano Fantoni. In rewriting the "lead" I noticed that there is a punctuation mistake: "In this context he gave four main contributionsIn the seventies he has been the author ..." should read " In this context he gave four main contributions. In the seventies he has been the author ...". Can you take care of correcting it? Best regards Rfantoni (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. The article is still too long. You can try to shorten it yourself. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Bbarmadillo I don't think I can edit the article anymore since I am the recipient of a COI. But I am not an expert on Wikipedia; do you think that I can edit it nevertheless Rfantoni (talk) 22:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rfantoni removing your own edits shouldn't be a problem per WP:COIADVICE. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LastObject (January 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Craig Davison (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bbarmadillo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Craig Davison (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Craig Davison thank you for reviewing the article. I asked for a more detailed feedback (if possible) at the article's Talk page. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:7shifts has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7shifts. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:7shifts has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7shifts. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mark G. Swenson has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark G. Swenson. Thanks! versacespacetalk to me 14:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark G. Swenson has been accepted

[edit]
Mark G. Swenson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

versacespacetalk to me 18:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
VersaceSpace thank you for accepting it. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you

[edit]

You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.

The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.

Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.

You can discuss this newsletter here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Sent by Hulged ⟨talk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7shifts (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I can see a lot of passing mentions, fundraising announcements etc. but nothing that satisfies WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS 💬 07:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GSS 💬 07:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaliy Katsenelson (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
scope_creepTalk 18:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold D. Foster has been accepted

[edit]
Harold D. Foster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong thank you for accepting it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN in progress for Hanyu

[edit]

There is currently a GAN review for his article taking place here [1]. Could I suggest adding your comments on the GAN review page and taking your merge discussion there instead of starting a separate discussion. All comments welcome. ErnestKrause (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ErnestKrause this is not my war, sorry. You can remove the tag if you feel like it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damien Echols (born 1974) has been accepted

[edit]
Damien Echols (born 1974), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- The9Man (Talk) 19:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The9Man: thank you for accepting it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

New article

[edit]

I read Draft:upGrad. I do not work on educational institutions and is not the right person to help you. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 10:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chandan Guha: Thanks for taking a look at it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 13:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lasercare Clinics Harrogate

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lasercare Clinics Harrogate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Quality Logo Products

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quality Logo Products, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moonfare

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moonfare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LastObject has been accepted

[edit]
LastObject, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Modussiccandi: Thank you for accepting this contribution! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wilbert Hart

[edit]

Hey, a few months ago you listed Wilbert Hart at the Project Cleanup page. Nobody has done anything with it yet. What would you think about merging his page to that of his old band? This can be discussed in the APRIL section at Wikipedia:Cleanup. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upon a closer look at the articles, I think there should be a merge. If you'd like, discuss at Talk:The Delfonics#Merger proposal. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Rumack has been accepted

[edit]
Barry Rumack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bkissin: Thank you for reviewing and accepting it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UpGrad

[edit]

Re: Draft:upGrad - The subject is beyond me. Sorry, I am not able to help. I do very little work on companies/ business organisations, except in areas like steel and coal. I am somewhat familiar with these. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UpGrad (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The topic is about an organization therefore must meet WP:NCORP guidelines. NCORP requires (at least) two references that contain *both* in-depth information *about* the *organization* and "Independent Content" (see WP:ORGIND for explanation). Notability is not determined by the volume of references, but the quality, so adding more references relying on announcements, interviews, etc, doesn't help when assessing the criteria for notability. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, as they rely on announcements or interviews or information provided by the company.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HighKing++ 20:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:7shifts

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:7shifts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lasercare Clinics Harrogate (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read Wikipedia's notability criteria for organizations thoroughly. Press releases, standard notices and other routine coverage cannot be used to establish notability. I suggest removing any sources and related content that fall under "trivial coverage" and start from there. Please also remove content supported by the Daily Mail as Wikipedia has deemed it unreliable (see WP:DAILYMAIL). You may also find this essay helpful.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GymNation (September 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bbarmadillo/Archive_4&oldid=1046605144"