User talk:Barumbarumba

Barumbarumba, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Barumbarumba! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Dan Nica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Minister of Communications

Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Minister of Communications

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ilie Verdeț (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to State Planning Commission and Ministry of Mines

Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Minister of Communications

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ion Diaconescu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boțești (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dan Nica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zsolt Nagy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viorel Cataramă

Hello, Barumbarumba

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Viorel Cataramă, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

John B123 (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicolae Rădescu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ion Antonescu

At the very least, give some suggestions on the talk page of what could be split into another article. Because honestly, I don't see anything wrong with the article length, so if it's just a matter of different opinions, you should argue for why you think the tag should be there. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 01:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know man, I’m not the one who put it there. If you do or don’t like how it looks is none of my business. You can take it out if you whant. It’s not that importnant anyway. Barumbarumba (talk) 06:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Viorel Cataramă moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Viorel Cataramă, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 11:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look man, i just translated an already existing (romanian) wikipedia page into english. The romanian article had more references because it had more information (which is not in this page because i did not find that information useful), but all the information is from there and all references that were there for those same paragraphs are here too. Barumbarumba (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Save Bucharest Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viorel Cataramă (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appear to be notable. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viorel Cataramă and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Viorel Cataramă, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decision was to delete the user box in question. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I consider this censorship as they are MY views and I fully embrace them and everybody is free to think the way they want. The fact that you do not approve them does not give you the right to change MY section of ABOUT ME from MY user page. - User:Barumbarumba (User talk:Barumbarumba) 18:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Rebirth Alliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Rebirth Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Rebirth Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 10:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Humanist Power Party moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Humanist Power Party, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AUR

I've started a discussion about AUR's ideologies. Feel free to join. Vacant0 (talk) 22:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did, thank you for the invite :) - Barumbarumba (talk) 11:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humanist Power Party has been accepted

Humanist Power Party, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Nicolae

I apologize, I wasn't aware there was a limit on such sections of the infobox. Just so I get it straight: you left 5, so 5 is the most they can be? If not, how many can they be? A large chunk of readers don't go beyond the infobox, I just wanted to make sure they get as complete a picture of the guy as possible. Transylvania1916 (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can put more than 5, but keep it minimal. The reasones for remmoving those which i did was because:

1) Some of them were to complicated to be mentioned in the infobox (having to much explination; should be just a link to a page)

2) were not important enough (the fact that he supported the Khmer Rouge)

3) were mentioned in others (for example payin the entire foreign debt was mentioned in the 1980s austerity policy in Romania page)

4) the infrastructure projects like Transfăgărășan or Danube–Black Sea Canal cannot be attributed only to him as a person (as a politician he is known for his polices, this would normaly be put on the infobox of the architect) - Barumbarumba (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I must add on the last point, to be fair, those construction projects were his initiative. One doesn't say Anca Petrescu's palace, they say Ceausescu's palace, for instance. Transylvania1916 (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Viorel Cataramă

Hello, Barumbarumba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Viorel Cataramă, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deputy Prime Minister of Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Constantin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible formatting

Hello Barumbarumba. Your changes to the results tables in party articles are not an improvement, hence why I reverted the ones that popped up on my watchlist. The main issues are:

Setting width as a percentage means the tables are unnecessarily wide on wide screens (it looks particularly bad for the seats column as the colour bar aligns to the left), and too narrow on narrow screens (the table sets to 50% width on narrow screens, meaning the information is bunched up while there is whitespace to the side of the table.
The coloured boxes in the Position column are really unhelpful as they make it hard to read the number inside. They are probably a violation of an accessibility guideline.
Adding unnecessary code – for some reason you put right-alignment at the top of the table, and then centre-alignment for every individual row.
Unhelpful headings – 'Assembly' is a much less helpful heading than 'Seats' as it gives readers no context.

Please could you stop making these changes to articles. If there are other articles like this, they are the ones that need changing. Thanks, Number 5 7 16:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Every modern political party in Romania that has an electoral table has this type of table, it's a pretty common format. - Barumbarumba (talk) 16:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be. I have political parties from all over the world on my watchlist, and the format used at (e.g.) Radical Peasants' Party or Labour Party (UK) is probably the standard across Wikipedia. Number 5 7 16:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well i don't know, even the pages of European parties and other parties from across Europe have coloured boxes saying if a partty is in opposition or government after the election. It's just that in Romania it is nearly never the case for a single majority party government and it is often a coalition government that changes even during a 4 year term and just saying government or opposition it's just not enough and is necessary to mention the parties that are part of the government coalition. Those parties that you have changed back do not need this but others do. The thing is that PNL and PNȚ had in their tables those factions and mentioned if they were opposition or government. It was too cramped and because they had their own pages i thought i should put those informations there so that they won't be lost. - Barumbarumba (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the colouring, I'm not talking about the colouring of the final column, I'm talking about the coloured box you put around the position the party finished in. Number 5 7 17:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opposition to gay marriage userbox

Hi. I started a discussion on Jimmy Wales' page about one of the infoboxes you have on your home page.[1] You are one of only 9 users that has this infobox. Irene Croat (talk) 18:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so...? You want me to take it down or something? I don't live in America, in my country same-sex marriage is not legal and still in debate whether or not it should be. Because of my religious beliefs I want it to remain the way it is now. If you have a problem with my userbox you are more then welcome to try remove that template from Wikipedia and then I will no longer have it on my userpage. But do know that you are infringing on free speech just because you feel offended by something that is not even your problem and that you want others to agree with you and be punished if they don't. If that sounds moral to you, then go ahead, do it! Is not even as if it's up to me whether or not it becomes legal some day. It's such a double standard on your side because you are all about "what do you care if they love each other?" but you do care if someone dares to disagree with with you and make that public and you want to silence them even if they are on the other side of the planet. If you in US got tired of your freedoms, I didn't. We just got out of totalitarianism 30 years ago, so give us a break with your woke culture. - Barumbarumba (talk) 8:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barumbarumba

Thank you for creating Assemblies of God (Romania).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plans for "Christianity in..." templates?

You created many "Christianity in..." templates in 2021 and 2022, but at least 30 of them are unused. Do you have plans to incorporate them into articles? We do not normally keep unused templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i forgot to incorporate them, but I am going to do it for every national denomination mentioned in those templates (except for those that are international denominations because it would mean for that page to have some 30+ templates on the bottom of the page). It will take some time, so if you want to help me that would be very much appreciated.- Barumbarumba (talk) 20:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Talk:Catholic Church in Romania. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Liberal Christianity

Template:Liberal Christianity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interdenominational Churches has been nominated for renaming

Category:Interdenominational Churches has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marian Vanghelie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Justice Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]