Jump to content

User talk:Baba9090

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharat Singh Kundanpur (October 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Baba9090! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mission ki awaaz (October 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bharat Singh Kundanpur has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bharat Singh Kundanpur. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mission dastak (October 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharat Singh Kundanpur has been accepted

[edit]
Bharat Singh Kundanpur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajaram meel BKU (October 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Missionkiawaaz (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mission Ki Awaaz (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 19:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajaram meel moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Rajaram meel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajaram Meel for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajaram Meel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajaram Meel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eagleash (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mission Ki Awaaz for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mission Ki Awaaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Ki Awaaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajaram meel BKU (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 08:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surendra Panwar moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Surendra Panwar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surendra Panwar (October 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surendra Panwar moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Surendra Panwar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 06:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) * The item has again been returned to draftspace. It is currently not suitable for publication. Develop in draftspace and submit for review when considered ready. Please do not move to main space again or it may be deleted. Further, please do not continue to create items which are not ready for publication and tendentiously move them after decline or draftification. If you continue to edit against the conventions of the encyclopedia, it *could* lead to the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Surendra Panwar journalist for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surendra Panwar journalist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surendra Panwar journalist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eagleash (talk) 07:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop attempting to add articles about non-notable persons and edit-warring when they are declined. Eagleash (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rampratap Kasniyan moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Rampratap Kasniyan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rampratap Kasniyan (October 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Singh meena moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Vikram Singh meena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to establish general notability. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Singh Meena moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Vikram Singh Meena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Singh Meena (October 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 12:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vikram Singh Meena BKU for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vikram Singh Meena BKU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikram Singh Meena BKU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 14:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]