User talk:BFolkman
Your submission at AfC Series of 1902 was accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 18:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Welcome
[edit]
|
Welcome aboard
[edit]Hi BFolkman,
A belated welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your recent edits on the Washington-Franklin page. I took the liberty of putting a few items on your user page so your name doesn't appear as a red link. If you would prefer to remain anonymous please accept my apologies and remove the items. I was looking at the article your created. Very nice! I see however it -is- was tagged for lacking citations and possible original research. I know finding reliable sources can be difficult for many stamp articles. When I created the Washington-Franklin Issues and the US Regular Issues of 1922-1931 I used Scott's Catalogue for many of the citations. A good online source can also be found at The Smithsonian National Postal Museum. If you need any help or have any questions please feel free to drop by my talk page. All the best, -- Gwillhickers 16:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
For you
[edit]
|
The Content Creativity Barnstar | |
| For your excellent and extensive work in creating the 1869 Pictorial Issue and the Series of 1902 articles with the many fine images you have created. -- Keep up the great work! -- Gwillhickers 17:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paste-up pair (October 20)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paste-up pair.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Your edit at String Quartet No. 14 (Schubert)
[edit]I reverted your modified translation because the version quoted in the article is taken from a published source. I don't speak German, so I can't vouch for its accuracy. If you feel the translation is erroneous or misleading, you should try to find a better published translation. Alternatively, you could point out alternate translations of specific words in a footnote. But you can't change the language of a direct quote.
Just FYI, the quoted translation is offered pretty widely (though it is by no means definitive), probably because it makes a pretty good poem in English. Ravpapa (talk) 04:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Later: We got an answer to my question. It appears on the talk page of the article. In spite of the fact that an editor's translation of a poem is considered OR, I thought it important enough to include in the article, since the translation offered is so free. So I added your translation to the footnote. Feel free to fix anything you think needs fixing. And thanks. Ravpapa (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to St. Louis Bears may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Postmaster's Provisional—engraved with considerable skill by a firm specializing in bank notes. (See also: [[Postage stamps and postal history of the United States# Provisional issue stamps| “
- “Provisional issue stamps”]] in the entry Postage stamps and postal history of the United States]]. The use of provisionals ceased in the U. S. after national postage stamps became available on
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Symphonic Poems (Dvořák)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Symphonic Poems (Dvořák) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 00:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear B,
I have submitted a request to have the article reinstated, which you can read here. I imagine it is quite daunting to a new editor to have your work reverted again and again. I urge you not to be discouraged. In its middle age, Wikipedia is getting a bit crotchety and rule-bound, but there is still plenty of important work to be done, and you are doing it. So keep it up, and don't let the bastards (of whom I guess I am one) wear you down. Ravpapa (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear Ravapapa,
How very considerate of you! But, as it happens, I myself tried to delete the article by wiping all the text, not realizing that won't do it. The subject was one of those I found on the "articles requested for creation" list; and when I saw that an article in French wikipedia existed, I got it up and translated it. (I also did this recently with Hindemith's Konzertmusik for Brass and String Orchestra--the article isn't much good, but it's better than nothing.) After doing the Dvorak, however, I went to his work list and saw that English Wikipedia has excellent separate entries for the individual symphonic poems which have much better info than the writer of the French article provided. Hence I deleted it, lest somebody consult it instead of seeking out the better articles! It really should be taken off the list as well (housekeeping at the music portal leaves much to be desired). But your encouragement is very welcome, and I appreciate it.BFolkman (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I came here to tell you that, having read Ravpapa's request at WP:REFUND, I had restored the article. I should have checked your talk page first. I have re-deleted it.
- Two tips which would make things clearer in a similar case: while blanking of a page by its sole author is taken as a request for deletion, that does sometimes cause misunderstanding. A more definite way to request deletion of an article where you have provided substantially all the content is to put {{db-author}} at the top. Also, a few words of WP:Edit summary, like "deletion requested - subject already covered" helps to remove any doubt.
- Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well, Gosh. Ravpapa (talk) 07:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 19:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ww2censor (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- New York Postmaster's Provisional (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Robert H. Morris and Small
- Overture in G major (Cherubini) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Médée
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 17:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
unsurpassable
[edit]Unsurpassable in exactly what aspect? Price? No! Rarity - there are other one-of-a-kind stamps, so no it can't be that? Definitely not a WP:NPOV. Rare is perfectly accurate. Sorry but there is no need for peacock words that don't convey any encyclopaedic information. ww2censor (talk) 21:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Sorry. Unsurpassable is correct. Other stamps are EQUALLY rare but none surpass the Blue Boy in rarity. Stamps of which 20,000 copies exist qualify as rare. This peacock word as you call it conveys precisely the information that no stamp is MORE rare. All best, 139.140.99.188 (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Fair use, .TIFF vs. .JPEG files
[edit]I am trying to add stamps since 1976 by fair use guidelines of the USPS to Commemoration of the American Civil War on postage stamps using the upload wizard at Wikipedia.
I tried three fair usage items, First Bull Run, Irish immigration and Vicksburg battle along the format, but so far I have not been successful in calling up the image. My uploads for older stamps seem going alright on Wikimedia Commons, I have added five stamps there for use at my User:TheVirginiaHistorian/sandbox/U.S.Territories on postage stamps. as well as Nevada statehood for 'commemoration of ACW on postage stamps'.
On the fair use items, I think I omitted category: stamp on the pull down menu for two of them. I tried to resubmit today, is there a notice board that I can ask about the status of my uploads? Will the .tiff format in fair usage work in the fair use wizard -- it seems alright coming over from Wikimedia Commons.
I tried again today, in the title slot, the page automatically adds .tiff to the title, even when I alter the description. The selection at the bottom of the page does not let the upload continue, although all red starred boxes are filled. Mac allows 'Save as' from the default Grab .tiff file to .JPEG file, which I take to be the moral equivalent to .jpg on a PC. Another editor recommended trying .jpg. Am I on the right track for Mac? TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paste-up pair, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Philatelic E'books
[edit]For a wealth of philatelic information now in the public domain you might want to check out this list of Philatelic E'books. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 00:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
RfC for Media Viewer
[edit]Opinions are needed at RfC about Media Viewer being the default image viewer. Please help in the effort and pass this notice on. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]-- Gwillhickers (talk) 04:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
U.S.Stamp locater
[edit]Here's something that hopefully will assist you in locating existing U.S. (and perhaps other) stamps, fresh off the press. If you know of any other categories to help in this effort bring them to my attention and I will add/edit them into the template.
General categories on Wikimedia Commons:
|
See also (Wikipedia articles):
-- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
New category
[edit]U.S. historical landmarks on stamps -- Gwillhickers (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inverted Jenny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flat-bed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don Quichotte à Dulcinée, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jota. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Do you have any sources for the additions you made with this edit? They are some pretty significant claims. ww2censor (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, BFolkman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Moog synthesizer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
- instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inverted Jenny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily News. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, BFolkman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, BFolkman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Select Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_2hEDLT7rFnt6njL&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, BFolkman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |