User talk:BD2412

This user prefers to communicate
on-wiki, rather than by email.

Status: Active. bd2412 T

Dispute resolution clause: By posting on my user talk page, you agree to resolve all disputes that may arise from your interactions with me through the dispute resolution processes offered within the Wikipedia Community. BD2412
Archives: By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):; Articles-1st/Deletion-1st-2d/Law-1st-2d-3d-4th-5th; Misc.-1st-2d-3d-4th/RfA-1st-2d-3d-4th/Tools-1st-2nd-3rd/Vandalism

Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):

001-002-003-004-005-006-007-008-009-010-011-012-013-014-015

016-017-018-019-020-021-022-023-024-025-026-027-028-029-030

031-032-033-034-035-036-037-038-039-040-041-042-043-044-045

046-047-048-049-050-051-052-053-054-055-056-057-058-059

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Evans (judge) has been accepted

John Evans (judge), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 14:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Gibbons

Can you tell me if this deleted article was about the artist who did some work on Call of Cthulhu? BOZ (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BOZ: The entire content of the article was: "Did the arwork on the covers of the SPY HIGH books (SERIES ONE)". No sources or anything, just those few poorly formatted words. BD2412 T 15:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, and thanks! BOZ (talk) 15:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - cheers! BD2412 T 15:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Braidwood v. Becerra has been accepted

Braidwood v. Becerra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 14:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gisozi (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gisozi (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Done. BD2412 T 20:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Fosheim has been accepted

Jon Fosheim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 01:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Homer B. Woods has been accepted

Homer B. Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 15:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Snake eyes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Snake eyes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § Snake eyes until a consensus is reached. 162 etc. (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have commented in the discussion. BD2412 T 16:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guy Amsler has been accepted

Guy Amsler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 17:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Authentication (law)

Can we get this referenced? Bearian (talk) 04:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: Yes, I believe we can. BD2412 T 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bearian (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure you get credit for the citation drive this month. Bearian (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sterling R. Cockrill has been accepted

Sterling R. Cockrill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 14:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buccal (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buccal (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Cock (slang) has over 10k views since you turned it into an article. Thanks for that. Mach61 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is something for which to get a barnstar! BD2412 T 19:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

@BGerdemann (WMF): Did I not take this survey? I remember taking a survey, I think it was this one. BD2412 T 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eli Huston has been accepted

Eli Huston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 04:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert H. McFarland has been accepted

Robert H. McFarland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 04:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred S. Moore has been accepted

Alfred S. Moore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 22:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hale McCown has been accepted

Hale McCown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 04:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add a Fact survey and thank you

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vernon H. Broom has been accepted

Vernon H. Broom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas C. Green has been accepted

Thomas C. Green, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 04:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southcote Junction

Please reconsider your close here. I respectfully disagree that "consensus is clear" given the even split between those supporting a keep and those arguing for a different outcome and the multiple evidence-free keep votes which refused to engage when I asked them for evidence. A relist would be better. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trainsandotherthings: I have expanded on my close rationale. BD2412 T 01:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I personally disagree, but the expanded rationale is at least reasonable so I will leave things at that. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hello, BD2412,

You are a page-making machine! But I have a question for you. When you are creating redirects, who do they first show up as broken redirects like here? I get a slew of broken redirects that show up on my broken redirect Quarry query. I realize that you quickly fix them but I'm just curious why they are initially broken when you create them. Thank you for any insight into the process you can provide. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I feel like we have had this conversation before, but maybe it was with someone else. I have a two step process to make these sortname redirects with AWB, the first being to create the page by substituting the page name of the redirect target, and the second being to remove the part of the page name that is superfluous to the redirect. The should only exist as broken links for a few minutes. BD2412 T 02:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an IP

User talk:3.14159265358pi ain't an IP talk page. It may look like one at very first glance but it's not. If you're using regex, your regex needs to be much more precise and accurate as even the slightest format changes can disqualify a string from being a valid IP address. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:13, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's happened again

Someone wrote Murder in New Jersey law while you have a better quality draft. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: Of course. I will work on this shortly. BD2412 T 15:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Politics of Contraband

Hi there! Would you mind moving The Politics of Contraband to draft space for me? I have sources and can work on it later today. BOZ (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been draftified. :) BOZ (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. Best of luck with the article! BD2412 T 16:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Did that user have any other deleted creations related to tabletop gaming? BOZ (talk) 04:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Their one other non-redirect page creation is a Star Wars short story titled A Free Quarren in the Palace: Tessek's Tale. BD2412 T 05:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks! Looks like that story was in Tales from Jabba's Palace. BOZ (talk) 11:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and restored it as a redirect. BD2412 T 15:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. :) And I moved the draft into article space as I found about 2 1/2 good reviews for it; anyway, that's a lot better than a one-sentence unsourced stub. :) BOZ (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William S. Case has been accepted

William S. Case, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 04:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	good work! UMAGPR (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much appreciated. Cheers! BD2412 T 21:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Situation resolved...redelete?

Now that Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Ecrusized has been closed, should 2024 Turkish hostage crisis be deleted again? It had been temporarily undeleted so non-admins could see its contents for purposes of that AE discussion. DMacks (talk) 09:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.

Done; cheers! BD2412 T 15:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank ye DMacks (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shepard Barclay has been accepted

Shepard Barclay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 21:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Antifreeze" slander at Breyers

Could you please browse the article and talk page history to give guidance on what should be a straightforward stub article about an ice cream manufacturer - Breyers? The Breyers story is simple and should be quite easy to describe, as I have been trying to do, but two users are insistent on raising an unscientific issue, which impresses as purposeful slander.

Users Graywalls and NutmegCoffeeTea have repeatedly disrupted the article with disinformation, trying to insert "antifreeze" (propylene glycol, PG) as a relevant, presumably dangerous, ingredient. PG is a safe, FDA-regulated additive in food manufacturing in specified small amounts. It is used worldwide in commonly manufactured foods. Referring to it as an antifreeze is intended to slander this or any food manufacturer, without a WP:BMI source to indicate it has had any health effects in consumers.

The antifreeze comment was cited in two low-quality sources 11 years ago when an opinion article in the Motley Fool showed a Breyers product label where PG was circled.

However, it has no relevance to Breyers products in 2013 or in 2024 (no longer displayed as an ingredient), and has no RS reference to justify a health concern in ice cream or any manufactured foods.

Both editors have persisted in the dispute, yet it isn't a disputable issue. Their behavior is incivil, but the long-term insistence on including the antifreeze comment indicates more than incivility.

This leads to a conclusion that they are only attempting to slander the Breyers brand. They are not making edits on the numerous other articles about ice cream producers.

I am considering ANI for both users to have TBAN, but hope this is something you can readily assess and advise for the appropriate next steps. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have looked at the RS/N and I've taken out the Motley Fool based source while retaining Random House sourced book. A reliably published source simply makes a connection what other things propylene glycol is commonly used in and a health effect claim is not being made in the article. From talk page discussion, the general consensus supports having some inclusion about it. Mentioning a common application, for example, saying polyester clothes is made of PETE, also used for bottles is not unreasonable. You have been trying to repeatedly remove any mention of propylene glycol, repeatedly despite there being rough consensus in favor of some mention. Reading through the comments and talk archive, it seems pretty obvious to me there's general consensus to include it in some capacity. Graywalls (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the word "antifreeze" in the article at all. BD2412 T 15:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zefr took it out on their own. Since they've invited you into this matter, I would love it if you'd look through the talk & and its archive and comment on the general vibe. thank you Graywalls (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have opined. BD2412 T 00:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1650 introductions

A tag has been placed on Category:1650 introductions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Funny story, I actually only created this category because I discovered that a template being used in the category tree was generating a disambiguation link, and I was using this as an experimental space while trying to figure out what in the template for the category calls that link. I have now deleted the category. BD2412 T 00:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Coming here as you are the most experienced user I have interacted with. Hoping you can point me to a tool that can search edit summaries. I am looking at a sock farm and they are using the same edit summary (an uncommon one) for their edits. But, I want to check and see if there are any other accounts using the same. CNMall41 (talk) 01:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: Interesting challenge. I am not familiar with a tool to do this (never having needed to make such a query myself). I would recommend asking at WP:VPT. BD2412 T 01:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicodemus D. Wernette has been accepted

Nicodemus D. Wernette, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 03:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]