User:BD2412/Archive 041
So, there's this article and I think it needs to be re-named but there's a lot of stuff to move...[edit]Anyway, way back when I worked up an article and then recently I took a look at it and thought...might be good enough for a GA...so I put it up for a GA Review. When I wrote the article it was the person's name Benjamin Franklin Graves. In December 2019, this article, along with a similarly named article were re-named by another editor: Benjamin Franklin Graves->Benjamin Franklin Graves (Kentucky), Benjamin F. Graves -> Benjamin F. Graves (Michigan)->Benjamin F. Graves (Michigan judge), plus there is now a disambiguation page Benjamin Franklin Graves. The GA Reviewer has mentioned that the title doesn't say anything about the man himself, like "Name (politician)" or whatever. I agree with the GA Reviewer and think the title of the article should be Benjamin Franklin Graves (soldier) or Benjamin Franklin Graves (Kentucky soldier) since that is what the Kentucky man is most well-known for. However, it gets a little sticky since I am in the middle of responding to Talk:Benjamin Franklin Graves (Kentucky)/GA1... is it proper form to change an article title in the middle of a Review? and then there are all the redirects or erased redirects... I am hoping you wouldn't mind changing the title for me, I've seen your account amongst the edits and was thinking you wouldn't mind. I'd do it myself but usually I'm a right royal cock-up in these types of things. If you'd rather not, don't have the time, it's somehow against MOS-process to enact a title-change in the middle of a GA Review or whatever, that's cool. It can wait. The title-change always kind of bothered me but seemed ok-ish, but then the Reviewer commented about it and I thought "Yes! That makes sense!". Thanks in advance - Shearonink (talk) 04:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC) Cheers![edit]
Requesting help[edit]Hi, Saw your user page profile and felt encouraged to request help. Recently I created Qisas (disambiguation) but still I am not finding myself confident and bold enough to add it's links to all the articles where Word 'Qisas' occurs since I am not well versed with all template usages properly. Hence this request. Thanks warm regards and greetings Bookku (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC) Rivers[edit]Thanks for the river moves, I guess. And thanks for pruning my list of the ones you moved. But what's motivating these, as opposed to waiting for the bot approval? Or is that I had failed to link my bot request Wikipedia:Bot requests#Move 500 River articles per consensus on tributary disambiguator where you would see it? Dicklyon (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. It seems we need to add {{OW}} to IP users talk page. I may let my bot to do this. Do we need this task? --Kanashimi (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Did I miss a fly ball I should've caught?[edit]
Speedy deletion nomination of Farley, California (disambiguation)[edit]
A tag has been placed on Farley, California (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC) On March 30, you create-protected this title with a note of "Shenanigan protection". There have been shenanigans about it since then. Did the create-protection get lifted or expired or bypassed? If so, can you re-protect it? There are shenanigans about it. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit] Hello BD2412,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271 To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here Need your attention against Chinese revisionism[edit]I had read your requested move proposal on Talk:Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China. You need to focus more on this topic including articles about the Yuan dynasty. Checkout these articles Tibet under Yuan rule, Manchuria under Yuan rule, and especially Mongolia under Yuan rule. That is ridiculous. How can it Mongolia under Mongol rule???????? Since the Yuan was a Mongol state. Why did they miss out China under Mongol (Yuan) rule?????? The article Korea under Yuan rule had been renamed to Goryeo under Mongol rule. My proposal is that u should request a deletion of "Mongolia under Yuan rule" or merge it with "Yuan dynasty". As for 3 articles, you should create a requested move proposal to Tibet under Mongol rule, Manchuria under Mongol rule. Why? Because these countries were already conquered by the Mongol well BEFORE the proclamation of the Great Yuan. We should use a general term for the whole period. 152.130.1.16 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Since the old title was not ambiguous, what basis is there for this move? This applies to his son and grandson as well. Srnec (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One pre-season testing[edit]I noticed you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One pre-season testing as no consensus to delete, and leaning towards keep. But very few of the keep votes actually gave a policy based discussion, they just said "lots of sources". But my source evaluation- which I did 3 days ago and all the keep voters have decided to ignore- shows that the sources in the article aren't significant coverage at all. So I don't feel like this was a justifiable closure. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Presidential primary RMs[edit]I'll move some of them to help. Starzoner (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Executive order[edit]Would you look at the move history of executive order, and fix it, if need be. I was about to move it, to "Executive order (United States)", but the move history says you did that in 2017, and nothing after that but it's not moved, or something? (sorry, for my confusion) Alanscottwalker (talk) 15:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Promotion only account[edit]Mind blocking User:Jaan jaani6 Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 16:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi BD2412, You previously blocked this user for 31 hours for disruptive editing despite my thorough warnings. I just found out that they've returned to make the exact same disruptive edit (changing Obama's infobox portrait on the 2008 U.S. presidential election page) without any discussion. They made the edit as an IP, were reverted, logged in, and reverted the revert. They marked their edit as minor. Since you blocked them, I see that there have been numerous warnings about sockpuppet editing and abuse of the minor edit feature on their talk page as well as on their IP talk page. I left another warning. Given the large number of warnings, I think another block is necessary to prevent further disruption. Can you please look into that? Thanks. — Tartan357 (Talk) 01:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Me again, the re-namer....[edit]I need some advice and some help. I have submitted List of cyclists with a cycling-related death for FLC - Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cyclists with a cycling-related death/archive2 and a reviewer has suggested some possible title changes. Is this proposed title ok re: WP-naming conventions? If you want to see the FLC posts about this please refer to Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cyclists with a cycling-related death/archive2#Possible title changes. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
I think I'd look for recent sourcing mentioning her participation with Lucifer seasons 5 and 6, and see if you can find at least one "profile" article specifically on Estevez, and resubmit it to AfC. I'm not sure why it was rejected the first time – the sources currently used at this article all look up to snuff, so I find the "decline" rationale from February to be odd. I would say the only thing missing right now is one or two in-depth profile sources on Estevez specifically, and then it should be ready to go in WP:Mainspace... Just my $0.02. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred G. Schroeder has been accepted[edit] Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Thanks for all your contributions[edit]Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit. Can I remind you of the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 17:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Please Unprotect "Triple The Mogul" Page[edit]Hi BD2412 i see you have protetcted the "Triple The Mogul" Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Triple_The_Mogul&action=history. From reading the AfD, i see the primary issue was lack of notability and reliable sources. However, in the past few weeks he has been in the news tremendously with his new Boxing League with famous musician Sean Kingston . Here are a few links from The Blast, Jerusalem Post and The Source magazine, all of which i believe properly reach the criteria for WP:BASIC. https://theblast.com/c/sean-kingston-professional-boxing-league-rappers-ufc https://www.jpost.com/special-content/jewish-rapper-triple-the-mogul-teams-up-with-sean-kingston-to-start-pro-boxing-league-for-rappers-632748 https://thesource.com/2020/06/22/sean-kingston-boxing/ Can you please unprotect the page so i can edit it ? Jayzhizbovvs (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Manzanita[edit]I'm trying to clean up Manzanita, Butte County, California which was moved from Fagan per AfD. As it stands, the location and other data from Fagan was simply reused, even though we don't have a source to support its application to Manzanita. Do you have any suggestions for sourcing this information so that we can at least have a viable and verifiable stub? –dlthewave ☎ 02:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I've opened a deletion review to try to get more input. –dlthewave ☎ 00:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC) Deletion review for Employsure[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Employsure. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Deus et lex (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Move review[edit]BD, based on the discussion that included you at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#MOS:SPORTCAPS_might_need_revision, I think I'll file a move review now for 1978 NHL Amateur Draft. Say more here or the other discussion if you want. Dicklyon (talk) 23:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC) "List of minerals Y–Z (complete)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
User:Hitterfann[edit]Might need to do an SPI to check for sleepers.-KH-1 (talk) 04:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Assistance[edit]Hello, I would like to know if there is a group somewhere on Wikipedia or project where I may receive inspiration or helpful tips and tricks when it comes to growing my editing style. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Redirect out of Disambiguation?[edit]BD2412, was wondering if you could assist me on this. I was trying to make "Solti" a redirect for Georg Solti but ran into this disambiguation page, not sure how to create a redirect when the disambiguation already exists, but it is definitely warranted as the disambiguation page only lists Georg Solti, Valerie Pitts (his wife) and Krisztina Solti (a random Hungarian high jumper). Best - Aza24 (talk) 18:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC) Could you elaborate on your closing comment? While I don't agree, I can understand the argument for keeping the list as a navigational aid. However, I don't think GNG was ever firmly established, which is why I'm a bit surprised that you suggested expanding the list into an article. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 01:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Rationale required please[edit]Hi BD2412, thanks for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign for Better Transport (United Kingdom). I just wondered if you could provide your rationale for the 'keep' result, particularly with respect to the stringent requirements in WP:ORGCRIT. ORGCRIT requires that to be notable an organisation: "has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." I'm not sure that has been demonstrated to the extent demanded by WP:SIRS is at the moment. Thanks. -- DeFacto (talk). 05:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Dispute on the 'FBI files on Michael Jackson' Article[edit]BD2412, there is an ongoing dispute occurring on the FBI files on Michael Jackson article. Both TruthGuardians [1] and ThunderPeel2001 [2] were blocked for 36 hours. ThunderPeel2001 removed large portions of the article without any prior discussion on the Talk page per MJ sanctions. Part of the problem is, when there is actual disruption or vandalism, editors may revert (up to three times within a day). Rules on edit warring aren't clear enough, both were blocked, but from what I see, there was actual disruption. These types of battles have been occurring on MJ-related articles (because of the highly controversial nature of the allegations against Jackson) for awhile now. Israell (talk) 01:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
I think this page needs semi protection permanently and the IP needs to be blocked. Starzoner (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit] This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! WikiMane11 (talk) 11:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Abbott has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex M. Fromme has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Your AWB edit on Jagannath Temple, Puri[edit]Just letting you know, that in your AWB edit on page Jagannath Temple, Puri you have introduced usage of template {{18}}, which has been fixed. —andrybak (talk) 12:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Boyce C. Clayton[edit]Hi, I've padded out Draft:Boyce C. Clayton with as much as I can find - and can find no indication of DOB or if they are still alive. Do you think it's enough? Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Sharpe has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)My turn[edit]Robert H. Boyle - I just created this stub, and decided to take extra precautions because I worked with Bob back in the 90s when I produced Sturgeon: Ancient Survivors. I thought about him when I wrote last month's op-ed for The Signpost, but for some reason, I thought he already had a WP article. Anyway, I can do most of the heavy lifting but your collaboration would be very much appreciated, and it will also serve to avoid any potential COI issue. It is rather difficult for me to create articles in my area of interest because I've worked with quite a few notables, some of whom I prefer to forget. Anyway, who knows...I'm thinking that as long as it's well sourced, and you're collaborating with me, there shouldn't be a problem. I trust your input and know that the article will benefit as a result. Atsme Talk 📧 00:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Please see ....[edit]User:Smallbones/Proposed commercial editing policy Smallbones(smalltalk) 02:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Move review for Murder in Texas[edit]An editor has asked for a Move review of Murder in Texas. Because you participated in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Austin M. Cowan has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Winn Holmes has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert H. Kaul has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick N. Six has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Clair E. Robb has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Larson (Kansas judge) has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:21, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: David Prager (Kansas judge) has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reason for deleting the Gaby Natale biographical page[edit]I just found out that a Wikipedia page with the biography of Gaby Natale, my wife, was deleted on July 14, 2020 per your request. Could you please explain the rationale? I respectfully request that the page be restored. I am unfamiliar with Wikipedia's procedures for undeletion; my apologies in advance if this is not the proper channel to request it. Regards, Andres O. Suarez --Aosuarez (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
|
