User talk:Avs5221/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Avs5221. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Feedback on Behavioral Approach to Systems Theory and Control
Dear Avs5221, thank you for reviewing The Behavioral Approach to Systems Theory and Control.
Can you please let me know the reasons for rejection? (Do you need more references to prove the importance of the topic, or is it the way the article is written that is not acceptable?)
Do you have any recommendations for revision? Is a revision and resubmission possible?
Imarkovs (talk) 11:03, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Shell Beach (band) submission
Hi! Thanks for reviewing the submission for this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Shell_Beach_(band) I have added more references and took a careful look at WP:MUSIC criteria for notability. I think this article shows notability of the band with the references in the article regarding at least: - criteria #11: reference #11 & #12 are links to the two biggest music TV channels in Hungary showing this - criteria #6: the article has wikipedia links to members' previous bands which are notable in the "Biography" section - criteria #7: reference #9 talks about this in detail. the source is in hungarian. - criteria #1: reference links to different music related review and news sources throughout the article
Please consider accepting the article, I believe these references added do show what the guidelines of wikipedia are looking for. Shoud I resubmit the article for review? Shellbeachband (talk) 22:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Shellbeachband
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shell Beach (band)
Hi! I already left some questions/comments on this talk page relating to this article you reviewed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Shell_Beach I can't find my previous comments, have they been deleted? I have made modifications to the article, should I re-submit? Thanks. Shellbeachband (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Resubmitted page for approval : Solidiance
Hi Avs5221,
I have applied the suggested amendments you specified previously on my article submission. Please therefore kindly check it out now and reconsider to approve it - or suggest more tips/clear guidance to help me enhance it in order to acquire an approval. The resubmitted page is : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Solidiance
Thank you. 25 December 2012 | 12:29 AM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sitaresti Astarini (talk • contribs) 17:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Submission declined : Fix8(software)
Hello, thanks for your review. I understand that some of my references are not acceptable however I think one is. The reference ^5 is from an industry site (quantlabs) - and according to WP policy I believe is acceptable - please consider. The other references support some of the statements, ^1, ^2 and ^7. If I remove ^2, ^3, ^4, is that more acceptable? regards Ian.
Iammckane (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)--Iammckane (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I have added an alternative reference and removed the blog/reddit refs. The quantlabs reference is a short entry written by the industry authors at quantlabs - who are respected and recognised within the HFT/finance community - this is how I found about about fix8. Iammckane (talk) 08:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)--Iammckane (talk) 08:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
afc speedy
As reviewing administrator, I do not consider that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Haim- choreographer is a BLP violation susceptible to speedy deletion. Only the BLP violations that fall within the general criteria at WP:CSD can be so deleted, and I do not see that this page was intended to abuse the subject, or that it contains negative or contentious unsourced information. We do not remove BLPs for merely being unsourced via speedy, even in mainspace. The procedure there is WP:BLPPROD, which removes them in 10 days if at least one reliable source is not added--and that does not apply to anything other than mainspace articles.
The relevant problems with this article are first and most important, whether it is a copyvio, probably from the users web site; second, whether it is too promotional at least in its current form, and third, whether it meets WP:CREATIVE. , My guess is that it's a copyvio--go check that first. DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- nd just the same for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David William Parry. DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware the review tool was CSDing articles in the background. That's my fault. avs5221(talk|contrib) 02:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- nd just the same for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David William Parry. DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello! I would like to improve it to a level of acceptance or start level. Please give me advice. I would like to read an appropriate article of a similar nature. How to deal with the newspaper story ? Thank you in advance. --Ichiro Kikuchi (talk) 05:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Article on Autosomal DNA in South Asian populations
You obviously haven't read the article. And I don't understand what you mean by saying that the article reads like an essay without verifiable sources, especially since 90% of it consists of quotations from easily verifiable sources rather than personal opinion (listed below in the reference section). Can you please tell me which portions of it offended you so I can re-submit it please? The article can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Autosomal_DNA_of_South_Asian_populations
It's impossible to find good help these days!
Āryāvastra (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
It doesn't matter, it's already been re-submitted. Reads like an essay? That entire article is based on peer-reviewed sources. Anyway, I hope someone with better reading comprehension skills gets a chance to review it. Āryāvastra (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Kenneth Simmons
I've published Ken Simmons. I believe that an obituary in The Ibis meets our requirements to do so. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Request your input
Hi Avs
- I draw your attention to AfD Rev. Samuel Gilbert Scott, which seems to have been created by Andy Mabbett immediately after you declined it at AfC. I find this odd, especially since I would have declined it immediately for the same reasons you did.
- Also, see User_talk:Romariem#Eric_Brooke_Dunlop where, rather than going straight to AfD regarding Eric_Brooke_Dunlop, I asked the author whether there was perhaps more notability than was apparent in the article. Andy responded on the author's talk page, but not helpfully.
I will ask Andy himself why he is doing this - nicely, of course! Regards, David_FLXD (Talk) 04:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
questions about an article
Dear Avs5221, the article I had created (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eduardo Sarmiento) was deleted due to copyright infringement which I do not see the reason for. All content was verified for copyright and the sources listed. I intend to go with the article and did not save a copy of it, it is not deleted, is there a way I can access it as a draft as to no have to rebuild it from scratch? Would you be so kind as to point out the copyright infringement which led to deletion? Thank you. Ketty Mora (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kettymora (talk • contribs)
Manchester Women's Christian Temperance Association
Thank you for assessing my article on the MWCTA. This is my first attempt so I am trying to understand where the issues are. I have re-edited the article and removed the introduction as the existing Wiki WCTU page covers this. I have copied the style the WCTU article to try and get this right. I have also removed the biography on Herbert Philips which I will submit as a separate page in due course. If the edit fails again any advice however brief would be invaluable if I am ever to get this published. Mike McCulloch (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Apptegic Article
Good morning,
I'm working on getting the Apptegic Wikipedia page up to standards and I'm curious why you placed the notability tag on the draft. I sited 3 independent sources for the article and it's similar in description and length to other startup pages such as Bulktix.com, cheek'd and campustours. Are there some specific parts you'd suggest I can change or add to the article to make it better?
Cheers,
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mrryanconnors (talk) 17:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there,
You declined my submission: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Gunjan_Sinha. It was rejected earlier due to not enough references, so I added more. Perhaps I added too many. Is that what you meant by it sounds like an advertisement?
Thanks
A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.152.30 (talk) 18:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
questions about an article
Dear Avs5221, the article I had created (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eduardo Sarmiento) was deleted due to copyright infringement which I do not see the reason for. All content was verified for copyright and the sources listed. I intend to go with the article and did not save a copy of it, it is not deleted, is there a way I can access it as a draft as to no have to rebuild it from scratch? Would you be so kind as to point out the copyright infringement which led to deletion? Thank you. Ketty Mora (talk) 20:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Manner of Citation
Dear Avs5221,I just submitted the article again after modifying the references and adding some contents based on your feedback. We have worked so hard and so long to this article, from a very objective opinion. Hope this time we can get approval to have this article published successfully. Thank you very much.Elsachangtw (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Article for Creation/Frank Cannella
Saw your rejection saying that the article reads like an essay. Can you please do me a favor and look at the Wikipedia entry for Tim Hawthorne, another leader of the DRTV industry (and with whom I have no association), and let me know how that -- accepted -- article is any different in style from the one I submitted on Frank Cannella?
Thank you for any specific insight/direction you can provide. Mark RBraff (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I submitted a page for Interstate Auto Center Inc. on the 28th. It is a resubmission. Did I resubmit it correctly or is it just waiting for review?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Repairablevehicles (talk • contribs) 19:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Query about my page
Hello and happy new year!
I would like to ask you why my article is not acceptable. I am asking you because its my assignment for the University and I do not want to fail. My resources are Greek webpages. Why you think are unreliable. It is a Greek custom from Greek Macedonia and from Thessalia . I am from Thessalia and I know that is right.
Thank you in advance,
Vithopoulos Christos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vithopoulos Christos (talk • contribs) 17:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I would like to understand why my page was declined for inadequate reference. This is a page about a record label, and references the record label's url.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sharp_Nine_Records
Ednaedel (talk) 00:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)ednaedel
Article for Creation: I Guess I'm Floating
In response to the rejection of the above article for its lack of reliable sources, I have added references from The New York Times (an article reviewing bands hosted by the website at their annual SXSW concert), the BBC (also covering the blog's showcase), The Phoenix (same), The Deli (discussing the creation of the blog's record label), and a mention of their nomination for a Bloggie award (the longest running weblog awards).
I've also added the blog's connection with Flying Dog brewery, who was a co-sponsor of the blog's Floating Fest at SXSW for a number of years, and included an article from The Full Pint, a beer aficionado website, announcing the partnership.
I will also point out that the original submission included references from Wired Magazine (who published an article about the blog's creation of a record label), Techcrunch (who pointed out the blog as a notable inclusion to exfm's Tastemaker section), and The NY Daily News (who highlighted the blog in an article about notable MP3 blogs, and whose author deemed the blog his "personal favorite").
As I understand it, there's a fine balance when showing objective notability. Attendees of SXSW will know the blog and its concerts, which consistently have had lines out the door during the two years I attended it. And while that's clearly subjective, there's still a relatively large amount of objective reference material from several well known sources, including perhaps the most important, well known source of all: The New York Times.
If this isn't enough to demonstrate the site's notability, please explain why.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/I_Guess_I'm_Floating
Tikitakiwiki (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Michael Falzon
Can you be a little more specific about what I have done wrong? As far as I was aware, it was referenced properly. I don't know what I need to change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_Falzon_(actor) — Preceding unsigned comment added by I hate thinking of names (talk • contribs) 03:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Verifiable may have been wrong. There are a number of points that go unreferenced, but honestly I'm more concerned by his notability. Read over WP:NACTOR and make sure he meets the notability guidelines. Also, please replace all instances of "Michael" with "Falzon." We prefer to say "Falzon starred in XXXXX" rather than "Michael was a star in XXXXX". avs5221(talk|contrib) 03:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
I can change his name pretty easily, but I am not sure how any Australian musical theatre actor meets "notable" any more than he does. He was the first Galileo Figaro outside the UK, he was the first to be directed by Ben Elton. He originated the role of Stacee Jaxx in Australia. He has been in every version of Jeff Waynes Arena production of the War of the Worlds since joining the cast for the second tour (and is I believe the only cast member to be asked back that often.) - And thats not his first Arena tour. These are pretty major roles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I hate thinking of names (talk • contribs) 03:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Clarification Needed Please
Hello,
I recently submitted edits for a page on Alexis Gideon. It says that the submission was denied due to external links within the body. There are no external links in the body, only wikipedia links. Can you please clarify?
Thanks a lot, 76.105.136.185 (talk) 04:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Tasha
just wondering
why you declined the paul wheaton page i made. you criticism would be helpful. Thanks. Abe. AbeColey (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Keith Loris' submitted page
Dear Avs5221,
Thank you very much for the prompt review of the Keith Loris page.
I have a quick question that would greatly help me to improve the article: can you please indicate which specific points in the article you feel aren't sufficiently supported? This was a birthday gift from my children and they would really appreciate more guidance.
Many thanks for your efforts on the community's behalf!
Kloris12 (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Twinkle error
I am struggling to understand what happened here. It looks like your edit mangled the page so badly that there were no references left and then simultaneously tagged the page as having no edits. I am unfamiliar with the operation of Twinkle, but either you made a big mistake in using it somehow (in which case please be more careful in the future, the person who wrote the article was a little confused as to what happened) or there's a bug in Twinkle (in which case please report it to the developers so they can fix it, because it looks like a pretty big one). --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 13:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh my....that looks like Twinkle went insane. That was an AfC approval that I was cleaning up and when I left it the article was in one piece. Thank you for letting me know. avs5221(talk|contrib) 21:42, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
My Votacall Page submission
Hi,
I appreciate you taking the time to review my page and make edits. I am working on a college project for Endicott College in Beverly, MA. My assighnment is to make several telecommunication pages on wikipedia in reference to hosted VoIP. Do you have any suggestions to me as to how to make this page better and make it able to be approved? I worked hard on it to obtain the secondary sources. This company is up and coming and my research has showed they increase revenue every quarter since VoIP was adopted. There is a ShoreTel wikipedia page and they are the direct competitor of Votacall, basically being a similar company. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Bjohn690 (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Bryan Johnson
trillbass
Thanks for reviewing my submission. Could you please give me specific areas that need referencing? I have seen musicians in the list of dubstep musicians with fewer or less reliable references than what i submitted, such as Joker_(musician) and Jon Gooch. I believe the intereview with spinner_(website) was reliable, as it is part of AOL Music. Can you help me understand how those articles were approved? Thank you for your feedback. Kittycolada911 (talk) 09:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charbroiler
Avs5221, Regarding the recent decline in the submission of this article I must admit both confusion and frustration. The article is only 1800 words, has 12 verifiable web citations, 8 additional and verifiable sources, and having read the 'What Wikipedia is not' section very thoroughly, cannot understand how this submission does not meet the requirements for article generation. Two other reviewers have indicated previously that the changes that I've made would be sufficient, and the changes recommended have been followed diligently.
Most importantly, I feel strongly that this article subscribes exceedingly well to the stipulations of What Wikipedia IS(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is), which is to say, a thorough and well thought out encyclopedic summary of the form, function and operation of commonly used cooking equipment.
I respectfully request a re-review of the article with this in mind.
Sincerely, Christian M. Yungbluth, P.E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyungbluth (talk • contribs) 16:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
My Damian Barr page
Hello Avs5221,
Thank you for taking the time to review my article. I am obviously disappointed it was declined, but would like to focus on how to improve it. It was not my intention to make it look like an advert rather than a neutral description of a person
One of the suggestions in your response was about my sources. As I am new to Wikipedia, I wasn't sure how many I would need to use to show a broad range from various credible sources talking about Damian Barr. Is what I have not enough, do I need to produce more, or is it more about quality than quantity? I made sure to try and use sites that were respectable like broadsheet newspapers and national magazines. Would you require more references like this?
Would the text be OK to be re-edited throughout to create a more neutral, encyclopaedic tone rather than a total rewrite?
Thank you in advance for your help so that I can make this page work.
Peterhutton (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Head Lice Hero
Hello, I was wondering if you could help me to improve my article. Head Lice Hero is an independent company that is trademarked. I can include URL links with the detailed trademark information from the official US federal trademark database as references if that will help verify? As for secondary sources, I also have put in a NEWS 12 video that covers a story about head lice hero. It is on the Head Lice Hero website but was not produced by the creator. I am simply trying to describe the company, please let me know what else I can do. Thanks so much, Headlicehero (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/SOI
I have made what I believe are the necessary changes to the SOI article. I would like for them to verified and submitted.
Thank You
72.15.253.72 (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Co-development questions
Hi there,
Could I ask what you mean by your review of the submission on Co-development. The article seems to be a good overview and not just a definition, rather bringing in the key concepts and making links with different areas?
Thanks
Jonny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlmglobalhealth (talk • contribs) 11:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EXNESS
Hello! You have seen already the page I made. And I have some questions. It would be better to find out how to make my page better from you. So my page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/EXNESS and you wrote me it looks like an advertisement. I have already asked on the Help Desk about improvements of the page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2012_December_28#Review_of_Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation.2FEXNESS), and I have some additional questions without answers. Thank your very much for your advices in advance. Julia.tretyakova (talk) 09:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Julia
The West One Bridging Index declined entry
Hi Avs5221
I am at my wits end and I would appreciate a quick chat to help me get this article published. I have tried to include all the guidelines you have requested with this entry including links to the necessary external sites but each time I submit the article it is declined. It is an independent Index created to help Mortgage Brokers understand the bridging market. There is no other Index in existence. I would appreciate some clarity in clear English as to the edits I need to make in order to get this article live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andymossy (talk • contribs) 12:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/SOI
The following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SOI has been edited to conform to Wikipedia guidelines. Please verify that it is ready for submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorgant (talk • contribs) 15:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Shantam Shubissa
Hi Avs5221 -thank you for your feedback regarding my article "Shantam Shubissa". It was rejected because it did was not from verifiable sources. I have added links to other wikipedia published Oromo singers such as Ali Birra and Ebisa Adunya (but have less verifiable sources than Shantam Shubissa?!), added a profile picture and reduced the original information volume. Hope this is useful and look forward to receiving feedback/publication. Many thanks, Afaankiyya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afaankiyya (talk • contribs) 01:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dwayne Beckford
Can take a look at this submission? To see if there are any errors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dwayne_Beckford 173.78.231.251 (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
An Barnstar for You!
|
The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
|
|
|
Congratulations, Avs5221! You're receiving The AFC Barnstar because you reviewed 187 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC) |
.
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Declining drafts for lack of wikification
You had declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan S. Elliott with a rationale of "Please WP:WIKIFY." The author asked about that rationale at the AfC help desk. I don't think it's a valid rationale to decline a submission, and the draft was rather well-wikified anyway. If I misunderstood you or you disagree with my reply at the help desk, you may want to leave a comment of your own. Huon (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Please help to create this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Eco-friendly_Science_Society_of_India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohit Kumar Tripathi (Magic Mohit) (talk • contribs) 06:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Trillbass Article - Notability source
My submission for Trillbass was declined months ago due to lack of notability. I have since found a review for them in a back issue of Mixmag. The review is not archived online. I have a hard copy of the magazine. How do I go about citing this as a reference? Do I take a photo of the article? Or do I just cite the issue nimber and author? Please excuse my markup as I have not been editing in some time. Thanks for your help and continued patience. here is the link to the submission [[1]] (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Delivered at 12:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duverger's Law, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hebron Presbyterian Church, Banks County, Georgia
Dear Editor, Please edit and make any changes by adding or removing material as you see fit. I would be glad to work out the problems that have made this contribution unacceptable. William CarsonWilliam Groves Carson (talk) 23:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Duverger's Law
Hello Avs5221. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Duverger's Law.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duverger's Law}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1100 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
Hi Avs5221,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Avs5221. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Avs5221! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Avs5221. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Select Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_0ofl5n0kSy64eAR&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 16:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Avs5221. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Avs5221. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Edit suggestion for Ed_Dante
Hi, I noted you created the Ed Dante page.
I work with Dave Tomar. I thought you might want to know about his current role and current writings.
thebestschools.org/magazine/masthead/#davidtomar
I would have left this on the :talk page, but I didn’t want to seem I was promoting my employer in any way.
--BlogRodent (talk) 23:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)