User talk:Romariem

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "RowanAlexanderLibrary", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it represents an organisation.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Please note that this is a procedural matter, and not a reflection on your edits, which are most welcome. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Thank you for changing your username; and once again welcome to Wikipedia, Romariem! Thank you for your contributions. I am Pigsonthewing and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

I'm very interested in 20th century ornithologists, so I'm enjoying seeing your draft article creations. Do let me know if I can help with any problems you encounter. You might like to know about {{Infobox person}}, which puts a panel with key facts in the top right of an article. That page has a blank you can copy; and there's an example on Horace Gundry Alexander. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Eric Brooke Dunlop, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:44, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Oliver Vernon Aplin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Vernon Aplin

Congratulations on the publication of your article on Oliver Vernon Aplin. I've made a few tweaks - please let me know if you have any questions about them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Henry Neville Southern.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 00:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken Simmons.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 00:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rev. Samuel Gibert Scott.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 00:59, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Ken Simmons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Rev. Samuel Gibert Scott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Henry Neville Southern, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Arthur Cox (Ornithologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clemence Margaret Acland.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 18:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Leslie Hilton Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

David_FLXD (Talk) 17:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eric_Brooke_Dunlop

Hi, please don't be offended, but I wonder whether the above article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria? At the moment, Dunlop seems (from the article as it stands) to be a virtual unknown, nor does the article claim anywhere that he was a particularly significant ornithologist. In other words, there is no apparent or claimed notability. However, I wonder whether his contributions to The Auk and British Birds were in fact significant? Looking at the good work you have been doing, I am inclined to think that there must be some reason you wrote the article on Dunlop. Please enlighten me! David_FLXD (Talk) 17:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obituaries in The Ibis and The Auk, both august journals and both reliable sources, seem to satisfy our requirements. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been able to access The Ibis, but did read the obituary in The Auk; there seems nothing there to indicate any special notability. Still waiting a response from Romariem. David_FLXD (Talk) 04:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The obituaries themselves are the evidence of notability. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting a response from Romariem. David_FLXD (Talk) 16:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rev. Samuel Gibert Scott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rev. Samuel Gibert Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev. Samuel Gibert Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alexrexpvt (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Charles Oldham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eric Brooke Dunlop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Brooke Dunlop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Brooke Dunlop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. David_FLXD (Talk) 17:38, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher James Alexander.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nimuaq (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clemence Margaret Acland concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clemence Margaret Acland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken D. Smith concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken D. Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher James Alexander concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher James Alexander, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clemence Margaret Acland

Hello Romariem. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Clemence Margaret Acland".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clemence Margaret Acland}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Christopher James Alexander was accepted

Christopher James Alexander, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Spinning Spark 16:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken D. Smith concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken D. Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken D. Smith

Hello Romariem. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ken D. Smith".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken D. Smith}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]