User talk:Atheera raj illalai

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dileep, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 19:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atheera raj illalai, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Atheera raj illalai! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Janapriyanayakan

Dileep real title Atheera raj illalai (talk) 11:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Atheera raj illalai! You created a thread called How to create Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Daniel (film)

Hello, Atheera raj illalai,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username William2001 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Jack Daniel (film) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|William2001}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

William2001^(talk) 19:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ananya pandey

Acted 3 film No Wikipedia Atheera raj illalai (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Daniel (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Daniel (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Daniel (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William2001^(talk) 19:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Khans of Bollywood, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 20:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HINDUPHOBIAYES

Create your own articles

WP is not staffed by paid employees. We are all volunteer editors and admins. People create articles about persons and subjects that interest them and of which they have knowledge. We don't create articles because non editors ask us to. If you want an article on a particular person then by all means familiarize yourself with the guidelines and rules about Articles for Creation (creating new articles). If you ask for links to WP help pages that provide that info, then ask it on the Teahouse. But your accusation that WP is Hinduphobic or Philomuslim is nonsense. We volunteer editors are not in the habit of taking assignments, some will I am sure, but I am busy creating and managing my own articles and articles of interest to take on an assignment of which I know absolutely nothing and have no interest. And is safe to say the same for others like Theroadislong Oldperson (talk) 23:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No

You get pay for making .. If its for public How you have

More power than me

Why all not equel Why there is wiki for Tara sutaria But not ananya pandey Both debut same film Both doing 2 films

Why wiki for Khans of bolly Why not for Khanna Kumar and Kapoor Where Rajesh Khanna is superstar And Akshay highest paid HYPOCRITE HINDUPHOBIA Atheera raj illalai (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does have articles about a large number of individual Bollywood actors, such as Akshay Kumar and Rajesh Khanna, and also about actor families, such as Kapoor family. Is that what you were looking for? --bonadea contributions talk 08:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atheera, you are ranting for no good reason. The answer to why Ananya Pandey doesn't have an article, is that at the time her article was created, the article creator failed to demonstrate that she was notable. She only had one film credit to her name, which is not sufficient to warrant an article. Subjects have to be notable, and the two relevant criteria can be found in our General Notability Guideline and WP:NACTOR. Nobody was sitting around scheming to create an article about Tara Sutaria, but to deliberately not write one for Pandey. That doesn't make any sense. Also, Sutaria had multiple TV credits, so she met the criteria of WP:NACTOR. Instead of shaking your fist at everybody in sight, why don't you try calming down and engaging people in rational discussion? All your "Hinduphobia" accusations are pure nonsense. There is no agenda to suppress Hindus at Wikipedia. Articles are created by volunteers. That could be anybody in the world including you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tara sutaria also one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 16:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this response. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ananya debuted with tara She has wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 17:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts by typing four tildes like ~~~~. This will add a signature and time stamp so people will know who is talking. Secondly, I already explained to you the issue with Pandey and Sutaria. Sutaria had several television credits, where Pandey did not. The fact that they both made film debuts at the same time does not mean they are equal in all of their accomplishments or equally notable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atheera raj illalai (talk)butAtheera raj illalai (talk) Ananya signed 2 films

So? How does that make her notable per our notability guidelines that I linked for you above? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok All accept her actor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 17:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atheera raj illalai (talk)HiAtheera raj illalai (talk)

Jamie lever one film

Vandalism

Wiki is full of Christian and mulla No hindu support I log in but cant edit Cant create All have different rules Wiki has employees Its a foolish company No one respetcs HYPOCRITE HINDUPHOBIA Atheera raj illalai (talk) 05:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of us is employed by Wikipedia. Lots of nationalities and religions are represented among the millions of editors and we all have to follow the same rules. Like all other new editors, you can create a draft article or use the Articles for creation process to write an article which will then be reviewed by an experienced editor. I'm sorry you have experienced frustration here, but attacking other editors is not acceptable. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 07:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Khans of Bollywood. bonadea contributions talk 07:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar of Bollywood

Make Wikipedia of Kumars of bollywood like

khans of bollywood

Akshay kumar Kishore kumar Ashok kumar Manoj kumar Rajendra kumar Indra kumar Kumar gaurav Raaj kumar Sanjeev kumar

All are A lister Atheera raj illalai (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Akshay Kumar. Begoon 08:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

29

How dare you block Wiki is public If you block thatvmeans Wikipedia fake

And you 29 is not successful its hit films, success is 42 film check boxofficeindia.com the same site mentioned HINDUPHOBIA Atheera raj illalai (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.

Th next time you accuse editors, individually or as a group, of "Hinduphobia" or other bad-faith claims, your behaviour will be reported. bonadea contributions talk 10:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ha chal nikal

Tu galat likha bhe Atheera raj illalai (talk) 10:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Begoon 10:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

Have you edited English wikipedia with any previous account names? -- Begoon 10:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

Bro Atheera raj illalai (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What other accounts have you used? Please don't click "New section" at the top of the page. Just click Edit, scroll to the bottom and reply below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tried srk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 16:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That comment doesn't mean anything to me. Are you talking about Shah Rukh Khan? We're not asking about what articles you have tried to edit, we're asking about what wikipedia usernames you have used apart from this one. Also, please read WP:INDENT and WP:SIGN to learn how to properly indent and sign your posts on talk pages.

If you can't communicate properly in English, which is looking increasingly likely, then perhaps you do need to consider the advice above about editing a wikipedia in your native language instead of this one. You'd probably find it a lot easier, and if you continue editing in the way you are here then questions about competence become inevitable.

At the very least you need to stop the ridiculous, unfounded little 'mini-rants' about how unfair you think everything is and engage in some proper, productive discussion. One place you could do that immediately is: Talk:Dileep#Title, where there are some questions to address. Thank you. -- Begoon 02:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

chutiya Atheera raj illalai (talk)

Bless you. -- Begoon 13:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Geniac (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mc

Bsdk! Atheera raj illalai (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And that is another personal attack. Bsdk is shorthand for bhosdike, which means "cunt" in Hindi. --Geniac (talk) 15:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Chutiya means https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chutia_people Atheera raj illalai (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chutia and chutiya are two different words. Chutiya means fucker/asshole/idiot in Hindi. You were obviously directing an insult at Begoon. That is a personal attack, which you have already been warned about, thus the block. --Geniac (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not

Nahi Atheera raj illalai (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atheera, you seem to have great difficulty understanding how to respond to comments, and I'm also worried that you might have communication limitations that may negatively affect your ability to participate constructively at Wikipedia. For instance, I asked you what your previous user name was, but you never answered that in clearly. I'm not sure what your native tongue is, but you might have better luck editing at a Wikipedia in that language. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You dont know english? I dont have other name Bhag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 03:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When Begoon asked you "Have you edited English wikipedia with any previous account names?" You replied "Yes Bro" here. And then I asked you what other accounts you've used[1] and you said vaguely ""I tried srk", whatever that means. So I don't think your question about whether I understand English is as relevant as your ability to understand English. And since the bulk of your edits has been either disjointed rambling comments on talk pages, unsigned comments, insults, or what could be construed as trolling comments, I'd be on my best behavior after your block expires, if you wish to edit here any longer, because it doesn't seem to me that you are here for any constructive purpose. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atheera raj illalai (talk)YesAtheera raj illalai (talk) Only this account mine

Cyphoidbomb

Mind your business Atheera raj illalai (talk) 03:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Gopy (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Gopy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arun Gopy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at

you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Begoon 00:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are my hater — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 12:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 13:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 15:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajeev Parameswaran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rajeev Parameswaran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sona Jelin

The article Sona Jelin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Praxidicae (talk) 20:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prithviraj Sukumaran. Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Salman Khan. Begoon 01:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely, talk page access revoked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

11:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rajeev Parameswaran

The article Rajeev Parameswaran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Declined a speedy request because there's a claim of importance here, but in trying to find sources to add to the article I'm coming up short. No hits for Google news, the only regular Google hits are wikis and Facebook, and not much of that. Just not finding notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arun Gopy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arun Gopy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arun Gopy

Hello, Atheera raj illalai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arun Gopy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]