User talk:Aspireeditor5

May 2024

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kahaani Ghar Ghar Kii, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 21:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mishap. I'll try to add the reference soon. Thank you. Aspireeditor5 (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dil Ko Tumse Pyaar Hua moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dil Ko Tumse Pyaar Hua. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because TOI is about to be considered unreliable per discussion at RSN. Also SPI concerns which were just filed. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 05:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dil Ko Tumse Pyaar Hua 2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dil Ko Tumse Pyaar Hua 2. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uraan (2024 TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Uraan (2024 TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and All of these are being moved to draft. Likely COI as sock IPs continue to edit. Needs reviewed for sourcing and NPOV. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhua moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bodhua. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and All of these are being moved to draft. Likely COI as sock IPs continue to edit. Needs reviewed for sourcing and NPOV. Also seems like similar accounts . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and SPI case filed. Moving all these to draft. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Udne Ki Aasha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Udne Ki Aasha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and SPI filed, moving all these to draft. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uraan (2024 TV series) (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only two references are bylined. And even those are routine announcements. There is also a pending SPI case so this would be subject to G5 potentially based on the results.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uraan (2024 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aspireeditor5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 07:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udne Ki Aasha (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

TOI is about to be considered unreliable based on RSN. Only one bylined reference, the rest are NEWSORGINDIA. Reiterating that there is currently an SPI case so this could be G5 as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Udne Ki Aasha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, current pending SPI which would render this G5. In the meantime, the references would need to be cleaned up as the majority of them fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA so notability is not shown.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bodhua (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Same as the others that were draftfied. This is part of a current SPI and potentially G5. In addition, the references (with the exception of one) are all used to support ratings. Nothing in-depth about the show.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bodhua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uraan (2024 TV series) (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uraan (2024 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udne Ki Aasha (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Udne Ki Aasha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SANIRA. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veetuku Veedu Vaasapadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]