User talk:Asdfasdf1231234

		The Special Barnstar
		From a simple list of suburbs of Shrewsbury, you've made something special SuzanneKn 21:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:River Thames

Are the things ordered on here based on te order in which they appear from the mouth to the source, or just a general jumble? Simply south 16:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Are they ordered from source to mouth, or an attempt at alphabetical order gone wrong? I think this is slightly confusing as som places that are before others are after them. Simply south 16:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Consensus: Welsh Name

Hi, I copied this to the Shrewsbury page where the same debate is open. --MJB (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shropshire users

Hi there - if you wish to be added to the list of Shropshire users, use the following on your userpage:

[[Category:Wikipedians in Shropshire|{{subst:PAGENAME}}]]

Ludlow

Hello there Asdfasdf1231234,

Thanks for the contact. It appears the geograph sources have since been removed, which was a good call. I know the advocate of their inclusion meant well, but that source just isn't reliable. Using Geograph.org.uk as a source does not have the article's best interests at heart.

I'll try to monitor the situation, but feel free to give me a nudge should the debate continue. -- Jza84 · (talk) 00:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

City Stars Cairo

Hi, can you reassess the article City Stars Cairo? I have improved it and added references. And also, can you tell me how to improve it further in order to get a better assessment? Thanks, Abdallah (talk) 19:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks :), but I want to make this a good article not just "relatively good". I upgraded this article from this to what it is now, and I'm hoping to get this article to a GA or A status. Can you tell me what is it missing or what’s not right? Abdallah (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thats alot...I'll try my best, but the problem is that, there are very few online resources that I can use. Thanks for your help! Cheers, Abdallah (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review feedback

Hi, I noticed you have a request in at peer review which has not yet received any response besides the semi-automated script. Have you tried requesting a peer review from the volunteers list? Another idea is to review someone else's request (particularly one from the list of requests without responses), then ask that they look at your request. Hope these are helpful suggestions and help to get some feedback for your request soon, APR _t 20:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome for the PR on Shrewsbury - hope the suggestions help make it even better, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TraffordSelfridges.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:TraffordCentreSelfridges.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have received your reply. Unless fair use can be claimed, we cannot keep your upload.--Jusjih (talk) 21:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged your last message by assuming good faith. Wikipedia itself is non-profit, yet GFDL does not forbid for-profit uses.--Jusjih (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ShropshireLoggerhead.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ShropshireLoggerhead.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Sorry not to get back to you earlier, I kept meaning too! No problem about posting messages about the proposed Shropshire WikiProject, I just hope it stimulates some interest. Clearly Dpaajones, yourself a maybe a couple of others have been doing a lot of great work in this region and it'd be a shame if you couldn't get some more folk from the area to help you.

Have you tried posting a message about the proposal to all those at Category:Wikipedians in Shropshire? That might help a bit more. It would be fantastic to get another local project off the ground; the major city-regions seem to be dominating UK geo at the moment. Hopefully some Shire projects can start churning out some GAs and FAs, some of which I have no doubt (Shrewsbury) will come from yourself. --Jza84 | Talk 15:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your last post about Shrewsbury, I made a couple of small cosmetic changes to the article and left a note on the talk page about a few minor issues. I hope they help! It was a really, really great article. If nobody else comes by over the weekend, give me a nudge and I'll do the GA review myself. --Jza84 | Talk 18:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury passes. Good work! You may want to take a look at the current featured article nomination for Navenby. It might give you some ideas for Shrewsbury. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second that! Great Work Asdfasdf!! I really enjoyed the article. Next is FA!! You might also want to take a look at Blackburn, which is a GAC I've reviewed and kinda shows the difference between a fail and a pass! Again though, well done, I know only too well GA's no walk in the park. --Jza84 | Talk 19:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WellingtonShropshire.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Asdfasdf1231234!
We thank you for uploading Image:WellingtonShropshire.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of editing one of your private pages, Asdfasdf1231234/Notes, because the syntax for {{shortcut}} is being updated. Your page appeared at CAT:SHORTFIX where you can find more information. Best wishes. --DRoll (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that because the shortcut redirects have not yet been created the page is still going to be listed at CAT:SHORTFIX but it will not hurt anything. --DRoll (talk) 21:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SHROPSHIRE

Hello there! I hope all is well,

Just wondered how you got on with the Shropshire WikiProject proposal? I noticed the entry has gone from the proposals page. --Jza84 | Talk 11:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands schools

Got the data from the DCSF school performance tables website - the A level data is provided at more accuracy than GCSE data too. It's all kosher. DinosaursLoveExistence (talk) 09:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Supermarkets

Hi. I disagree. You said yourself, you used the BBC news story AND a postcode map - you should have referenced that too. Someone else has reverted the Sainsbury's edit on the basis that "the source is two years old and market share has changed since" - that's a fair point. And given Sainsbury's quite aggressive expansion policy announced with its annual results (extensions & new stores) it will change still further very quickly. Mark83 (talk) 13:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request

Hi Asdfasdf1231234,

Sure, I'd be happy to make the change, but I'm worried that User:NE2 plans to create a Editing Welsh Bridge (Iowa) article in the near future. Would you be able to prod him/her for their thoughts and intentions? --Jza84 | Talk 00:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can only be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, I shall endeavour to use it wisely! Asdfasdf1231234 (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hey

Hello there! Thanks for the contact! The issue with Scotland is, well, annoying to say the least! I suppose it's a product of consensus editting, where large groups of organised users can sway opinion. Scotsmen are reknowned for defending their land as anything but less than a "country" - it's part of the cultural psyche. It might be worth you having a flick through the debates and stating your piece? I hope all is well with you, :) --Jza84 | Talk 19:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Question

Liverpool One's own website says it has 1.4m square feet of retail space. Converted into m² that gives 130,050. The old figure had non-retail space included. ^┌_Joshii^┐_└^chat_┘ 21:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shuts and passages

Hi there - not Wikipedia related, but very much Shrewsbury related! Have a read of the following article about the new move by the County Council to add 20 of the shuts and passages in the town centre to the rights of way map.

http://shrewsburyforum.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=1390

It's an important moment in getting many of the town's shuts and passages the protection they deserve. Would be most excellent if you could chip in with a letter of support or so. David (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Universities Superannuation Scheme; Oakengates; Broseley; Buildwas; John Bagot Glubb; Trench, Telford; Wellington (Shropshire) railway station; Deutsche Presse-Agentur; Cressage; Oswestry (borough); Madeley, Shropshire; Craven Arms; Moseley Neighbourhood Forum; Cleobury Mortimer; Ketley; Oldham; Grenoble; Dormagen; Bridgnorth (district)

Cleanup: Meadowridge; Camden Market; Salford
Merge: The Forge, Parkhead; Random access memory; Richmond Park
Add Sources: Nantes; Midlands; John Rickman
Wikify: Russian National Unity; Watsonians RFC; Shropshire Wildlife Trust
Expand: Shropshire Star; Salman the Persian; Ironbridge

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Bridge

Ooops! Sorry - I forgot to let you know I'd actioned it! Hope it helps! :D --Jza84 | Talk 19:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:GloucesterSkyline.jpg

Image:GloucesterSkyline.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Gloucester Skyline.jpg and Image:GloucesterDocks.jpg as Commons:Image:Gloucester Docks.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Gloucester Skyline.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trafford Centre

Do you remember what source you used for the List of shopping centres in the United Kingdom by size article? I was thinking about giving the Trafford Centre article a look and most of the article needs sourcing. In this case, I was thinking of the bit about it being the 4th or 5th largest shopping centre in the UK. Nev1 (talk) 00:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sorry to bother you again

Done! At this rate, you might want to consider gearing up for adminship? Just a thought, as you seem to need to tools! Hope it helps, :D --Jza84 | Talk 21:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats exactly why I went for adminship - some of the processes for making ammends to what are obvious mistakes or intrusions were, and still are ridiculously cumbersome and lengthy. I've no issue applying WP:COMMONSENSE to these issues at all, and you seem to make serious requests only... exactly why I think you should consider it for the not so distant future. :) --Jza84 | Talk 21:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhamuniversitylogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bhamuniversitylogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:GatecrasherLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GatecrasherLogo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shrewsbury

The panorama might do if it were not such a low resolution image. Nor does it show the same perspective of the river. (I have just had a comment from a contact who lives there that he may ask one of his friends to do a better version of it. And my contact has a brilliant photo of Shrewsbury School, but I am suggesting that he does not upload it to Wiki until he has tried it in competitions.) I could have done with a better camera when taking that riverside photo. If you live close enough, you could probably nip out at the best time of day and improve on this photo, as well as find a better location than by Pig Trough.

We could probably add an Image gallery at the end of the article, like the one for Shrewsbury railway station. Shrewsbury is too large a topic to cover adequately in one single article. Wikipedia is not very good at managing photos in any other way in terms of page layout. photos tend to run past the horizontal lines associated with headings. For that matter, so does the Infobox. It is just one of those things about the wiki page layout. Sic friat crustulum.

The photos relating to John Wesley serve the function of Reference to verify encyclopaedic content. A lot of the other information caould also be regarded as being referenced by photos, so this is something to think about in general, not just on this article. Robert of Ramsor (talk) 01:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And one photo we need is the Column near SCAT, London Road site, this being a substantial landmark. If we could add a useful Image gallery, it should also include both English Bridgae and Welsh Bridge as the main road bridges, but the footbridges are also of interest, not least that one of them is cast iron, made in Dudley. Back to the River Severn view. History is the wrong section for it, but I put it there as being (at the moment) the first sevtion after the introductory section, which would be too crowded (I did a draft version with it there). Robert of Ramsor (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Old Shrewsbruy Market Halledit.jpg

File:Old Shrewsbruy Market Halledit.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Old Shrewsbruy Market Hall -England.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Old Shrewsbruy Market Hall -England.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WellingtonShropshire.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Wellington Railway Station -Shropshire-27Jan2008.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Favour

Hi there, could I ask you a favour? My name's Andrew Turvey and I'm the Secretary of Wikimedia UK. We're the newly formed chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation - the charity that owns and runs Wikipedia and other projects - covering the United Kingdom and we're looking to organise our first AGM.

We have decided that the best place to hold it would be Birmingham, as it is central, and would like to follow up Birmingham University. I notice that you are down as a Birmingham University student and wondered if you would be able to help us with this.

The main thing we need at the moment is a contact at a sympathetic BUGS student society who would be prepared to book a room at the university for us, which would allow up to 40 people to come along. Is this something you could help us with?

Anything you could do would be gratefully received - please contact me on my talk page or via email. Thanks AndrewRT(Talk) 23:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AONBSUK.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AONBSUK.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Interesting

Yes, I know - the Newport eccentric has used my user page as a template! David (talk) 19:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Broadway Plaza (Birmingham)

I have nominated Broadway Plaza (Birmingham), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadway Plaza (Birmingham). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 | Talk 02:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Shropshire

Hi. I notice you've created some WikiProject Shropshire pages in your userspace. Without knowing they were there I've just started a WikiProject Shropshire page. But I see your version is a little big mroe in depth and has a better userbox. Would you be interested in helping to expand the project and help get it off the ground. Let me know if you can help. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have also noticed the project draft in your userspace at User:Asdfasdf1231234/Notes. However, there are active templates in it that are causing confusion in the search routines of Wikipedia. As this project is not yet officially online and has not received an endorsement from the project requests department, any shortcuts, templates, and cats you have created in it should be enclosed in tags. This will temporarily disable any functions that are invisibly embedded in the code. I can't do this for you as it is frowned upon to refactor users' pages without their express permission. Do take up TheRetroGuy's offer of help, and mine too - I manage the neigbouring WP:WORCS which currently looks after Salop a bit. I am online a lot, and I'm sure that between us all we could get this project up and running, although it should ideally have at least six members signed up on the project request page to justify its launch.--Kudpung (talk) 02:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I actually wasn't aware that new projects had to be run past a proposals discussion when I started the Shropshire Project. I'd got WP:EDINBURGH off the ground a few months earlier by just launching it and inviting others to join. Fortunately I got the required number of editors with that one. WP:HEREFORD, which I also started, seems to have got enough. I haven't done much with WP:SHROPSHIRE for a while, but hope we can get it off the ground. Perhaps if there's not enough interested users we could merge WP:HEREFORD and WP:SHROPSHIRE with WP:WORCS and rename it? Perhaps WP:West Mercia after the area. TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:30, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The draft proposal in Asdfasdf's sandbox is quite OK, but as you probably know, one of the best ways to make a project page is to find a good one and copy its basic layout and then populate more pages as the project grows. That way, it's easier to recreate all the required templates ensuring that they have the right code. I created the Worcs project by doing this. I'm not sure it's absolutely mandatory to go through the proposals process, but that process exists with the express purpose of ensuring that only projects get created that have a likelihood of remaining active. We've been lucky with Worcs that we've gathered a reasonable following, although it's a bit sporadic at times. I tend to help out on several projects for neighbouring counties, but I'm not sue there would be much support for merging Worcs with any of them. County projects all tend to be fiercely proud of their local identity and at Worcs we already have several thousand pages to manage, besides, there is I believe already a West Midlands project - you can check all that out on the WP:WORCS main page. I think you'd be doing a good job if you were to take a basic Salop project page through the creation process, you'll soon know if there is enough support. I actually did a lot of spamming and canvassing to get enough support for Worcs, but the idea to launch wasn't mine alone; It came mainly from teamwork that already existed while developing a set of pages for the Malverns, where several of the editors come from. Projects for rural counties are indeed hard to get going. This page: WP:WikiProject England/Projects will certainly provide you with the best possible overview of all the county projects and how they are performing.--Kudpung (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy message from WikiProject West Midlands

Hi there Asdfasdf1231234. You are registered with WikiProject West Midlands and we are cleaning our list of members. As you have not contributed to any page for over a year we have removed you as inactive. If you still want to participate in the project, just go back and move yourself into the active list. Thank you. Gavbadger (talk) 17:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CL icon.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:CL icon.PNG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CL icon.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CL icon.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WakemanSchoolLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WakemanSchoolLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShrewsburySixthFormCollegeLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShrewsburySixthFormCollegeLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shropshiresettlements.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shropshiresettlements.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WelshMarchesMap.jpg

The file File:WelshMarchesMap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TelfordParishes.jpg

The file File:TelfordParishes.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:TelfordParishes.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shrewsbury area

Template:Shrewsbury area has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]