User talk:Arsenl2017

Speedy deletion nomination of Gryphon Investors

Hello Arsenl2017,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gryphon Investors for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 16:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenl2017, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Arsenl2017! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gryphon Investors has been accepted

Gryphon Investors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Arsenl2017. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 04:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Arsenl2017. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 15:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your Teahouse question

No one answered, but with some effort I found this by PrimeHunter in the Teahouse archives, referring to a similar question.

New articles get the noindex tag for 30 days or until they are patrolled by a user with the required user right. noindex tells search engines to not index the page. The page has not been patrolled but is now more than 30 days old so it no longer has the noindex tag. It varies how long it takes search engines to index a page. They only had a few days after noindex was removed and they must visit the page to detect it's no longer noindexed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now this is interesting. I found something by Softlavender on the archive page I was just reading, after I had already posted here. However, this person is not certain of whether the statement is correct. Unless an editor has autopatrolled rights, any new article they create will not be indexed by search engines until it is marked as reviewed by a New Page Patroller, or after 90 days, whichever is sooner.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The quoted post by me is from 2 May 2017. The indexing delay was increased from 30 to 90 days around 8 June.[1] The current version of Gryphon Investors is from 11 April‎. This means it allowed indexing from 11 May to 8 June, but not from 8 June to 10 July where it became 90 days old. It's currently indexed by Google. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gryphon Investors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gryphon Investors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gryphon Investors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]