Jump to content

User talk:Ari Azzopardi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Azzopardi (May 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ari Azzopardi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Ari Azzopardi, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ari D Azzopardi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4, Duplicate draft of speedy delete nominated Draft:Ari Azzopardi

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari D Azzopardi (May 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 01:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Ari Azzopardi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Virtually unreferenced autobio with no indication of notability.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to publish your autobiography

[edit]

I've just rejected User:Ari Azzopardi/sandbox, and now find out this wasn't your first or even second attempt at creating an article on yourself, and all in the space of a few hours. If the content of the draft I rejected is anything to go by, this article quite simply won't be accepted. Therefore my advice to you is: please stop, before you get sanctioned. You're welcome to make constructive edits to Wikipedia, but continuing in this way isn't helping. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoubleGrazing, I understand your concern and will take on the feedback you provided. i was hoping you could unblock me. i was hoping that with access i would be able to make articles on players in the national sports leagues that dont have articles yet. i was blocked without making any further edits to anything post your comment so i was hoping that you may give me the opportunity to use my account to create these imfomative articles Ari Azzopardi (talk) 09:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't unblock you if I wanted to, as I'm not an admin. This is why I was trying to warn you so you don't end up sanctioned; too late, as it turns out. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Ari Azzopardi/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 08:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking My Account

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ari Azzopardi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi Athaenara, I do sincerely apologise for my actions. I was unaware that I was not allowed to make an autobiography on myself. I had three attempts, all of which taken down by different users, for different reasons. I started off writing a bunch of lies having a bit of fun knowing that it wouldn’t pass through and that it was all a hoax. the next reason I couldn’t publish an article was because the content was too small. I then spent time trying to make my auto biography only for it to be disapproved because of it not being sufficiently notable in Wikipedia. I was going to stop and use my account for good and create articles about notable organisations and professional sports players that don’t have a Wikipedia article on them. I still intend to do this, and I no longer have the want to create an auto biography about myself. if you could please unblock me I would much apricate it. I understand if you choose otherwise. Thanks... Ari Azzopardi (talk) 09:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As you have said you will not create an autobiography any longer, I will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What edits do you intend to make, since you will no longer edit about yourself? 331dot (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to make edits about professional sports players, either correcting/adding to thier current articles or making and article for a player who does not have one who has made thier debut in the highest standard of their respective sport. Ari Azzopardi (talk) 10:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]
Athaenara What do you think? 331dot (talk) 10:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot: I was tempted to unblock him myself and then thought, no, it's always better to have more than just one admin assessing this kind of situation, so I held off. Whatever you decide is fine with me. – Athaenara 10:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fade258 (talk) 03:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Dempsey moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Oliver Dempsey, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've moved this to drafts, because notability hasn't been shown. Notability per WP:GNG requires significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject. This article cites two sources, neither of which meets those criteria. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Carey Baptists Grammar School Football, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I've moved this back to drafts, because it wasn't ready to be published. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Word of advice

[edit]

Here is some friendly advice which you didn't ask for but which may come in useful. I've just moved two of your articles into drafts, because they were referenced in a way that tells me you don't yet fully understand the requirements for (and/or importance of) notability. Please study carefully the principle at WP:N, and the general notability guideline at WP:GNG, and make sure that your articles comply with these.

I would also recommend that you continue to publish through the AfC process, until such time as you are sure you have mastered the notability (etc.) issue. With the Carey article I just draftified, it had been declined twice already, which should have told you that it's probably not a good idea for you to publish it yourself, you should wait for a more experienced editor to review it first.

One thing you need to also realise is that if you publish articles (past AfC declines or otherwise against advice) which aren't ready for publishing, they will more often than note end up being deleted anyway, which is a complete waste of everyone's time and effort, yours and others'.

It's great that you want to contribute, but you need to learn the proverbial ropes. Please take all of this in the constructive spirit it was offered. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HenryTemplo were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HenryTemplo (talk) 06:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bilorv were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bilorv (talk) 22:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ollie Dempsey

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ari Azzopardi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ollie Dempsey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oliver Dempsey

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ari Azzopardi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oliver Dempsey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ari Azzopardi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carey Baptists Grammar School Football, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oliver Dempsey

[edit]

Hello, Ari Azzopardi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oliver Dempsey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ari Azzopardi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carey Baptists Grammar School Football".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]