Jump to content

User talk:Aquabluetesla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aquabluetesla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Aquabluetesla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Texas A&M University College of Engineering

[edit]

I think I've corrected your mistake with Texas A&M University College of Engineering and done the move you were originally trying to do. The RM wasn't needed as it was a technical move request really. Let me know if any issues! -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham, thank you very much for your help! I am eternally grateful for your assistance. Aquabluetesla (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to help. :) -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Political userboxes

[edit]

@Aquabluetesla: Just to let you know an editor at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion is try to get all political userboxes deleted. I am sending you this message since you created some of them. Catfurball (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]

Hey, just noting that some of your comments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas A&M University College of Liberal Arts are arguably violations of our policy against personal attacks directed at other editors. The community typically extends some leeway for editors in a stressful situation to blow off steam without facing consequences, but if you turn making comments like this one into a habitual pattern it is likely to result in sanctions against your ability to participate in deletion discussions and/or edit more broadly. signed, Rosguill talk 16:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, that user has been trying to WP:BAIT me on several pages now, including R. Bowen Loftin's (1) and (2), the second was after I first edited this to include their first edit, and they continue to monitor every single edit I make, see Talk:President of Texas A&M University. I am at a loss for what I can do. They seem to be unable to WP:Let it go. Yes, arguably, many would not consider that to be against guidelines. That message was not a "personal attack", but was rather nice and grateful for the attention directed at my other contributions. The original message I responded to was far worse in that regard. Aquabluetesla (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing comments

[edit]

Hey, just a tip - it's generally considered very bad etiquette to edit comments in a thread after the fact. It's okay to make minor grammar corrections, but changing much more makes it extremely confusing, if not borderline impossible, to discuss things. If you do make changes, I'd suggest just using a strikethrough on text you don't want to be there anymore or noting what you've added after the fact. Toa Nidhiki05 14:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would say it's usually fine to edit your own comments after the fact, but only if someone hasn't responded to it already. Once they have, it should be set-in-stone. ~ HAL333 17:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comanche names

[edit]

You seem to be new to Wikipedia with a vested interest in the affairs of Texas, but you are a little confused about what a "Comanche name" really is and how the spellings that you think are "Comanche" are not. Let's use Cynthia Ann Parker as an example. Her name in Comanche was Na'ura (I'll use the easier-to-type ' for the harder to type ʔ to represent the glottal stop). The na- is a passive prefix on the verb 'ura 'find', thus "Was Found". The Americans who regularly came along with the Army to "pacify" the Comanche were rarely speakers of Comanche (and that's being generous). So they didn't really care about accuracy in terms of transcription, but just adapted the sounds to what they "heard" with their English-speaking ears. One of the most common listening errors was moving that r-sound up in front of rounded vowels and glides. Thus, Na'ura > Nar/dua (that 'r' is phonetically a tap like the "d" in the middle of "rider", not an approximant like the "rr" in the middle of "borrow"). Thus both "Narua" and "Nadua" are anglicized version's Cynthia Ann's Comanche name Na'ura. The same thing happened with Ten Bears' name in English. The first half of his name isn't relevant because the Comanche word for "ten" wasn't too far off from the Anglicized version, but the second half, the "Bears" part, shows the same r-movement from English speakers in the 19th century. The word for "grizzly bear" in old Comanche (the word has been lost in modern Comanche due to the extinction of the grizzly on the South Plains late in the 19th century) was pawɨɨra (based on pa- 'big' + wɨɨra 'bear'). Once again, English speakers moved the "r" up in front of the rounded glide, thus Pawɨɨra > Parua. This happened regularly between Comanche and English in the South Plains. (In Utah, the Shoshoni name Tuuwɨɨta "Black Bear" [the "t" in Shoshoni is pronounced the same as the Comanche "r"] became Tooele [tuwɪlə] in English so it didn't always happen, perhaps because the Mormons listened to Shoshoni more carefully than the Texans listened to Comanche.) So be more careful about what you call an "Anglicization" and what you call a "Comanche name". "Narua" and "Nadua" are BOTH Anglicizations of Cynthia Ann's Comanche name, which was Na'ura. TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ...anglicized versions of Cynthia Ann's Comanche name...
TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 22:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I will admit I was confused, I am interested in linguistics and I have some experience with IPAs (Tixtla, Tixtla de Guerrero (municipality)) but I have no knowledge of how to do a Comanche language IPA and didn't know of the "ʔ" character before this. I had assumed that her name was given as "Narua" in the Comanche dictionary and "na-uhru" was "the Comanche construction". I have known about the glottal stop from reading, Empire of the Summer Moon by S.C. Gwynne, which is mostly an excellent book, other than some of its sensationalization of violence and barbarousness. I have also made similar edits to Isatai'i and Mow-way. The policies of the federal government in the past (& present) was (& are) extremely regretful. I hope more is done to save the language. Aquabluetesla (talk) 23:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comanche phonetics aren't particularly difficult since there's only one sound in the language that doesn't occur in English (the high back unrounded vowel [ɨ]). The contemporary Comanche dictionaries don't contain the original Comanche pronunciations for several historical figures, just the modern English versions ("Narua" instead of "Na'ura", "Parua" instead of "Pawɨɨra", for example). This isn't unusual in moribund languages where the speakers of the language don't use the "old forms" with any regularity and over time default to the Anglicized versions that they can look up in Anglo sources. Kwana (Parker) is an exception because it is just the Comanche word kwana "odor, smell" and sounds the same in Comanche and English. I'd like to warn you about using Gwynne's book. It is highly inaccurate in its over-reliance on white sources from the 19th and early 20th centuries. It is filled with sensationalistic portrayals of Comanche barbarity and butchery drawn entirely from contemporary newspaper accounts that operated under all the prejudices of the time. It is not well-respected among anthropologists and tribal members. If you want a far more accurate portrayal of Comanche history and life I would highly recommend Thomas W. Kavanagh "The Comanches: A History 1706-1875" (Kavanagh is a fluent, although non-native, speaker of Comanche and is highly respected by the tribe), Pekka Hämäläinen "The Comanche Empire", and the older, somewhat dated, but still good, Ernest Wallace and E. Adamson Heobel "The Comanches: Lords of the South Plains". (My nickname, Taivo, happens to be the Comanche word for "white man".) --TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, very interesting, I’ll look into those. After doing some reading, I am wondering if you would prefer that her native name be listed as Naʔʉra or Naʔura? In my view, it may benefit from a change, as Na'ura is linked to a village. Although, if changed to this name then the IPA would appear the same. Would there be any tones that could be added to differentiate it? Aquabluetesla (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The letters u and ʉ are not interchangeable in Comanche, they represent the different vowels [u] and [ɨ] respectively in the writing system. The verb 'find' is ura [ura], not ʉra [ɨra], which means 'thank you'. There are no tones. Here is the articulatory difference between the two sounds: [u] is the English vowel in "boot", the back of the tongue is raised toward the top of the mouth and the lips are rounded; [ɨ] is formed by raising the back of the tongue as for [u], but not rounding the lips. You cannot "switch" "u" and "ʉ" in Comanche any more than you can switch the vowels of "heat" and "hit" in English and have the same word. It's not an issue if a person and village have the same name in Comanche any more than "Paris" can be both a placename (Texas) and a personal name (Hilton). In the article, Na'ura should be mentioned in the beginning as Cynthia Ann's name in Comanche, but the remainder of the article should actually use "Narua" or "Nadua" (whichever is more common in the literature) because that is the English version of her Comanche name. It's a Wikipedia policy that the most common version of the name in English sources should be the one used. That's why it took a few years for "Kiev" to become "Kyiv" as English language sources (media, etc.) switched spellings. --TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review

[edit]

I have nominated Lawrence Sullivan Ross for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dylanvt (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Aquabluetesla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Texas A&M University College of Liberal Arts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Augustus Belknap

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Augustus Belknap at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! TCMemoire 21:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Augustus Belknap

[edit]

On 22 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Augustus Belknap, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Augustus Belknap led the first mule-drawn car from Alamo Plaza to San Pedro Springs Park, which developed into the first streetcar line in San Antonio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Augustus Belknap. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Augustus Belknap), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thomas S. Gathright

[edit]

On 9 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas S. Gathright, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the only functioning secondary school in Mississippi during the American Civil War was founded by Thomas S. Gathright? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas S. Gathright. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas S. Gathright), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass 00:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Q. W. Watson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Quintus et Ultimus Watson

[edit]

On 27 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quintus et Ultimus Watson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Quintus et Ultimus Watson was the acting governor of Texas for one day in 1915? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quintus et Ultimus Watson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Quintus et Ultimus Watson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 00:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on this topic. —  AjaxSmack  23:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aquabluetesla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Texas A&M University College of Liberal Arts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Texas's 62th House of Representatives district

[edit]

Hello Aquabluetesla,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Texas's 62th House of Representatives district for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Texas's 62th House of Representatives district to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aquabluetesla

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Texas's 62th House of Representatives district, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 18 § Texas's 62th House of Representatives district.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]