User talk:Apostolicus

Welcome

Hello, Apostolicus, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Apostolicus, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Giovanni Bernardo Gremoli have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Your addition to Giovanni Bernardo Gremoli has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also found copyright violations in St. Joseph's Cathedral, Abu Dhabi and List of pastoral visits of Pope Francis. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No shared accounts

Hello Apostolicus. Your user page indicates that this is a shared account, which is not allowed. It also indicates that "Apostolicus" is the name of an organization. If it is, you will have to change your user name. Please post your reply below.— Diannaa (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apostolicus (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC) Hello Diannaa. My page is not an organization, i have rectified my mistake, and i deeply apologize for my mistake.[reply]

Your user page still states "We are writers". How many of you are there?— Diannaa (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

forgive me I have ratified my mistake! - Apostolicus (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irzio Luigi Magliacani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Irzio Luigi Magliacani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Apostolic Vicariate of Southern Arabia. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Giovanni Bernardo Gremoli

added links pointing to Cardinal and Giovanni Bianchi

Irzio Luigi Magliacani

added a link pointing to Cardinal

Paul Hinder

added a link pointing to Cardinal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Raffaele Filippo Presutti. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 10:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again here. Please exercise more caution when evaluating sources. Kuru (talk) 09:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giovanni Bernardo Gremoli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giovanni Bianchi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

May the force be with you!

Kash Up (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apostolic Nunciature to Venezuela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Salle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Anthony Catholic Church (Fort Lauderdale, Florida) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need independent reliable sources. And not just about the 100 year anniversary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Anthony Catholic Church (Fort Lauderdale, Florida) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:St. Anthony Catholic Church (Fort Lauderdale, Florida), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apostolicus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your edit to Eugine Mattioli has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 11:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ubaldo Teofano Stella moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ubaldo Teofano Stella, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 19:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ubaldo Teofano Stella (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Silikonz was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ubaldo Teofano Stella instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You do not need to simultaneously contest a draftify and submit this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ubaldo Teofano Stella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Silikonz💬 20:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ubaldo Teofano Stella. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Higher Committee of Human Fraternity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Higher Committee of Human Fraternity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.forhumanfraternity.org/zayed-award-for-human-fraternity/ and https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/44524/what-is-the-higher-committee-of-human-fraternity. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that not only did you create this copyright infringement, when it was brought to your attention you stated it wasn't a copyright violation. Entire paragraphs were found to be copied, word for word, from the sources. Please review WP:COPYVIO more carefully before starting your next article. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 23:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kannikadass William Antony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good Shepherd School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carmelite Sisters of Saint Teresa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carmelite Sisters of Saint Teresa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi! I noticed your signature contains images. I'm sorry, but this isn't allowed. Can you please remove the images from your signature? Thanks! Tails Wx 13:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

whoops, I just noticed that in Wikipedia:Signatures, Thank You for that. - Apostolicus (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this: don't overly enlarge text. Just eliminate font-size: 180%. Your current signature is pretty big. See WP:SIGAPP. Also, please make sure you review WP:SIG before you make changes to signature. Silikonz💬 15:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As they say, the second time is the charm, right? :D Apostolicus (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was third! Anyways, the signature looks good now! Tails Wx 17:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, both of you @Silikonz and @Tails Wx - Apostolicus (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, a neutral signature helps professionalism :) Silikonz💬 17:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I'm glad we got it fixed! :) Tails Wx 17:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftification

Hi please slow down your draftifying. There is no need to push articles to draft shortly after they are created. You can tag them as needing more sources and come back after a week or so to draftify if there’s no improvement. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - Apostolicus (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing. You draftified 23 articles today! That's excessive. Moving main space article to Draft space is just one tool that is possible to use, it's not the only tool that you should use when you see an article that needs to be improved. Also, you focused much of your efforts on the work of one editor and that could be seen as harassment. Please edit thoughtfully and don't mass-edit with any type of editing. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your edit to Apostolic Vicariate of Kuwait has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 18:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chapter 2: The Tribes of Tatooine (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Chapter 2: The Tribes of Tatooine instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chapter 2: The Tribes of Tatooine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.avona.org/kuwait/ola_timeline.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Whpq (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Our Lady of Arabia - Pontifically crowned in Kuwait.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Our Lady of Arabia - Pontifically crowned in Kuwait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Our Lady of Arabia Cathedral." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Our Lady of Arabia Cathedral. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 3 § Our Lady of Arabia Cathedral. until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M.CC.I.

Hello Apostolicus,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged M.CC.I. for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want M.CC.I. to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carmelite Sisters of Saint Teresa

Hello, Apostolicus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carmelite Sisters of Saint Teresa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait

Hello, Apostolicus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request - March 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Apostolicus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge my mistake in violating Wikipedia's copyright policy and have since thoroughly reviewed and understood the guidelines. I am committed to adhering to these policies and ensuring all my contributions are compliant and to that end, I will stop uploading any pictures to any Wikimedia website

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Our Lady of Arabia Church, Kuwait

Hello, Apostolicus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Our Lady of Arabia Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request - April 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Apostolicus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Following my previous request, I diligently reviewed multiple Wikipedia articles to help further my understanding of copyright issues. Here are the results of my review:

1. What is copyright?
Copyright is a type of law that protects original creations and gives the creator exclusive rights to use and share them for a specific period. It aims to help creators earn money from their creations. Copyright laws differ by country but typically apply to literature, music, drama, art, and other forms of creative work.

2. How is Wikipedia licenced?

The information on Wikipedia is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). This means that people can use and edit the text as long as they offer the same freedoms to others and give credit to the original authors of the Wikipedia article.

3. Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Wikipedia follows U.S. copyright laws as its servers are based in the United States. It is unable to host any material that violates these laws, ensuring that its content can be freely distributed and edited. The website aims to offer reliable information that is available for sharing and usage. When I posted pictures on Flickr and later moved them to Wikipedia, I not only violated copyright laws but also falsely changed the images' licensing and included them in Wikipedia articles unlawfully. This misled others to believe the images could be freely distributed when they were not actually authorized to be.

4. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
Certain content that is protected by copyright laws may be utilized under the "fair use" doctrine, allowing for restricted use of copyrighted material without obtaining permission for specific purposes like commentary, criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research. Various factors influence fair use, including the intent and nature of the usage, the type of copyrighted material, the proportion utilized compared to the entirety, and the impact on the market or value of the copyrighted work. Wikipedia may also permit fair use for educational and transformative objectives within its articles.

5. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
In order to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy, it is important to:

Understand and adhere to copyright laws, including those that apply outside the U.S.
Use content that is either in the public domain or licensed for free use and redistribution, such as CC BY-SA.
Include information when uploading images, including copyright tags, a description, source, and author details to ensure proper permissions for use on Wikipedia.
Avoid using copyrighted content that doesn't meet Wikipedia's fair use guidelines or lacks a clear license for redistribution and modification.

I hope my explanation of Wikipedia's copyright policy was clear and has shown my readiness to return to contributing constructively to the platform. I have learned a lot by re-reviewing these policies, and I am eager to apply this knowledge to enhance my future work. My aim is to ensure that my contributions not only enrich the resource but also strictly adhere to the necessary legal and ethical standards. I am sincerely looking forward to being part of the Wikipedia community again, helping to share accurate and valuable information with the world.

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not accepted(98% likely according to GPTzero). You haven't shown that you understand anything, you just put what a bot spit out for you. 331dot (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.