User talk:AntiVandalBot/Nov06

PSP banners.

The bot deleted the {{listdev}} template and a banner I set up at List of PlayStation Portable games which is perfectly legit. Here's the diff. Ceros 22:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

small non-Latin character set difficulty

It looks like AVB didn't quite parse a particular type of non-Latin character set in this revert. After AVB's change, the "got" language dissapeared. To help verify there wasn't another unrelated edit, here's the individual diffs: [1] [2]. After I changed it back, the language appeared as a long string of blocks, two above Hawai'i and two below Galego ([3]). In the edit before mine, you can see it missing from that spot.

It's a very small error, compared to speedily reverting page blanking and the rest, but I thought I should let you know in case you are unaware. Gotyear 23:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Please whitelist User:Mathbot

AntiVandalBot and Mathbot seem to have been edit-warring (e.g. [4] is a vandalism warning given to Mathbot by AntiVandalBot); check the history of User talk:Mathbot for a history of the warnings (there have been quite a lot...). You may want to whitelist Mathbot to stop any more weird bot interactions like this happening. --ais523 17:24, 23 October 2006 (U T C)

HAHAHAHA WTH!!! So...if bots disobey 3RR, then what? ;) --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate message from you

I received a message from you claiming that I had edited the "Mountain Vista High School" entry.

I didn't. And I don't appreciate your threatening message indicating that unwanted modifications to the page are considered vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.115.194 (talk • contribs)

You're running as an IP.... IP's are shared...... it's possible that someone else who had received your IP via DHCP earlier had - nothing to worry about -- Tawker 14:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Run my own bot? ;)

I'd like to run my own copy of AntiVandalBot/Tawkerbot2/etc. What do I (and my computer) need to do in order to be able to serve Wikipedia in this capacity? --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still reverting Mathbot

see User talk:Mathbot -- Agathoclea 09:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write that

I didn't write that profanity on the Sasuke Uchiha article, because on history you say that I wrote it, but I didn't, some other guy did, so go back there and say you blamed the wrong guy because it's ruining my reputation here on Wikipedia.Sam ov the blue sand 13:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop

making edits like this [5] and do so immediately or you will be reported,.. This is disgusting and a crude attack that you reverted the anti vandal person 3 times! SqueakBox 16:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

southpoint

Why did it mark Southpoint? Am trying to list a legitimate travel site. 70.112.240.110 17:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AntiVandalBot mistakes / improvements needed

I find I'm really getting irritated by AntiVandalBot's disruption of a logical sequence of escalating warning messages on a user's talk page. It appears to post its standard boilerplate without looking at the comments and dates left by the previous substitution templates. In some cases I have taken to reverting the bot's edit and correcting it myself. I don't want to have to do this.

It doesn't seem hard to parse a page for the inline comments left by warning templates. For anonymous IP addresses, the bot could pay attention to warnings it finds within the past 24 hours and then post an escalated warning instead of the usual drivel it posts now.

Furthermore, the bot should stop inserting its own headings. It should use the -n templates such as {{subst:test2-n|PageName}} to insert the appropriate text with the name of the vandalized page built into it.

Just my $0.03 -Amatulic 22:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's something that's going to be added when we finally release version 2.0 or 3.0 depending on how you count of the bot... there really has been a war over the warnings the bot gives, people don't want an standard warning as it may confuse the rare new user who was acting IGF. As for the headers.... it's a major matter of discussion, personally I think it's easier (for me) at least to read... but we shall see - do you have a better warning template in mind? -- Tawker 23:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the headers aren't a big deal, keep 'em.

The text is OK but I'd actually prefer the bot to use one of the standard warning templates and append its own text to it, something like this:

{{subst:test2-n|ArticleName}} ''This warning was added by [[AntilVandalBot]]. If this automated bot reverted a legitimate edit, please [[click here]] to bring it to the developers' attention so they can improve its behavior.''

That way the bot leaves behind the same standardized inline comments because it's using the standard templates. I use these comments to see what level warning has previously been added.

My major gripe is that the bot should be smart enough to know how to escalate the warnings based on what is already on the user's talk page. If that will be fixed in an upoming version, that's great. -Amatulic 23:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Half the problem is the fact that the template is not stable... maybe we'll add an comment into the existing warnings which should help a bit -- Tawker 23:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Well, maybe a first step would be the capability for the bot to escalate its own warning level if the bot had previously placed one. Then at least you have control over the format and stability. And it would help if I could see the "level" of the bot's warning in a comment. -Amatulic 00:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. John's School

There is currently a lot of vandalism happening on this page in relation to an upcoming sports game. AVB is on the job, but is ending up reverting to vandals' versions of the page. I don't know what kind of attention this needs. I'm pretty new here. 66.245.149.113 22:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My IP Address

Hi, I have been warned about vandalism I didn't commit on the African continent page

I am a peaceful person who doesnt want any trouble, and I suspect that someone knows my IP Adress and did this in my behalf, or the vandal bot is wrong

I would never vandalize Wikipedia, for I am responsible and it is a page I frequently visit.

I would like all and any wikipedia accounts , which maybe 1 I don't ever use, to be deleted so this can never happen again.

Your IP will never be permabanned, even at your request, because it won't always be your IP. IPs change hands from time to time. If you have an actual account, you can get that permabanned, but that has a password so, barring theft of your account, it will always be yours. -NorsemanII 07:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bot got drunk?

Anyone want to explain this edit? --Ixfd64 10:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL the bot has come alive!!!! --WikiSlasher

That was Cyde screwing around with the account.................. do I need say anything more? -- Tawker 17:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ROFLMAO!!! E. Sn0 =31337= 17:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no wonder. :P For a moment, I thought that the bot account was compromised. Perhaps I really need to lighten up, lol. I later figured that it was probably a joke, but with vandals going around and trying to give us headaches all the time, we can never be too careful. --Ixfd64 20:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh God, that's funny! I've added it to BJAODN. Not really deleted nonsense, but deserves a place. --AAA! ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still LOLing! E. Sn0 =31337= 02:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Governor reverts

Very strange revert behaviour at Governor. Two vandals in a row and the bot reverted to the first vandal's edit. See AntiVandalBot revert of 16:14, 29 October 2006. Aphipps 18:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC) . [reply]

amanda dowler not vandalism

its a withdrawla of the nomination plaes do not use the bot agian as i am withdrawing the nomination

Umm.... diff? -- Tawker 18:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the article "Kenny Sia"

To the person-in-charge of AntiVandalBot:

I would like to make a request that you review the article Kenny Sia. As far as I am concerned the article was edited with proper reference and is compatible with the format of Wikipedia in general. I believe that the bot has made a mistake in reverting edits. Thank you in advance.

Cheng 17:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a diff.... all I can see are the basic "is gay" type vandalism that it reverted -- Tawker 17:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I should address this to the 'spammer' that reverted my edit... Many sorry! Cheng 05:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Witness tampering

Bot recently reverted my edit on this article. (diff) I had deleted a huge block of text which was nothing more than a transcription of U.S. Legal Code. While my edit was legit I can see how such a large deletion might trigger the Bot. I'm going to go back and remove the material in smaller chunks, I just wanted to let you know. Kudos to all Vandal Fighters! :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 19:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yeah, that's murder to detect... thanks for your understanding :) -- Tawker 20:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

My edit here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=24_%28season_4%29&oldid=84498828 Was reverted, I removed a large number of episode summaries which had been copied from tv.com. Sfaok 22:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User messages

Hey, I've noticed the bot doesn't seem to be leaving user warnings when it reverts, is this deliberate or a bug? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does that from time to time until I reset..... which I did -- Tawker 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals&diff=prev&oldid=84557667

--evrik 04:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HI' I DID NOT EVEN KNOW IF I DID ANYTHING TO THIS SITE ALL I DID WAS CLICK ON TRYING TO LEARN ABOUT CYADS' I AM SORRY AS I DO NOT EVEN KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS SITE PLEASE LET PEOPLE KNOW I CANNOT SEE VERY GOOD AND WHEN I WAS AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER I SET IT DOWN AND MY CAT WAS ON TOP' MAYBE SHE DID SOMETHING I WAS NOT AWARE OF' SINCERELEY CINDY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.117.66 (talk • contribs)

Try getting another ISP. AOL shares your IP with all kinds of random people, so 99 times out of 10 any message you get will be in error. Try opening an account here to alleviate the problem. E. Sn0 =31337= 07:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect revert by AntiVandalBot

Hi, I reverted a vandal on the Alton Towers article here. But AntiVandalBot reverted me (here) thinking my edit was vandalism. Just FYI. Keep up the great work. --Siobhan Hansa 12:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Very helpful!

That AntiVandalBot macro is so mega helpful! I keep seeing it reverting vandalism automatically, that would otherwise have to be corrected by someone.

Thanks for the help! Markseth 01:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Category:Farms in Norway

See: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_10#Category:List_of_farms_in_Norway_to_Category:Farms_in_Norway. -- ProveIt ^(talk) 16:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Public terminal IP addresses

See: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_27#Wikipedians_who_required_user_interventions.

Note that removing a leftover CFR tag is the correct thing to do... -- ProveIt ^(talk) 18:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have not received a warning yet but just in case I do, I was simply trying to removed someone else's nasty comments from 'Annabel Lee'. The entire entry has been deleted only to be replaced by profanity. It's very sad that people do this kind of thing.

You sent this to the wrong person

[6] Mattisse (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see no bot edit there -- Tawker 01:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

flaw

yo i think you said i vandalised the burple page but i didnt

I think you're using a shared ip address.... someone who had your IP previously likely did it. -- Tawker 02:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stuyvesant High School

All hail the conquering hero, the mighty AntiVandalBot! Seriously, the small crew who look after Stuyvesant High School were in no way prepared for the onslaught of vandalism caused by its appearance on the main page lo these many minutes ago. AVB has been doing a righteous job helping us keep it pristine. THANK YOU. RossPatterson 02:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Healey

All the information in Dorothy Healey was moved to Dorothy Ray Healey per the discussion page. Dorothy Healey should no longer be a page, but there might have to be a referral put there, which I don't know how to do. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis 07:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

User talk:200.98.131.195

Olá. I have received a message from you, regarding an edit on the Serj Tankian article, and the reversal of it or something. Well, I have to say that I am neither a contributor or a vandal in this version of wikipedia, and that my computer (and this IP, from what I've read in the history page of said article) has nothing to do with it. This could have something to do with the fact that I have just reconnected my dialup, since I think IPs have something to do with this... I just wanted to warn you about this, since you're asking to bring such things about your bot to your attention, and from what I see here in this discussion page, your robotic pal's having a bad day XD

Abraços, 200.98.131.195 15:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. its the IP. I don't know if I'd call this a bad day though.... for the amount of crap it's fixing its doing pretty well -- Tawker 16:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Bad

Sorry about that i logged in at school and said remember me so yeah umm.... sorry ill change it belive me I do not vandilise so ill fix it? -_-' so embrassing hope u understand Mr.Willison 18:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

College lab

Regarding your post to this ip's talk: it is a university 24/7 lab. Please do not consider banning.147.174.150.24 01:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Someone made a redirect between Christmas and Death. It appears the bot tried to fix it, but the redirect is still there. If I knew how I would take care of this myself. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 02:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, fixed within 2 minutes by another editor. Thanks anyway, keep up the good work. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 02:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:24.124.16.165

Apologies for removing someone else's (albeit positive) vandalism of Fear Before the March of Flames. In the future I will strive to be more apathetic. 24.124.16.165 04:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help

hi on the subject page on knottingley iv been getting personal bullying and threats can you please delete the articles made by 84.69.77.108 --DAZZELLBRUSH 14:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC) thanks [reply]

Kevin Durand

This article was considered for deletion and I've deleted him. Why is it vandalism? Lieutenant Dol Grenn 16:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Someone already responded on Lieutenant Dol Grenn's page, so there's no need to reply. (They explained the difference between blanking and deleting.) Lawikitejana 18:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing

I was wishing that this BOT also gave "test1," "test2" and so forth notices to vandals. Kukini 01:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, lemme test the additional warnings. Do you have any suggested text for the test2 and test3 warnings? -- Tawker 02:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...looking good at AntiVandalBot!!!! Kukini 16:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misinterpretation of page blanking

Drumguy8800's legitimate archiving of Wikipedia:Peer review/Dallas, Texas/archive2 was mistakenly reverted as vandalism after he blanked the original page post-archiving. I wanted to let you know. Lawikitejana 18:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC) (I noticed it only because Drumguy is the creator and maintainer of most of the pages related to Dallas, Texas, so for him to vandalize that page would've been pretty darn strange.)[reply]

St. George's School (Vancouver)

Hello, Mister Bot. Sometimes vandals can come in packs. You revert http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._George%27s_School_%28Vancouver%29&diff=85543316&oldid=85543278 succeeded in getting rid of one vandal, but not a second. -WarthogDemon 21:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode bug continues

[7] --Femto 11:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Digimon

I did not edit DIGIMON! iT WAS ONE of my computer viruses

We should WP:BJAODN this. xxpor (Talk|Contribs) 16:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the name of the current rector of wimborne minster on the wimborne minster page and it didnt allow it

Please sort out the problem

Thanks

you deleted my work of art

i spent three bloody hours and you deleted my work on Australia. get rid of the bot and do it with humans.

</gallery>

Thankyou for reverting the vandalism. You are doing an excellent job. I have never had any new page vandalised before and I have started about 10,000! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scooby Doo Wiki

Hi, I am a huge fan of Scooby Doo, and recently I put up a request for a Scooby Doo wiki, and it will be called Scoobypedia. I hace contacted Angela about this and I really hope that this wiki will make it past the Scratchpad. Please inform all of your friends and buddies that are interested in making the Scoobywiki a very informative, welcoming wiki. Thank You. --NDynamite 03:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Jacob Gossett [reply]

stop!

You can't edit or take in a rolk in user pag! please stop it!! you must be drunk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.26.63.86 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 28 October 2006

I made an edit to the Hatboro-Horsham Highschool Page

The edit I made was a note on a certain school clubs, and a note on the specification of info already there. The first was in the line "principle Dennis Williams shut of the lights". I would like to point out that he told the tech crew to turn off the lights and sound. Since the members of tech crew are Matt and Owen, I felt it necessary to add their nicknames with it. The second edit was adding on that the school also has an award winning Jazz Ensemble which is headed by the teacher Mr. Kuczynski (Mr. K). Both of my edits were accurate and I feel should not have been changed.

-ObesePyro137 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.6 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 29 October 2006

"I edited this" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.6 (talk • contribs) 13:40, 29 October 2006

I edited nolan kamitaki's wikipedia article, and the bot reverted it, even though it was legit!

Someone should revert it back — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.171.14.84 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 30 October 2006

Wikipedia Bot, Turkey Bowl

The wikipedia entry which comes up first when you enter "Turkey bowl, Calvert Hall" in Google is a bogus entry. It talks of some football quarterback having vaginal pains, etc. In Google, the next "hit", which appears indented under the first "hit", is legitimate. I tried editing the first hit and when I realized the second hit was much better than what I had written, I tried to delete the whole page I had edited. It then reverted back to the asinine "vaginal cramps" page.

That page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey_Bowl) needs to be removed. The page which appears indented on a Google search (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvert_Hall_College) is better, even though it doesn't address the "Turkey Bowl" as a headline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.171.161 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 1 November 2006

John Robertson (minister)

Sorry you thought my last edit was vandalism. I thought I was removing a duplicate version of John Robertson, Minister but obviously it somehow has been caught up in a disambiguation process. No vandalism intended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony164 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 1 November 2006

Annabell Lee...

I received a warning that I vandalized Annabell Lee. I did not do that. I was simply trying to erase the curse words that someone else had left. I love history and reading and encyclopedias and would NEVER in a million years deface such things. Please remove my name from the 'bad list.' Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kms1076 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 2 November 2006

Stupid Bot

Stop reverting my "short hand" => "shorthand" redirection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.80.100 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 3 November 2006

truth

in my edit i simply told the truth, there was no offense meant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.163.196 (talk • contribs) 12:43, 5 November 2006

Nick Saban page that you erased

Hey, I spent a lot of time updating a wiki page on Nick Saban. Then on 18:44, 5 November 2006, you came and erased everything and re-stored the page to the old page that existed before I updated it.

I spent a lot of time and research on that page, why did you erase it?

Anyway, I'm reupdating the Nick Saban page now, and this time I will try to do a better job making it more acceptable.

--Wikiwopbop — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwopbop (talk • contribs) 20:09, 5 November 2006

I Fixed the Vandalism IP 64.12.116.131 caused

Dear Anti-Vandal-Bot. I Fixed The Vandalism 64.12.116.131 Has Caused In The Page List of Kids Next Door operatives. No Need To Thank Moi. I'm Just A Normal Wikipedian Doing Good Deeds, Always Trying To Do The Right Thing. - TREEHEMOTH. 11/5/2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by TREEHEMOTH (talk • contribs) 23:47, 5 November 2006

P.S. I shall keep up the good work editting and revising pages for you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TREEHEMOTH (talk • contribs) 23:53, 5 November 2006

Rally Cap entry in "Baseball Jargon"

I corrected the history of the origin of the Rally Cap in that entry's definition on the baseball jargon page but apparently AntiVandalBot thought it was vandalism. Please revert to the change that I made. 69.112.28.229 01:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

It removed my name "Declan"

saying that it is vandelism, how is this? i am giving an example of the name and how it is used thus my name and that i am an irish citizen - 81.101.114.111 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.114.111 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 24 September 2006

Danny Kaye

The Link off the Danny Kaye page for "The Kid from Brooklyn" redirects to an irrelevant page. There is a phrase referring to 'The kid from brooklyn' but it has nothing to do with the movie of that title. Your bot corrected my deletion, and that was an error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.59.42.61 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 6 July 2006

I blanked an article regarding louis xvii's sister Catherine OF Navarre, duchess of Lorraine because it erroneously redirected to Henry ii duke of Lorraine who was two centuries before her time. Please see to it that you revert the revert of your bot.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.146.78 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 6 September 2006

Mallory Knox

I delete it because there's already an article about mallory called mallory.w.knox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 05:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

september 11th site edit

the information I provided to that search was considered vandalism. however, the information i provided was far more fact laden that any of the lies previously posted to that search — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.21.92 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 September 2006

Ryan Adams Article

It seems like you're reverting the Ryan Adams article back to its vandalized state since right now its showing information for Bryan Adams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.57.121 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 15 September 2006

I reverted the Ryan Adams page back from the Bryan Adams info and this bot reverted it back and gave me a warning. I'm not very impressed by this bot (98% correct???). RobDe68 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobDe68 (talk • contribs) 03:47, 15 September 2006

Vampire Freaks

You don't mind keeping an eye on VampireFreaks.com, some people keep vandalizing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xachna (talk • contribs) 01:54, 30 September 2006 - User:Xachna 9/29/06 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xachna (talk • contribs) 01:55, 30 September 2006

Ghepeu's inferior revisions and AntiVandalBot revisions

The user "Ghepeu" does not know enough about Vesalius to be the person/author to whom the page constantly reverts. Indeed, some of the other edits have been vast improvements (in both content and English prose). I think Wikipedia would be better served by stopping this silly AntiVandalBot from making changes, especially when the changes revert mindlessly to previous inferior versions.

Just my thoughts (as a professional historian of science and academic), darin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.198.122 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 3 October 2006

Belgrade Vandal

See here User_talk:Naconkantari#Kosovo problem and User_talk:Naconkantari#Kosovo again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.158.190.179 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 3 October 2006

Lobster Telephone

The text was removed from Lobster Telephone because it is copied verbatum from another website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.207.111 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 4 October 2006

PS thanks for your threat, I will accept your apology gracefully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.207.111 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 4 October 2006

improper redirect was removed

Someone had created a redirect which inadvertently rerouted searches for a legitimate Wiki entry off to an alternative spelling. In effect, this hijacked searches for one entry and deposited them at another irrelevant entry based upon the faulty assumption that the searcher had mispelled the name. Bad move. Better would be to edit the entry for the name of the person with closely spelled name to add link to other individual's wiki. ~Chandra Patel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.51.6.208 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 5 October 2006

Sorry about that edit

I was looking at other edits and I thought I press "Show Preview." Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by NFAN3 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 October 2006

Your doin a bang up job Mr. VandalBot, im proud of you — Preceding unsigned comment added by APACOlypse27 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 5 October 2006

motor development

Hi,

I tried to delete the automatic redirect from motor development to motor neuron, but your bot reverted the change. The redirect might lead people to think that motor development is something specific to motor neurons, which it isn't. Motor development is a branch of psychology, not something specific to neurons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.244.161 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 10 October 2006

Spammed article.

The talk page on the Digital Divide article needs cleaning. It has been spammed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.190.146 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 10 October 2006

courtney love's album

there is no proof that the album's title was changed to 'sunset marquis'. more4 documentary, interviews, articles, all relate it to 'how dirty girls get clean'. not a single note in press state that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.78.114.202 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 10 October 2006

david

Destructa

Who is this user??? He has horrendously vandalised lots of pages on Wiki. He is also an AOL user like me and I normally get blocked. Any other AOL users annoyed, anyone seen this user name on vandalised pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.2 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 18 October 2006

srry ttyl---MillionBucks93

sorry pc errors---MillionBucks93 i didnt mean it ttyl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MillionBucks93 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 23 October 2006

former muslims

while doing research for a paper on barak obama's family history, i was directed to a wiki page entitled former muslims @ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_Muslims from a page that held religiouly charged views of a violent nature . I reported the page and attempted to delete en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_Muslims but your bot has prevented that. I'm left with no choice but to report that wiki is allowing itself to host what could be a terrorist hit list.

good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.126.82.49 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 23 October 2006

Automatic reversion

I refer you to the Law School at Griffith University page. It was not intended to be vandalism, the changes were merely to redirect the user to another page of a better title, namely, the Griffith University Law School. cheers, Johnny Howard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadrant666 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 25 October 2006

I got reverted for trying to repair vandalism

I erased explicit content from an article Titanium and the Bot reverted me! How do I show it was not me and was only trying to help. Will I be blocked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.223.27 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 6 November 2006

Link please -- Tawker 05:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German Shepherd Dog page vandal

Someone is repeatedly adding the following link to the External Links section of the German Shepherd Dog page, in spite of being reverted many times. This link is inappropriate link spam. I don't know if this is something AntiVandalBot can do, but automatically reverting any changes that adds this link would be a good thing.

http://guardog.biz/German-Shepherd.htm

Thanks. Dsurber 23:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out the lonelygirl15 articel. Someone keeps on taking out the 'Other Notable YouTube Celebrities' paragraph without discussing it as is required. Its vandalism. Chavatshimshon 05:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning messages

Hi! Could you include warning level in comments such as , just like standard warning templates work. It can be helpful for other anti-vandal tools to parse contents of userpage to see if user received warnings recently. MaxSem 12:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

False positive on the Ref Desk

[8] was a small bit of redirect vandalism. User:Skittle tried to revert this vandalism and the bot reacted by reverting Skittle [9]. Probably not major, just thought I'd point it out. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

RWRR Challenge: The Duel

Why and the hell did u change the Duel tables ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaxtelles (talk • contribs) 23:45, 14 October 2006

HI!!!

Bold textThis Website is soooo good.... i get all my information from it!!! i am pleased to say it is a success!!!~*~* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.28.159.169 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 16 October 2006

Deleting The Article

Could you please delete this article? A friend of mine made it as a joke. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.207.215.208 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 26 October 2006

Bot is misbehaving. Not sure if it is bad enough to block it for.

It reported vandalism for blocking [10] and apparently never warned the IP in question before it did so. JoshuaZ 03:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has not been warning any anonymous users. For that matter, I am not sure it has warning anyone in a while. I have been ensuring warnings were added to the pages, but since I can't block anyone in this wiki, I have refrain from using those templates. Will (Talk - contribs) 03:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiz fixed :) -- Tawker 04:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was this more problems caused by the resource conflicts? If not, what was it and could it reoccur? Will (Talk - contribs) 09:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is back. It reverted here without generating any warning. JoshuaZ 03:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bot seems to be not warning anyone again. JoshuaZ 03:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhhhh /me will do a script on cron to reset the bot once every 2 hours or so.... it seems to be a time based thing -- Tawker 06:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baba (disambuguation)

I moved (or am attempting to move) Baba (disambiguation) to just Baba. Can this bot be fixed to accept that? Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it, just have the disambiguous page deleted and redirected to Baba. Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C&P move fixed, if anyone cares. Kusma (討論) 16:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be missing these cases

I was looking through history of Constantine I and noticed that the Bot missed two occasions of someone inserting homophobic vandalism edits into the article—assuming it was running at all. Humans intervened in both cases. This is the second one, the first was a few edits earlier. Hence I thought to suggest you add some keywords like "homo", "homosexual" and whatever to your redflags and criteria. Perhaps an iterim tagging step flagging the file for human perusal is something to consider??? Good luck either way, and good job! Kudos. // FrankB 18:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Junkers Ju 252

Antivandalbot reverted my edits to Junkers Ju 252, apparently due to blanking. What I did was removing all text, since it was written in German and replacing it with one English sentence. Have you faced this kind of situations before and would it be possible to hinder this kind of recessive reverts in the future?Julius Sahara 18:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, after further attemps I managed to proceed my edits. Julius Sahara 18:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's the first time I've ever heard of that happening, sort of a freak case. I'm still not sure how we can have it approve of the blanking for select users, it's the whole catch22 thing. Thanks for fixing it :) -- Tawker 13:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Cornuke

We are asking that all references to Bob Cornuke be removed immediately from this site.

We will give Wikipedia until November 20th to do so

If not further action will be forthcoming

Thank You

Monty Maple Executive Director BASE Institute — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.219.203.170 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 7 November 2006

England

This is a bit embarrasing, isn't it? [11] This is another example of two vandals' edits being followed by AntiVandalBot reverting only the later one. Does AntiVandalBot look further back into the edit history that the last edit? Could it? --Stemonitis 20:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It could, it will in version (currentversion)+1 -- Tawker 13:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Wight and Booker Huffman

I was simply deleting the vandalism that had occured on the page, i thought this was the role of a wikipedian ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noface1 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 7 November 2006

AntiVandalBot apparently missed this edit to Booker Huffman and this edit to Paul Wight. However you also blanked the pages on four occasions: Booker Huffman 1, Booker Huffman 2, Booker Huffman 3 and Paul Wight.

The best way to deal with the problem is to revert the vandalism (see also Wikipedia:Vandalism for more extensive coverage of the subject) or to bring the matter to the attention of an administrator. You can also help out by joining the RC patrol. --Oden 12:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I wonder if it's going into an overloading situation which is allowing that kind of vandalism to stay. I'll take a look -- Tawker 13:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cron reset not working

Whatever you did to reset the bot so that it writes user notifications is not working. It is reverting without notifying again.

Cheers

LittleOldMe 13:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

It reverted my Manhattan change

I had wikified "S.C.U.M. Manifesto" to SCUM Manifesto and you reverted it. It was not vandalism, it was adding the appropriate wikilink. I don't think the bot is 98% correct. Jaysbro 17:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reverts on any of your edits, diff please. Hey, 1 or 2 out of 5000 reverts a day is still pretty darn good! -- Tawker 21:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the strange edit regarding SCUM Manifesto: diff. AVB is the greatest thing since sliced bread! --Oden 09:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HSL-Zuid

Why was this edited automatically reverted as vandalism? The other lines that I added under the see also section are related, and it is useful for them to appear on the HSL-Zuid article, especially since the High Speed Alliance redirects back to that article. -- 12.106.111.10 23:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Handled. Luna Santin 23:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong revert on The Real World

Hi AntiVandalBot,

You have reverted an edit which was made áfter the edit that vandalized a whole article: it seemed that the anonymous contributor you reverted, was just trying to solve the problem, but did not know how. Because English is not my mother tongue and therefore giving a clear explanation is hard for me, I recommend you to watch User talk:70.237.143.133 and its edit to see what I mean, so you can try to make the software even better (I think it is already quite nice).

Bye, SietskeEN 20:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the diff, AVB currently has problems handling two vandalizations which happen after each other. --Oden 09:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that explains. Thanks for taking notice! SietskeEN 21:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Christie

I deleted the text on John Christie (producer) as almost all of it was duplicated in the (better informed) page on John Christie (Glyndebourne).

They actually refer to the same person but the connection does not seem to have been recognised. So I suggest that the first page is completely deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.109.184.210 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 9 November 2006

(diff). When you have two articles (like John Christie (producer) and John Christie (Glyndebourne)) which cover the same subject the best course of action is to merge them. Blanking one of them (which here might have been done with the best of intentions) is not a good idea, and is sometimes done by vandals. --Oden 09:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tsonga entry

The entry to Tsonga had been hijacked by a commercial entry for a bluejeans company. I tried to change it back to its original version, which was a two line disambiguation between Tsonga people and language, but it was reverted to the old, bad content by your bot.

Katie (I do not have a user name yet but you can see my IP in the Tsonga entry if that helps) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.103.176.23 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 9 November 2006

AVB apparently reverted back to the jeans company version (diff), which was spam. Fixed it. --Oden 09:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong revert on Minnesota Chippewa Tribe

Hello AntiVandalBot, Please have your human check your routine to tweek it a bit and make your function more effective. You have reverted a vandalized page to the version before the vandalization, but that previous version was also a vandalized page. There should be a built-in check to ensure that the version you revert to is the actual version to revert. Otherwise, your routine is very good. Report praises to your programming human. CJLippert 19:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's acting up......... a semi rewrite is in progress..... -- Tawker 21:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Browne, Baron Browne of Madingley

Your revert to nonsense on John Browne, Baron Browne of Madingley didn't go back far enough. roundhouse 20:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the diff:(diff). AVB, like the rest of us, has problems handling serial vandals (edit 1) (edit 2) (edit 3) (edit 4) (edit 5). --Oden 09:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi?

uhh...what did i do again? 67.87.226.190 22:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You or another anonymous editor using the same IP address as you vandalized a page on 21 May 2006 (diff) and received a warning on that day (see User talk:67.87.226.190). --Oden 09:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Revert on Oroville, California Page

An election was just held; the mayor has changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewjube (talk • contribs) 04:35, 10 November 2006

Tawkerbot2 reverted vandalism on that page (diff), and did not change the name of the mayor. --Oden 09:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your posts!

Just browsed through this talk page, and thought it would be funny if AntiVandalBot could reply to unsigned posts with a polite "What part of 'sign your posts' is it that you don't understand?" Keep up the good work. --PeR 16:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One got through the net

this wasn't an ideal revert. Would the first edit in this sequence have been got if the second hadn't been made? Providing this in hope it can be useful in further refinements. Morwen - Talk 16:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

No warnings

Why is AntiVandalBot not writing any warnings to the user talk pages? It would be nice if we human new page patrollers had assistance on this front. There are a number of IP's that I could have reported to WP:AIV had warnings been written to the user pages by the bot.

LittleOldMe 11:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See User Talk:AntiVandalBot#Bot is misbehaving. Not sure if it is bad enough to block it for. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it reverted one of my edits [12] without telling me. I thought maybe it didn't leave a warning if there was already one on my talk page, so I tried removing it in the expectation that if it reverted one of my edits again then it would tell me. But it hasn't. And I've just looked at the latest contribs and it's still failing to warn. I call this a malfunction. I've a feeling that this is as bad as not having an anti-vandal bot at all, but can't make up my mind whether to hit the big red button. -- Smjg 17:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, should've realised sooner that the emergency shutoff is just a shortcut for admins to block it. I'd thought at first that it was a link to the bot's own shutoff script. -- Smjg 18:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/* Removal of Titans info */

Your bot removed legitimate information I added into Titans (comics) about the next trade paperback collection of the comic.

(Sorry, thought I hit the "signature" button the first time.)

--Gregmce 20:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AntiVandalBot is not to blame, your contribution (Titans Around the World) was removed by User:CovenantD here. --Oden 22:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange one in Masturbation

Hmm...wonder why the bot saw this revert as vandalism? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 21:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Again failing to warn

Its doing it again. See [13]. JoshuaZ 19:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When did it ever stop? -- Smjg 22:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tricky mistake by AVB

I'm not sure there's an easy solution for this one, but since you're looking for feedback, I'll offer what I can. Legit blanking to Jacob Fred Jazz Oddessy (misspelled article title) by User:Cobrapete was reverted (and warning left at User talk:Cobrapete) because I'd added a merge-to tag to the article, and made a couple of other tiny edits. I speedied the article, so there's not much for post-mortem, but the details to consider are: the article was less than forty-eight hours old, had been created by the alleged vandal, and had maybe 15 or 20 edits, of which all but four were made by the creator/alleged vandal. That ... might have been enough to clue in a human.

Another thing AVB might have wanted to consider: the article, when blanked, had a merge-to template at the top. I realize that merges usually should be made into redirects, and that cases like this where deletion is justified are the exception, not the rule. But at the very least, maybe AVB should consider creating the redirect when there's a merge-to with a valid target. At least in cases where the blanked article is very new, very short, or has very few edits/editors. (Probably don't want to do it in all cases, since vandals and POV-pushers could learn to take advantage.)

I realize that asking for AVB to recognize edge cases like this may be asking for a lot, but I hope I've at least given you some food for thought. Cheers, Xtifr _tälk 00:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i dunno

i dont have an account here but i have been sent a ton of messages for editing and vandalizing pages on wikipedia that i haven't touched. why do these people keep sending me messages about vandalism when im not doing anything wrong. ive only edited one page on wikipedia and that was a simple plan page. all i added to the page was that the band was french-canadian instead of just being from canada. that's all i sware to god!!!!!!!!!!!!! please make all this stop!! im getting worried that people are going to start leaving messages that are threatening me, and i dont want that. if you can help me, i promise i'll never edit anything ever again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.117.66 (talk • contribs)

We'd highly prefer you register an account. Your IP address is an AOL IP. Please see the message at the top of your IP page. E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 01:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Failing to warn again

The bot is on the blink again. bet you'll be pleased when you stop receiving these messages.

LittleOldMe 15:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect revert on West Champaran

AVB incorrectly reverted [216.251.50.73 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:216.251.50.73]'s edit to West Champaran diff. Please undo AVB's edit, and remove the notice from [216.251.50.73 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:216.251.50.73]'s user page. I'd do this myself, but I'm a newbie, and I don't know how AVB reacts when you revert one of its edits. Can I do this myself without issues, or does an admin have to?

Thanks! Ac246 03:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

....

65.30.192.92 20:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC) I recentaly read a message that claimed that I had somehow vandalized "Cardiac Arrest." Since I have never even been on that particular section of Wikipedia I dont see how this is possible. Perhaps someone with an advanced proxy or something could actually screen their IP adress and insert another. Even though I realize that that seems extrememly unlikely, I would just like to tell everyone that it is impossible for me to have edited that page. Thanks.[reply]

Joseph McMillan entry

I wish the article about myself that appeared on Wikipedia without my knowledge or consent to be deleted. It is taken almost verbatim from a bio prepared by me for a printed publication, Burke's World Orders of Knighthood and Merit. Its republication certainly violates Burke's copyright. Furthermore, as I am not a public figure and do not wish to be covered by Wikipedia, I consider the article a violation of my privacy. I tried to remove the text and see that it has been restored. Please delete it.~~~~Joseph McMillan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dantallass (talk • contribs) 00:34, 15 November 2006.

Apparent copyright violation, article nominated for speedy deletion and message left on user talk page. --Oden 01:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Entry

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_literature&action=history , 69.** the bot reverted it back to the vandilized page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jab843 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 15 November 2006

RV on Human Anatomy - bot rolls back to unvandalized version

An anon removed another anon's vandalism, and the bot rolled back the anti-vandal fix. See diff here. --Wooty Woot? | contribs 03:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

System of a Down edit

Your bot left me a message on my talk page saying that my edit to System of a Down was comsidered vandalism. I was just un-cersoring a bad word, since Wikipedia Is Not Censored. WereWolf 03:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jane, stop this crazy thing!

I was doing a removal of copyrighted and POV information from the Bruce Golding article, and lo and behold, I get a message from this "thing" that claims I vandalized the article. Yeesh. --Folksong 06:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Neoism page

Hello, AntiVandalBot. I added the hardcore punk band Fucked Up to the Influences on other subcultures section of the page on Neoism, and you have reverted it. I realize that the band's name contains profanity, but I believe this was a worthy edit. 70.243.126.123 06:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Reporting a bug related to Category vandalism

Seems that vandalism to categories causes the user's talk page to be added to the category: see here.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage in South Africa

AntiVandalBot improperly reverted this edit and then warned me that I might be vandalizing. Michael Slone (talk) 17:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)-[reply]

Revert in Africa

I got warned for this revert because AntiVandalBot was confused by multiple IPs all attacking the article at once. Hard to know how to defend against this, though. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 23:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

I was sent a warning for supposedly vandalizing the bridgetown page which I didn't do. I just thought I would let you know. 203.59.135.234 11:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Double vandalisms

Just so you know, on the Resistance: Fall of Man article, someone vandalized the page by adding junk text[14] and then some else vandalized (well, maybe they were just trying to help) it again by blanking it[15]. Anyway, when the bot reverted the blanking it reverted back to the junk text. Perhaps you should have the bot rescan the page after it reverts it to make sure it got all of the vandalisms. Koweja 20:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

eek, the bot should have gotten the first version, it was pretty obviously vandalism, it's just been a little overwhelmed lately (maybe the campaign for toolserver3 should begin.) -- Tawker 05:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm

WTF?? LOL... - crz crztalk 05:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I felt the page needed a little humour :) -- Tawker 05:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot scope

Do I need to invite AVB to a page, or will it watch for me automatically? Thanks! Adam Cuerden ^talk 20:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The bot made this revert, which was apparently a mistake. Is this the "mass removal of text" algorithm? Perhaps it should do a keyword check and not restore such words as "anus". Otherwise, happy botting :) (Radiant) 22:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it shoulda got the first one and not had the problem w/ the second one. Damn overloading situation -- Tawker 22:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this page reverted??

As discussed with Wiki staff I've been working to improve an article that was being altered with misinformation (the person who wrote what the bot restored). Why did you blank out the corrected version? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_After_Midnight_%28band%29 blipblip]

Some language in there triggered the bot, I'll restore it for ya -- Tawker 23:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this page reverted?? part 2

Tawker- the page is still the same wrong version. I tried to restore it msyself but your bot automatically changes it back to the wrong version, leaving Deathrockers unsourced and inaccurate version in place. Why is this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_After_Midnight_%28band%29 blipblip]

AntiVandalBot was right the first time, other admins have tried to explain the way Wikipedia works to Blipblip on the talkpage but it doesn't seem to be getting though. (His variation is stolen from the band's official site, has been shown to be POV and violative of Wiki policies) If you check the version AntiVandalBot reverted to, it has 7 sources (blipblip isn't telling the truth) [16] Could ypu change it back to AVB's version please? - Deathrocker 00:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bots don't take sides, they are very neutral in that regard. As for the rest of us, it is important to avoid an edit war. Drastic changes should perhaps be discussed before being introduced, in order to reach a consensus. --Oden 01:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This 12.43.something guy

What's with this IP who keeps vandalizing articles? 67.41.213.180 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Censoring.

The RuPaul article mentions the phrase "genderfuck." This is a legitimate term and does not direct itself to the article if it is censored. Even if it were not, censoring the word "fuck" to "f**k" is hardly desired. While I realize that (and applaud you for) you are trying to create something that removes vandalism, it should either leave swear words along or remove them completely. It really should not censor them with *.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.95.220 (talk • contribs) 09:10, 18 November 2006

diff --Oden 13:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Reynolds

There are two Jack Reynolds, both English footballers/managers. There is also a third Jack Reynolds who was an American footballer. This is why I have used their years of birth/death in article titles rather then footballer. Your anti vandal bot and reverted my attempts to avoid repeating articles. Djln--Djln 22:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to the rollback button every single time. Keep up the good work! Bushcarrot 15:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot error

Please fix this mess [17] created by your bot. Thank you. --Ligulem 16:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Super Mario Football in delopment yet

Why did you revert it back to the vandize page of Super Mario Football with a long page in it. 70.110.165.160

Here's the diff. There should be no blank pages on Wikipedia, instead an article which should be deleted should go through the deletion process.
When you blanked the page a second time you wrote the following in the edit summary: "Reverting back to the blank page because there is no Super Mario Football in delopment yet get it through your head AntiVandaBot." Bots may not have any feelings (that we know of), but their human creators sure do. See Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks.

--Oden 20:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wii

I got warned for removing Metal Slug Anthology from the list of launch titles. It is not a launch title, and has been pushed back to later this month. TJ Spyke 23:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that to, Bots really should have a list of people it knows are not vandilists Cocopopz2005 00:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Celebrity Deathmatch episodes article table under attack by Vandalzer

I need your help. The articles known as List of Celebrity Deathmatch episodes tables are being attacked by 206.169.39.38. He/she is attacking the tables, renaming unecessary Celebrity names such as Paris Hilton vs. Nicole Richie changed to Gene Simmons vs Marylin Manson. This attacker has got to stop. Professional Gamer 02:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot error

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Love_New_York_%28TV_series%29&diff=88938444&oldid=88938432 - Jack (talk) 03:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work "Brahmins" page

Thanks for reverting to the older version of "Brahmins" page. Good timely action against vandalism.

--Ajayshanks 05:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did someone say shells?

Battleship Ammunition: View of several 1,900-pound high capacity (HC) projectiles in a handling room beneath one of the turrets of an *Iowa*-class battleship. The blue projectiles in the background are 2,700-pound dummy projectiles.

TomStar81 (Talk) 08:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

The Spelling of Shafaat Jamil

Recenly I gave more information about Col. Shafaat Jamil. A national hero of Bangladesh. His spelling is Shafaat not Shafat. I am an author, a university teacher and nephew of Col. Shafaat Jamil. So I changed the mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumit2006 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 20 November 2006

Poor edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cannabis_culture&diff=89040741&oldid=89040717 was clearly not what you meant, you should have gone one edit further back. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football

Same situation for this article--went back only one vandalism. -RatSkrew 17:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Akhenaten (Disambiguous)

I'm terribly sorry for what I did to that article. I should have used Sandbox mode. I'll never try to vandalize Wikipedia again. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.234.110 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 20 November 2006

Andrew Rock

Someone vandalized the Andrew Rock article by deleting the external links and categories. Could you please repair the vandalism? I am not sure how I can do it. Thank you-RFD 22:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Coon Valley, Wisconsin article. Thank you for your help and kindness.RFD 23:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Edit on the Nintendo Wii

The Bot reverted my edit where I set Mexican prices for Wii remote, nunchuck, and Virtual console controller. here Killerfox 00:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate revert

Hello, AVBot. Could you give a message to your programmer? Your recent revert of Fire re-introduced some vandalism that another user had already reverted (and then you warned the reverter). Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ProVandalBot

In the Article on Suzy Lamplugh, I tried to eliminate some illiterate effort and it was restored by Anti. Some one else has also tried to get rid of the illiteracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.206.83 (talk • contribs) 11:10, 21 November 2006 Editor Gwernol has eliminated the apparently deliberate illiteracy referred to. He has improved the article considerably.

Unjustified revert

Hi,

I just wanted to bring to your attention the following unjustified revert by AntiVandalBot: [18]. I reverted it. Regards, IronC hris | (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti vandal bot more trouble than it's worth?

I've noted several occasions where the antivandal bot merely reverts to a previous version of vandalism and then no one catches it because they see "oh the bot caught it" and move on so the previous vandalism stays in place for months. Here is an example of one I caught today [19] but there are many many more which have lasted for weeks or longer.--Deglr6328 01:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The antivandalbot defeated one attempted vandalism of the Dora the explorer page but this page is nearly always under attack so I must ask if the AVB has a watchlist could you put this page on there. Conserned Superx 02:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

195.194.74.227

This IP address seems to be a source of some vandalism recently, take for instance Gael Garcia Bernal, where user fromm this IP added a rather libelous/unfounded content. Modelwatcher 09:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Code for Rollback?

Have you guys implemented code for Rollback? I would love to get that kind of thing for an anti-vandal protection I'm making. It would automatically rollback a certain user's edits. Thanks --ApplePie3 04:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Colbert

The edit I made was not vandalism. A dialog box was overlapping other boxes. I added a few <br>s to lower the original dialog box. Naufana : talk 05:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimates

My edit was not vandalism. The hacked-out part of the article was rewritten and remerged in a more condensed form in a different part of the article. Onomatopoeia 13:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]