User talk:AAA!

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page by starting a new thread. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.

Talk page guidelines Please respect Wikiquette, assume good faith and be nice, and bear in mind what Wikipedia is not.

Note: If you're going to leave a message regarding my name, please don't. I am tired of these messages, and they're just a waste of time for me and you. Any messages regarding my name will be ignored.

Welcome!

	Hi, AAA!, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
I go by the nick Werdna here, but you can call me Andrew if you like. Thanks for deciding to get involved in Wikipedia, the largest encyclopedia in the world, created entirely by volunteers, and that anyone can edit. I just thought I'd drop by your talk page to say Hi, and to give you a few pointers on working around Wikipedia. One of the most important things is to sign your posts on talk pages, with four tildes (~~~~). This helps us figure out who said what and when on the talk pages. Another thing you should do is to fill in the edit summary field, which is just above the Save page button. You should also make all of your contributions here verifiable by a reliable source, or they might be reverted or removed. Finally, don't let grumpy people here scare you off. We have a policy of not biting the newbies — please make an effort to know and understand our policies and guidelines, but if you don't understand them, just ignore them, and use your own common sense. There's stacks for you to do here, so I'll leave you with a few pointers as to where you can get started. — Werdna talk criticism 06:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.) Fix spelling and grammar Outlawz Red Vienna Silvana De Stefano Samantha Ronson Hell's Kitchen (American TV series) season 12 More... • Learn how Fix wikilinks An Jung-sik Max Fishman Murahachibu ostracism Tyrannicide Puteri Indonesia 2022 More... • Learn how Update with new information Doppler spectroscopy Fluoxetine Mexican Cannabis Institute Syed Aminul Hasan Jafri Allan K. Pedersen More... • Learn how Expand short articles Ser Serpas Greg Colfax KlaWayHee Dwight Kirsch Art Hansen A Little Yes and a Big No More... • Learn how Check and add references George Ludford New World PCS Kuala Kangsar District Gelsemine Homalopoma More... • Learn how Fix original research issues Dehing Patkai National Park Malagueta pepper Pancreatectomy Sigrid Schultz Butts Up More... • Learn how Improve lead sections Nancy Buirski Charismatic Adventism Head Like a Hole (band) HSBC Bank (Chile) Live by Night More... • Learn how Add an image Meera Bagh Medby Chapel Mahaica River Midway Crossings McDowall, Queensland More... • Learn how Translate and clean up Osman Batur Gultoo Shuhrat Rastrelli Cello Quartet Avtokam More... • Learn how Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women. Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Thanks!

Hi AAA! Thanks for helping me keep the Monash Student Association wiki page clean. Can you also have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne University Labor Club and add your opinion? I'm getting sick of Australian student politicians using Wikipedia to promote their own agendas.--Petrol pyro 10:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Innapropriate username?

Innapropriate username? --60.241.167.210 06:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

AA, AAA AAA AA AAA AAAAAAAA! AAA AAAAAAAA A AAA! --AAAAAAAAAAA 44:44, 44 AAAAAAAA 4444 (AAA)

What he said. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 06:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I couldn't resist :) --WikiSlasher 06:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, AAA!! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

what do you need help with? Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Futurama

We all miss Futurama. --Yancyfry jr 02:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't we all... --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 03:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

"Deregulation of the Texas Electricity Market"

Those edits were NOT "test edits": That articel was in an abysmal state, flooded with bias and unencyclopedic wording, over 1/3d of which was a blatant copyright violation (See the initial edit summary). 68.39.174.238 03:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

It was a massive redaction, so I wasn't too surprized when it got auto-reverted ;D. 68.39.174.238 03:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Robert Buckley

What I wrote in the article about Robert Buckley is true. You can revert it if you insist, but it's true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.76.181 (talk • contribs)

Due Process

Hi, I noticed that you reverted 15 edits that I did, and I was wondering why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.243.72 (talk • contribs)

Spurious vandalism accusation

I am astonished at your revert of my edit and the subsequent spurious accusation of vandalism for which I'm expecting an apology. I suppose you should know that it is inappropriate to make edits into archived peer reviews of featured article candidates because such edits can skew the impression from the discussion. Beit Or 07:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate your recognition of a mistake. Unwarranted late insertions into archived discussions are reverted all the time. Please don't revert me again. Beit Or 08:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I haven't configured my VandalProof settings, but I have done it now, so you should be okay. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 11:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Ilaiyaraaja

Hi AAA!. Noticed that you made an edit in the above Wiki's discussion page. May I know what the edit pertains to and the rationale for the edit? Thanks. RaraTheAppleJuggler 08:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiMapia

but it's true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.100.11 (talk • contribs)

Oh, I haven't read the big yellow box above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.100.11 (talk • contribs)

Thank You

Hi AAA

Thank u for ur correction on my page Sasha Abunnadi. I find that very insulting, frustrating and downright disrespectful. I also find it very ignorant, considering some people just don't understand that Middle eastern is very different from Afghani, Pakistani, or even Iranian. Thank you again for catching that.

MBCC

Articles for Deletion: Holophonor and Planet Express Ship

As pointed out by Stardust8212, both the Planet Express Ship and Holophonor articles are currently marked for deletion. Your comments thereon would be really appreciated. DrWho42 06:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Zen

I don't think those Zen edits you reverted were a test. --MichaelMaggs 10:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Moving pages

I seem to have forgotten to do so, thanks for reminding me.--TBCΦtalk? 16:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Image

Why do you want do delete my image? Miller 10:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Well that’s why I kept it hidden on my copyright complaint archives page! What harm is doing there? I funny image hidden away on an archives page is hardly a “personal attack” now is it?Miller 16:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

You may hath won the battle, you damned Wikipedian, but you hath not won the war. My image shall be taken to the much more respectable online encyclopedia [1]. Luckily “Personal attacks” are allowed in this place: [2]! Wah hah hah hah! Long live Uncyclopedia! Miller 23:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

It's not a brilliant gag, but here it is on Uncyclopedia: [3] 20:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Template db-meta

Do we really need a stop hand on Template:db-meta? It is in my opinion distracting and throws off the formatting of the text. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 22:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

VandalSniper userbox

Thanks for making that and putting it on my user page! It's pretty much exactly what I was looking for in a VS userbox, and it's simple and strong to boot. Good work! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

You're Welcome

You're quite welcome. Sharkface217 04:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of your own user pages

I closed the nomination and deleted the page. In future, just add {{db-userreq}} to the user page of yours you want deleted. No fuss, no MfD needed. Regards, Kimchi.sg 05:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

The whole list of them is here : Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Deletion templates I agree they multiply faster than rabbits, but you'll use only a few most of the time. ;-) Kimchi.sg 06:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Please fix your signature

Per WP:SIG#Transclusion/template, transclusion of user subpages is not allowed in signatures. Please remove, thank you. —Doug Bell ^talk 23:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 02:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAA!

Aa, a aaa aaaaa aa aaaa:

AAAAA A AAA AAAAA AAA A AA AAA. AAA, AAAA AA AAA AAAA. AAAAAAAAA!

AAAAAA, AAAAAAAAAAA

Aaaa! Aaaa'a a aaaaa aaaaaaa! Aaaaa aaa A aaa aaa? A•N•N•A hi! 22:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA AA AAA AAAAA? AAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAA AAAAwesome username! AAAA:AAAAA AAAAAAAA (AAAA) AA:AA, AA AAAAAAAA AAAA (AAA) —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC).

Did you steal those userpage templates translated into AAAAAAAAA! from my page?

I have no problem with that, just curious. Sir Crazyswordsman 07:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

No, I substituted Template:Userpage and replaced everything with A's. Probably a coincidence. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 09:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Long term abuse pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Hi AAA!, I'm guessing you weren't around when Wikipedia:Deny recognition was adopted and Wikipedia:Long term abuse was last cleaned up. Read through all the reports that you are sending to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion very carefully. There's a huge difference between denying recognition and tracking abusive users who have been permanently banned or use very subtle tactics to POV push, spam, or vandalise articles. For example, could you spot Universe Daily yourself without a reference page to refer to? I doubt it. Please don't waste everyone's time with a blind mass nomination -- they're disruptive. --  Netsnipe  ►  11:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

So much for doing the right thing. Okay, revert my edits. I still haven't got this "policy" thing figured out yet... --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 11:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

No need to worry about it. We've all made mistakes, I've even made a few here at some point! Don't worry about it! --SunStar Net^talk 12:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Your intentions were right and some of the pages you nominated deserve to be deleted, but you went a bit overboard in nominating all of them without reviewing their content first. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Time for my meds! (really) --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 23:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:OvergrownSpaHellBourg.jpg

Thanks for that. However, I still cannot edit it. For example, there is a minor error in the image description, and I can't fix it. Any ideas about how this came about and how it can be changed? MadMaxDog 05:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Try logging out and editing the image as an IP. That might work. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 05:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

UPN vandal

I might watch some of the targeted pages. Can you give me a list? --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 03:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Three of the vandal's main targets were UPN and 2007 in television (which I semi-protected) and Futurama (which another sysop semi-protected). Also vandalized to varying extents were Butters' Very Own Episode, CBS Paramount Television, Chappelle's Show, Comcast, Comedy Central, Desire (TV series) KUVI-TV, Moesha, Paramount Television, Password, Romeo!, Tweek, Watch Over Me and WPWR-TV. This might not be a complete list. —David Levy 04:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Can't we just block all these IPs (For at least 1 year)? Also, I've discovered some of the socks are proxies. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 03:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

If you tell me which IP addresses are open proxies (and provide proof of this), I'll block them indefinitely.

As for the others, long-term blocks would mainly affect innocent users. —David Levy 04:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, these are the proxies. Type in their IP address at this site, and look at the box "Is proxy":'

*contributions

*contributions

*contributions

*contributions

*contributions --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 05:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Those appear to be AOL proxies, which are used by AOL to provide Internet connectivity to subscribers. They are not the same as open proxies (which are disallowed by Wikipedia policy). —David Levy 06:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

User talk:4.68.248.134

His/her block has expired, and is still doing that UPN vandalism. I've given him/her an only warning. Next time he/she makes another false move, please block him/her. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 05:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm already on it. I've blocked the IP address for a month. —David Levy 05:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Russia is the best

Hm... at this point, it would probably only indicate that we're still paying attention to it. But I'll keep that in mind, if I run into it again. Thanks. Luna Santin 00:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

thx

  S
SSSSS
 SSS
S   S

I give AAA! this text star simply for finishing the work I was doing for the BJAODN page. Dark Ermac 15:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

(Zoidberg) "Hooray! I'm useful!" --AAA! ^(AAAA) 06:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

E-mail

Please configure your account to accept e-mail from other users or e-mail me directly. —David Levy 13:45/14:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. I don't have an email. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

You might consider registering a free e-mail account somewhere (such as Yahoo! Mail). I wish to inform you of something without invoking WP:BEANS. —David Levy 05:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

VandalSniper

You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

UPN vandal update

He now has members:

• contributions
• contributions
• . --AAA! ^(AAAA) 22:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I've blocked both accounts indefinitely. —David Levy 22:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

More socks

• contributions
• contributions
• contributions

I have also updated his entry at RFI, but I think this vandal qualifies for Long Term Abuse.
And please look at this. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I've blocked all of the accounts indefinitely and speedily deleted/protected the reposted nonsense page. —David Levy 11:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but could you also delete User:Delariondavis3? Before I redirected it to his talk page the only content was an imitation of my own page. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 11:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Done. —David Levy 11:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I've semi-protected List of Interscope Records artists; thanks for the suggestion. (I also fixed the heading level of the section below; hope you don't mind. :) ) —tregoweth (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, I think that you should become an admin (and I'd like to nominate you myself). Here's my advice:
1. Wait a few months before applying. Otherwise, some people will oppose your nomination on the basis that your account is too new.
2. Tone down your user page's Uncyclopediocity (thereby making it easier for readers to understand who you are and how to contact you for help). Stuff like the Willy on Wheels joke needs to go, and you probably should at least move the userboxes to a separate page.
3. Get an e-mail address. Every sysop should have one, as it's important that users be able to communicate with you off-wiki. If you have access to any sort of private messaging (via an IM program or website) I'd be glad to send you a Gmail invite.
I still have other information that I'd like to share, but I would prefer to do so via e-mail. —David Levy 00:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Also, I'm going away on holiday for 3 days, so you'll have to take care of the vandal by yourself. Sorry about that. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

*cough* beans *cough*

Anyway, I'll try my best. Enjoy your holiday!  :-) —David Levy 01:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The coveted Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Thanks very much for the barnstar! It occurs to me that you deserve one too, so here you go!  :-) —David Levy 12:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edit on IPVandal

Could you explain http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:IPvandal&curid=5048777&diff=100622658&oldid=100339322 ?

Is it that you have misstaken | with &124;? _→AzaToth 16:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure. You replaced the bullets with the straight lines, as you may know. But sometimes people might want to link them, such as [[WP:RFI#127.0.0.1 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log)|link]] which you have to use the | to shorten link. But if you used the | instead of the bullets, it will confuse the server and make the link look like contribs | WHOIS | RDNS | RBLs | block user | block log)|link. Now, the bullets don't do that, because they aren't used in the MediaWiki software during linking; so it should come up as link. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, then I understand, the reason for my edit, was that I though it would be good if they all looked simlar to the {{lx}} family templates. _→AzaToth 01:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Goatse

Thank you for fixing the image. My nipples explode with delight!!! Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Oookay, then... --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Long term abuse

I think the UPN vandal now qualifies for Long Term Abuse. Should we submit an entry? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 03:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

This is something that I would prefer to discuss via e-mail. Please create an e-mail account somewhere. If you'd like, I'll even post some Gmail signup links on your talk page. —David Levy 03:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'm going to try and get a hotmail account. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 03:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! When you do, please add it to your Wikipedia preferences, confirm it, and make sure that the "Enable e-mail from other users" box is ticked. Then I'll be able to e-mail you. —David Levy 03:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Rollback

Why are you rollbacking me? Several editors have already agreed to tag it and improve it. Stop stifling the improvements, and lay off the page if you're involved in it (which, judging by your name, you are). After all the discussion so far, you need to use edit summaries and teh talk page like everyone else. Milto LOL pia 03:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm just doing what the admins are telling me. And I do use edit summaries. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 03:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I mean one that explains your edit, not just "reverted this vandal guy". And I don't see any admins telling you to revert. Did I misunderstand? Milto LOL pia 03:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I try to keep order around here. Whatever an admin says, I obey it. And what you are doing can be considered trolling, which can get you blocked from here. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 03:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

No, what I am doing can be considered "trying to get cites for an article so it can be front-paged". And what admins are telling you to revert me? I don't see anything on your talk page. Milto LOL pia 03:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

of possible interest

Some products and services you might find of interest are this, this, and this. As you probably know, Wikipedia has articles on A, Aa, Aaa, and Aaaa, but as yet no article Aaaaa or Aaaaa..., thus there is nowhere to put information on articles such as this, which is a shame, I think. Herostratus 05:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Not interested. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 06:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi

I think that's cool idea! Dark Ermac 12:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

CONCERNING THE PALMS SHOPPING MALL ARTICLE

I have since updated the article and the article I beleive is well documented. Especially if compared to a alot of the other articles around. The Article has two relevant links and the only thing that might cause any concerns is the picture(which i clearly stated was posted on a photohosting website by one of my mates and has no copyright requirements whatsoever. I will continue tio update the article as i think it is a relevant article and especially when you take into account that i am a new user and this is my first piece excuses any mistakes. I do not understand why it should have to be deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tbite (talk (Tbite 14:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)).

Neuro

no problem at all, but which color do you prefer, 3 or 4. i personally like 3.... thuglas^talk|edits 23:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... I like the red barnstar with #4 sparks. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll do them both up. I need a few days. exam tomorrow. ill let you know when done. thuglas^talk|edits 23:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Who am i kidding, i'm addicted to wiki. I did it. Its hard just to do it normally because there has to be some contrast between the background and the dendrites. I did my best to compromise... check it out... thuglas^talk|edits 23:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

You ain't the only one who's addicted... :P --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Neuronew5.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Neuronew5.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

You know the drill...

contributions. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 06:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I've already blocked that account (along with contributions, contributions and contributions), deleted a couple of pages that the user created, and removed links to said pages. —David Levy 06:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

You have mail. —David Levy 06:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

UPN vandal

User:DelarionDavis19 has been blocked. —tregoweth (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Ludavion 4

...has been blocked. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 06:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Protected. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 06:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Brendavis 18

Blocked. —tregoweth (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Much obliged, sir. —tregoweth (talk) 03:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Editorship

From what I've seen, you'd probably make a fine editor. I was recommended for editorship based on my continuing battles against MascotGuy; I'll look into the procedures for nominating and whatnot. :) —tregoweth (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship; if you're interested, I'll see if I'm upstanding enough to nominate you. :) —tregoweth (talk) 06:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. If you become interested, let me know. —tregoweth (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Zoidy-Poo

I have adopted a member, named Zoidy-Poo, who is a friend of mine outside Wikipedia. But I can't do this alone. Could you co-adopt him to help me? Thanks. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 11:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd be glad to assist either of you to the best of my abilities. Just let me know if you need help.  :-) —David Levy 20:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

"Not a star" barnstar

Thanks. and AAAAAAAAAAAAAA! back to ya :-) — Rickyrab | Talk 07:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

This is like, what, the 4th time someone's commented on my name? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 02:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Make that five. Hey, what can you do? It's fun! --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 19:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Haa... I'm a living joke... --AAA! (AAAA) 01:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, if you wanted, you could retaliate by mistyping my name in the next message. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 16:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Buddhist Monkey.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Buddhist Monkey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian

I dont know the qualifications for a vandal, but i may have foundone. Maybe you could look into this? thuglas^talk|edits 01:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Judging by his contributions, he doesn't look like a vandal. He's probably a new user who wants to expand articles (I do, sometimes), which isn't vandalism. And to know the qualifications of a vandal, go into their contributions and look at some of the diffs. If any seem to be nonsense, POV, or personal attacks, or clear vandalism, then that person may be a vandal, and should be warned with the appropriate warning templates. If he continues to vandalise despite a last warning, then you can report him to WP:AIV. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 02:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I had looked at several articles he has edited. Almost all of the edits i looked at appeared to be nonsense, but perhaps i did not look at enough of them or did not have knowledge of the material myself... One of them talked about erections? - [[4]] the one that made me suspicious was an unsourced claim that had no hits on google... Regardless, thanks for looking into it for me thuglas^talk|edits 12:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure these are not vandalism -

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Reynolds_%28actor%29&diff=prev&oldid=86441550

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Harvey_Birdman%2C_Attorney_at_Law_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=103426932 thuglas^talk|edits 00:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Not vandalism. Just because someone added a reference to erections doesn't mean it's vandalism (unless it was in a silly way like "His erections are bigger than a tree trunk", then that's vandalism). I remember seeing a few T.V. shows that have made a few penis jokes myself, they can still be added to articles, as long as it's not in a silly way. Also, could you show me those nonsense edits you were talking about? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 00:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You did not respond to his first contribution. John Reynolds 'allegedly' plays a role on a lark? where is this coming from? is this implying he rides a lark while acting or something i have not thought of? the revert i made on carol king seemed nonsensical to me so i reverted it because it had no hits on google. Most or all of his edits seem odd and have no sources. While i do not argue that adding to wikipedia requires sources - if someone is making many claims that cannot be verified i would suggest having some way of checking. After all i could say B.F. Skinner 'allegedly' was a underdeveloped child when he was younger but this should need some form of source. after all, perhaps i have alleged this? I have not found one edit he has made that i have been able to verify. i appologise for poor grammar and such i have no time to be wiki'ing - exam in 12 hours. thuglas^talk|edits 02:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. I'm afraid I can't help you there. Try contacting an admin. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 02:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

AA (AAAAA)

AAA AAA! (AAAAA). AA... AAAAAA? AAA AA AAAAAA AA AAAAAAA? AAAA-- aGH, URGH, AHEM ugh... okay, I'm beter now.

so... whatsup? Just decided to say hi (again). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dark Ermac (talk • contribs) 14:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC).

Nothing much. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 02:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Sock again

contributions --AAA! ^(AAAA) 02:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. Images deleted. —David Levy 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

contributions - I can tell because he uploaded fake UPN images. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. Images deleted. —David Levy 11:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

contributions --AAA! ^(AAAA) 21:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. Edits rolled back. —David Levy 21:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

And I think UPN will need semi-protection again. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 21:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. —David Levy 21:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

contributions. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 05:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. Image deleted. —David Levy 05:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, 4.68.248.134's block has now expired. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 05:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on the contributions. —David Levy 05:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

contributions --AAA! ^(AAAA) 00:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. —David Levy 02:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

contributions --AAA! ^(AAAA) 05:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. Article and image deleted. —David Levy 06:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

And I also came across this one. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Account blocked indefinitely. —David Levy 16:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Sooooo...

Uhh... What happened to all the Barnstar Proposals? Are they dead or something? Dark Ermac 14:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't know; I'm not the one armed with explosives... :P --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Help....

GAH!!! Stupid me! *Face-palm* My squidditch picture was badly photoshopped by me, and I got the pics from Google Images. Zoidy-Poo 10:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

User:The UPN Vandal

User:The UPN Vandal has been blocked (I think that name violates username rules anyway, as it promotes a company :) ).

Finally, I won't have to look up that one IP address all the time when I tag sockpuppets! —tregoweth (talk) 00:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I still don't understand what this tagging accomplishes (aside from providing recognition) —David Levy 01:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year

Thank you for voting in the picture of the year. However your vote was invalid because you did not have 100 edits on Commons, or the diff you supplied was not correct. Please read the instructions on diff making how to do this. You can remove the strike from your vote once you have add a correct diff. Thanks, Bryan 19:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I assert to be the same user as Commons:User:AAA!. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 22:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

As per your request, please find enclosed...

Image:WP_for_Futurama_Userbox_purple_background.png (your requested image). I prefer the transparent myself, so I have uploaded a new file, not overwrote the existing one. If you have comments/questions/concerns feel free to contact me. --WillMak050389 05:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Shock Site article

You reverted my removal of Lemon Party. In my edit summary, I refered to [[5]]. Yes, Lemon Party is a notable website, but the removed content was nothing that was suitable for a tertiary source like Wikipedia. It was pure description, taken from personal observation, and a comment on how it was "offline for a few years".

Unless some site publishes an article that specifically mentions lemonparty and its usage/distribution and/or fame on the web, nothing that can be said about lemonparty is objectively notable. Blueaster 01:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

{{sockpuppet}}

Excellent! Thanks for the note. —tregoweth (talk) 12:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

signature

• Ok, I transfered my signature directly to my user prefs. Could you get an admin to delete [[6]] and [[7]], now? I dont want to get in trouble but I dont know any admins here. - Raquel Sama ^★Talk★ 02:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

UPN Vandal

70.237.122.93 and 172.164.138.4 are now blocked. —tregoweth (talk) 04:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I protected it for another six months; I figure there should be an actual soundtrack album out by then. :) —tregoweth (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

More UPN Vandal stuff

Your talk page is just riddled with this guy, I feel so guilty to dump more stuff on you. Anyways, here's a copy/paste from WP:ANI about a few people that probably qualifies under this guy's Modus Operandi, as you are the resident expert type guy on him....

Delarion97 (talk · contribs) I'm a little confused by the form to submit sock puppets, but I suspect this is one case. In any case, the user is engaging an agressive behaviour towards other editors (and admins) based on the fact that his page was speedy deleted.

In any case, he appears to be using multiple accounts:

• The capitalization pattern between Jay-G7 (talk · contribs) [8] [9] [10] [11] is similar to Delarion97 (talk · contribs) [12] [13] [14]

• In all three accounts, 172.163.78.145 (talk · contribs) Jay-G7 (talk · contribs) and Delarion97 (talk · contribs), there's a strong assertion that Over The Hedge 2 was announced.

• Consistant edits among accounts: Jay-G7 has [15] while 172.163.78.145 has three diffs restoring the same edit. [16] [17] [18].
• This diff seems to be clearcut proof where the user sort-of admits to sockking.

While this is on the early side for posting this request, I'd like to prevent any disruption as soon as possible. --Sigma 7 20:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Per Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of The UPN Vandal, Delarion appears to be a sockpuppet of the UPN Vandal per his choice of username. Jay-G7 appears to be a sockpuppet of Delarion, due to their similar patterns on contributions. The 172 IP falls into the UPN Vandal range. Logical2u_{Review me!} 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

That's the majority of it. Few admins have too much knowledge on this guy, and you seem to have a bit of knowledge of where to go to get this sort of stuff looked at...Logical2u_{Review me!} 20:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm working on it. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 00:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

69.214.18.86 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log) - another sock. --Sigma 7 21:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Your user page...

What exactly do you mean by "Blue Key" and "Red Key" on your talk page?

Thanks,

Booksworm Talk to me! 20:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

My way of saying "I'm not telling". --AAA! ^(AAAA) 22:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

A little task for you

[Copied from User talk:David Levy]

Another UPN sock, contributions, has created a few pages which I've marked for Speedy deletion. These were created on the 6th of March. Hoping if you could delete them. Thanks. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 05:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, can you transfer the salted page "Greene County Cable Television" to "Wikipedia:Protected titles" (aswell as its talk page)? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 05:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Done and done.  :-) —David Levy 06:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Admin coaching

Sure. Though, frankly, you've been doing pretty well so far. :) —тяеɢощетн (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, they let me in... :) —тяеɢощетн (talk) 23:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Even though I can't seem to manage to work my tilde key... —тяеɢощетн (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Lyme

That's good. It's now down to 79 KB. I'd recommend adding a bit more of that controversy stuff back in the main article (maybe one or two more paragraphs) and also split off a few other of the longer sections of the article. Everyking 09:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. It looks like that's actually the last long section left, so maybe the article will be OK if you take some length off there. Everyking 09:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I struck out my object vote. Is it good enough to be an FA? Right now I'd say no; I don't think the referencing is good enough. Some parts of the article are strong on references, but some parts are very weak. But it can always be improved during the nom. Everyking 10:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD you might be interested in...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A

One of your relatives? Came very close to deletion... --W.marsh 13:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Damn, too late. Oh well. At least he was saved... --AAA! ^(AAAA) 13:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Check out each link to the essay WP:ROFL

The wikilinks look harmless but point to different off-beat articles. Ronbo76 03:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Ta muchly

〈REDVEЯS〉 awards this Barnstar to AAA! for fighting the good fight against vandals.

Ta for the rvv on my user page! 〈REDVEЯS〉 18:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

71.247.42.91

I'm not sure it's the UPN vandal, but there seems to be at least one vandal that I keep spotting who always uses the article title as the edit summary. —tregoweth (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The Chipmunks movie is probably legit, but I don't know that there's enough info for an article yet. I mean, if someone fleshes it out with more than a one-sentence description, I'll be happy to leave it alone. —tregoweth (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

SProtecting Templates

Heh heh, that's really funny. Here I was assuming that the insertion of the sprotect template automatically protected the article. I suppose it would've helped if I'd read the protection policy first and learned that only admins can protect. At least I would have realized sooner how UPNV was able to change the template (already) with a new account.

Well, while I'm here, I might as well ask what you think of SProtecting the three templates UPNV has been messing with and whether you are able to take care of this.

Thanks and d'oh!

--Butseriouslyfolks 02:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again! --Butseriouslyfolks 02:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Whats going on?

Ah, well, thats interesting. Because people are silly pages and redirects (such as at [19]) I was just checking all the AAA! pages, like AAAA!, AAAAA!, etc, when I coincidently came across it. Some of those pages might need protection against re-creation if they get created again. Anyways, good luck... Danski14 02:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Herostratus/Aa

You said that all the A's have to be in capitals. Where did you hear that? And also, could you sign my hello! autograph page, please? A•N•+N•Afoxlover hello! 21:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Somewhere in Uncyclopedia:Talk:AAAAAAAAA!. Although I think lower-case are acceptable. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

AAAAA AAA AAA AAAAAAA AA AAAAAAAAA AAAA!

(Thank you for signing my autograph page!) A•N•N•Afoxlover hello! 23:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! And if you want to know what it says, it says "Since you asked me to sign, I will". :P --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

AA! AAAA! A AAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAA! (I love AAAAAAAAA!; couldn't resist) A•A•A•Aaaaaaaaa aaaaa! 17:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I can tell by your new sig. :P --AAA! ^(AAAA) 03:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: You've got mail

Hey, David. I sent you a couple of emails about a week ago, but I haven't heard a reply from them. I was wondering if you got them or not. Thanks. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 23:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I received the messages. Sorry, I wasn't aware that you expected a reply. —David Levy 02:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Confused

Isnt it somewhat of an oxymoron to say you like punk rock and metal? The two generes hate each others guts, so its just kinda wierd --ÄtΘmicR€£igione^sїgñ

You know, I never thought about that. Oh well. I do like them both, actually. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Also in an unrelated subject, would you sgn my autograph book? It wouldnt be a true autograph book with out that legendary triple A sig --ÄtΘmicR€£igione^sїgñ

Done. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 04:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I award this to you for reverting that vandalism on my user page. Actually, since you fixed it, I didn't even notice it until today

Wikipedian64 21:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Long term abuse

I'm not sure that I have much more info about him than you do; I think you've been trailing him longer than me. (Though if you need access to deleted pages and such, let me know.) —tregoweth (talk) 02:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Friendly warning about April Fools Nominations

They're not funny, and if you keep doing it, I will be forced to block you --01:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'll stop. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 01:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey wait a minute, you're just an IP. Crap, I was fooled... --AAA! ^(AAAA) 01:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

My offer to nominate you for adminship

...is hereby rescinded. —David Levy 01:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Just a little request

I was wondering if you could transfer the content of "Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Special:Recentchanges" to my user subpage, under "User:AAA!/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Special:Recentchanges". I just want to preserve it for the BJAODN page. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 03:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Y Done —METS501 (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

SockpuppetProven

Using that template is a good idea. (There are so many templates that it's hard to keep track of them all... :) —tregoweth (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Your icon changes

Hi, you recently changed the icon parameter to the vandalism series of warnings. Could you please explain how the change differs from the current optional icon parser (I'm not a scripting guru)? Also can you let me know if you are going to add it to the other 100 odd uw templates please, as this series is now out of sync with the rest of the temaplates? Many thanks ^Khukri 07:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I can explain. I was looking at the code, and saw that for the current parameter, you'd have to add "{{template|icon=[[Image:example.png|25px|left]]}}" to change the icon. But with the new parser function I added, all you'd have to do then is "{{template|icon=example.png}}", which is much easier. Do you understand? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The icon code isn't for changing the icon, it was simply requested by a couple of editors to disable it i.e. {{subst:uw-test1|icon=}}. Please read here (hidden amongst it all). If you are suggesting that we can change the icon for any symbol we chose I'd rather this went through WP:UTM, as this has potential problems in trying to maintain a harmonised system. ^Khukri 07:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, okay. I thought it was for changing icons, but I could see i was wrong. Anyway, I'll go and revert my edits to its previous state. Sorry for any inconvenience I may have caused. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 07:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem at all, and I think it's an idea with merit as it gives the issuing editors greater flexibility. But for now I think it should stay on the back burner until the uw- series is finished, and we have a complete instruction manual for all the warnings, as they are becoming quite complicated. Anyhoo cheers again ^Khukri 07:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. Where do I sign up? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 08:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:UW is the project (where you can sign up) that organised the whole rationalisation shebang in the first place, started with all the multi level warnings, and we are currently killing off the last of the single issue templates. If you look here WP:UW/Overview this was the proposed redirects plan that was scrapped after too many editors decided they preferred the old system, but it still gives a good overview of the status of what needs to be done. You really need to read through all the talk pages for an idea of the work that's been done so far. WP:UTM is the day to day frontpage of the templates, this is where Joe Blow comes in for questions as to which templates to issue when an editor does blah blah. My next plan is to harmonise the few image warnings, then merge to WP:UW into WP:UTM but that still a way off in the future. Anyway more the merrier and sign up. ^Khukri 08:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Look at this diff. Did I do the right thing here? --AAA! ^(AAAA) 08:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Yea but I wouldn't do the re-directs yet, as you'll get someone screaming it's their favorite warning, etc. We're going to leave the redirects for a while (quite a while in fact) most probably run the two systems in parallel and eventually once more editors tweak the uw- warnings to exactly how the community wants them, then the old ones will become superflous and will gradually die a long slow and hopefully not so painful death. Oh you can reply here, I have your page on my watchlist instead of having a disjointed conversation, though I will copy it over to mine to keep things tidy. I know call me a tidy nut..... ^Khukri 08:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

WOW

is that your real name T-o-b-y-k-n-i-g-h-t-s 08:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

I wish... :P --AAA! ^(AAAA) 08:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

aaa (i mean lol) A•N•N•A hi! 22:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Apologies for inadvertent vandalism

Many apologies - I thought I was on the sandbox. Springnuts 09:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The sandbox page was a redirect to your page - hence the error. Again, my apologies. Springnuts 09:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Have you mentioned things like this anywhere? I'm somewhat amazed that there isn't some guard against putting "#REDIRECT [[foo]]" into places like the sandbox. It's a rather nasty attack vector. Shenme 22:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

No I haven't. I think the IP said that as a trick so people would think it's a legitimate edit. But that's just a guess. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 01:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I would like your signiture

Hi. I was just wandering if I could have your signature, on my Autograph page. Thanks. Nocturnal Wanderer ^sign 00:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for signing my Autograph book - Nocturnal Wanderer ^sign 22:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Removal of Pop Culture from Sydney Opera House

Thanks for removing that lousy section from our serious encyclopedia. I'll support any such removal (well, there may be very very rare exceptions!) as I support removal of Trivia sections. Nice work. Merbabu 12:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

168.9.128.157

Reporting this editor on WP:AIV won't do much good, as he has already been blocked for 6 months. The AIV helperbots will automatically remove any report on this editor. I've made a report on WP:ANI. Errabee 13:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

did not know that, that function existed and was doing the best i could with the tools that i knew how to use anywho this wll make cirtain vandal edits easyier to fix, thanks again, gholam

Real name:

Hmm... Is your real name so hideously grotesque that every time you go to say it you just scream in horror instead? That would explain why every time you write your sig it reads Aaa! There are three a's so I'm guessing your name is either Joe, Bob, Sam, Ken, Kob, Meh, Red, Hal, Val, Guy, Tim, Tom or Kiko miatotoma! Also, say I was to find this red & blue key? Do orange, purple or azure keys count or are they just cheap knock offs? Any answers to these questions can be submitted here: Spawn Man 08:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC) :)

No, the name "AAA!" is a play-off of the Uncyclopedia article AAAAAAAAA! (Shortened to make it easier). The red & blue keys is just my way of saying "I'm not telling". --AAA! ^(AAAA) 09:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

But I found them! Unless that guy on Ebay ripped me off.... Yes, of course I know all that, judging from your unencylopedia userbox I asumed your name referenced to the AAAA article there. I also asumed you'd get that I was joking - obviously not lol. Anyway, see you around.. Spawn Man 09:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

{{uw-redirect}}

Morning, I have put a {{hangon}} on the speedy tags you've put on the uw-redirect series of templates. It's nowt serious, just I want to get some more input on this before we blitz the old templates, see here. Afterwards not sure if it's better to go through TfD instead of speedy. Cheers ^Khukri 09:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloody GIR 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloody GIR 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Missing small tag.

I fixed this weeks ago, but accidentally left it off for some people last week. A volunteer fixed it for most people, but a few might have been missed. It shouldn't happen again. Ral315 » 03:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

{{editprotected}}

Your response is requested regarding the editprotected tag you left here. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Quotefix

Thank you very much, sir. Most kind. -- Codeine 12:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

AAA!
I'd just like to say that I honestly apologize for vandalizing your page.
I was being stupid and trying to get a few laughs from my friends.
I hope there are no hard feelings between us.
Charlie.somerville 03:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Aaaaaaaa!

Aaa aaaa aaaaa aaaaa aa aaaaa, aaa aaa aaaa aaaa aaaa aa Aaaaaaaaa, A, AAAAaaaaaaaa, aaaaa aaa, AAA!...

		Aaa Aaaaaaaa aa Aaaa Aaaaa
		A aaaa AAA! aaa Aaaaaaaa aa Aaaa Aaaaa, aaaaaaa aa aaa aaaaaa aaaa aaaa aaaa aaa aa aaa AAAAAAAAA! aaaaaaaa. Aaaa, aa aa a aaaaaa aa AA:-A, aaa aaa aaaa aaaa, aaa aaa aaaaa aaaa aaaa aa aaaa aaaaa, aaa aaa aaa aaaaaaaaaaa aa aa aaaaaaaaaaaaa. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, AAA!, aaa aaaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaaa. A•A•A•A aa! AA:AA, AA Aaaa AAAA (AAA)

--AAAAaaaaaaaa

AAAAAA. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Sock puppet case update

Please see my comments at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Charlie.somerville. Shalom ^Hello 03:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Sock case

You and he are welcome to discuss it (though please don't get into it in real life over something here! :) ), but I don't think it would materially change the outcome. The other account's already blocked, and it's seemed the vandalism to your userpage has stopped. If there are any further problems, please let me know. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Ratherduarm

I indefblocked Ratherduarm shortly after blocking Duarm3300, check his/her block log. --Coredesat 06:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

New vandalsniper logo.

Hey, I made a logo for vandal sniper that is in the svg format, (see WP:SVG) which is preferable to other formats for logos. The userbox will look like this with it, however I want to make sure that you're ok with it before I change it over to the new version

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalSniper.

--lucid 01:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, since I see you aren't very active, I'm going to go ahead and switch it over now. Feel free to revert me and leave a notice on my talk page if you disagree --lucid 01:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

George W. Bush

I added that George W. Bush started Arbusto Oil with Salim Bin Laden. Which is true, and was previously removed from Wikipedia by Someone at ip address: 156.33.144.92 (According to Wiki Scanner is the U.S. Senate Sergeant At Arms). I felt that his and now your actions are more biased than mine. It was an interesting fact I didn't know. I think people should know that Former Pres. George H.W. Bush and Pres. George W. Bush knew and did business with the family of Osama bin Laden. You could hear that and think, "Wow, what a small world the greatest president ever did business with the uncle of the greatest terrorist ever!" or "He must've planned 9-11". It's everyones choice what to do with knowledge. In your case you choose to delete it, pretend it didn't happen, and call me a vandal. I don't think removing information for political purposes should be tolerated. That's why I put it back. People should have access to the facts and judge them accordingly but you'll probably just remove this and forget it ever happened so why do i even bother? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marklee81 (talk • contribs) 06:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama Roll Call

Hello, you are currently listed as a member of Wikiproject Futurama though you may be inactive. This seems to be the case for many members so I am sending this message to help renew interest in working on these articles. If you are still interested in working on Futurama related tasks please visit the wikiproject page to see how you can help. If you have time please also join in the recent discussions on the talk page, in particular I would personally appreciate comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama#A new proposal for episode articles. Thank you for your time, hopefully I didn't annoy you too much. If you would not like to receive messages such as this in the future then consider removing yourself from Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/List of participants. Happy editing. Stardust8212 01:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

goatse.cx and giver's penis

so you need source? check this photo [goatse link removed] and this flash [goatse link removed]

it's obvious that it's giver's cock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.58.172 (talk) 08:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi

I just felt like saying HI. O yeah, and I re-awarded the Text Star that I gave you about a year ago. Dark Ermac 15:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi 2u2. --AAA! (AAAA) 20:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

shock site and lemonparty.org

The paragraph I added about lemonparty.org *IS* sourced. The quote from 30 Rock is a reference within itself, and the link to the short film parody of the website is also a source. The link to the website being mentioned on VH1's "Best Week Ever" is a source. The link to goldefiddle.com sources the 30 Rock quote; however if that is unacceptable or not sufficient, please feel free to Google ""30 Rock" "Lemon Party"" and choose a more appropriate source from the 606 hits. TheGoonSquad (talk) 18:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ronnie.jpeg

I have tagged Image:Ronnie.jpeg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Rettetast (talk) 12:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Paulie.jpeg

I have tagged Image:Paulie.jpeg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Rettetast (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beaker muppet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beaker muppet.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Ahey!

Ahey, AAAA!, Acheck Aout Athis Anew Ameme AI Ainvented Ajust Aa Afew Aminutes Aago. --AGpA75Amotorsports ^{AREV ALIMITER} 00:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Uhh, that's great. Good luck with that. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:47, 3 AJanuary 2008 (UTC)

Need a translation? If so, here's one: Hey, AAA! Check out this new meme I invented just a few minutes ago. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 20:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I managed to figure that out. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Potential vandal here

User:NikhtaSt, who already has three warnings on his talk page. He is also fairly new (no userpage yet) and made an incivil comment here. Got your gun? Here's some ammo. Keep an eye on him. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 16:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, or have any of those mentioned permissions. Just report the vandal to WP:AIV. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Not just yet, they're new. I wanna give this guy a little time to get familiar with the rules. I've got my mentoring admin, FisherQueen, on hold. If he's still making personal attacks at the end of the month, that's when I'll report him. Sound good? --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 15:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

It's best to warn him right after he makes the personal attacks, and when he still does it after the last warning, that's when you report him. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'm gonna check on him. Be back in a minute...--Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 00:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, lookee here. I smell sockpuppet. I'ma run a check real quick. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 00:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Part 1 out of the way. Now for Part 2...--Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 00:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind. Done. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 16:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Here's a barnstar for your work in RVing vandalism, among other things. Keep up the good work! --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chopper.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chopper.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Albania T

I've left a [20] warning at Albania T's talk page, after reverting the changes to your user page. Do you have your user and talk page's on your watchlist? Shenme (talk) 05:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of The UPN Vandal.

I've blocked most of them for a year (except those already blocked). I think it's obvious that's UPN, so if you see any more socks, just report to WP:AIV linking the above category. I'll semi-protect the Dreamworks page as well. Good work. :) · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

A rangeblock probably wouldn't help much in this case, as he's been known to use other ranges as well. Also, rangeblocks are far too easy to screw up. ;P · AndonicO ^Hail! 12:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. These guys are popping up all over. :/ · AndonicO ^Hail! 12:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully this should increase awareness... · AndonicO ^Hail! 12:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

see Diff Jeepday (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Response at my talk Jeepday (talk) 02:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

'Kids Choice' vandal

I see you've reverted this roving IP vandal a few times, thought I'd let you know about this: [21] I requested semi-protection on a bunch of his current haunts (and apologized to the admins, I should have been more selective). I'm hoping this will discourage them a little, since sock warning/blocking isn't helping. Will take it to AN/I if he returns. --Bazzargh (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I asked for protection because his edits were quite slow, but consistent - suggesting that this isn't a bot or someone typing, but more likely he's just hitting 'undo' on our reverts. At least this way he'll have to resort to typing again, which might make vandalism more painful for him. I'll read up on the UPN incidents. Bazzargh (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

(sigh) ok, I see - if he's been at this for over a year, a few semi-protects aren't going to stop him. Bazzargh (talk) 14:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia

I tried to go back to uncyclopedia, and found what was left of it,and I AM trying to be funny, so I could be like you. 65.173.105.141 (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe U show me how to be really funny ? 65.173.105.141 (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

That Sock warning

Yeah, I caught him earlier but he paused for an hour or so, so AIV decided not to block. Hopefully it'll stick this time - that makes it 5 times this week I think. As for signing the warning, I'd seen other people do it, seemed like the polite thing to do. Bazzargh (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

He's trying something different. See User talk:63.215.28.109. I made a revert yesterday on Osmosis Jones from a similar address (popsite dialup) but the edit was isolated and I didn't check further then; but now I have I see this [22]. I think he's using AOL broadband to make a few edits, switching to a dialup account temporarily, then switching back to AOL to get a new address. I expect another 172'll be along in a minute. Interestingly thes 6x.x addresses seem to be just him, so I'll take them to WP:SSP to get longer blocks. (btw just got your message when I previewed - I wasn't done with him yet! :) ) Bazzargh (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Useful Firefox plugin for you

You see the problem with this page? There are simply too many characters that is not a capital A. In such a case, I have the ever most useful Firefox plugin AAAAA. Five A's. It converts every character on any page to an A. I should warn you though, it can be somewhat slow on large pages. But that is until I pull myself together to use DOM instead of xpath. Note: It requires to be logged in with a developer profile, until I can release it into the wild, so please! Make a review! Oh, and btw, weren't you a member at the Infosphere? --Svip^pong 18:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Used to be, but got bored of it. Also, I'm sick of the AAA joke now, so I'm not really interested in the plugin (I'm not changing my name though). --AAA! (AAAA) 20:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Aw, that's a real shame. I don't use the plugin so often myself though, but I don't regret ever making it. But I appreciate removing the Wikia Futurama Wiki link, that wiki sucks. --Svip^pong 00:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dancing Banana.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dancing Banana.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. asenine ^{say what?} 16:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Putting an AAA! thing on the wikipedia sign

People will know you!!!! ShakespearesZombie (talk) 11:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Uhh, no. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Please! [Fair use image removed] ShakespearesZombie (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Warning the guy

I've found recently that warning him is having an effect. If I just revert while he's active, he continues editing, but after a warning he seems to get the picture that I'm deleting his stuff and he takes a breather; I've rarely had to warn him twice this last month. I'm using Twinkle these days so its just a couple of clicks. Bazzargh (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

AAA!, you have a friend

I have thought if you would like to be pals with User:Swirlex? ShakespearesZombie (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I don't really know him. So no, unfortunately. Sorry. --AAA! (AAAA) 15:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Uw-redirect

Template:Uw-redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Study

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, Sam4bc (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Me? Important contributor? I think you're asking the wrong guy here. --AAA! (AAAA) 14:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

UMMM

How did u get rid of the edit this page thing on ur profile? Bonesy2233 (talk) 10:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ga790308.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ga790308.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAA AA AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA

A AAA AAA AAAA AAAAAA AA AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAA AA AA AAAAAAAA AAAAAAA AAAA AAAAAAAAA. AAAA AAA AAAA AAAA AAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAA, AAAAA AAAAAAA AA AA AAAAA A AAAA AAAAAA, AAAAAAAAAAAA (AAAA, AAAA, AAAAAAA, AAA.), AA AAA AAAAAAA, AAAA AAA AAAAAAAA AAA AA AAA AAA AAAAAAA AA AAAAAAA: AAAA AA, AAA AA AAAAAAA AAAAA AAAA AAAAAAA AAAAAA AA AAAAAAAA AA AA AAAAAAAAAAAA. AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAA AAAAAAAA, AAAAAAAA AAAA AA AAA AAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAA'A AAAAAAAAAA AA AAAAAAAAAAAA AAA AA AAAAAAA AA AAA AAAA. AAAAAA AAA AAA AAAAAAAAAA AAA AAAA AA AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA AA AAAAAAA. AA AAAA AA AAA AAAAA AAAA AAAA AAA AAAA AAAAAAA, AAAA AAA AAAAAA AAAA AAA AAAAA AA AAAAAAA AAAA AAAAA AAAAAAA.

AA AAA AAAAA AAAA AAA AAA AAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAAA AA AAA AAAAAAA, AAA AAA AAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAA AA AAAAAA {{AAAAAA}} AA AAA AAA AA AAA AAAAAAA (AAAA AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAA AAAAAA AAAAAAAA AA "AA" AAA), AAAAAAA AAAA AAAAAA A AAAA AA AAA AAAAAAA'A AAAA AAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAA AAAAAAAA, AAA AA AAAAA AAAA AAAA AAAAAA AAA AAAAAA AAAAAAAA, AA AAA AAAAAAA AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA AA AAA AA AAAAAAA AAAAAAA AAAAA. AAAAAA AA AAA AAAAAA AAA AAAAAA AAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAA, AAA AAA'A AAAAAAAA AA AAA AAAAAAAAAAA AA AAA AAAAAAA AAAA AAAAA AAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAA'A AAAAAAAAAA AAAAA AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA.

AAA AAAAAAAAAA AA AAAAAAAA AAAAA AA AAAAAAAA, AAA AAA AAAA AA AAAAA AAA AAA AAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAAAA, AAA AAA AAAAA, AAA AAAAA, AA AAA AAAAAAAAA. AAAA AAAA AA AAAAA A AAAA AA AA AAAA AAAA AA AAA AAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA AAAAA AAAA. AAAAAAAA(AAAA AAAAAA) AA:AA, A AAAAAAA AAAA (AAA)

Image:Nuvola kgpg important.png licensing issue

I notice you uploaded this image based on two other LGPL images. Please note that it is not possible to release this image under the GFDL, but you can replace the tag with {{LGPL}} instead. Stifle (talk) 14:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Dancing Banana.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Dancing Banana.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SpinningA.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:SpinningA.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 22:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 22:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Spinning !.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Spinning !.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 22:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 22:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

the UPN Vandal

The UPN Vandal may have came back under an IP. He was blocked 2 years ago. looks like he has returned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meteorman7228 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Futurama revival

Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Verror4im

Template:Verror4im has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Beaker muppet.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Beaker muppet.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)