User talk:Tony164

Welcome!

Hello, Tony164, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Extraordinary Machine 18:12, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Just a quick note. You need to put your four tildes after your comments on Talk pages, not in the edit summary. AlistairMcMillan 01:22, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Scottish Wikipedians' notice board

Wow! I am extremely impressed by your wonderful edits at John Mair. Just what we need, but see all too rarely. (Or perhaps because I do not read enough of the heavy, academic articles.

Please visit the new Scottish notice board. Here's shortcut: WP:SCOWNB, plus the new Portal:Scotland. Click the "Watch" tab while you are there, and sign up at the bottom if you like. We'd be very pleased to have you on board.--Mais oui! 23:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dalbeth

Instead of creating articles that consist only of "see also", please use the proper syntax for redirects. Henning Makholm 19:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cambuslang 001.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cambuslang 001.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Cambuslang Subscription School.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cambuslang Subscription School.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Parkhead Station.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parkhead Station.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Cadoc and Cambuslang

Just saw your addition to Cadoc. I followed the link and took a while reading through to find why on earth it had been linked. If it's the church you want to link to, and the article is relatively stable, it might be worth linking directly to the section in question, either visibly (Cambuslang#The church) or not (Cambuslang - you need to read the source to see that one). Or even just "The dedication of the church at Cambuslang" would do, which gives enough information for the curious to skip ahead to it. Also, I am a bit curious: have you a reference for the "recorded as wandering about the hills of Strathclyde" mention? The Cadoc article doesn't have anything about this, so it would be good to get the two articles in sync and to make a start of references for Cadoc: currently all we have is a note that one book is not to be trusted :) Telsa (talk) 17:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statistical Accounts of Scotland

Thanks for writing this excellent intro on the accounts. Very useful. I made some redirects, like Old Statistical Account and so on. If you are writing Scots articles, you may like to have a look at the Scottish WP noticeboard, and there's a New articles page which will get things noticed. Or that's the idea anyway. Best of luck ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverts on Greece

Hi, why did you re-introduce your edit I had previously reverted on Greece, regarding the Greek Orthodox Church ([1])? I thought my edit summary was pretty self-explanatory: Church of Greece is factually incorrect in this instance. "Greek Orthodox Church" may be formally tagged as a dab page, but I believe it is actually the most informative place to point to in this instance. I'm a bit astonished at your seemingly mechanistic revert, are you a bot? Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. May I also ask you to be more careful in general with replacing those links, unless you are very certain about their factual accuracy? For instance here: [2] - I doubt a Greek church in Hungary would belong to the actual Church of Greece; AFAIR orthodox churches across Europe are under the jurisdiction of the Church of Constantinople, but as long as we are not sure, the more general page "Greek Orthodox Church" seems more appropriate. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've felt I had to revert or correct quite a couple of your edits on this matter. If you are concerned on formal grounds that links shouldn't go to dab pages, I think the best thing to do is to just no longer tag Greek Orthodox Church as a dab page. I left a note at the Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links page too, and there's now a discussion ongoing at Talk:Greece. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your reply. I can see your concern, of course. If we can agree that that page should just not be treated like any garden-variety dab page in certein respects, there won't be a problem. Maybe the best thing would be to slightly expand that article, making it clear to the reader that "Greek Orthodoxy" as such is a concept more of historical-cultural-national self-identification than of either theological doctrine or church organisation. In theological terms, a person belongs simply to the Eastern Orthodox Church; in terms of ecclesiastical jurisdiction a parish or bishopric may belong to the Curch of Greece or the Patriarchate of Constantinople or whatever (but that's not a distinction of denomination of the parishioners). But still, people will implicitly self-identify as "Greek Orthodox", and many of the incoming links to that article are from pages where it's really that historical self-identification concept that's at issue, and the other distinctions are simply not very relevant. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles on ministers

Hey, your contributions are certainly well-researched and appreciated, but I and other users feel that some of the people you've added don't qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia based on Wikipedia's notability criteria. Some are up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J E Houston, Minister, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Blair, Minister, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Robertson, Minister. Your input in those discussions is certainly welcome. Regards, Elmer Clark 00:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to John Robertson (minister)

Your recent edit to John Robertson (minister) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI when you want to redirect a page to another page, you need to use #REDIRECT [[New PageName]] - that will automatically redirect the page and be less confusing for the user. -- Tawker 13:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Dear Tony; please always remember to sign your comments made on talk pages (such as Talk:Cambuslang railway station)with the ~~~~ - please see WP:SIG for help. Cheers and regards, Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 20:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:George Hutcheson.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:George Hutcheson.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Strangerer (Talk) 20:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baillieston_Juniors.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baillieston_Juniors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:R_Clyde_at_Westthorn.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:R_Clyde_at_Westthorn.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 03:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hew Scott

I have nominated Hew Scott, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hew Scott. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Keilana^talk 20:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tribute to the martyrs

Thanks for creating Martyrs' Public School, a very good start. Couple of handy hints - avoid a space at the start of a line or it upsets the formatting, and as you can see by looking at the link in the next sentence when editing, single [ ] brackets work with external links, with a space between the link and the title. Being lazy, I used this tool to get the webpage title of the external link without having to type it myself. Very handy. Thanks again, ... dave souza, talk 20:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from James S. Johnstone. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bit Lordy (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deleted article

I deleted the page you mention as as broken redirect, the target it pointed to is James S. Johnson, which was deleted by User:Gwen Gale per speedy deletion criteria WP:CSD#A7. See [3]. VegaDark (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up

Hendrick Zwaardecroon needs some help in its layout, if you can help that would be appreciated. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Halfway, Cambuslang, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tony164! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 68 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Charlotte Link - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Standonck

You whrite that Jan Standonck was enrolled on 22 November 1469 at the Catholic University of Leuven, but this University founded as a Gregorian University^[1]in Malines in 1834, was not existing in the time of John Standonck. It is then more accurate to say that he was enrolled at the Old University of Louvain.--Bruxellensis (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^ See: R. Mathes, Löwen und Rom. Zur Gründung der Katholischen Universität Löwen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Kirchen-und Bildungspolitik Papst Gregors XVI, Essen, 1975.

Speedy deletion nomination of J E Houston

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on J E Houston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert Wilson (tenor)

On 4 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Wilson (tenor), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lilybank

Hi, I've been decorating the articles for the areas of Glasgow with infoboxes, and have got as far as Lilybank. And I've had a little difficulty with it as it appears to have been quietly forgotten following the BBC documentary of the 1970s... could you give me an idea which are the main streets that made up the estate? Cheers Catfish Jim & the soapdish 15:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic, thanks! I had been going on the coordinates a previous editor had placed in the article, which turned out to be about a mile to the east in Shettleston. Makes me wonder how far off I've been in the other infoboxes... Catfish Jim & the soapdish 16:16, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parkhead Station.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Parkhead Station.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Tony164}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parkhead Station.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parkhead Station.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Building Trades.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cambuslang Subscription School.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cambuslang Memorial.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cambuslang Institute.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerhard Vollmer

The article Gerhard Vollmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person. No indication of notability and arguably libelous.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish Reformation Parliament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calvin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valkenier.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Valkenier.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishopton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tony164. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tony164. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Abraham Patras (2).jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Abraham Patras (2).jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tony164. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MCM Memorial.jpg

The file File:MCM Memorial.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Diederik Durven.jpg

The file File:Diederik Durven.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Johannes Thedens.jpg

The file File:Johannes Thedens.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mattheus de Haan.jpg

The file File:Mattheus de Haan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abraham Patras (2).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abraham Patras (2).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

File source problem with File:Dalbeth House.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dalbeth House.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 14:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] See: R. Mathes, Löwen und Rom. Zur Gründung der Katholischen Universität Löwen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Kirchen-und Bildungspolitik Papst Gregors XVI, Essen, 1975.

[1]