Jump to content

User talk:Anolacrabsss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. I am Omg35. I recently noted that you replaced the birthplaces of Prithwiraj Sukumaran and Indrajith Sukumaran as Thiruvananthapuram without any reliable source and replacing the reliable source which was there. It is against the Vandalism policy of Wikipedia.

The user has done the same at Priyadarshan. Jay (talk) 12:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mohanlal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

Information icon Hi. Please only upload images that are either taken by you or those that have a permissive free license. Do not copy paste images from the net to Wikipedia and claim it yourself, it is a copyright violation. See WP:NONFREE and Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Thanks - Vis M (talk) 19:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Prithviraj Sukumaran. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Prithviraj Sukumaran. Jay (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ahaana Krishna, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Also, the edit was contrary to MOS (see MOS:GEOLINK).

 — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ahaana Krishna, you may be blocked from editing. Jay 💬 06:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Ahaana Krishna) for a period of 3 months for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 05:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem and UtherSRG: Exactly after the 3-month block, the user went back and added the unsourced statement at Ahaana Krishna. Would request another 3-month or indefinite block this time as I don't see the user trying to communicate. Jay 💬 04:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anolacrabsss (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked from editing without an expiry date due to disruptive editing. I accept my mistake and I promise to not make that mistake again. So I request you to kindly unblock my account

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anolacrabsss (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]