User talk:Anneuroscientist

Hello, Anneuroscientist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 13:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rasnaboy

Thank you for your kind advice

Anneuroscientist (talk) 21:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Anneuroscientist. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Public health, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MrOllie

Thank you for your information.

Anneuroscientist (talk) 10:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrzej Brodziak (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alexandermcnabb were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article needs a massive copy edit by a native English speaker. The sourcing is completely inappropriate - suggest spending some time ingesting WP:GNG and WP:RS guidelines. This is written like a CV and that simply won't do for Wikipedia - see also WP:NOTCV and I would heartily suggest the editor spends some time familiarising themselves with WP:FIRST before working on this draft further. Best

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrzej Brodziak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anneuroscientist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrzej Brodziak (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrzej Brodziak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andrzej Brodziak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andrzej Brodziak. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong

You wrote: "Comment: so poorly written it is not easy to comprehend, is it a translation by any chance? Theroadislong (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)"

You decided that my submission "Draft:Andrzej Brodziak" is not approved. I am asking kindly to help me.

In times of rapid development of A.I. the theory of the "functional unit of neural circuitry", that I was developing since years, became very important. Understanding this model is important for understanding what imagination, self-imagining, and ultimately consciousness is.

You write that my text "is not easy to comprehend". Accepted explanations of my theory are found in the cited papers. This is best explained at https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080984 but it was already presented in the literature 33 years ago (see https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JIom0Hb0o7C57TS2HurYqFytAne-vxA8/view )

The text of my submission is short. It would be a few minutes of work for you to make the necessary shortcuts and corrections. For example, the recently added list of papers published in major journals is redundant, but your colleague said that the theory had no international resonance, therefore I added it. .

In short, I am asking you to help me. This is justified if you believe in the importance of understanding how the brain works and in the sense of developing A.I.

with cordial greetings

Andrzej Brodziak

my prive phone number

(also Whatsapp ) +48 605044609 Anneuroscientist (talk) 12:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits you included material from a journal article that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your remark Anneuroscientist (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrzej Brodziak (April 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Headbomb was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Headbomb

You wrote "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". But, in the proposend entry, a consistent effort made over several decades is presented, with the results of these endeavours being presented in renowned journals and cited (also in renowned journals) by many independent scientists. At the same time, the results of these efforts (which can be easily accessed as they are generally available in open access journals) are extremely important right now in times of rapid dissemination of generative AI systems. They are important to understand where the development threshold of systems like GPT comes from and what it entails.

There are Wikipedia entries dedicated to individual books. I published several books and about 300 scientific papers. Therefore, I believe that the assessment that the described results are not sufficiently "notable" is unfair and perhaps incorrect. Sincerely Anneuroscientist (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The functional unit of neural circuits (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rich Smith

I regret that you have made such a decision. It is not beneficial for the community, especially in times of rapid AI development. I am writing "community," but which community exactly... The proposed entry is an important addition to knowledge essential for computer scientists and anybody. It should be summarized in this way:

...........

The authors of the entry present the action of a functional unit of neuronal circuits, which should be distinguished both in the structure of the brain and artificial intelligence systems. Such a unit is responsible for recognizing objects that are denoted by a single word or a verbal phrase. Within such delineated neuronal circuits, the perception of an object, the memorization of the object's image pattern, and the retrieval of that pattern in the form of an imagination occur. These functional neuronal units are activated by the working memory system while searching for a solution.

The authors recall their the essential achievements done over the decades, aimed at developing a theory of such functional units, also known as 'the equimerec - units'. Their structure is derived from the combination of two elementary natural systems known as 'the threshold logic unit' and 'the feedback control loop'. The entry presents the scheme and a formal notation describing such systems. The authors emphasize the importance of the theory, describing the realization of the imagination of objects denoted by single words of natural language in times when artificial intelligence systems based on so called 'models of language' have been so greatly developed.

The authors note alse that since the essence of the functional units of neuronal circuits, they described, is based on so-called backpropagation connections - within these units, circulation of impulses occurs in closed circuits, which must cause the emergence of an electromagnetic field. This explains the well-known fact of the existence of the endogenous electromagnetic field of the human brain. The authors argue then, that a similar EM field probably arises in artificial intelligence systems. In light of the recently promoted Joe McFadden's "Conscious Electromagnetic Information Field Theory (cemi)", he possibility of self-awareness emerging in artificial intelligence systems should be considered

with due attention.

.............................

So, the entire community, which may soon wake up among conscious artificial intelligence systems, is not being informed about this. I appeal to you to change your decision and allow the entry about functional units of neural circuits to be added to Wikipedia. Anneuroscientist (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Anneuroscientist! Your additions to Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Your edit to Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Diannaa !

Thank you for your post. However - please help ! Please tell me which fragments of the draft "The functional unit of neural circuits" yet violate copyrights?

Under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:The_functional_unit_of_neural_circuits you can read that " Copyright problem removed

Copyright-problem.svg Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://basiclearning.angelfire.com/equimerec-2.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license..."

Yes, I am a neuroscience scientist and have published many papers in this field, so sometimes I may quote myself. However, developing the draft "The functional unit of neural circuits" I try to write from a neutral point of view about an important fact - which is the need to take into account the theory of MacFadden and other researchers stating that in the presence of backward connections consciousness can appear in artificial intelligence systems. It is important that people realize it just now - in these days.

So I am asking kindly for your help. Anneuroscientist (talk) 17:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell there are no further copyright issues. — Diannaa (talk) 12:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The functional unit of neural circuits (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to be in the appropriate genre.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrzej Brodziak

Hello, Anneuroscientist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrzej Brodziak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits

Hello, Anneuroscientist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The functional unit of neural circuits

Hello, Anneuroscientist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The functional unit of neural circuits".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]