User talk:Angunnu

Angunnu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Angunnu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Thank you... Angunnu (talk) 07:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Angunnu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 06:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Angunnu (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hello again. In reviewing your edits, including those at Thrombin and Protein S, I see that you are not adding sources for your contributions. Anything that is not common knowledge (like "the sky is blue") should be cited to a reliable source (like a newspaper or journal article or a book), which is also described in the links in the welcome message above. The source should preferably, but not necessarily, be online-accessible. Please have a look. Cheers! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 10:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, if you want to go back and add the sources to your contributions, you can see your history at Special:Contributions/Angunnu. —[AlanM1(talk)]—

Try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources

I favour the inline citation style, using <ref> tags. But there's several ways of citing. MrDemeanour (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help. I think it will take some time for me to get adapted to the methods here .Well will keep trying. Angunnu (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry; if you screw it up, eventually someone will come along and repair it. The main (only?) asset of Wikipedia is its legion of editors, and you are one of them.

And to be sure, it takes time to learn how to do things like citing - I've been editing since about 2004, and I have much to learn. There are tools you can use to make citations easier, but I haven't learned to use them! MrDemeanour (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You seem to have gotten the hang of it at Protein S, presumably looking at the coding of the other refs in the article, which is always a great way to learn here. Good job! One thing you may not have run across is the re-use of cites. If you need to use a cite more than once in the same article, in the leading <ref> tag, you can add a name, like <ref name="PMID123456">{{Cite journal ...}}</ref>. Later, if you want to use that ref again, just use <ref name="PMID123456" /> (note the extra " /") instead of repeating the whole reference. Cheers! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 19:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.Yes,kind of. Now,if I am adding PMID1234...does it have to be any particular number,or will any random number be enough? Angunnu (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can call it whatever you like, within reason. To be safe, stick to letters, numbers, hyphens, and underscores and surround it with "quotes". I usually use an abbreviation of the source name/author+hyphen+date, e.g., name="NYT-20191029" —[AlanM1(talk)]— 09:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.Got it.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Angunnu! You created a thread called Help at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Names

Hi. In edits like this one to Factor VIII, when you introduce a new name to the article, like Tuddenham, it's best to include their given name as well. You should also try to find that person's wikipedia article if it exists to provide the reader with a convenient link to read more about them. Subsequent mentions by surname are fine. In this case, I changed Tuddenham to [[Edward Tuddenham]], producing Edward Tuddenham (after verifying that link was to the correct person). There may sometimes be other words, too, that could benefit from linking, though see WP:OVERLINK. Cheers, and keep up the good work! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 23:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Got it![reply]

Hi,when we are using names which appear in red color on the Wikipedia page should we link them- like when a page is not yet created but still it is appearing in red letters. If yes please tell me how to do that too. Thank you. Angunnu (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

linking to a page that does not exist is saying that you think the page should and eventually will exist, it is inviting other editors to create the page. If the person nor topic you are linking to seems to be clearly notable is is relavant to the article you are editing, feel free. See WP:REDLINK. However, if in doublt, it is better to avoid a redlink -- make one only when it seems rather clear cut. Make a redlink by enclosing the name of the topic in double square brackets, like this: [[New topic]], which renders as: New topic. I hope that is clear. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 03:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your post on the talk page at MAN, and have looked up a little of the controversy about the picture on the internet. After reading some commentary, not being Indian, I have no understanding. Could you explain why the picture is controversial? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 13:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi [[User:Jacona|Jacona],Regarding the photo onMAN, I wouldn’t say that the picture is controversial..The discussions are more likely due to the fact the guy in the picture looks like a person from Kerala,which is a state in India.The local media and FM channels are discussing it as to find out who the guy is.That’s all.It was amusing for all of us here that Wikipedia selected a local guy for its page on MAN(Angunnu (talk) 04:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Better source

Have found a better source.[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
51	Recombinant factor VIIa (talk)	Add sources
4,420	Ethanol (talk)	Add sources
38	Hereditary inclusion body myopathy (talk)	Add sources
208	Tissue factor (talk)	Add sources
75	Translocase (talk)	Add sources
18	Hyperphosphorylation (talk)	Add sources
7	Semantic amnesia (talk)	Cleanup
228	Spatial memory (talk)	Cleanup
151	Affective neuroscience (talk)	Cleanup
1,533	Tranexamic acid (talk)	Expand
1,492	Maglev (talk)	Expand
158	Medial medullary syndrome (talk)	Expand
48	Functional symptom (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
195	Non-24-hour sleep–wake disorder (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,864	Inflammation (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
439	Tau protein (talk)	Merge
49	X-linked intellectual disability (talk)	Merge
529	Spaced repetition (talk)	Merge
237	Myeloproliferative neoplasm (talk)	Wikify
32	Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (talk)	Wikify
187	Chédiak–Higashi syndrome (talk)	Wikify
2	Between-systems memory interference model (talk)	Orphan
3	Max Snodderly (talk)	Orphan
4	Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini (talk)	Orphan
4	Coagulation factor XIII, A1 polypeptide (talk)	Stub
73	Carditis (talk)	Stub
23	Carboxypeptidase B2 (talk)	Stub
58	Fibrinogen gamma chain (talk)	Stub
176	Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (talk)	Stub
65	Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
638	Stargate Project (talk)	Add sources
32	Evolution and Human Behavior (talk)	Add sources
2,513	Dementia (talk)	Add sources
666	Thrombus (talk)	Add sources
760	Von Willebrand disease (talk)	Add sources
12	Thrombodynamics test (talk)	Add sources
4	Inherited disorders of trafficking (talk)	Cleanup
52	CFU-E (talk)	Cleanup
79	Mental time travel (talk)	Cleanup
13	Factor I deficiency (talk)	Expand
229	Corticobasal degeneration (talk)	Expand
110	Spastic quadriplegia (talk)	Expand
47	Mohammed Illias Sahadulla (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37	Osteomyology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
128	The Seven Sins of Memory (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
131	Development of the nervous system (talk)	Merge
105	Development of the nervous system in humans (talk)	Merge
82	Transcription preinitiation complex (talk)	Merge
287	Blood doping (talk)	Wikify
80	Iranian traditional medicine (talk)	Wikify
11	CFU-Baso (talk)	Wikify
7	Visual selective attention in dementia (talk)	Orphan
3	Jeanne Lusher (talk)	Orphan
7	College of Nursing, Trivandrum, Kerala (talk)	Orphan
7	Melanophilin (talk)	Stub
36	Gla domain (talk)	Stub
27	Myopericarditis (talk)	Stub
28	Hyperchlorhydria (talk)	Stub
30	Ciraparantag (talk)	Stub
15	Heparin cofactor II (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Un encyclopaedic

What is expected to do with “unencyclopedic” article (Angunnu (talk) 13:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Whole blood clotting test (WBCT)

Hello Angunnu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Whole blood clotting test (WBCT) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Angunnu, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Ciraparantag have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which has a button "Cite" click on it
Then click on "Automatic" or "Manual"
For Manual: Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details, then click "Insert"
For Automatic: Paste the URL or PMID/PMC and click "Generate" and if the article is available on PubMed Central, Citoid will populate a citation which can be inserted by clicking "Insert"

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC) Okay.Thank you (Angunnu (talk) 01:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
562	Cerebral atrophy (talk)	Add sources
1,422	Parasympathetic nervous system (talk)	Add sources
72	Snake pit (talk)	Add sources
1,158	Medulla oblongata (talk)	Add sources
2,391	Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) (talk)	Add sources
189	History of Bangalore (talk)	Add sources
372	Islamic extremism (talk)	Cleanup
213	Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi (talk)	Cleanup
50	X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (talk)	Cleanup
1,106	Progressive supranuclear palsy (talk)	Expand
98	Atheris (talk)	Expand
113	H-reflex (talk)	Expand
141	Balti language (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
626	International Security Assistance Force (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
31	Nund Rishi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
157	Coronary catheterization (talk)	Merge
3,198	Shweta Tiwari (talk)	Merge
831	Parvovirus (talk)	Merge
100	Symmetrical tonic neck reflex (talk)	Wikify
162	Vagal maneuver (talk)	Wikify
824	Joint Entrance Examination (talk)	Wikify
5	Eliezer Joldan (talk)	Orphan
13	Sahil Deshmukh Khan (talk)	Orphan
4	Mini-SEA (talk)	Orphan
4	Sri Gurudeva PU College (talk)	Stub
54	Gene dosage (talk)	Stub
37	Subcortical dementia (talk)	Stub
72	Purohit (talk)	Stub
108	Biceps reflex (talk)	Stub
89	Dorsal nucleus of vagus nerve (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vishwak Sen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vishwak Sen, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Raaj Tilak (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]