User talk:Angel Angel 2

Nomination of Illyrian_(South_Slavic) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Illyrian_(South_Slavic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illyrian_(South_Slavic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zixt2010 (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Legisprudence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Legisprudence, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yordan Ivanov

Hi. Please don't hijack an existing article and change it being about someone else. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 21:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rebellion of the Seimens and Home Guard has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rebellion of the Seimens and Home Guard, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Legend of Mehmed Sultan

The article The Legend of Mehmed Sultan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

obvious mere machine translation done using Google Translate on the Serbian article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Yordan Ivanov (bobsledder) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters, seems controversial, and relies on sources only on one side of the question. . It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to provide a WP:NPOV. . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And relies on sources only on one side of the question

I did not understand that. Which is the other one? Can you explain! Angel Angel 2 (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Angel Angel 2, I've done the same for Catholic propaganda in the Balkans in the 17th century. The crux is WP:NPOV: articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, based on up-to-date reliable sources. The article about the Catholic "propaganda" was based entirely on Bulgarian sources from the 19th and early 20th centuries. How history was written then is different from how history is written now, and the Bulgarian viewpoint espoused there is not necessarily the viewpoint appropriate for a global encyclopedia. – Uanfala (talk) 13:43, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rascians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orthodox and Patriarchate of Peć (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Irene Palaiologina (Eulogy)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Irene Palaiologina (Eulogy). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Irene Palaiologina, Empress of Bulgaria. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Irene Palaiologina, Empress of Bulgaria. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi! Thanks for creating some interesting articles, but please be advised that a) you should have some knowledge of the topics you write on, and b) that your English should be sufficient to the task of writing an encyclopedia in English. From what I have seen, you simply translate articles from other languages and use a smattering of online sources, without trying to write a coherent narrative. This contravenes both the points raised above: Google Translate is no substitution for a good working knowledge of English, and simply using whatever source you come across and jumbling it together into a pastiche of an article is not enough either. Please take more time and devote more care in writing your articles, so that they are of a higher quality. Creating many articles quickly only to have them deleted, redirected, or having to be extensively reworked by others before they become legible is not a worthy goal. Cheers, and a happy holiday season to you. Constantine ✍ 12:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS, when you translate from other Wikipedia projects, you are legally required to state so and annotate the article, as described in WP:TFOLWP. Constantine ✍ 14:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At Annexation of Thessaly and Arta, you write "The High Gate attempts to deflect Greek territorial claims quite reasonably from Epirus and Thessaly - to Crete after another Cretan revolt (1878). However, the Greek government itself rejects them, knowing that Crete will not escape it unlike Macedonia." This is cited to this page, which says nothing of the sort. Do you understand Greek at all? If not, then please stop using/referencing Greek sources.

Now it is pretty evident from your general editing that you have a certain pro-Bulgarian and anti-Greek stance on these matters (name-dropping Bulgaria in irrelevant topics, making Greece seem unreasonable to even want to claim Macedonia, etc.). I cannot determine how much of this is because you translate from the Bulgarian WP (which I fully expect to be filled with Bulgarian nationalist POV in the same way as the Greek WP is with the Greek one) or your own. Neither is tolerated, however: WP:NPOV is a core pillar of Wikipedia, especially in sensitive historical matters. Editors are expected to leave their biases at the door, and to check their material for such bias.

But the piece I quoted above is not translated, it is your own, original work, and it is not only nationalist WP:OR, it is a clear attempt to deceive the readers by adding a bogus reference. So consider yourself warned: Wikipedia is not here to promote nationalist analyses, regardless from which side they come. There are severe sanctions in place for anyone engaging in that sort of behaviour on Balkans-related topics. On the next transgression, you will get reported to WP:ANI. Constantine ✍ 09:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing of the kind. You are biased and subjective. And you are accusing nationalism of going from your own "I" to a subconscious level.

Which is not true? Yes, the source is for another Greek. But this is the most substantial. And why would the article be redirected, given the facts about Thessaly and Arta, towards Macedonia? Angel Angel 2 (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You keep missing the point and proving mine: For example, "Yes, the source is for another Greek. But this is the most substantial." What is that supposed to mean? What is "for another Greek"? What is the "this" in "this is the most substantial"? That is not comprehensible English. What I can sort-of-guess-at what you are driving has no bearing on the point I raised above: the source you used as a reference does not support what you made it out to claim. Now either you knew that and deliberately tried to mislead the readers, which is grounds for being blocked on WP, or you didn't (because you don't know Greek) in which case you have proven to be (to put it mildly) negligent with using sources and do not have the competence to edit in such delicate matters such as this.

For "And why would the article be redirected, given the facts about Thessaly and Arta, towards Macedonia?" again, what are you talking about? I really can't understand what argument you are trying to make here. Your English is not good, I am afraid. Again, from what I can guess you may be trying to say (but may be completely wrong), the articles deal with the same topic, i.e., how Greece got Arta and Thessaly; ergo one of the articles is redundant; of the two articles, one is far less biased than the other (see above for why), and older, which gives it precedence. Do the math. Constantine ✍ 11:44, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To put it even more clearly, compare your initial draft with the current state of Irene Komnene Palaiologina. No-one expects you to make perfect articles from the get go, but when you are unable to translate the name correctly ("Eulogy") and even mix the gender pronouns ("He stood at the head of the Orthodox Party, strongly opposed to his brother's Uniate policy") without correcting it, then you clearly don't spend enough time with your articles. I repeat: you cannot expect other editors to correct your mistakes; you need to assume editorial responsibility, which includes looking for reliable sources, watching out for neutral point of view, and readable prose in English. If you don't do that, then don't be surprised when your work gets short shrift. Good intentions are, unfortunately, not enough. Constantine ✍ 12:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I conclude the discussion: Territorial annexation at a particular time in a particular territory is a completely different concept from the international treaty under which it was implemented.

Example: Alsace-Lorraine and the Treaty of Frankfurt (1871).

The end.

Proposed deletion of International Committee of Slavists

The article International Committee of Slavists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It exists, and there are many mentions in lists, but I can't find any in-depth coverage of this organization to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Petar Bogdan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Propaganda" in Latin means "propogation" and does not refer to what you think it does, as does the English word. Elizium23 (talk) 13:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Catholic propagandists in the Balkans has been nominated for discussion

Category:Catholic propagandists in the Balkans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 13:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Angel Angel 2. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 16:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macedonian Question, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please improve the English of your pages!

Most of the time you create articles in a poor, almost incomprehensible English. Please try to make some efforts or make WP:DRAFTS and ask for people to help you. Take this as an advice as well as a warning because you have already been warned by @Cplakidas:. Veverve (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Macedonian refugees in Atalanti

Hello, Angel Angel 2,

Thank you for creating Macedonian refugees in Atalanti.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article appears to be a direct translation from this article on Bulgarian Wikipedia, yet you have not credited that as a source. This is a breach of our policies, yet you can easily fix this by following the advice on how to attribute content to those editors. See WP:TFOLWP for details.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Khirurg. Your recent edit(s) to the page Moscopole appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Greece of Melouna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greece of Melouna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece of Melouna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine ✍ 15:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice about the Balkans

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have recently shown interest in the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Dr. K. 05:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bulgarian land has been nominated for discussion

Category:Bulgarian land, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phrygian alphabet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phrygian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Northern Thessaly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northern Thessaly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Thessaly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine ✍ 13:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor

I see that you are marking many of your edits as minor, even when they are not. Please read WP:MINOR. --T*U (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Northern Thessaly. Consider this the last warning. Wikipedia is not here for you to push your agenda. Constantine ✍ 16:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temple of Cybele in Balchik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Temple of Cybele in Balchik, does not have enough sources to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. They don't necessarily have to be in English, but it would help if they were. If not, please at leastadda translation ofthe nameof thesource, and, thetitle on the article in it. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 20:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Angel Angel 2

Thank you for creating Gavril Katsarov.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

His signature is available on commons, you could add it to the infobox. some proper refs to his scientific works would be good.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:11, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temples of Cybele in Balchik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Temples of Cybele in Balchik, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Temples of Cybele in Balchik (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

Wait until there's an article about Temple of Cybele in Balchik before creating a disambiguation page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Temples of Cybele in Balchik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Temples of Cybele in Balchik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel Angel 2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Temple of Cybele, Balchik has been accepted

Temple of Cybele, Balchik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again: Minor

A couple of days ago, I adviced you about your use of the "Minor" marking, but you continue to mark virtually all your edits as minor. I must ask you again to read WP:MINOR carefully and make sure you undestand it. In the section "When not to mark as minor changes", it says that you shall not use the minor marking when Adding or removing content in an article. That means that you are not supposed to use of the "minor" marking when you add text, like here, or pictures, like here. It also says that Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. --T*U (talk) 06:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can only conclude that you either have not read WP:MINOR despite being asked twice to do so, or you have not understood it. (There is, of course, a third possibility, that you deliberately refuse to follow Wikipedia etiquette, but I hope that is not the case, since that can be considered disruptive and may be met with edit restrictions.) Under the heading "When not to mark as minor changes", one of the bullet points is Adding or removing references, external links, or categories in an article. You have just made four edits to existing articles, in each case adding categories and in each case marking the edit as minor. Please stop using the "Minor" marking for edits that are clearly not minor. --T*U (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deževa Agreement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deževa Agreement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deževa Agreement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. T*U (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ottoman Slavic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ottoman Slavic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottoman Slavic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. T*U (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slavia Orthodoxa (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs at least two references to general works that indicates the term is widely adopted. If at all possible, one should be in english.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slavia Orthodoxa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Slavia Orthodoxa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Catholic missionaries in the Balkans has been nominated for discussion

Category:Catholic missionaries in the Balkans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 16:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seven Saints

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seven Saints requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.kashtite.com/en/traditions-and-celebrations/bulgarian-traditions-and-celebrations/seven-saints. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 14:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've similarly tagged for speedy deletion your recreation of this article at Saints Seven Saints. – Uanfala (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 14:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement has nothing to do with the information content of a page. It's about how it's expressed. You can take information from other sources, but you can't take phrases or paragraphs of text - those sources own the right to that text written in that specific, particular way. Wily D 16:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You might find it ridiculous that a restaurant would own the text they write about some saints, but they do. It's critical to understand this and how it works if you want to participate in Wikipedia. Wily D 16:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that it has come to this, but your last comments and your record show that you simply don't understand and apparently don't agree with our policy on copyright, and we can't let you continue to violate it. Doug Weller talk 16:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Irene Komnene Palaiologina

On 21 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Irene Komnene Palaiologina, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irene Palaiologina, the elder sister of Byzantine emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos, became a staunch opponent of his proposed union of the churches, and tried to form a Bulgarian–Mamluk alliance against him? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Irene Komnene Palaiologina. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Irene Komnene Palaiologina), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kingdom of the Slavs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kingdom of the Slavs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of the Slavs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. samrolken (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Legisprudence concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Legisprudence, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyrillo-Methodian Encyclopedia has been accepted

Cyrillo-Methodian Encyclopedia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I can't find anything in English that talks about this. It's possible that the (Russian?) language references provide evidence of WP:N, but in its current state, I can't verify that this even meets WP:V.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vlach-Bulgarian royal charters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I)

Hello, Angel Angel 2,

Thank you for creating Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this new article but it contains many non-neutral political statements and possibly historical revisionism, especially in the "Background" section.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Legisprudence

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Legisprudence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian Glagolitic Script Day moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Croatian Glagolitic Script Day, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Phanariots governance

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Phanariots governance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:06, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Catholic propaganda in the Bulgarian lands in the 17th century

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Catholic propaganda in the Bulgarian lands in the 17th century".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Catholic propaganda in Serbian Countries

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Catholic propaganda in Serbian Countries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Temples of Cybele in Balchik

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Temples of Cybele in Balchik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 11:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Catholic propaganda in the Balkans in the 17th century

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Catholic propaganda in the Balkans in the 17th century".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angel Angel 2, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Zoozaz1 (talk) 00:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Slavia Orthodoxa

Hello, Angel Angel 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Slavia Orthodoxa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Slavs in Greece

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Slavs in Greece requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Macedonian (talk) 11:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Public governance" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Public governance. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 20#Public governance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 04:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Public governance has been nominated for deletion

Category:Public governance has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 04:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Transdanubian Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Transdanubian Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Day of Slavonic Alphabet, Bulgarian Enlightenment and Culture

A tag has been placed on Category:Day of Slavonic Alphabet, Bulgarian Enlightenment and Culture indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Phanariots governance

A tag has been placed on Category:Phanariots governance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old Bulgarian Scriptoriums has been nominated for renaming

Category:Old Bulgarian Scriptoriums has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Köprülü era has been nominated for deletion

Category:Köprülü era has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Temple of Cybele, Durankulak

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Temple of Cybele, Durankulak has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20171011223053/https://www.dobrichmuseum.bg/index.php/en/research/archaeology-research?view=article&id=30 and translationvio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyustendil Spring

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kyustendil Spring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://kustendil.com/bg/culture/view/1/1/%D0%9A%D1%8E%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82 and translated from the Bulgarian which is a close paraphrase/CV of the above. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Renegade thesis

The article Renegade thesis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dubious "thesis" sourced to a primary source and a website published by "Club Zebra Media". Translated copy of the Turkish Wikipedia article by a user now blocked for socking, CV, and CIR issues, so I don't exactly trust anything they created.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Udch moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Udch, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Udch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Udch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bulgarian medieval cryptography

The article Bulgarian medieval cryptography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable single-source article created by individual now blocked for CIR, sockpuppetry, and CV issues. The translated title of the source article is "Old Bulgarian literature", nothing to do with cryptography. Even if the single source is legitimately sigcov, I wasn't able to find any additional substantive sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michail Arnaudov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michail Arnaudov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20180609173527/http://www.libsu.uni-sofia.bg/slavica/Arnaudov.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stoyan Romanski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stoyan Romanski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20170929232634/http://www.libsu.uni-sofia.bg/slavica/Romanski.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Benyo Stefanov Tsonev

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Benyo Stefanov Tsonev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20180609173712/http://www.libsu.uni-sofia.bg/slavica/Tsonev.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ravna Monastery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ravna Monastery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://muzei-provadia.com/istoricheski-obekti/istoricheski-obekt-ravnenski-manastir.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sennecaster (Chat) 02:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]