User talk:AnemoneProjectors/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions about User:AnemoneProjectors. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

→

Seasons greetings

Hi Anemone, I hope you're well? Are you any good with histormerging? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes what do you need doing? Anemone Projectors 20:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh goodie =) Could you histomerge User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox/2 with Ass on the Floor please? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Isn't that just a simple page move? Anemone Projectors 20:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh I was under the impression that to preserve page history a histomerge was required. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

No, your redirect has no history other than the fact you made a redirect. You should be able to move your sandbox over the redirect and the history of your sandbox will move to the history of the new article. If you can't move it I can delete the redirect. I'll also delete the redirect created by the move in your userspace if you want! But a history merge isn't required. Anemone Projectors 20:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

It says Administrator action required. But yes if you could do that and then delete the user page for me it would be appreciated :) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

DONE! :-) Anemone Projectors 20:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. How are the holidays (as in Christmas season) going for you? I'm itching to hear some new Leona music soon... The David Guetta collaboration sounds interesting though I was disappointed to hear she's worked with Tedder again. I really wanted to her what she and Timbaland had recorded together... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:43, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh not bad, you? Yeah I'm excited for the Leona/Guetta track. She said she'd work with Timbaland again next time, so hopefully she will. I wanted to hear her Xenomania collabs too. I think she'll always work with Tedder though. Anemone Projectors 20:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Ugh! They have moments together it just too much of a good thing can ruin one's credibility when one of those collaborations disappoints. It would be great to here her go more urban. I liked the vibe she had with JT on Don't Let Me Down. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

That's my favourite Leona song. What if this was real? :) Anemone Projectors 01:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

o_O F*ck me lol. That would be hilarious. I hope this time she blows everything out of the water. with everything she's been through there should be enough meat to really create a deep record with lush beats and heart-string pulling vocals :P who else do you follow musically? P.s. you really should GA the leona articles. (most are really good... :P) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Some of them are GA, Forgive Me and Better in Time I think. I want Bleeding Love and the two albums to be GA. Ummm my last.fm page is probably a good indication of my other tastes! Anemone Projectors 01:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Quite eclectic ... but similar to mine i'd say. (a real mixed bag). Well I have some free time during these holidays (I'm not at uni see) so I could take a look at Bleeding Love and either: 1) Make some changes for GA-prep or 2)produce a list of suggestions. I can't promise a perfect pass but I have done nine now so i have a rough idea what can be expected. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey Anemone, I'm pretty sure that this recent page of of Hot R&B/Hip Hop Songs → Hot R&B/Hip hop Songs is incorrect per WP:Capitals as the chart is a published work. Anyhow it would require administrator action to fix. Could you take a look and see if my thinking is correct. If its any use... it was moved by Unreal7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a user you've previously encountered and warned for unhelpful editing. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

The chart on Billboard appears to be hyphenated anyway so it can just be moved back to where it was before Unreal7 moved it. It doesn't need an admin but... I've just done it anyway. Anemone Projectors 01:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

I did try moving it but it came up with the "a page already exists with this name... you might require administrator attention" etc. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

That's because you tried to move it to Hot R&B/Hip Hop Songs instead of Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs :-) Anemone Projectors 01:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

My BAD! ... i think its time for bed lol! hope you're well. egh! the holidays are over so I have university again on Monday. Really CBA! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Question!

Hey Anemone, are you following me as I update all these images, Deleting them after I've added rationale etc? :D --GSorby-Desroid - (Contribs!) 23:19, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

They're all on my watchlist, so I thought I might as well remove the old revisions as you edit them. Anemone Projectors 23:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Kay let me know on my talk page when you want to stop and we'll continue tomorrow. Am I doing it right yes? --GSorby-Desroid - (Contribs!) 23:24, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Yeah you're doing fine, you can stop when you want, if I can't keep up then I'll just leave them lol Anemone Projectors 00:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Well I've stopped for tonight. But the unused revisions have to be deleted eventually so you might as well do them now (no not trying to be bossy ;) lol) --GSorby-Desroid - (Contribs!) 00:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm catching up on my watchlist, so will attend to each one as I come to it :) Anemone Projectors 00:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh I think you might have resized File:Geoff Barnes.jpg a bit too small, it's less than 200px! Anemone Projectors 00:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I just noticed, can you restore the older one a moment please? --GSorby-Desroid - (Contribs!) 00:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

There we go :) --GSorby-Desroid - (Contribs!) 00:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Kelvin1.jpg as well is slightly under. Anemone Projectors 00:44, 30 December 2010

Okay Anemone! Ready to start chasing me again? :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

If you're resizing them all, would it perhaps make sense to do them to around 300px, just so we have leeway on size. That's still relatively small.GunGagdin ^Moan 19:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, some of your images are huge in size, but very bad quality, so the smaller they are, the better quality they become. :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

What's that got to do with it? They never get past 250 px on the page, so even if slightly bigger/lower quality on the image file it makes little difference because the reader only sees it reduced. By all means reduce them, some of them were way too big, but im asking if you can leave them slightly larger than 200px in size, so we have leeway for increasing if needed on the article.GunGagdin ^Moan 19:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

So let's say the lowest dimension can be 220 minimum? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, that would be grand.GunGagdin ^Moan 19:28, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Just out of interest Gungadin, why are all the old images (characters from around 1985-2000) really large but bad quality? Just wondering :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 20:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

300px is a pretty standard size for a fair-use image. Album covers are usually uploaded at 300x300, but appear as 200x200 in articles. Anemone Projectors 20:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

By the way, you don't have to change the category sort key to {{PAGENAME}} because when I added the sort keys, I used {{subst:PAGENAME}}, so it makes no difference. Anemone Projectors 21:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh no, I use this template that I created in Notepad and fill in the fields. I delete the whole page and paste that in :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 21:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I thought you might say that. You could subst it... Anemone Projectors 21:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Not that you have to... I just think it looks better. Anemone Projectors 21:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Re GS: Many of the images you are cropping are very old uploads now. When we first started uploading images for these pages in 2005, size wasnt really taken into consideration and fairuse rationales weren't even needed, just the screen template; plus as you know, the image size on the file is never the image size that appears in articles so I didnt think it mattered to be honest. Prior to using screen shots, we used promo photos taken from cast cards. we got in trouble for using them and they were all deleted. We ere told e could use screenshots or nothing as copyright laws are less strict with screenies. The older images are lesser quality because, due to their age and the lack of availability of the episodes at the time, they are taken from episodes that I downloaded via torrents from UK Nova, which have been uploaded from TV, prior to digital etc. Obviously, they are going to be lower quality shots than ones taken more recently because A) they did not air in digital/HD B) they were taken from torrent files not direct episodes as aired and quality gets compromised C) the episodes and characters are up to 26 years old and filming techniques have changed dramatically.GunGagdin ^Moan 21:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Re AP: Okay so you want me to replace it with [[Category:EastEnders images|subst:{{PAGENAME}}]]? This may sound stupid but what does the subst exactly do?

Re Gungadin:Oh right...I did notice you used promophotos. But yeh good point about the non digital... --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 21:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

You can, but you don't have to. But not like that, it's not subst:{{PAGENAME}}, it's {{subst:PAGENAME}}. It substitutes, meaning it puts in the actual page name (e.g. Luisa dimarco.jpg‎) rather than the template ({{PAGENAME}}). Anemone Projectors 21:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello there! Favour?

Could you possibly move Les Battersby-Brown to Les Battersby for me please? Obvious reasons of course, thanks! :) Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 01:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Done! Anemone Projectors 01:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that! Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 02:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, could you protect List of Coronation Street characters?. There's been persistent vandalism by the same previously banned IP for days, the same one who'd been adding 'Aleesha Compton', 'Roxanne Barlow' and 'James Barlow' all over the place. Thanks :) Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 19:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I've protected for two weeks. Anemone Projectors 20:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Peggy's Images

Anemone, can you do me a favour...? I know this sounds really stupid but Peggy's Image file name, Pegegegegege or whatever, everytime I see it I wanna smash my laptop up cos it gives me a twitch in my eye :S Urgh...could you rename it to Peggy Mitchell or Peggy Mitchell EE please? and Happy new year! Cheers GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 00:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll do it after sleep. Or if someone else sees this who can do it, maybe they will do it. Anemone Projectors 01:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Paul Burling and Paul burling

Hi there, Anemone! and a Happy New Year to ye. I have converted the Paul Burling page, which formerly redirected to Britain's Got Talent (series 4) to an article, albeit still at stub stage. There is, however, still a Redirect page called Paul burling (note the surname with lower-case initial) which still goes to the BGT Series 4 page. Could you please delete the Paul burling redirect page, as I don't know how to? Or if you tell me what to do, I will try to do it.

Completely off topic - go to here for a beautiful seasonal cat pic. If you want more, google "Winterfyre litters" and go from there. . . .awww! Best wishes, FClef (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

I changed it to redirect to Paul Burling. Cute cat :-) Anemone Projectors 20:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Box clever, there! Thanks. The cat is a Norwegian Forest Cat, arguably the most beautiful breed in the world, allegedly brought to Britain in the 9th century by Vikings, with its majestic ruff, etc. Winterfyre have fabulous pictures of their litters (Baby Photos) chronicling their lives from birth onwards. Alas, these pix are not on Wikipedia. FClef (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Celebrity impersonator

Hi again. While research Paul Burling, I came across this Celebrity impersonator. There is an ancient suggestion to Merge it with Impersonator. I would do it myself as Wikipedia directs, but I read elsewhere in Wikipedia that History pages apparently need to be Merged too to preserve authorship. This I am not familiar with and don't know how to do.

Is it necessary to perform a merge on the History page? If not, I can do the Merge myself. Otherwise, please could you take care of it, if you think fit. Thanks again. FClef (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

It shouldn't be necessary to perform a history merge. What you can do is when merging the information, leave an edit summary when saving Impersonator saying something like "Content merged from Celebrity impersonator" and when you redirect Celebrity impersonator, leave an edit summary saying "Content merged to Impersonator", and that should be enough. Anemone Projectors 21:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Or basically follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Merging#Performing the merger! Anemone Projectors 21:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Eek, Anemone, I have done it (NB I have done merges before) but ballsed up the redirect to section, so I just stuck with the article name. But the redirected page (the source article, Celebrity impersonator looks odd, and the redirect doesn't throw you onto the destination article page - why not? I have followed the format. Please review it at your leisure (hah!) and correct as necessary. Gramercy.FClef (talk) 22:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Because the < and > aren't meant to be included :S I fixed it! Anemone Projectors 22:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Blimey, aaaarrrrrkkk! (that's a bird-squawk noise) - my technical and logical abilities are even worse than I thought. But I have looked at the page and it hasn't allowed your fix. I have even checked the edit screen, and though your edit shows up, the source page is not accepting it. Check by searching for Celebrity impersonator Would an undo help? Will this need to be done at a stratospheric level? (Just a thought: Is this because I put the dreaded <> brackets on the destination page as well? Perhaps removing them might help.) I leave this mess in your capable hands (grovel)FClef (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

It's redirecting fine for me, my edit was accepted. Maybe you're viewing a cached version. The only other place you put the brackets was in an edit summary. Anemone Projectors 23:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

You're right, it's worked. Thanks. I must have looked at it very soon - I'm talking milliseconds - after you did it and perhaps the system was discombobulated.FClef (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah, you looked too quickly! Anemone Projectors 23:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

BGT Navbox on Paul Burling - default Hide/show setting

Dear AP, Final request of the evening - and this one I am not empowered to do - is, can you please alter the Default setting on the BGT Navbox at the bottom of the Paul Burling article so that it is hidden and you can press the button to Show the Navbox?

I ask this because I am applying the Wikipedia principle, does a reader of the Paul Burling article really want all that information? Would they want to read about all the other people on there? I see why the Navbox should be there, but should, I feel, default to Hidden.

Two precedents: the X Factor box on the Rhydian article, which you helped re-title among other things, is also defaulted to be hidden, so that one can request it to be shown. Even on the Britain's Got Talent (series 4) page, the Navbox is defaulted to be hidden.

Thanks for being around in the holiday season to lend your expertise with all this. I bid you good night.FClef (talk) 23:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh good night :-) Hmm, on Britain's Got Talent (series 4) the navbox isn't hidden on my screen. On Rhydian it's probably because there are two. When there are many navboxes (I don' know if it applies if the article is particularly long), the navbox is automatically collapsed. To be honest I don't think it's a huge issue and I'd rather not change the template to suit a single article :S Hope that's ok! Anemone Projectors 00:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Interesting, didn't know about automatic collapsing of navboxes. I thought it was possible to just just tailor the Hide/Show button within a single articles. But I respect your view. :-) FClef (talk) 11:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I worked out how to do it, I had to add a line to the original template and then a bit to Paul Burling's page. Anemone Projectors 12:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Seriously, thank you for that. Non-seriously, I have my uses after all. I have been obnoxious and you have expanded your knowledge! :-D FClef (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Patrick, Denise and Kim's recent move

Thought you might know this as I obviously missed the relevant episode - Why are Patrick, Denise and Kim living with other people at the moment? Heard it was because of an overflowing bath which flooded the house, but who did it? Any answers? Bleaney (talk) 16:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

It was Kim who left the bath running. Not sure how relevant it is to storylines, but hmm they must have done it for some kind of reason, right? Anemone Projectors 16:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Maybe so, I just think they are giving us a bit of interaction between the characters ahead of the new Fox storyline arc (the B&B), which also may explain Jordan's departure. Thanks for this Bleaney (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah maybe. Thing is those two houses used to be one anyway, when Patrick ran the B&B with Yolande. It's daft! lol Anemone Projectors 16:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Character article sections

Hey, I was just looking through some articles, notably Ronnie Mitchell's and Danielle Jones and really like the idea of having the storylines first, I was just wondering how did changing the order of the sections come about?--AcidBrights (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, MOS:TV suggests putting storylines first. It helps to give context for the following sections. We've only just started doing it on a few articles, and we're making so the storylines are cut down before we do it. Anemone Projectors 14:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Glee

We have a mismatch that needs fixing please. Journey to Regionals (Glee) and Talk:Journey to Regionals (Glee episode). CTJF83 chat 16:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh gosh I forgot to check the talk page when I moved the article, I've moved it now. Anemone Projectors 16:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, CTJF83 chat 16:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Baby James

Baby James needs to be added to the Mitchell and the Branning family trees. Arjoccolenty (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

ok. Anemone Projectors 00:25, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

When it it going to be added? Arjoccolenty (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

When I get around to it. Anemone Projectors 15:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Diphallia picture

Okay, I'm going to quit uploading photos. Every time I do, I get a boilerplate message about how it doesn't fit in. From now on, I will simply be adding links to pictures. I used to work for the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, auditing tax forms. That was far less frustrating than trying to get a free picture onto Wikipedia. I noted in the description of the diphallia pic that it is a free image. It doesn't fit into a certain type of license, but it is perfectly plumb pellucid that the website allows the use of the image for any purpose. I imagine it's pretty hard to find a picture of a guy with two penises, since there has been a request up for a picture for years. Go ahead and delete it. It will probably scare children anyway. PBF1974 (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I quit. Please courtesy blank my pages.

Today I had to deal with some guy who seems to assume bad faith and make uncivil personal attacks on a daily basis. Then I find that you have deleted a picture of diphallia clearly labeled as such by the Centers for Disease Control. I rather doubt that you have the credentials to make that determination, but Wikipedia is a game of attrition, and a winner is you. I'm done. Please blank my pages, so that I can move on with real life and not end up like some of the freaks I've encountered here. I'll go ahead and blank the pages. PBF1974 (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

X Factor

Hi mate, Just saw that you had reverted my edits on the x factor series 4 article. I was attempting to move the details of the finalists to a separate article to create some level of consistency with the hope of expanding the entries. I planned to do this for each of the first four series. 03 md 01:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

If you're going to expand the entries, then ok, go ahead. But I'd prefer not to have red links on the navigation template, so could you wait until you've created the articles until you add the links? Anemone Projectors 01:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Restore

Hey Anemone. Can you please temporarily restore all revisions of Image:DeirdreB2008.jpg. Thanks, --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 21:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

There's only one and she looks stupid in it! Anemone Projectors 21:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Let me know when I can delete it. Anemone Projectors 22:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Precisely why I wanted it, cos of that face she's pulling :) oh btw why your at it, can you please completely delete Image:8th_April_Jackson.png as the user that uploaded it keeps reverting me and I've already uploaded it as a jpeg. You can delete deirdre now. Thanks man --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 00:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)re[;y

You know, there's nothing wrong with .png images. Just let a bot tag it, I'm going back to sleep. Anemone Projectors 00:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Or tag it yourself as unused. Anemone Projectors 00:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Anemone, can you please restore all revisions File:Abi Branning EE.jpg? I'll let you know when to delete them. And about me asking you to delete old revisions, my web browser just puts it in there for me :) Thanks GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 13:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Apparently I did it. Anemone Projectors 17:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I guess I can delete now... Anemone Projectors 21:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh nits nuts nats, yes you may delete...I forgot about that :/ --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 23:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Possible Sock?

Hey Anemone, User:Vuvuzela2010 maybe a possible sock of User:Dweeby123?? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 23:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Umm, not sure I can see any evidence just yet. There was an IP recently though. Anemone Projectors 23:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Let me take a look... - JuneGloom Talk 23:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

At the moment I would say no, but I'll keep an eye on them. - JuneGloom Talk 00:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Help

There are a number of editors causing concern for me. User:PringlePan doesn't take any warnings on board and carries on removing characters from lists, listing characters as departed on there pages and so on. Hollyoaks related, also.. could Mercedes McQueen, Carmel McQueen, Jacqui McQueen and Theresa McQueen have IP protection, for a long time the middle names have been disputed. Only have been mentioned on-screen, I'm an avid viewer, but there is no reference of how to even spell these pointless long middle names. It's not exactly how the characters are known out universe anyway... but IP's ignore hidden messages, a number of warnings... this has been going on since last year.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 13:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, PringlePan is on a final warning so next time they do it, if someone else doesn't block them or request them to be blocked, don't forget to make a request at WP:AIV. I don't think the pages need protecting because there's not a high level of vandalism, in fact there's not even a high level of edits on any of them. I would suggest adding a hidden comment  to explain why people shouldn't add the middle names. It doesn't always work but it's the best I can suggest really. Anemone Projectors 15:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh well okay. Hidden comments didn't work any, so there gone. Thanks for taking a look.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 16:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello there. Could you move Sarah-Louise Grimshaw to Sarah-Louise Platt, David "Bombhead" Burke to Bombhead (redirect is for the article anyway).RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 23:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. Anemone Projectors 23:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Could you also delete previous versions of the images of Sarah Beaumont (lots of ophotos of Nicola Charles modeling have been added), also Cheryl Brady previous images, Cindy Longford's previous images.. also could you move her page to Cindy Cunningham dunno how I let that one slip. Sorry to be a pain.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 23:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

lol all done :) Anemone Projectors 00:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		This is because you always help me with my queries and the many questions I seem to have. Always lending a hand. Thanks!RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 00:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

And because I'm special ;) Anemone Projectors 00:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I was wondering if you could look at something, On User talk:212.183.128.67 I warned the IP for a spree of vandalism, which IMO adding fake characters to articles is, but I gave a level for because of over 7 bad edits were made... but I've had a complaint on my talk page with a suggestion. Do you think the action I took was hasty? Or is this person complaining because it's his IP too?RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 18:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hmm personally I would have started with a level 1 warning. I think you were a bit hasty this time. Anemone Projectors 18:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Not sure if I can just remove it, If I can't you can hide the revision can't you?RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 19:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Just change it for a level 1 vandalism/error warning and explain why in the edit summary. :) - JuneGloom Talk 19:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Will do.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 19:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes do that. Anemone Projectors 19:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey there. I don't know if you noticed but me and Junegloom have been cleaning Home and Away up again and I was wondering if you could move page names of Liam Murphy (Home and Away) to Liam Murphy which is a redirect to a unsourced character list of Rescue Me, that one can be moved to "Liam Murphy (Rescue Me) and still serve as a redirect, it's untouched for a few years so it doesn't look like anyone's interested. Plus our Liam appears more searched, and talked about on google.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 21:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't notice but I can do that. However, there are a couple of things linking to Liam Murphy that are nothing to do with either of the characters, so I think a disambiguation page would be more appropriate, though the others would be red links. Is that ok with you? Anemone Projectors 22:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

What other pages link to Liam? I clicked what links here button and it was just a few user pages and Home and away related things.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 22:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I've just disambiguated them. There's an author, an athlete and a footballer all with that name, and their red links would belong on a disambiguation page. Anemone Projectors 22:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Ahh okay, didn't realise there were so many in use, tis a bummer!RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 22:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually, as most of them are red, I could make the dab page at Liam Murphy (disambiguation). Maybe in future someone will want to move it though. Anemone Projectors 22:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Looks loads better now. Yipeee! In the future when more are created and they want a move I'll guess it'll have to be. =DRAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 22:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Story line

Hi again. Noticed the recent issue. According to Merriam-Webster, "story line" is two words. Searching for it as one word will redirect you to the two. -- James26 (talk) 15:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Not sure about that. WP:MOSTV refers to "storylines", Wikipedia has an article at Storyline (Wiktionary agrees), Google asks "Did you mean: storyline", and everyone knows that it's "storylines" not "story lines". I suggest not changing it either way, just leave them all as they are. Anemone Projectors 16:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure Merriam-Webster has more credibility than Wikitionary or Wikipedia.

That said, I know that "storyline" is used commonly, but "story line" is used as well. According to Merriam-Webster, however, "story line" is not incorrect. Worth noting. It's likely just a matter of preferance, so I agree with leaving them all as they currently are. -- James26 (talk) 19:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Well that's fine but honestly I have never seen it as two words. Ever. EVER. Anemone Projectors 20:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I have also never ever seen it as two words. Looking at the Oxford Dictionary online, looks as if they agree with my spelling. Nothing found for story line.--5 albert square (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I had tried to find an online version of the Oxford Dictionary. I knew it would agree with this spelling. Anemone Projectors 23:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Nice seeing that. Between Webster and Oxford there are two credible dictionaries with two different spellings (as mentioned, I've seen both). I imagine neither is incorrect. Must be an interesting etymology. :) Cheers. -- James26 (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm actually wondering if it's a difference between the UK and US. Anemone Projectors 08:34, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooky Quesnel. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Lloyd Tavernier

Hi, would u have any objections to me merging Lloyd into Etta and celestine? I think it would help expand the article a little.GunGagdin ^Moan 09:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Ummm would you want to rename the article or would it still be about Etta and Celastine? I don't think it necessarily needs expanding in terms of length. I'm not sure I like the idea really... Anemone Projectors 15:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

It would be renamed as Celestin, Etta and Lloyd Tavernier and would be about all three, only info re Lloys storylines included and stuff on his casting.GunGagdin ^Moan 16:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't think I like the idea of making an article about three people. A family is ok, a couple is ok, but I don't see the point of that to be honest. Anemone Projectors 16:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Why does it make it any better if it's an article about 2 characters as opposed to 3? It's just a page to redirect to that houses the characters. It's not like anyone is going to type into wikipedia, "Celestine and Etta Tavernier". They will type in Celestine Tavernier and get redirected to the couple page. Same if one more is added to the page. I could make Lloyd a separate page, but I think a collective one for those 3 would be more convenient and lessen rehash of information that we would have across the lists and articles.GunGagdin ^Moan 18:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

It just seems odd to have an article about a couple and one of their children, but keeping the rest of the family separate. What would you do about the infobox? Anemone Projectors 18:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

I thought there's an option for a third image in the infobox template, was going to just use that. Shame there's no Tavernier family image as that would be better.GunGagdin ^Moan 19:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

An image of the three would be better. But what about the parameters? There will be three of everything, plus the family will be weird. By the way the duration looks a bit weird even with just the two characters. Anemone Projectors 20:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but we will be able to alter the duration once we decide on option e to 1992-1994, cant we? Otherise I can do a separate line each for duration for each character? GunGagdin^Moan 20:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh yeah that's true, though Celestine has a different exit year. Is it at all possible to change it to a family article to also include Hattie and the other one? Or not? Anemone Projectors 21:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Dont think so, Hattie's is quite long already and not complete, and Clyde's will be the same once I get around to doing it, Jules is quite long as well. And the problem is with those 3 is that they were much bigger characters than the others with separate storylines, more integrated. Lloyd, Celestine and Etta were a self-contained unit really, which is why an article with just those 3 works because they all were part of the same storyline, if that makes sense? For instance Lloyd had sickle, parents were involved with that, and Lloyd got in trouble with police, parents involved with that as they opted to move away. Hattie had relationship with Steve, job with Ian etc likewise Clyde had relationship with Michelle, Eddie Royle's murder; A collective storyline for them all would be a bit random and unrelated to Etta, Celestine and Lloyd. Only thing that could be done is something similar to Flaherty family I suppose, which links to Connor and Mary's separate articles. Maybe it's easier just to see if I can find enough to make Lloyd his own page. I suppose it doesnt matter hugely if there's repetition, does it?GunGagdin^Moan 21:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Repetition is ok. I've come around to the idea of the three having one article though :-) Anemone Projectors 21:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Re Goeff image, looks blurry, so am leaving it as the exact image size which is making it less blurry as it's not being shrunk. It's barely any bigger anyway, 200px x 260.GunGagdin ^Moan 23:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok but you should undo and leave an edit summary rather than rollback cos rollback is meant only for obvious vandalism (yeah I know I don't always lol but I would never rollback an experienced editor, or an admin ;) ). Anemone Projectors 08:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah sorry about that, I was expecting that little dialogue box to show up so I could write something, I forgot it doesnt do that with rollback. i was going to roll myself back and then undo, but it seemed like hassle at that time of night so I just left u mssg here :)lol GunGagdin^Moan 09:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

No problem :-) Anemone Projectors 14:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Charlie Slater's Image

Hey AP. I don't know if I should upload this. I thought it's be good to have an image of his last appearance so I thought I'd get you opinion. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 20:28, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Not as a separate image, but it might be an improvement for the infobox. But it also might not be, because it's less "facey". But he looks happy at least. Anemone Projectors 20:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

And I'm going to assume that this edit summary was a joke :-) Anemone Projectors 20:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Ahaha! Yes lol, so should I upload that and give it a go? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 20:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

No, see if Gungadin sees this first :-) Anemone Projectors 20:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Go for it.GunGagdin ^Moan 20:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

DoctorMaster2010

Hi AnemoneProjectors.! I already replied with my bad English (and a lot of grammar mistakes) on your talk page here, but apparently you didn't see my comment. I'm pretty sure (100%) that DoctorMaster2010 is a sockpuppet of KirkleyHigh, as I have known this user since over a year on WP, and he has always done the same kind of edits. Concerning The Twelfth Doctor, I don't know this user, so I can't say anything about him/she. Regards, --Europe22 (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh thanks, I did see it and I did reply but I did nothing about it. I obviously forgot about it and on looking again, I assumed you had not replied as I expected you would reply on your own talk page, so I apologise. Anemone Projectors 21:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

No problem! Regards, Europe22 (talk) 21:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

The X Factor world map

Hello, I just wanna ask you, if you can add Chile to The X Factor World Map please. Thank you. Juanacho (talk) 13:03, 16 Janaury 2011 (UTC)

Sure, I think it probably needs a few other countries adding, I'll see if I can get around to it a bit later. Anemone Projectors 13:23, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Username

How do I request to change my username? I'm not Aiden Grimshaw and it isn't my name. I'm just a big fan of him.

Sincerely, Julian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiden Grimshaw (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Well...

Well I don't what you have to say about this, but looking at these, I think you see me as a pest. What was the erk for on seeing my rollback rights then? GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 14:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't see you as a pest but I just wasn't sure you were ready for rollback. I haven't seen you use it so I can only assume you are using it responsibly, which is good. I sincerely apologise. Anemone Projectors 16:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Still...is that really how people talk about me? Through twitter? I accept your apology...but was just that "erk" part...GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 16:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Another histormerge?

Could you please histormerge User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox/7 with Gone (Nelly song)? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Done, though again I don't think this needs an actual history merge but restoring the newly-deleted history won't hurt. Tagging the redirect {{db-move|User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox/7}} would get you the same result (4 edits wouldn't be undeleted but it's not that big a deal) :-) Anemone Projectors 18:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

oh thanks for the tip. You keeping well? I'm itching for some new Leona news... she's been out of the limelight for a long time :( -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah good thanks. Hmm Leona... last I heard Jessie J was planning to write them a duet... Anemone Projectors 19:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Romances

You keep rolling back "Oliverrox" but see the discussion I've started here - I'm not sure automatically reverting is currently justified according to that template... Stephenb (Talk) 19:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

It's WikiProject EastEnders that doesn't want it in EastEnders articles. That's all. Anemone Projectors 19:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Can you point me to that policy? If it has been previously discussed and agreed, it ought to be added to Wikipedia:WikiProject_EastEnders/Manual_of_style so that we can inform editors that add this otherwise valid field. Otherwise, it's more like WP:OWN... Stephenb (Talk) 19:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I found a discussion here but I think before that it's just been one of those things the members decided on, maybe via a user talk page or in edit summaries or some such. It used to be just an EastEnders template, and the romances field was only added when it was made available for any TV series, so that other shows could use it. Anemone Projectors 19:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Good enough for me, I'll add it to the Wikipedia:WikiProject_EastEnders/Manual_of_style so we can refer people to it. Stephenb (Talk) 19:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

ok :-) I need to add the result of the most recent discussion as well Anemone Projectors 19:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Good idea :) Stephenb (Talk) 19:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Dot GA

I dont get this GA nomintating shit. Can you fix it for me please? GunGagdin^Moan 13:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

You got it right first time but missed off the subtopic part, then when you added it you didn't need to remove the rest of the stuff, so I fixed it. Good luck, it better pass this time!!! Anemone Projectors 13:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, hon.GunGagdin ^Moan 13:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassadors

I saw you have been really active lately and I clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 23:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Umm sorry I don't think I'd have time to do anything more than I already do! –Anemone Projectors– 17:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

New User

Oh god AP, this new user is asking me so many simple questions! Any chance you could help me answer him ? D: He keeps wanting to slip off Kim GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 18:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

I love how you said slip instead of split! ;) –Anemone Projectors– 17:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Glee images

So...what happened?? CTJF83 chat 17:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

They were all FFD'd, but I was too late to save them. Apparently they can all be replaced by free images of the actors. It's stupid, the only image that can depict a fictional character is a picture of the character, and as you can probably tell from my edit summaries, images of the characters help with identification because some people know them by face but not by name, including myself! –Anemone Projectors– 17:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

(ec) Oh, ok, thank you, CTJF83 chat 17:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I bought up a policy discussion about this situation at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 50#Characters/actors images replacement. Thought you might want to contribute to it. JDDJS (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. This makes me mad. It was never an issue before. A fictional character can only be depicted via a picture of that character! –Anemone Projectors– 22:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh, you might be interested to know that an FFD for the photo of Ringo Brown ended with a resounding keep! –Anemone Projectors– 22:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I really don't get what people have against the non-free images. I know free images are better, but now all of those articles look empty without the images. JDDJS (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

And I don't get how a screenshot or promotional image of multiple characters is ok when one of a single character supposedly is not. Contradiction much? –Anemone Projectors– 22:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

16th National Television Awards

Hey. I've done quite a bit of work to the 16th National Television Awards page. Please let me know what you think. Can you think of anything to add? Or maybe you could copy edit it if the wording is poor... Thanks. --Twentiethil1986 (talk) 00:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I think it's pretty good. The only thing I can think of that could be added is the people who presented each award. What do you think? –Anemone Projectors– 00:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah that would be good but I can't remember all of the presenters, plus I can't seem to find a source that lists them all... --Twentiethil1986 (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Hmmmm... I'll see if I can find one. I know some sites were blogging live so might have included the presenters. Ooh you could add that EastEnders was the big winner with three awards, and that two audience members were asked to present an award. That's all mentioned in the Beehive City reference already in the article. –Anemone Projectors– 00:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh here you go [1] I don't know how realiable that can be considered as a source but it lists all the presenters. –Anemone Projectors– 00:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh thanks for that! Good find. I added them to the awards table. I didn't see much point of creating a separate table for them. --Twentiethil1986 (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

That's where I'd have put them too. –Anemone Projectors– 01:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Do you think it will be OK to create the 15 other pages for the Awards? Will they be OK with just the tables in them?--Twentiethil1986 (talk) 23:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

worth a mention?

Hey Anemone, Hope your well? This interesting article appeared online in the last few days. I'm wondering if its worth using to add information to some artists about their leaked songs? I thought it could be used at Echo (Leona Lewis album). It mentions the song "Pulse" which was recorded for the album? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I've been meaning to ask about this because I found this yesterday, though I didn't read it fully yet. Yes I would say it's worth adding to Echo (Leona Lewis album) (and any others that may be involved). –Anemone Projectors– 20:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I've had a go at mentioning it at Echo (Leona Lewis album) and This Is Us (Backstreet Boys album). I'm not sure if its ok or not. What do you think? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

That sounds good to me. (Ugh, just reminded myself of that awful Eurovision song!) –Anemone Projectors– 20:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh dear... that song made me embarrassed to say I was from Britain lol. I don't know what's worse: the fact the UK went with that or the fact that Pete Waterman defended it afterwards!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I knew as soon as Pete Waterman was brought in that it would be a disaster! I think the only way the UK will do well again is will ballads. Or Mika! –Anemone Projectors– 20:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Hmm... they need a good ballad written by a good old fashioned songwriter e.g. Gary Barlow. I was meaning to ask... what are the qualifying criteria for Eurovision artists? I was under the impression that it was only unsigned or soon-to-be signed artists? Shame someone like Leona couldn't represent US. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's true, is it? Like, we've had a few people who have been slightly well-known, I would assume they were signed. Russia entered Tatu as well. –Anemone Projectors– 20:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

BLUE!????? –Anemone Projectors– 23:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

self-written ballad... i bet it was produced by Steve Mac. o_O -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

non-free images

Can you start an official vote on the policy change please? I would but I am unsure how. JDDJS (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I was hoping someone else would do it :S –Anemone Projectors– 20:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I was going to try a RFC but I don't understand it. JDDJS (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) RFC is actually pretty easy, you just need to put {{rfctag|policy}} on the talk page, with a brief and neutral statement below - something like "Are free-use images of actors sufficient in articles on the fictional characters they play, or should a fair-use image of the character be allowed?". A bot should take care of the rest. It's been an interesting discussion so far, but I'm not meant to be on Wikipedia again until Tuesday so I don't want to dive in, haha. Frickative 23:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

See, if I was going to do it I'd ask something like "So and so is trying to change long-established policy to force their own POV on the Wikipedia community. They're wrong to do this, aren't they?". Which is why I don't want to start it! –Anemone Projectors– 23:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

LOL. Thinking about it, it might be better to address the NFCC directly, maybe something like: "Does a free image of an actor adequately constitute a free equivalent of characters they play?" Because, as you say, the debate is more about interpretation of existing policy than something new. Frickative 23:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps, but JDDJS has started an RFC now. –Anemone Projectors– 23:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I was just about to inform you about that. JDDJS (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Not that it actually matters, but we did both post at the same time. I'm not being deliberately obtuse :p. Frickative 23:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Sadly I fear it's a waste of time. The policy is so stupidly ambiguous which is why these deletionists have managed to twist things so much, And it's no coincidence that they linger around fair-use policy pages instead of actually editing, because for some unknown reason they have a desperation to get the policy altered and vote accordingly, and it's all a lot of them seem to care about - they think they are being constructive, they dont realise they are a bunch of hypocrites, they need a new purpose .... I can guarantee that most average users would advocate for the use of fair-use images in fiction articles, but they are far too busy editing articles and dont tend to even know about the annoying discussions that go on at these policy pages. A lot are scared to get involved because all they do is quote long-winded essays and policies at everybody, while simultaneously contradicting themselves on so many levels with their pseudo-intellect and pompous way of talking at people. The policy doesnt state that the images cant be used, it just happens that the deletionsists got their way on the glee images because they are on a mission to delete and watch the deletion pages waiting to pounce. There is little chance of policy being changed, and note that it doesnt suggest fair-use cant be used anyway so they'll say there's no need to change it, so I think contesting the deletion instead of the policy may be more fruitful.GunGagdin ^Moan 23:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I'd love to see them actually contribute to articles instead of asserting power over everyone. You're right, they do throw every policy in the book at editors, all high and mighty. Totally unfair and IMO it's bullying others into thinking they are wrong, when the policies actually allow these images..RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 16:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

The never ending fair use argument

I have enough with Hammersoft and MASEM. They are just going by their interpretation of policy, and ignoring everyone else's opinion. Masem has actually said that consensus doesn't matter here. That is just ridiculous. I really just don't know what to do. I am hoping you do because I want this to end already. JDDJS (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

They're aloud to say that now though, they can ignore consensus. Infact I think your aloud to say and do as you please on WP now.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 02:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, I think all we can do is fight for our images to be kept if they go to FFD, and if they get deleted then I'm sure someone will come along pretty quickly and upload a new one. They still think it's ok to have fair use in Eleventh Doctor and Characters of Friends, yet there's just no difference. –Anemone Projectors– 08:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Lol, like they will get past me :P Still It is kinda ridiculous... GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 10:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused, how can they sweep in and change everything because they want to. If the shoe was on our foot we couldn't. It's like a police state, you know what happens when you go agaisnt the machine, you're removed.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 21:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't know but now they've gone off and are talking amongst themselves. So it looks like our part in the discussion has ended. –Anemone Projectors– 21:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

"You-know-whats"

Okay, I'll start doing that. :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 13:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

haha :-) –Anemone Projectors– 14:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Thomas F. Duffy

Hi, I was wondering why my article marked G5? I never even used Wiki before? I am only trying to enter an article for one of my clients Thomas F Duffy, who has received many inquiries why he is not on Wikipedia. As you can see, he has many Wikipedia links, and thousands of web links. I am sorry if I violated some Wikipedia rule, but I was trying to post this honestly, with first-hand knowledge.

Thanks, Mrcrebbs.

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

10:37, 5 February 2011 AnemoneProjectors (talk | contribs) deleted "Thomas F. Duffy" ‎ (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban)
18:55, 20 January 2011 AnemoneProjectors (talk | contribs) deleted "Thomas F. Duffy" ‎ (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrcrebbs (talk • contribs)

Answered at Talk:Thomas F. Duffy. –Anemone Projectors– 23:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Help needed

I have a tricky one for you. Home and Away character Bobby Marshall, common name Bobby Simpson is ready for the mainspace. But there's a problem. She has existed over three page names and the situation was never adressed. However the page Bobby Simpson was taken without discussion for Bob Simpson (cricketer) but it's just a redirect and the cricketer in question was only ever refered to as Bob or Bobbie, not Bobby. So that where I want to put the article. But then redirects for Bobby at Bobby Marshall (Home and Away), Bobby Marshall (character), Bobby Simpson-Marshall. I'll only need 'Bobby Marshall (Home and Away)' to redirect to Bobby and I'll want it moving to 'Bobby Simpson'. So the other need deleting because theyre not needed and the other to make way for the move.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 19:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I'll delete Bobby Simpson for you, as well as the two other redirects and you can do the rest :-) –Anemone Projectors– 19:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou AP!RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually it might be inappropriate for me to speedy Bobby Marshall (character) because of its history. You could take it to RFD. –Anemone Projectors– 20:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Ooh, this one's nice and tricky (probably not as bad as Morag Bellingham though, which has been protected against creation). Bobby Marshall (Home and Away) was the article that was PROD'd, so shouldn't Rain recreate the article there and then move it to Bobby Simpson? He would have to speak to the deleting admin (Magioladitis) about restoring it first though or take it to WP:UND. Bobby Marshall (character) should then redirect to it? Or is that all wrong? If so, I fail and have some reading to do, lol. - JuneGloom Talk 20:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

She had two pages anyway for some reason and no one objected. The page was never deleted just redirected after that discussion and the fellow article was nominated and it gained a consensus to keep.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

(ec) I wouldn't say so, no. Just create Bobby Simpson. I'm wondering if I should merge the history of Bobby Marshall (character) though. But I don't think I will. –Anemone Projectors– 20:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I've created it now. You could merge BM Character with BM Home and Away, right? Then it won't matter about deleting 'BM character'. I'd say it's almost certain it will be deleted in any case if I take it to redirects for deletion. Would just take ages though, when it could be done quick. Then two combined history can sit happily in the other article.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 22:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes I can do that. I may just restore the history of what I deleted as well (see below). –Anemone Projectors– 22:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Also there are lots of links to Bobby Marshall (character) so can't be deleted. –Anemone Projectors– 22:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Hmm I thought you were going to move it from your userspace. I didn't need to delete the page at all :-S –Anemone Projectors– 22:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I decided I wanted to keep the article in my space after all for when I do the next character, I have the templates, actors names present, lay out and so on. ..Sorrylol ... Look at Bobby Simpson edits history, somneone put a disambig note on the page, so i repaired it, but critised it's inclusion in my edit note, next thing I know the editor goes and decline by DYK of Bobby, and hides a message about it in my Archived talk. Is this even aloud, plus I did expand it didn't I,it's just the addition of different edit history in their after, the reason the editor is trying to use to decline .. because of the revision history apparently.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 18:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't think they were refusing because of your edit summary (which I did see and did think that they probably wasn't sure if it was one of the links on the dab page or not). But I've left them a reply because it's basically my fault for doing the history merge. –Anemone Projectors– 19:11, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou for that. Could you put that note you left on the talk page and include it in the DYK talk please.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 19:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. I think I've been put off doing DYK for these kinds of articles before because the plot so soooo overly detailed that when it's cut down properly, the real-world stuff is too short, even if it's long. Add unnecessary details to the storylines? ;) –Anemone Projectors– 20:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

And it's going to be featured at DYK :-) –Anemone Projectors– 16:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed, had to add more development to it aswell. So I guess it made the article better in the long run.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 18:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Could you link me to the section in the Mos on fictional characters that states the storyline section doesn't need referencing/sourcing? I'm blind I tell yer laddo!RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

MOS:TV#Plot section "Plot summaries do not normally require citations; the television show itself is the source, as the accuracy of the plot description can be verified by watching the episode in question. An exception to this rule may be shows containing plot details that are unclear or open to interpretation, in which case the different interpretations should be sourced to reliable sources." –Anemone Projectors– 20:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again for that. =DRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Linking

The relevant guideline is at WP:OVERLINK. In general, reader utility is the best guide; why would it benefit the reader to repeat the same link multiple times? --John (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, it says "As a rule of thumb, link on first reference only", but that's not refering to the references section is it? I believe that repeating links in the references is acceptable because the order can be changed and when I add a new reference or rearrange an article, I don't want to have to keep making sure the first occurance is linked! WP:REPEATLINK doesn't meantion this but it gives only three examples, and implies there are others. I believe this is one. It's certainly never been brought up in any GA or FA nomination that I've seen. –Anemone Projectors– 16:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I take your point. If you ever discuss this centrally please let me know. Meantime I am going to assume that OVERLINK is still a guideline. --John 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok. Well, I'm not going to revert you if you do it on any other articles I'm watching, but I'm probably going to keep on linking! If it comes up at an article I nominate for GA or FA then I'll change it :) –Anemone Projectors– 16:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I've just asked for clarification here. –Anemone Projectors– 17:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Ratings

Hi there,

Just saw what you did after I undid your edit, your way looks better! So I'll undo my edit and keep it that way! Sorry! Mjs2010 (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

S'ok. –Anemone Projectors– 17:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Reverting good faith edits

I'll try not to make this into a rant or a personal attack. Please do not go in all guns blazing and revert good faith changes made to EastEnders related articles because you don't like them or don't agree with them. You have no ownership over these articles and it very much feels like you think you do. It is disconcerting and offputting to other users of Wikipedia to spend their time making perfectly good edits, only to have you come along and revert them. Every time I have personally tried to make an edit you disagree with it has felt like an uphill battle, having to get consensus to go against what you prefer, and even when consensus is reached, you continue to argue that your way is right. All I am asking is that you take a step back and look at your personal conduct when it comes to good faith edits, because the manner in which you conduct yourself has made my experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. I am not trying to be rude or disrespectful, I think a lot of your work on here is wonderful, it just seems that you get a little too involved with articles sometimes and lose sight of what is best for the community as a whole, as opposed to just yourself. Please don't be offended and try to take my comments on board. 144.124.121.55 (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

if this is about tvtv, they have published incorrect information before that has been used on Wikipedia, so I feel it is an unreliable source. I'm sorry you feel that way though. –Anemone Projectors– 08:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

I've reverted myself and let the tvtv info in now. I don't think we should continue to add informaton from there, but next week the BBC will confirm these characters so we can change to BBC sources then. –Anemone Projectors– 08:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

How?

how do you put refernces on a charcetrs profile like you did with connor about the bubble awards?--MayhemMario (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Basically, if you put <ref> and then some text and then </ref> then the text between the two comes out as a reference. In the edit screen you should see a symbol that says <ref /ref>, which will give you the tags. Lots of people just put the url in between, like <ref>http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/scoop/a303447/in-full-all-about-soap-bubble-nominations.html</ref>, which is ok but it's better to use a citation template, like {{cite news}}, {{cite web}} or {{cite journal}}. You can get more information from Wikipedia:Citing sources. –Anemone Projectors– 21:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

did you see me doing the max branning one? You kinda of beat me to it though....--MayhemMario (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I saw you had done it so I decided to fill out the full reference. I'm going to add the rest of his awards. –Anemone Projectors– 16:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Heather Trott

Hello AP. Can you please restore Heather's previous image? Thanks --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 11:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Done, is that the one you wanted? –Anemone Projectors– 11:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanking you AP. You now may re-delete. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 11:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, you've changed the image to that one now. So I'm going to leave the last one there in case someone prefers it. In fact, I do, because it shows part of her everyday sort of clothes, rather than her work clothes, and her clothes have been criticised ("Her frocks and matching Alice bands could have been stitched together out of Nigel Bates's old ties", for example). I think a lot of our images need to be more than a headshot. In fact, we should probably use promo images instead of screenshots. But that's something that should be discussed more centrally. –Anemone Projectors– 11:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

If I recall, we got in trouble for using promo photos? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 11:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

We used to use scans of the actors' cast cards. But in many cases, the promo photos show a more typical or maybe more extreme look, for example, Naz Mehmet in her red jacket with fluffy hood. The recent WP:NFC discussion implied, in places, that promo shots were prefered to screenshots. But this is another discussion for another time. I just prefer the other image of Heather because it shows more of her outfit. Showing the outfit as well can be helpful if there's critical commentary on it. –Anemone Projectors– 12:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

But basically, never mind. –Anemone Projectors– 12:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Entered first reference on Thomas f Duffy page

Hi, Entered first reference on Thomas f Duffy page. If I did this correctly, I will continue and enter more. Let me know. Mcrebbs Mrcrebbs (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Close. I fixed it for you. after {{Cite web it's a pipe '|' but think you put the letter 'l'. Also if using the {{cite web}} template, you have to specify a title for the reference as well. A minor thing as well is that the reference should go directly after the punctuation, not before it. –Anemone Projectors– 20:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Rafael Ábalos

Checked out this guy and floated article again -- were previous WP articles on this spanish author botched? Three references, looks solid (imo) but if its still not satisfactory let me know.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

It's much better now than before, yes. Basically it didn't show why he was notable. –Anemone Projectors– 14:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

If it still needs improvement, let me know. I'm particularly adept at taking a competent article and making it into a real mess. :)--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

The only problem is "fictional book", which implies the book itself is fictional rather than a story or novel about fictional events... –Anemone Projectors– 14:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

It's fixed. You're sharp for noticing that; good catch.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh yes, someone came along and changed it :) –Anemone Projectors– 14:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

...what we discussed

Hey AP, you sent me a message about files. Does this include storyline one's as well? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 13:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

No, because we're removing them ourselves anyway. Just infoboxes. –Anemone Projectors– 13:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay cool :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 13:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

X Factor U.S. Discussion Page Reply

Hey. I wanted to let you know I finally responded to your comment on The X Factor U.S. Discussion page, sorry it took so long. 1Dbad (talk) 04:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

James

Any plans on adding James Branning (a.k.a. Tommy Moon) to the Branning/Mitchell family tree? Arjoccolenty (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes –Anemone Projectors– 08:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

You deserve this

		The Guidance Barnstar
		For helping me to learn how to do different things on Wikipedia and if I make a mistake you always fix it! MayhemMario (talk) 11:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you :-) –Anemone Projectors– 11:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

User talk:5teevee5#Changing and choosing images

Hello, AnemoneProjectors. Would you mind weighing in on this, especially the Téa Delgado part? Flyer22 (talk) 19:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I've left a comment. I don't remember editing One Life to Live character articles, though maybe I did one or two when I've been working on the list of soap opera villains! –Anemone Projectors– 20:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Don't you think they should use a screenshot? Aren't pictures meant to cropped or made low res so they can't make profitable copies anyway?RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

They're both screenshots, but I believe the original one is from the opening titles of the show (correct me if I'm wrong). But that's fine. But I think it could have its resolution lowered a little bit. –Anemone Projectors– 20:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

The former one isn't a screenshot. It's a promotional shot, but I fixed its licensing after Raintheone reverted to it. Flyer22 (talk) 21:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. Promo shots are just as good though :) –Anemone Projectors– 21:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

The other one is listed as a promo, so I think adding the incorrect tags on purpose can carry a warning, can't it?RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 21:12, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

If it was done on purpose, yes. But I don't think 5teevee5 did it on purpose. If you look at the length of his talk page, it's pretty clear that he's been very unfamiliar with adding images correctly (which includes licensing and all that). I would wager that he only recently learned what to do by copying the format from some other image and then filling in the correct information when uploading it to a different image; the only thing is...he's still unaware of all the different types of licensing. That's why he keeps putting the promotional image license for all his images. Flyer22 (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Well aslong as no more happen, or else I'll have warn him, because I've assumed good faith now.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree. If he's been told how to correctly licence the images he uploads and still does it wrong then a warning is in order for the next time. –Anemone Projectors– 08:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

It may be time for that warning. Also, judging by his talk page, he is no stranger to edit warring, no matter the reason/reasons he is being reverted. Flyer22 (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

You know what? I'm going to semi-protect the page. –Anemone Projectors– 20:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Just realised it won't help because it's not an IP doing it (though the last one was) –Anemone Projectors– 20:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

It'll help, in that he'll have to log in to revert again (I'm pretty sure that IP is him). So, yes, thanks for the help. I wasn't even aware that you're an administrator, as I didn't look at your user page too carefully, if at all (though I did just moments ago). I just wish that he would continue to engage in conversation so that we can work something out. I don't love the picture; I just prefer it to his upload. Flyer22 (talk) 20:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Are You The One...?

Who mentioned the Facebook link on the X Factor US page as a possibility for deletion? 1Dbad (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't think it was me, no. –Anemone Projectors– 09:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh okay. I didn't think so, but I wasn't 100% sure. I must have misread the history or something, lol. So do you know who did, or is this just something happening as a whole on Wikipedia? 1Dbad (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't know who it was. Generally Facebook pages aren't recommended but in this case I think it should be, it's an official one and it's currently one of the best ways to get info about the show. But I wouldn't use it for references. –Anemone Projectors– 12:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

I didn't either, but I just pulled up the discussion about it and found out who did it. Apparently a guy (I believe it's a guy) by the username of Alpha Quadrant is trying to get all Facebook pages removed from Wikipedia pages, but luckily everyone seems to be against it so I don't think it'll pass. At least hopefully it won't. And I completely agree! I think as long as it's official it should be fine, especially in this case since like you said it's one of the best sources of information about the show at the moment. And yeah, I wouldn't either. 1Dbad (talk) 12:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

unblocking brianwazere

let me know when my block is up please,this is brianwazere (not logged in) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.219.31 (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Your block was indefinite because you were making death threats to other Wikipedia editors. This included on your own talk page, which is why you are unable to edit there. If you wish to calm down, make no more threats and request an unblock, I will enable you to edit your talk page again and do so. –Anemone Projectors– 15:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes ok fair enough, but if i didn't request an unblock just out interest how long would my block last for?. because to be honest i fell i shouldn't need to request an unblock ye should realize your mistake and unblock me immediately without causing trouble for yourself please! signed-brianwazere —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.231.254 (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

I think it would be highly unlikely that someone would ever come along and unblock you, so you would have to request it and show that you understand why you were unblocked, etc. I didn't block you so I didn't make a mistake. I don't think the blocking admin did either, because you made several edits that were vandalism and insulted several editors. Death threats are not on. –Anemone Projectors– 19:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Well i am not going to beg to unblocked thats what sad people do, so i will just set up another account on another computer so i assure you u haven't seen da last of me on this, i will not beg for anyone or anything and trust me dat user did make a mistake and they will regret it i can assure you! 86.44.231.254 (talk) 19:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

If you create another account, it will be blocked for block evasion. The only way to get out of this is to request an unblock. Don't see it as begging, you don't have to beg. Just address the reasons why you were blocked. –Anemone Projectors– 19:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

ok fine but how do i request and unblock i never had to do it before

Well, first I allow you access to the page, then you log in as Brianwazere and add {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} to the page, changing "your reason here" to the actual reason you feel you are ready to be unblocked. Then an admin will come along and review it, and either unblock you or give a reason they have declined to unblock you. You might want to read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks first as well, but I'll go and change your block settings now so you may appeal. –Anemone Projectors– 19:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Emily Biggs

I have given nine references for the article and hope that it is not getting deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Parade Girl band

Excuse me but why do you keep deleting the article Parade (girl band)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

I only deleted it once. There was no indication of their importance or significance, which is criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD#A7). –Anemone Projectors– 23:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Jessica Agombar

Why are you deleting Jessica Agombar ? She has been in St Triannians and is a singer. Please answers it's driving me insane. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

A minor role in a film and a part of a band that aren't famous? That's why. Even members of The Wanted don't have their own articles, and The Wanted are a notable band. If the band becomes notable (if they have a hit single or album), then you can write about the members in the band's article, but none of them are going to be notable individually. –Anemone Projectors– 00:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh right now i understand, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

If she had a significant role in the film and the band was notable I'd say it was ok. I don't know about her film role but I'm guessing it wasn't a significant one. But the band still isn't notable. –Anemone Projectors– 00:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Queen Vic Fire Week

You have a review at Talk:Queen Vic Fire Week/GA1. Just a few fairly minor points, but I've put it on hold. Ping me when you want me to take another look. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Ronnie Mitchell

Hi i know you didnt revert my edits but i just thought i'd remind you that Ronnie sold her shares of the club to Jack Branning after they split up in 2009, she then wanted the money to start a new business but ended up giving it to Sam for her bail money. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.216.60 (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

And then in 2010 she went into business with Jack and Roxy. –Anemone Projectors– 00:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Archie and Peggy

Were Archie and Peggy ever properly divorced or did Archie die before the divorce go through and make Peggy a widow again? Arjoccolenty (talk) 12:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I think she was widowed. Only just seen this message, sorry! –Anemone Projectors– 00:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

But she was definitely divorced from Frank right? I know she kicked him out, but there was no talk of divorce. Arjoccolenty (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

According to our articles, Peggy and Frank's marriage ended in 2001. –Anemone Projectors– 20:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Uncircumcised userbox

Hi, I've noticed you use an existing "uncut" userbox and have contributed to the foreskin article. I've created my own userbox and just want to see what you think and if you want to add it to your page! --TBM10 (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

INTACT

This user is proudly
Uncircumcised.

Sure :-) –Anemone Projectors– 00:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Matt Cardle

Hello, I am new to Wiki and I tried to edit Matt Cardle's page earlier to add in some more information about his previous career, I noticed that you have taken it off. May I ask why please? It was factually correct. As I sad I am new to this so if I have have made an error I would appreciate the help for the future. Thanks Darwynfan (talk) 00:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. The reason I removed the information is because it was unsourced. While I understand that you want to add true information to the article, you need to cite a reliable source so that other users can verify that the information is true. For more information, see Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. I hope this helps, feel free to ask if you need further help. –Anemone Projectors– 12:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, I have tried again but added references this time.Regards Darwynfan (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks :-) –Anemone Projectors– 16:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

X Factor US Discussion Page Edit

I noticed you undid my X Factor US Discussion page edit and said not to do that. May I ask why? All I did was remove my own comments (not anyone else's), and I only did that because I already did them so I didn't see the point of keeping them there. 1Dbad (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Well firstly it was unclear what you were removing as none of the comments were signed. Secondly, it looks like one comment got changed, and also another one had replies which would make it unclear. I think it's best to leave the comments there, and either close the discussions or mark them as done, or set up archiving so that old comments are moved to a subpage. I think archiving is the best option. I'll set it up. –Anemone Projectors– 07:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

I can understand that, and I apologize. Those comments were made before I realized I could edit the page with my account, so I just commented when I wasn't logged in and didn't sign anything. (since I knew it'd just use my IP address instead) And one comment of mine I did edit a bit, but I had planned to also delete it later after I did what I left. (I left one part of one of my comments instead of deleting it to remind me of an edit I wanted to do later) And really? I edited one with replies? My bad then. It's funny you mentioned marking them as done though -- I had actually thought about doing that a couple of times myself. I didn't know you could also close discussions or put them in an archive though. Thanks for the info and I'm sorry about that, I'm still fairly new to editing Wiki pages, discussions and all of that. And that sounds good, definitely go ahead and set up the archive and we'll just do that. 1Dbad (talk) 10:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

I've set up archiving. Although if you removed comments they'd still be in the history, I think archiving is a better option. –Anemone Projectors– 10:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Great! Thanks for that. If you don't mind, could you help me on using it? Want to make sure I don't mess anything else up again, haha. And huh, I hadn't thought of that. You're definitely right that archiving is the better option then.

And oh darn it. I didn't realize you were on right now and I just tried to edit my comment, but since you already replied to it it wouldn't let me do it. (I believe that's why it wouldn't let me) But if you don't mind I still want to include how I was going to edit my reply to your comment below, since I think I explained myself better on it. Hope that's okay. :

"Oh I'm sorry about that, I made those comments before I realized I could edit the page with my account, so I just commented when I wasn't logged in and didn't bother to sign anything. (didn't really see a need to at the time since it would have just left my IP address anyway) I can understand your concern though, but I assure you I only dealt with comments that were mine. (they just weren't signed) As for the comment changes, yes I did that as well. Most of my comments that I already did, or decided against doing, I removed; and with one or two others I just edited them a bit. One I just edited instead of deleting because there was one thing on it I wanted to do later, so I thought I'd keep it until I did it as a reminder. (I was going to delete it as well after I did it though) I don't remember edited a comment with a reply though, but I very well could have. If I did then (which apparently I must have since you noticed it) my bad then. Either I thought it wouldn't hurt to remove it or I may not have noticed/remembered it had replies -- I can't really remember at the moment to be honest. But okay, I'll leave my comments there then. Out of curiosity though -- would you like me to sign the comments I did, or just leave them alone? Thought I'd double-check before doing anything else in case I shouldn't do it for some reason. I didn't know you could close discussions though, that's interesting. I did know about marking them as done, since I actually contemplated posting a reply to my comments saying it was done a few times, lol. (I ultimately decided against it though, obviously) I also didn't know you could archive them either, but I agree with you that that sounds like the best thing to do. Thanks for offering to set it up too, I'd really appreciate it! Now you can either teach me how to archive the comments of mine I want to or I can tell you which of my comments I'd like archived. Your choice.

Oh! Before I forget...I want to say thank you for all the info about all of this, I'm still fairly new to editing Wikipedia and doing things here. So all the help you have been giving me the past few weeks is greatly appreciated. :) (and trust me, I'm learning) I really want to apologize for all of my foolish mistakes though, I'll try to be more careful so I don't mess up so much like I (unintentionally) have been recently. Hopefully one day I'll get as good as you and some of the other users here, haha."

1Dbad (talk) 11:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Help Needed Thread

Another one of these threads. =) Will you look at Peter Barlow (Coronation Street), do you think I should revert all of ChrisSmith1995's edits? One ref has gone missing along the way, removed page breaks and the like. This editor is soo problematic too.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Hmm I think so. They cut out a lot of the plot but some of it seemed relevant and should be rewritten shorter rather than removed completely. I didn't check that there were more edits when I removed that screenshot. –Anemone Projectors– 21:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

You're almost as famous as Eastenders baby! Look, you get a mention at the bottom as the "arsey admin of EE" [2]. =DRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 00:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

JuneGloom showed it to me on Twitter. Nice to know that Trampikey is still talking about me behind my back. –Anemone Projectors– 00:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh there's a history there then.. but.. Isn't it good though that some people are praising it all, finally. :)RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 00:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

The praise is nice to see. - JuneGloom Talk 00:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

He should just stick to TalkWalford where he can write what he wants without using any references, give articles any names he chooses and upload any image he wants without saying where it came from or why it's allowed to be there. I'm glad some people are saying good things though. Also wondering who blue_cobalt is. –Anemone Projectors– 00:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

From posting on DS a lot where he is, he watches Hollyoaks religously, but states it's crap and needs to be axed, which in turn annoys the 'stans'... he is a bit of a perv on the soap girls and went all weird obsessive about Jem Costello. If he edits on here maybe he is one of the HO vandals. :PRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

He does edit on here, it's User:Trampikey :)--5 albert square (talk) 01:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

No, that's Shamelessness, the one who posted the original message about me. –Anemone Projectors– 01:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

We want to know who AP's fancy peice is.. they know each other well ;) AP, we should take on Family Affairs articles, god it was my favourite soap hands down.. I screamed whe they axed it, it was gay central!RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't know who blue_cobalt is! I don't feel like taking on another soap, especially one I never watched :) Though I did just do a big fix on the list of Family Affairs characters –Anemone Projectors– 01:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Ahah, well you missed out, but get to see everything in EE now. Sami and Brett were perfection (Muslim and Aussie SL). .. and they had a iron attack before Little Mo :PRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 02:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't suppose you could protect Scott McGregor (model) again and List of Neighbours characters and ‎Mark Brennan (Neighbours) too. The sourced content is getting removed again because some people can't accept that he's leaving. - JuneGloom Talk 17:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC) ‎

Sure can. –Anemone Projectors– 17:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm pretty sure it's the same user as the other day. I also believe they've done this before with Belle Taylor. - JuneGloom Talk 17:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Am I right in removing Aaron Livesy and Jackson Walsh from the supercouples list? They worked hard to get refs on there mentioning the fact they are supercouples.. but Jaaron superfans insist they are a super couple, just because.. the ref used before didn't mention it, i read on them a lot and have never seen it. Plus the new ref they have added is a soaplife magazine without the correct data like issue, p no. etc... looks made up. Can you help? (I had a go at cleaning Jackson, they sneakily covered DS episode summaries as references and named them like proper news articles... but I noticed so cut the storylines right down. They have put them next to each other in the ED template. It's fancruft madness. aha)RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 17:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

British soaps don't tend to have supercouples - there aren't even any EastEnders couples listed. I would say it needs a source saying they're described as a supercouple specifically. If there's no issue number etc, then it's unverifiable. –Anemone Projectors– 17:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Just what I thought. No one listens anyway when I explain this, so they'll probably revert me again. :PRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 17:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I got a better ref for John Paul and Craig though [3] - they're the only couple described as a supercouple from Hollyoaks anywhere on Google News. –Anemone Projectors– 17:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Funny that Shamlessness is calling you out, when he did the same exact same thing to me on the Walford Web Wiki when I tried to change the info there to reflect your changes here. Arjoccolenty (talk) 12:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

He and his little gang seem to get their kicks bullying people that have differing points of view. I tried to make things up to him on his talk page last year but it clearly didn't work. –Anemone Projectors– 13:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

You come and overide their views then. Don't let them win.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 14:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I only added three for sexiest female, extra or only ref. If they win it though I always add it, it's a vanity/popularity award.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 13:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I hope you got a couple of good photos out of the 70 you took. :) Anyway, if a character appears in footage a month after her death and is not credited, that shouldn't be her final appearance date should it? - JuneGloom Talk 18:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Haha one or two, maybe! Umm if it's just footage, then I would think not! Happened with Frank Butcher in EastEnders. What did we do with him? –Anemone Projectors– 18:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Apparently the character appears in her daughter's flashback and it was new footage, but the actress wasn't credited. It doesn't have a ref and if I ask for one, I bet I'll get directed to a fansite. - JuneGloom Talk 18:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm if it was new then my instinct would be to include it. –Anemone Projectors– 19:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

It looks like it is!

It looks like that greg jessop and tanya will be marrying on the same day as the royals like I said before. They have definetly confirmed that there will be a couple marrying on the same day asnd as they are marrying in April it seems likely that Tanya and Greg are the couple. Please if you may could you revert my edits on greg jessop so it says that they may be wedding on that day as 1) i cant find them as it was a long time day 2) you only need the wedding part not the ian beale and phil and shirley part. I dont mean to brag I just thought i should say.--MayhemMario (talk) 13:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC) =)

I realised it was right as soon as I discovered Phil and Shirley's wedding day was yesterday. I'll try to find it in the history. –Anemone Projectors– 13:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Lynne Hobbs

No offense or anything but Lynne Hobbs only has ONE reference, shouldnt she be in the list of easteders charcaters needed real world perspective (or something like that)!!!.--MayhemMario (talk) 17:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

We based it the amount of prose, not the number of references, so not really. But a {{refimprove}} tag at the top of the page wouldn't hurt, unless you're going to work on it yourself... –Anemone Projectors– 17:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

A bit late but hey....

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For your amazing edits re-wording Zoe Slater and reorganizing it to make sense MayhemMario (talk) 21:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, and I haven't even started on the departure section yet :-) I worry that it might annoy you that I'm always editing your additions! –Anemone Projectors– 21:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

nah... You do a good job!--MayhemMario (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

And I must also thank you for actually looking for this information and adding it in the first place. The Zoe Slater article is so much better than it was! –Anemone Projectors– 21:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

nah.. it was quite easy it just took me about 5 hours which isnt that long but its worth it! she went form 3 to 28!!--MayhemMario (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

How?

How do you get the contents part up on the pages of older charcters up like say debbei bates?--MayhemMario (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

oh wait dont mind i've found ti! --MayhemMario (talk) 18:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

One Night in Heaven edit

Just so you know, in the line "The song has been noted for its similarity to a UK top 20 chart hit from 1975, Highwire performed by Linda Carr", I meant the "whom" tag to apply to the "has been noted" bit as in who has noted this song for its similarity. As for removing the line altogether I was willing to wait for the editor who put that in to add a citation (I left a general note on that editor's talk page about the many problems in the article) but I'm also cool with you deleting it as it seems very unlikely to me that a citation was ever going to be produced for that particular bit. SQGibbon (talk) 01:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh ok. If you had put the tag after the word "noted" I would have realised that and probably left it in. It looked like you were asking who Linda Carr is/was. It was probably original research anyway. –Anemone Projectors– 01:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Yep, you're right, I should have placed it better. But I think it worked out for the best anyway as it does look like original research and properly tagged would probably have stuck around for a long time. SQGibbon (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh no, I better do the JavaScript thing so I don't keep marking my minor edits as non-minor and my non-minor edits as minor. –Anemone Projectors– 20:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Actually I think I'll leave it due to the times I've accidentally left an edit as minor when I was in a hurry. I just hope I realise when I'm ticking the box by mistake and untick it before I save. –Anemone Projectors– 20:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Was just stalking (at Frickative's page) and did this

Feel free to use it. And no, I didn't tweet you just now, I am letting you know I created this. =)

Missing name parameter.
Missing username parameter.
Invalid date parameter.
Missing text parameter.
date parameter should be reformatted to look like:
1 Jan 1970 or Jan 1, 1970
or removed.
reference or ID parameter required.

'
@

^[1]

Don't mind the fact that the bird looks weird like that right now. If you can upload a version of the bird that has the background transparent, feel free to link to it instead in the template. If wording changes are needed, we'll deal with that later once the image looks nice. =) CycloneGU (talk) 23:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

haha nice one :-) –Anemone Projectors– 23:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

White space removal

Thanks for the tip regarding white space removal on Digitalis purpurea. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem, it also means the right amount of space is added, as before the text began halfway down the images, but now it's completely clear. –Anemone Projectors– 09:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

removed one direction article

what do you mean no notability? they released their own book which had amazing sales,people are basically going on the x factor tour just to see them (they are the only ones who have 5 songs next to Matt). and they are releasing their single and album in like 2-3 months.why delete a perfectly good article? people from all over the world know them - I should know I'm one of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Octobermind (talk • contribs) 20:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

When their single or album charts, then they'll be notable. Feel free to expand their section in the list of finalists until then. –Anemone Projectors– 22:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Bit of confusion....

Right you know i've been editing the 'list off ee charcacters 2008' page well you seem to be reverting a lot of my edit or 'cuing' them. I, on say Mr Lister put a gap form his first apeparance and his storylines so it looks much neater than from what it is know. I think that you do need paragraphs to seperate there first appearecne from there storylines. I have not left some gaps on more minor charcters as they havent got enough storylines to fill a paragrpah. I hope i have meade it clear why i leave the gap as before it was very untidy. I think i finished..... few!!!!MayhemMario (talk) 13:17, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't think we need a single line paragraph followed by another short paragraph, especially for characers who appeared in 4 episodes or fewer. –Anemone Projectors– 13:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't look neat at all to have little paragraphs of a line. Looks fregmented, It's unnecessary spacing.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 14:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Asher Levi

The article Asher Levi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Asher Levi for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Well done

For all your hard efforts making Wikipedia articles get nice, unblurry pictures! MayhemMario (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

It wasn't me. –Anemone Projectors– 17:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

no i've seen some of the articles with youor photos in and there really good!--MayhemMario (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

You're probably seeing where I've reverted to an old version, and the old versions have been deleted so it looks like I uploaded the file, but I didn't. I've never captured a screenshot for EastEnders. –Anemone Projectors– 19:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

i've changed it so it matches with you =) --MayhemMario (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I still disagree :-) –Anemone Projectors– 21:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

And I've commented out the barnstar since I don't deserve it. I'm rejecting your barnstar :-) –Anemone Projectors– 19:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Have a look at this?

Me and GSorby are trying to see if RAINIE CROSS should be split off we are kind of at a dead end at the moment as we need your approval. It is at lsit of ee charcters 2007 DISCUSSION! Thanks =)--MayhemMario (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I saw that before I saw this :P –Anemone Projectors– 18:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh! What a Lovely War

Dear Anemone, I refer to Oh! What a Lovely War, which seems to breach Wikipedia's core policies of Neutral Point of View, as well as No Original Research, and Verifiability, and Burden of Evidence. The main problems occur in the long, biased and unreferenced sections 1 (Synopsis) and 3 (Themes and social commentary).

There is far too much plot summary and detail in the so-called Synopsis section, heavily skewed to reflect political bias, without a single footnote supporting the assertions.

Section 3, on "Themes and social commentary reads as a critical socio-political essay without a single reference. As a musician I am familiar with the songs and with the film and much of the material here is presented with bias and lack of balance. Anyone coming to the film for the first time would not get a balanced view of it via this article.

Please could you flag Sections 1 and 3 of this article as lacking in citation, with a warning that it could be removed. As a whole, the article would benefit from a complete re-write and clean-up to meet wikipedia's standards. The entire article should , carry several templates regarding citation, clean-up and neutrality attached. The film was an important one, certainly Left-wing, but the article is doggedly "red" in political persuasion and displays almost no balance or neutrality. It seems only to reflect the views of the author.

It should be watched and possibly deleted if no one steps forward with a re-write, or at the least Sections 1 and 3 should be deleted. Unreferenced politically-skewed plot summary and "social commentary" sections along the lines of university critical essays are surely contrary to Wikipedia guidelines.

Oddly enough, despite its disregard of Wikipedia core policy, this article is on a number of project websites.

Thanks for action and for monitoring this article. FClef (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Update - I have removed section 3 of the article (see History) as non-neutral, containing original research, and unverifiable. Please watch the article. I think most contributions are unsigned by users and just have an IP number. I would be grateful if you could monitor this article, or pass it to another Admin if you think it is more in their ball park. Please let me know. FClef (talk) 03:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I've watchlisted it and added a few tags. –Anemone Projectors– 11:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Penile agenesis

Hi AnenomeProjectors,

You might be able to help at Penile agenesis... See the recent talk page history. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 14:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't know how I can help. –Anemone Projectors– 21:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

No worries, I just wanted give you a heads-up as you'd said you know him in real life. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 13:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I know Will, but I don't really know anything about the subject. I tagged it as possible original research though. –Anemone Projectors– 13:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Comig to a agreement

I am trying to round up if Rainie should be split off or not. We are doing a vote to see if she should or not if you would like to vote please go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject EastEnders ‎. Thanks! MayhemMario (talk) 17:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC) =)

QUESTION!

Hello1 I am just asking about your article on Rainie Cross you did. You never added it to the wikipedia just made a copy in some ways. If i wanted to start a article how would i go about it without it being published?--MayhemMario (talk) 18:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

You mean you want to make a draft in your userspace? You create a page like User:MayhemMario/sandbox. You could go to edit your userpage, type [[/sandbox]], then preview the page and click on the red link and start the page, or you could go to your userpage and in the address bar just add /sandbox to the end. Obviously you can put anything in place of the word "sandbox". See WP:USERSUBPAGE for more info. –Anemone Projectors– 19:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I have figured it out!--MayhemMario (talk) 20:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Branning Tree Again

Either the Branning Tree or the Beale Family Tree is incorrect. Either Martin and Sonia are divorced or they are not. Which one is it? Arjoccolenty (talk) 17:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

They divorced, then they remarried off screen, then Sonia came back and said they had split up. So they're either married or divorced :-) –Anemone Projectors– 17:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah but which is it? One tree says they are divorced, another says they are not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjoccolenty (talk • contribs)

The last we knew they were married. –Anemone Projectors– 19:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Then the Beale Family Tree is wrong. Arjoccolenty (talk) 21:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

ok –Anemone Projectors– 22:21, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Leona Lewis template

Regarding your edit summary, the reason I added them to the template was because that's what I was advised to do when I sought help on creating books (it's a new thing for me). My guess for these additions is to keep everything to do with a subject together: I agree that the category is probably redundant in the template (books aren't meant to just be a collection of links for convenience, based on what I understand about them), though when adding the category and making similar edits, I was merely being consistent. Thanks. Acalamari 22:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

I understand, but I just dislike it. I took the bold off, it's the icons that make it look bad. I mean, Template:EastEnders has a link to a portal at the bottom but it looks neater beacuse there's no icon. These icons are all over templates now but I don't see the point. –Anemone Projectors– 23:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I just previewed the Leona Lewis template without the icons, and you're right, the book/category parts at the bottom look better without them. Where would be the most appropriate place to raise this? Acalamari 09:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

I honestly have no idea! I've just never liked the icons, I think they're unnecessary and a casual Wikipedia reader wouldn't need them there. They seem to be purely decorative. But no, I don't know where you could bring it up. The only thing that springs to mind is something like Wikipedia:Navigation templates but that's an essay, I think a MOS, policy or guideline page might be better. –Anemone Projectors– 10:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

The only place I thought of was Template talk:Navbox musical artist: so far from what I've seen, it's mainly that type of template that has the icons (and of course, I am guilty of adding icons to a few of them!). However, more discussion seems to take place on Wikipedia talk:Navigation templates, so even with it being an essay, I think I'll post there about this topic, and if someone else knows a better location for the discussion to take place, it can be moved accordingly. Finally, I'd like to say sorry if my first note here came across as annoyed: I assure you it wasn't meant to be (it was nearly 11pm, and I probably should have waited until the morning to discuss it!) Best. Acalamari 10:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh it didn't come across as annoyed. Yeah maybe that is the best place to discuss it then. I noticed that Template:Doctor Who has the icons too, an example of a non-musical artist using them. –Anemone Projectors– 10:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, that's good! I posted at Wikipedia talk: Navigation templates#Book, category, etc. icons on templates, which I think covers what we've talked about here. Acalamari 10:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Suspected Sock

Hey AP: User:ColinTaylor95 seems to be a sockpuppet of User:Dude95. He/she is uploading images over the ones that Dude95 uploaded (which I keep reverting). Maybe you could look into it? GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 10:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Could be. Have you ever submitted a sockpuppet investigation before? –Anemone Projectors– 11:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Nope, wouldn't know where to start :/ I'll give it a go GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 11:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Is this right? GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 11:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah that's it. You might be asked for links to diffs as evidence. –Anemone Projectors– 11:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Images

I thought his name was Jabba ;) Anyway, can you delete the previous images for Oliver Barnes please. Also what image did you get in your head when Carol told Connor she only went with him because her arms ached!!!RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 19:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah he's a flabby Jabba! I didn't understand the aching arms thing! Did she mean... oh, she can't have meant that, surely! Yeah I'll delete them for you. –Anemone Projectors– 19:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Can you delete the previous versions of Anna Windass' image. It's become a real problem.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 16:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Done –Anemone Projectors– 18:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd put Mrs. Stickman in a skirt, not boobs!! RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Anemone, please can you restore all of glenda's images please? Thank you --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 21:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

They're all at File:GlendaMitchell.JPG but be quick please so I can delete that whole page again. –Anemone Projectors– 22:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Kay you may delete. Where the hell did that promophoto come from? :L --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Ouhe uploaded it. –Anemone Projectors– 22:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Ironically, that's my sister! :L Interfering as usual GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

That's your sister?! Have a read of her talk page. –Anemone Projectors– 22:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

My days, I'll have her for that! She goes to the library a lot and there's a man there that looks at dating websites and she says he's a "you know what"...oh the joy of siblings... :-D GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey. Home and Away went blue a while ago, but I keep forgetting to request the last action. Can you take it out of the colour change template Template:Infobox television/colour so it goes normal.Rain the 1 ^BAM 00:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Done, though I'm not exactly sure what I've done. –Anemone Projectors– 00:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Exactly what I wanted. The main TV template infobox on Home and Away is now Blue. It was bright orange before you removed it from the colour execption thing.Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Just A Heads-Up

Be sure to remove any edits to the US X Factor page saying that Steve Jones might be the host. That's already been confirmed not to be true in a video interview with Dermot when he said that he had made the shortlist for being the host along with 4 other people, and although he didn't say who the other 4 were, he did say that they were all Americans. Which rules Welsh Steve Jones out immediately. I'll try to find the video link later, I remember it was from ITN's youtube. And don't worry, I'll continue trying to help as well, but I can only check so often, lol. 1Dbad (talk) 02:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Although it is probably not true, these things change and Dermot's word cannot be taken for gold. Even if it is the best we have, this subject is so flakey because there is so much media speculation. Nothing should be added until a line up is confirmed and anyone added who is in the shortlist, only added if Cowell actually confirms it as fact, by no one else.Rain the 1 ^BAM 02:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Well obviously anything not from a reliable source will be removed. I think I did read somewhere that the shortlisted hosts were all American. I don't think Nicole Scherzinger should be the host though! That's just silly. She should be a judge. On the UK version! Repacing Cheryl Cole, who's bloody useless! –Anemone Projectors– 09:52, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I seriously doubt they would change, since they obviously have narrowed it down to a shortlist. Now if they hadn't done that already then I admit there might be a possibility, but I seriously doubt things would change this late in the game and so close to it being confirmed. And actually, yes they can. Unless we see a video or radio interview from Simon, Steve Jones, ect. or a very reliable source stating otherwise then I would believe Dermot's words over anything else since they're the closest we have to official confirmation. Otherwise I do agree with you that nothing should be added until the line-up is confirmed and that add nothing about anyone being on the shortlist unless it comes from Simon's mouth or some of the other people officially involved in the show. (like producers, ect.) 1Dbad (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

My line up would be:

US: Simon Cowell, LA Reid, Shania Twain, Paula Abdul. (aparently enrique is being touted as a host with a female).
UK: Gary Barlow, Louis Walsh, Nicole Scherzinger, Dannii Minogue. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't want Simon Cowell to leave the UK show, though Gary Barlow would probably be good. I like the idea of Shania Twain as well! –Anemone Projectors– 22:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't want Cowell to leave either but I can't imagine him staying. The show's in its eighth season and Cowell seems to get easily bored. I really Hollywood Magazine a few weeks ago and it said that Cowell had originally approached JLO, Marc Anthony and Tommy Mottla for the pannel. But Mottla seemed unkeen as he had not been involved in the industry for a while. Lopez had already been offered Idol and was more drawn to that whereas Anthony didn't want the couple's marriage to be exploited on air. It makes for an interesting concept... — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

He did say that he would find a way to do both... –Anemone Projectors– 22:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Hologram? Maybe he could appear via video link? LOL — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Well we don't know what day of the week it'll go out in the US so maybe he'll just fly across the Atlantic twice a week! But that wouldn't be good for mentoring his acts. I don't think he'd be able to do both. But Simon Cowell is The X Factor! –Anemone Projectors– 22:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Suspected socks

As you've noted, 81.152.142.84 and Christo jones could be sockpuppets, considering their recent activity on Pink Floyd article. Regards, Scieberking (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Christo jones isn't, that's a well established editor since 2006. But the IP could be. –Anemone Projectors– 21:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Cool, but that addition about Pink Floyd being one of the most influential bands ever, with RockHall reference, was valid I think. Regards, Scieberking (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I do apologise. I have restored that now. –Anemone Projectors– 22:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Regards, Scieberking (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Mill articles

WP:MILLS convention is that mill articles are housed at (mill name), (location) titles. See WT:MILLS#Mass moving of mill articles. Mjroots (talk) 19:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Are you sure? Just looking at WP:MILLS#DYK I can see several not in that format. It's not really right to disambiguate article titles that aren't ambiguous. Also that discussion starts off asking if it's a naming convention of the project but it wasn't answered. I can't see anything on WP:MILLS about this. Anyway I just happened to come across the article on the mill at Breachwood Green, didn't think there'd be another one on Wikipedia with that name so checked, there wasn't so I moved the article. –Anemone Projectors– 19:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh sorry it says "it is the convention" not asking "is it", I misread that. But has it really been discussed or was it something just decided by someone? I don't see it being necessary to do. –Anemone Projectors– 19:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm as sure as I can be, seeing as I set up the WP. The naming of such articles is for consistency across the project, but with deference to WP:NRHP which was going before WP:MILLS was (i.e. their naming convention takes precedence in respect of NHRP listed mills). Mjroots (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Neither project makes any mention of this "convention". I'm not going to get involved but I'm pretty sure it goes against the general Wikipedia naming conventions. –Anemone Projectors– 20:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Ian Gallagher

Please do not take away the new material I added to Ian Gallagher. I have included several sources that discuss the character, how that character was developed and critical response to the character. Harley Hudson (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Several? Three sources, the rest are episode citations. In reality it's just a article with too much in universe information. You did not create it under the correct namespace either, there is more than one Ian G... TBH the the british Ian is more notable looking online. It needed a lot of work too, more development info, the citations were laid out incorrectly all round. I didn't see the much or any critical response?Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

If I understand Wikipedia's policy on notability, three independent reliable sources about a subject are sufficient to establish the notability of the subject. if you believe that the article is named wrong then please rename it. If you believe that the British Ian is more notable then you are free to write an article about him. If you think that the article needs work then work on it. But please do not simply remove the information since the character is notable. Thank you. Harley Hudson (talk) 01:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

It is notable enough for a list entry perhaps, as it stands of course. In context this is a new character. Lets now break down the chosen sources. The online ones are fine, at the end of the day they are just dicussing development, they can be expanded on. The rest are episode citations which need more info.. The references need filling out with the correct parameters. Might help if you read up on the MOS for writing about fiction. I'm not going to work on the article, Shameless is great but it needs a lot of work. It is up to you to name the article correctly and not mess a DAB page up.Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

If the online sources are fine then I don't understand why you have a problem with the article. I don't understand what "episode citations which need more info" means. I put the name of the episode and the episode number. I don't see anything in the guidelines that says that the way I wrote the article is wrong. I wrote about what we know about the character and I wrote about how the creator came up with the character, how the actor who plays the character approaches it and a little about how critics have responded to the character. You tell me it's up to me to work on the article. If you can explain how I'm supposed to do that when three different people constantly take the article out I'd like to hear it. Harley Hudson (talk) 02:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

You could make a sandbox in this name User:Harley Hudson/Sandbox to carry out your edit tests, expand upon on it until there are enough sources. It could be moved at a later date. The template for citing episodes is at Template:Cite episode, it will explain more info. Webcite sources need setting out correctly, publishers-work-author-url-date-access date-title and so on... If there are no more than three sources I would not bother until there is more info and keep it into a list. When writing plot summaries, keep them short and breif. Note on the talk here.Rain the 1 ^BAM 02:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

I really don't care whether you would bother writing an article with three sources. Your not doing so doesn't mean that others wouldn't or that you should undo their hard work based on your opinion. In looking through other articles I see references done in all kinds of different formats. Suggesting that an article should be removed because the sources for it aren't done to your satisfaction is unreasonable unless you're willing to remove every single article whose references aren't formatted to your satisfaction. Harley Hudson (talk) 02:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

I've tried to help. It's not my opinion, along the way it has been met with a general consensus. My satisfaction has nothing to do with the way sources are formatted, it is another pointer in the manual of style... plus it helps fight link rot. You really don't care? That is also fine. You are right about one thing, I don't bother creating articles with three sources, 30 plus maybe...Rain the 1 ^BAM 02:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is your idea of trying to help, please stop trying because it's not at all helpful. Please point out this "general consensus" that three sources are not enough to write an article, because I don't believe there is one and there certainly isn't one that there have to be 30. Whether or not a particular reference is formatted in a particular way is not relevant to its usefulness as a source or whether the source counts toward the subject being notable. Harley Hudson (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Fine it is your choice not to take help. However the article will not exist outside a list entry until it is correct. There isn't one with thirty, I was just pointing out I include plenty of OOU info and it is never contested. Again did I say it was, I was again pointing out some improvements for when you do make the article, which in my view was offering helping hand. Anomemone (This user's talk page) is an Admin on Wiki, when he see's this tomorrow, perhaps he will offer more insight into the matter.Rain the 1 ^BAM 02:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

"The article will not exist until it is correct"? Putting aside the implied threat, what you're saying is that you have no objection to the existence of the article, just the format. So I take it that if I put it back and format it the way you insist you won't undo it again. And I never said I didn't want help; I said that whatever you think you're doing here isn't helpful. Harley Hudson (talk) 02:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

No threat from me, stating a fact. I have no objection once it written to an acceptable standard and place under the appropriate name space. More sources though, there must be some lying around on the net. It's not helpful for you that I am contesting this, I'm helping Wiki though..Rain the 1 ^BAM 03:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Your "acceptable standard" has no basis in Wikipedia guidelines. WP guidelines say that multiple reliable sources mean that a WP article can be written. I have provided multiple reliable sources yet you still object. Your objections have no basis in fact. Harley Hudson (talk) 05:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is too long for me to be bothered about reading but if you want to make an article, please make a new one instead of writing over an existing disambiguation page. Thanks :-) –Anemone Projectors– 08:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

There is already an existing disambiguation page. It's at Ian Gallagher (disambiguation). There is no reason why there needs to be two disambiguation pages for two articles and a list. Harley Hudson (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

No, you cut and pasted the disambiguation page to that title, which was a redirect and is now again a redirect. So that's two mistakes you made, because you should never cut and paste articles to rename them. –Anemone Projectors– 15:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Ian Gallagher (disambiguation) has existed for almost two months and was created by a robot. There is no reason why it can't serve as a disambiguation page and there is no reason why there should be two such pages. This whole mess started because you unilaterally decided that the character was not notable. I have explained why the character is notable based on the existence of multiple sources and a second editor agrees with me. Did you even read the article or the sources before deciding to undo the work? I doubt it since you've said here that you can't be arsed to read your own talk page about a problem that you caused. If you would stop being so pig-headed and would admit that you might possibly have made a mistake and that the page that actually includes the word "disambiguation" in its name is a good enough disambiguation page then this whole problem would be solved. Harley Hudson (talk) 16:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

That is Multiple sources, stop arguing for a poor article. Actually edit it instead of accusing me and other edits of not understanding things here. You are the one who has been around a day.Rain the 1 ^BAM 12:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd be happy to actually edit it, except there's this gang of editors who undo it every time I try. Harley Hudson (talk) 16:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Work on it elsewhere then, not the DAB.Rain the 1 ^BAM 16:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The DAB is at Ian Gallagher (disambiguation). There don't need to be two. Wherever I work on it, the end result is still that it should be at Ian Gallagher with a note directing people looking for other Ian Gallaghers to go to Ian Gallagher (disambiguation). Harley Hudson (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

You just want your own way and are hounding three editors ever since you joined wiki yesterday. 5 editors have stated why they believe the page is how it stands..Rain the 1 ^BAM 16:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Actually, one editor has said that the character isn't notable, which isn't true since it has multiple sources (although he probably didn't bother to read them), and two others have acted as enforcers without offering any answer to the very simple question of why there need to be two pages to distinguish amongst three articles while throwing around accusations of "vandalism" and "disruption". Two editors have voiced their support for having the article on the American character under the character's name. Who is it that just wants his own way, the person who's trying to add an article to the encyclopedia or the people who are preventing it from happening for no good reason? Harley Hudson (talk) 17:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Go ahead and create your page, all I'm asking is that you don't create it on top of the disambiguation page Ian Gallagher. Thanks. –Anemone Projectors– 17:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll even split the page history for you. –Anemone Projectors– 17:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

I've done that. Now we can deal with the notability of the character appropriately. By the way, I don't watch Shameless, but do they have completely different storylines? Are the two Ian Gallaghers not just different versions of the same character? Should they not both be covered in the same article? –Anemone Projectors– 17:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Reading that article the SL's match British Ian's storyline totally. Just about 2 characters have different names.Rain the 1 ^BAM 17:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

So it looks like both series have the same storylines and the same characters. So it's just American characters and British characters and that's the only difference. They probably have the same personality too. I'm just wondering why a British actor is playing him! –Anemone Projectors– 18:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

It is daft, they are essentially the same subject. Mandy has a different second name, Yvonne is called Linda.. that appears to be the slight difference. That article has issues I'll pull up on.Rain the 1 ^BAM 19:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah so there are some differences. But yeah, pull up on the issues! –Anemone Projectors– 19:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

They are not the same subject, "essentially" or otherwise. They are different characters with different story arcs on different series. Yes, the American version is drawn from the British one and they are similar but the American series is not a direct remake of the British one and there have been plenty of diversions both for this character and for the show. And even if the two shows were shot-for-shot, line-for-line identical, it doesn't matter. What matters is whether there are sources about the American character and there are. Psycho (1998 film) is practically a shot-for-shot remake of the earlier film but there's an article for it becuase there are sources, just like there are sources for this character. American Ian is not played by a British actor. Cameron Monaghan was born in California. Harley Hudson (talk) 01:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, when I wrote that, the infobox said that Dominic Monaghan played him, and you wrote that, so I believed it. Someone else changed it a few hours ago. And I disagree that there are lots of sources. There are ~~three~~ four that are independent of the subject and one of those is a blog. That's not really enough. –Anemone Projectors– 07:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Block

Hey AP, can you do something about User:77.97.186.72. They keep making the same edits that I'm reverting and carried on after the warning. Thanks GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 16:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Done. –Anemone Projectors– 16:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Replying to what you said on EE 2008 TALK i am going to finish it off definetly. Im quite busy at the moment but i will get round to it! MayhemMario (talk)

I know :-) –Anemone Projectors– 22:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

WELL DONE

For all your amazing efforts cuing my work. You do it to all my work! I cant for soem reason add the star here (dont have a CLUE...) but anyway... You espically have done a lot of edits at EE Charcters 2008. KEEP IT UP!!--MayhemMario (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Not finished yet ;) Interesting that Dotty was meant to be 11 years old, well done for finding that! Do you know what "cu" actually stands for? Just wondered! Try the barnstar again {{subst:The Editor's Barnstar|put your message here ~~~~}} ;-P –Anemone Projectors– 19:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

(Talk page stalker) means clean up right? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 20:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I was asking Mario to see if he knew! –Anemone Projectors– 20:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Sowwy :'( GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 22:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Well done for your amazing edits towards the article of List of EastEnders Characters 2008, you have been a vital person who cleared up the article,Well Done and keep it up! MayhemMario (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Haha thanks :) –Anemone Projectors– 16:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Good article nomination- Zoe Slater

Zoe Slater, is she good enought to have a nomination if you think yes then i will go ahead jsut need a second opinion, thanks!--MayhemMario (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Well the reception still needs expanding first and some slight cleanup... so I would say it's not ready yet. –Anemone Projectors– 17:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

There are also unreferenced statements tagged as needing citations, and the lead is too short. –Anemone Projectors– 17:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Interested?

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject EastEnders new topic started about Dotty make sure you have a look!--MayhemMario (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry I will :P –Anemone Projectors– 17:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Linda Davidson

Hey, check out the recent edits. The person editing is saying they are Linda Davidson. They seem genuine but are unsourced, and she has completely removed all the personal information about herself which were sourced from published material, like her relationship with Nej Adamson and what her mother did. Plus, she she got her date of departure wrong as Mary definitely left in 1988! Should the edits stay?GunGagdin^Moan 11:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I stand corrected, she's left the dancing bit in.GunGagdin ^Moan 11:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Hmmmmmm, I would send her a police notice about conflicts of interest, and some of what was added looks like advertising as well, so perhaps clean up the page and request citations, or revert it all though she might feel insulted by that?? But it would need cleaning up, for example she's used her first name where we should be using her last name, etc. –Anemone Projectors– 11:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I'll go and ask her for sources and do a clean-up.GunGagdin ^Moan 11:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

CBB 12 & BB 12

Hi, have a look at Celebrity Big Brother 2012 (UK) and Big Brother 12 (UK). Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msalmon (talk • contribs)

Deleted the former, redirected the latter. Both are way too soon even if they really will exist (I've not been following the latest news). –Anemone Projectors– 20:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I just thought it was a little too early to create a page yet (mabye redirect for now then take it off when more info is available). --MSalmon (talk) 20:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

I also redirected CBB2011, which you may have seen. It had no references. –Anemone Projectors– 20:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes I saw you had already done that one. Thanks. --MSalmon (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Reinstate image please for Mo Butcher

Ta GunGagdin^Moan 01:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Done –Anemone Projectors– 10:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Semi-locking request for Titanic (1997 film) article

AnemoneProjectors, will you semi-lock the Titanic (1997 film) article? An IP is refusing to adhere to consensus established on the talk page and keeps nitpicking at the lead. I am pretty sure I know who it is (which user) and have stated as much on the talk page. As we know, the article being locked won't stop his user edits, but it will stop him from editing as an IP. This will also draw out the user, and, if he strikes again as that user, I will report him in some form or another. I may even request a WP:User check. Flyer22 (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Never mind. I see EdJohnston locked it. Flyer22 (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I'd have done it but I was out and about :) –Anemone Projectors– 17:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I came to you after EdJohnston had already locked it; it's just that I was late in noticing. Flyer22 (talk) 20:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh right :-) –Anemone Projectors– 20:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Kim Fox

Hey AP, can you restore...I think it was File:KimFox.jpg, thanks GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 19:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

do you not have one?--MayhemMario (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but I want him to restore that one before I upload the new one. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 19:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Already done it as part of my cleanup of the article. –Anemone Projectors– 19:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I think I like the one before the one I uploaded on october, could you please restore it? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 19:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

No because you moved the bloody page. So awkward. –Anemone Projectors– 19:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Whoa, you could've easily just have restored the one on KimFox.jpg... :( your okay right ? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 19:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I moved it back temporarily because it would have been quite bad to restore without there actually being a page there. Then you'd have to save and reupload, it's just better to not do it that way. You know, GFDL and all that. –Anemone Projectors– 19:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

well thats all done, well done you lot! --MayhemMario (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm now busy cleaning it up ;) –Anemone Projectors– 19:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

By the way, if anyone else says "Kim Fox" today, I'll scream! –Anemone Projectors– 20:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

You and GSorby...

		The Special Barnstar
		Well done for splitting Kim Fox off and making it look good, great work! MayhemMario (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Well you made her splittable. Thanks though lol –Anemone Projectors– 19:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

thats okay,got to go,bye--MayhemMario (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I wanna give youy this one before Mario finds a reason to give it to you...Well done AP for typing the word 'The' :P GunGagdin^Moan 01:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hahaha thanks so much :) –Anemone Projectors– 09:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

AP, can you restore the page for File:Foto.JPG? It's going really funny? Thanks GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 18:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I'll explain on your talk page. –Anemone Projectors– 19:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Image(s)

Can you please delete the old revisions for File:Fiz Brown.jpg and it's redirect File:FizBrown Corrie.jpg? Thanks. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 11:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

I sure can, now that I'm home from my lovely day out walking in the Chiltern Hills :-) –Anemone Projectors– 17:55, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Seeings that your in a happy mood.. Could you delete the previous versions of File:Brendan Brady.jpg please? <3Rain the 1 ^BAM 18:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Yip I'll do that for you right nooow :) –Anemone Projectors– 18:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

About the Foxes

Was it ever said online that all of the Fox siblings (Denise, Kim and Daphne) were just half-sisters? Arjoccolenty (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I can't remember, but they're listed as half sisters on here. Daphne's relationship to Denise and Kim was only ever given as "sister", so even if Denise and Kim are half sisters, there's no reason to assume that Daphne is a half sister to both of them. She could be a full sister of one. But the EE website says Denise and Kim are sisters. So I don't know where this half sister thing came from. –Anemone Projectors– 11:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

User_talk:Hammersoft#Images in Lists of EastEnders

Hey AP, regarding images in lists, it appears that Hammersoft will let us use a couple of images in the EE lists. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 14:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

That's not exactly what I said. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, missed out a bit: Mere depiction really isn't enough. Is there sourced discussion about the visual appearance of the character? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 14:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Gsorby, you'd only really get away with it if the image of the character is discussed critically in external sources. Otherwise, you could use a cast photo, but many of the main cast are in these photos are they dont tend to be put in the lists.GunGagdin ^Moan 14:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I know :( So frustrating! GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 15:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

So in conclusion, there must be sourced discussion about the visual appearance of the character. That means hairstyle, costume, makeup, etc. But at least it means we can use non-free images in rare instances. At the moment, I can't think of any character where it would be appropriate. –Anemone Projectors– 17:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Grammy Awards task force

You are invited to join the Grammy Awards task force, a subproject of WikiProject Awards and prizes dedicated to improving articles and lists related to the Grammy Awards. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants.

Thanks, User:Another Believer, for the invite. I don't recall ever editing any articles to do with Grammy Awards, though if I did it was probably just a one off. So thanks again, but I don't think it's for me. –Anemone Projectors– 20:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Not a problem! I knew that you edited music-related articles in the past, so I figured I would send an invitation just in case you were interested. Best wishes! --Another Believer _(Talk) 22:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

To be honest, I barely have enough time to check my watchlist at the moment, so my joining another project or workforce would be a bit pointless. –Anemone Projectors– 23:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Bit of a odd one...

Hi AP, bit of a strange happening here. Someone's just copied and pasted the contents of one of my sandboxes into the mainspace without so much as a courtesy notice on my talkpage. What's done is done, but any chance you could do a history merge? Cheers! Frickative 22:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Not very nice of them to do that. People should leave others' userspaces alone, imo. –Anemone Projectors– 22:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Yeah, now I feel rushed to pick a DYK hook :( Oh well, cheers for your help :) Frickative 22:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

I could always move it back to your userspace, but I don't know if that would affect DYK. Was the article finished, from your point of view? –Anemone Projectors– 22:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Nope, I wrote most of it before the episode aired so there's a fair bit of updating needed, but I think I'll bite the bullet and take it as a shove to get it completed. Thanks for the offer, though! Frickative 22:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Judas (song)‎

Thanks for the histmerge. And I like the "lolcat" in your editnotice. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem. I saw the template and thought I'd just do it :-) –Anemone Projectors– 11:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Kylie

Can you do the honours on Kylie Turner? I've used my two reverts up.Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Well ohh fruity got that sorted but if you could keep an eye on it. Anyway, could you delete the image redirect name it is "File:Kylie-Turner CS.jpg" I moved it.Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Ding-dong-diddly-done (as Ned Flanders might say) –Anemone Projectors– 21:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Can Jim McDonald (Coronation Street) be protected for a little while, the IP's think they are so witty with their "So i do" comments.Rain the 1 ^BAM 22:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Done, so it is ;) –Anemone Projectors– 22:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Spankyuu sir! :)Rain the 1 ^BAM 23:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Could you move the Neighbours template to the name you suggested, if you rid of the hirstory for the current name I can add the new character template there.Rain the 1 ^BAM 21:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Someone will have to update all the links to it now... –Anemone Projectors– 21:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Can Kylie be protected for a bit too? I'm tired of undoing basic crap that is being injected into it. It is every day now.Rain the 1 ^BAM 16:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Will do. –Anemone Projectors– 18:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Tanya Branning

I think some semi-protection is in order here. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 23:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Not yet, no. Plus, semi-protection wouldn't have stopped one of the editors editing. –Anemone Projectors– 23:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh I see, but most of the edits are coming from IP's. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 23:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

And seeing as it was edited since your last revert, I've protected it. But Freerate can still edit. –Anemone Projectors– 23:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

re: Template:Infobox character

Thanks for the catch, I though I had only remove what I had added. Sorry about that.

- J Greb (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem. –Anemone Projectors– 21:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

John Frederick Nelson

This man is due to be paid £525,000 for three days work per week as Chairman of Lloyd's. Over 63 news items relate to him on Google. What was going on in your mind when you questioned his WP:NOTABILITY? Kittybrewster ☎ 22:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

The article just says he's a person that has worked for a number of companies. –Anemone Projectors– 22:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

How does a businessman avoid nn tags? Kittybrewster ☎ 06:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't think there's a specific guildeline for businesspeople, so have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (people). But I won't re-tag it myself. You also might like to mention why he's in the news at the moment. –Anemone Projectors– 08:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

No there isn't. I wish you would write one. Lord Myners and Sir David Clementi ruled themselves out of the Lloyd's job. Kittybrewster ☎ 10:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm not going to write it. Wikipedia:Notability (people) is sufficient. –Anemone Projectors– 11:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help...

Just popped in to say hi and to say thanks for all the work you have doen to help me make EastEnders 2008 a better article!It looks good now with the paragraph at the top edited by guess who... YOU! and all the articles full to the brim with refs. It now looks exactly like EastEnders 2010 (well not exactly) as it has the whole new 'others' table which you kindly helped me with. Its been good fun, im EXHAUSTED! day in day out adding more,changing, swapping, deleting, changing, deleting again.Im having a extended break like Bianca Jackson though i'll probably come back tomorow! I cant stay away... See you after my extended break (i.e. tomorow!)

QUICK FACT? Did you know that overall i have spent 2 days on the List of Eastenders characters 2008 (well you and me).--MayhemMario (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I haven't checked your other changes yet but yeah it's good, are you done with it now? Please don't start on any others lol at least not for 6 months so I can have a rest ;) –Anemone Projectors– 17:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Drawing your attention

Im just popping in to draw your attention to my new sandbox on Rainie Cross now with more refs it looks good, what do you think?--MayhemMario (talk) 13:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

What's there that isn't currently in her section (if anything)? Just want to check. It definitely looks good. I'll have a go at cleaning it up later and we can see how it looks then, if you want. –Anemone Projectors– 14:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

okey dokey AP!MayhemMario (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

ok, once I'm back from going out (now) and caught up with everything, I'll have a look. –Anemone Projectors– 14:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

quick question, on my userpage it only shows the contributions one how do i make it show all of the drop down menu's at one time?--MayhemMario (talk) 19:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

He may not be back for a while, how do you mean? Maybe I can help you. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 19:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

What drop down menus? What are you talking about? –Anemone Projectors– 19:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

He mean on his Userpage. At the bottom there is a contributions drop down menu, he wants them all to show at the same time. :/ umm...yeah GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 19:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

No idea but whatever you've done is all messed up. Try {{help me}}. –Anemone Projectors– 19:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

sorry but have i done that {{help me}} right? MayhemMario (talk)

I moved it to the bottom for you. –Anemone Projectors– 19:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Or why not ask JuneGloom? ;) –Anemone Projectors– 19:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Yep, should have asked me first. ;) - JuneGloom Talk 21:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Molly Conlin

As you can see i have undone your edit on Molly Conlin as i thought why? You seem to have done this on your own not with any discussion to any other users. If you didnt have to discuss things before you do them then i would go round and split off every EastEnders character in Wikipedia. I cant go round deleting articles without saying or having a appropriate reason. To be honest i dont see why its bad. It looks better than many other articles. If you look at James Forde he is only known for playing Liam Butcher yet he has got his own article, Maisie Smith again same reason. Himesh Patel same reason, Kylie Babbington same reason, Belinda Owusu same reason. All these articles have less than Molly Conlin so why delete her? Kylie Babbington is ONLY known for EastEnders as it is her ONLY tv role. Sorry i'm having a BIG mone at you im just a bit annyoed you didnt discuss it with anyone else before you decided to delete it. MayhemMario (talk) 13:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi Mario, AP didn't need to discuss it because it was already discussed here and here, and both discussions concluded that she is not yet notable enough for a Wikipedia article. The only difference between the article now and then is that she's appeared in a couple TV adverts, which constitutes a minor enough change that the consensus of the deletion discussions should probably stand. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a good argument to employ, because it usually results in someone looking at the other articles listed, and deciding maybe some of them should be deleted too! Frickative 14:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, like Frickative says, there have already been two discussions, and appearing in adverts don't really make her any more notable than she was before. I'm not going to argue over other articles. I'm sorry you're annoyed though. –Anemone Projectors– 16:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Ken Barlow

Hellorr AP. I'm just wondering if you would be interested in a big collaboration on the article Ken Barlow. I think the article is really neglected and could be GA with work put into it - not that just better than it is now. I've also asked another three editors in addition to you - I think quite a few heads would really help. We each work on a different section.Rain the 1 ^BAM 16:40, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

I can't even collaborate with myself on my own articles at the moment :D –Anemone Projectors– 19:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Oooh yerr lazy bum. =P Thanks for letting me know.Rain the 1 ^BAM 21:48, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Emmapillsbury.JPG

Hi AnemoneProjectors, I think I have to disagree with you here. The deletion debate did not discuss the exact images displayed but rather the use of non-free images to illustrate specific characters where there are free images of the actor. If you allow any slightly different image, with a different name to be used then the entire deletion discussion was moot and can be safely ignored by editors. I hardly think that this is a reasonable interpretation. Can you please reconsider - Peripitus (Talk) 23:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, assised from that, I suggest you read the "Characterization" section on Emma Pillsbury. A non-free image would clearly be appropriate here, same as in Eleventh Doctor. –Anemone Projectors– 23:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

I suppose then that you are ignoring the debate at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_January_20#File:SantanaLopezGlee.jpg where an image of this character File:Emma Pillsbury.jpg was discussed and deleted ? I was fairly sure that DrV was the correct place to dispute this. I notice that in your blind reversions of my edits you've taken articles with an image of the actor to an article with no image. I suppose to some that this is an improvement. Peripitus (Talk) 23:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

One person !voted to delete. Nobody addressed the fact that costume was discussed in some of the articles, meaning that fair use images are appropriate. If you want to add images of actors to the articles, you can but please don't put them in the infoboxes. And especially don't add actor images to infoboxes when the same image is already in the article. –Anemone Projectors– 23:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

If an article is deleted at AFD, but is re-created and the issues from the AFD have been addressed, the article stays and there's no need for a discussion. The same applies to images. The speedy deletion of the three images was incorrect, in my opinion, because the three characters have information on the costume, etc. –Anemone Projectors– 00:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what I was really thinking last night, I was wrong to just reverse your actions like that. I apologise. However I still think those three images should be kept. –Anemone Projectors– 10:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Antony Cotton

Thanks for your input and efforts there, happy holidays - Off2riorob (talk) 12:02, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Same to you. –Anemone Projectors– 12:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Eastenders Images

I'm trying to get Eastenders images, so if they start getting uploaded by any one we have never come across, new user or a IP - they are legit and we just need to edit the data - because this lady said we can have them.Rain the 1 ^BAM 13:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean? What images? What lady? –Anemone Projectors– 13:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

On DS i asked everyone "Have you had your picture taken with a soap actor?" - This lovely lady said she has had loads with EE people - so I then asked if Wikipedia could have them and she said yes. You should come along and suggest how we get them here. I don't want to be cheeky and suggest she put them on Flickr.Rain the 1 ^BAM 13:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

So they're images for actors' articles, but they'll all have some strange woman in them? That's not very encyclopaedic, is it? lol, does she know that "Wikipedia can have them" means "the whole world can have them"? –Anemone Projectors– 13:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

You have to be carefull with things like that....--MayhemMario (talk) 13:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Haha, Mario. I sent her a PM saying besically cut yourself out of the photo, explained everyone will see it and she would have to give permission to hand it over. She has already replied saying she is cropping herself out of them. I just want to know what we will have to do with them, this is a odd way but if she knows how to upload them and hopefully clicks the right tag - they'll be fine right? I didn't get too technical or anything, I've tried it before and it didn't work - that massive template I've emailed many flickr people with, it scares them off.Rain the 1 ^BAM 14:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

ahh!! im scared :P--MayhemMario (talk) 14:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Why would that be?Rain the 1 ^BAM 14:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

If I ever meet celebs, I'm getting photos without me in them! Can IPs upload photos? I dunno, but if she gets it wrong we can help, she may need to email permission to OTRS, I'm not sure. –Anemone Projectors– 14:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for coming in like this but how would this help we have aready got pictures in there own articles by themselves so why do we want more? What do you mean by 'Eastedners images'--MayhemMario (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

They are non free images which are fine in the context, but you can only have free images for living people. They help illustrate casting sections and development sections if the actor has said a lot or described something.Rain the 1 ^BAM 14:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

AP - If I get them to send me an email confirming they will release them under the license, what does she need to say specifically? She relases it to the public domain or does "Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0" sound better?Rain the 1 ^BAM 14:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Its not for me i know but AP has gone out MayhemMario (talk)

'Creative Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0' would be better. –Anemone Projectors– 17:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

The Zoe Lucker one is good but I'm not sure about the Johnny Partridge one. Could be cropped further so it's not a tall image. –Anemone Projectors– 09:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh yay. Well we can crop the Johnny one. Out of Scott Maslen, Jake Wood, Thomas Law, Jo Joyner, Nina Wadia, Himesh Patel, June Brown, Charlie G Hawkins, Tameke, Shane Richie, and Meryl Fernandes. - Which ones would you need the most?Rain the 1 ^BAM 09:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Well we have an image of Shane so she doesn't need to share that one if she doesn't want. Same for June Brown. There's no article for Meryl Fernandes but it doesn't mean we can't have an image, it could go in Afia's list entry. I would say Thomas Law's current image could do with being replaced as it's poor quality. But basically... all of them :D –Anemone Projectors– 09:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, I won't suggest all at once. But to start off I just asked for Jo, Thomas and Tameke... someone else has agreed too, but I think they only want to donate an Emmerdale one atm.. but anything is good. No one can contest they are free images can they?Rain the 1 ^BAM 09:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok yeah start with those three. I can't see there being any problems. –Anemone Projectors– 09:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

We have a new batch of images that have been uploaded. A new person has agreed to donate a whole host of images - but does not know how to upload them. She is going to give me the links to when she uploads them onto the net. What do I need to do now then?Rain the 1 ^BAM 15:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

The new one is a little worried about giving the images, if you went on DS and give her a nudge there is a better chance. She doesn't understand why she cannot watermark them lol Why can't you take pictures of the cast? You live really in traveling distance of the studio!Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

lol I've only been to Elstree Studios once and that was for the Big Brother 4 final. I can't just pop down there, it's not just down the road! I don't have a car. To get a train there I'd have to go into London and back out again. Thing about it is if she doesn't herself upload the images, and one of us does it for her, she'll probably have to email OTRS anyway. I suppose she could watermark them and still release the watermarked image with a free licence, as long as it wasn't watermarked with a copyright symbol... Sorry, I forgot to reply to your earlier message! –Anemone Projectors– 20:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

((talk page stalker) Just wanted to say great job getting all these new images uploaded - I love the one of John Partridge, he looks like he's hugging his article! Frickative 20:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC))

I was saying that one (or the other one) should be cropped so his body and legs aren't in it. I might be able to get a picture of Larry Lamb, the person who took it said he was ok with it being used but wasn't happy with the original being used because Erin O'Connor was in it and they'd just met, so it might imply they were friends, and then he wasn't sure about it being cropped. –Anemone Projectors– 20:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I had this crazy idea, if I create an account for the user and upload them and hand the account username and password over to her, for her to change. Then I thought, would someone say I am a sock... OTRS scare me.. Also I just kinda assumed it would be easy to get to. Damn you for not driving - I'd walk it if I lived near that near to somewhere like.. Ramsay Street :pRain the 1 ^BAM 20:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand OTRS. I don't think you'd be able to do that, but you could upload them on her behalf, I suppose you could put in the "source" part that she gave permission via email or whatever, you might have to give her contact details along with her name as the author. I can drive, but I don't own a car. I cycle everywhere! But I can't cycle there. Well, I could, but I probably wouldn't want to cycle back again!!! –Anemone Projectors– 21:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Well I'll try and figure something out. I'm gonna get her email if possible and upload for her, which she has already assumed. It will be wednesday apparently - Why I have chosen "busy" people - They only seem to visit the internet once a day, which is totally alien behaviour for my liking. Anyway the promise of 17 new images sounds too good! & Frick thanks, but it is hard work getting a yes, a few have told me where to go via PM :p I think I'll try my hand on Flickr users next. I uploaded some new pics on there AP, thanks for your previous comments too. Only noticed them yesterday. ;)Rain the 1 ^BAM 21:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

17? Cool, any chance you can get one of Roxanne McKee? –Anemone Projectors– 21:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Cora Cross

Cora Cross's storylines are REALLY low. It dosent even hardly look like she has appeared. All that fuss about one character and al that reception/development and she has only got one line of storylines! 1. She could be returning like GSorby said or 2. she was just a plot device to bring rainie back. What do you think? MayhemMario (talk) 10:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Like I said in my edit summary, "did she do anything? was she pointless? or just a plot device to bring Rainie back?" Other than being a bit of a bitch, she didn't actually do anything, so there's not really any storyline to add, unless someone adds things about what she said. There's not really that much character development info, the personality stuff was seen on screen, though dd she really attempt to heal the rift between Tanya and Rainie? There's lots of reception for Poppy Meadow, so reception doesn't necessarily relate to the amount of screen time a character gets. The rest is just casting quotes. I think anything she did is probably covered by real-world information. –Anemone Projectors– 11:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Changing subject, Kylie Babbington could it be deleted? Or put up for nomination? MayhemMario (talk) 11:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Do you want it to be? –Anemone Projectors– 11:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

No, Kylie Babbington's page is fine? Anyway, about Cora, if you want to see my work, look on my wiki:Cora Cross's page GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 11:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Well I suppose somebody could decide to nominate her for deletion at some point. As for Cora, feel free to add to her storylines. –Anemone Projectors– 11:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

i think she should be deleted as she ONLY known for EastEnders as this is her first TV role. About Cora i think the stroylines should be added they look good anf i was thinkig the image can we put that on the article? Also the image of Cora confronting Max why dont we use that many of them now? MayhemMario (talk) 12:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Have you created that Wiki? Can everyone see that? Why have you done that?Rain the 1 ^BAM 13:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Cos I wanted to make an EastEnders wiki without the harsh rules -_- GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 13:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

i think it looks good! Though there are no articles or picture for quite a few characetrs! :P

MayhemMario (talk) 13:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh I see. You are still editing here - right? Wikipedia is cool isn't it for it sharealike stuff - just think about the number of websites people can make without even lifting a finger.Rain the 1 ^BAM 13:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah! I will always edit here :) but having my own wiki is fun :D Help me out if you want, and Mario, I only made it last week. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 13:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

oh that's why! looks good for only 1 week! Do you copy the stuff from wikiepdia or make it up? MayhemMario (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm afraid I just wouldn't have the time - My wiki time is streched on Home and Away, Neighbours, Hollyoaks and Corrie as it is. :p

YOU have a wiki? By the way you forgot to sign yuor post! MayhemMario (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Mario, I have a LOT of wikis :D GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 14:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

ahh!!!!! If you need help im here! MayhemMario (talk) 14:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

hi GSorby, i left you a message! MayhemMario (talk) 14:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Don't Scare the Hare

Hi, I nominated this for DYK and added you as an author. Hope that was ok. TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh of course I don't mind. I had forgotten that it would be eligible for DYK, probably because I didn't start it. Thanks. –Anemone Projectors– 22:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

You should be listed as an author as well. You edited it before I did. We both added the majority of info. Should not the original creator be listed as well? –Anemone Projectors– 22:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm down as nominee, but should be an author as well I guess. I basically looked at who'd added teh most info and did it that way, but you're right about the original author. It was originally a two line article which was speedied, but I managed to rescue it. I dropped a note on the user's talk page, but will name a note at the DYK noticeboard. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Anome

Just wondering you seem to have a lot of experience with good articles. If you were reviewing the article Birth in Sri Lanka what are your thoughts. I know it doesn't have a very informative lead section, I have already been told that by User:Armburst but other than that, what are your thoughts. maucho eagle _(c) 22:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

It's Anemone but I'll let you off. At a glace, other than the lead, it seems quite good. I've never revied a GA, only written them so I might not be the best person to ask. You can always request a peer review. The only thing I did see is that references should go after punctuation, not before it. –Anemone Projectors– 22:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Connected

Hello. I am not being bias towards Myles and Connor, I am just getting facts straight. Myles and Connor have had all links to them deleted at times, whereas ReConnected have never had all their links deleted (these links include other pages), so is that not showing bias towards ReConnected? I am fine with both links and have no problem with both Myles and Connor and ReConnected sharing the link to Connected, so if the links are shared we can leave it at that. I am just being honest to all the people about Connected as i am not a fan of either group. Thank you. Apkid55. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apkid55 (talk • contribs) 12:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I do ask to reply on your own talk page... but anyway. I was talking more about the Connection disambiguation page. Anyway, as for BGT they should probably neither be linked because it does show bias. Connected were more than just Myles and Connor. I guess it's complicated. I don't think we can "share" the links. –Anemone Projectors– 12:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Reverted on Mercy Olubunmi

On the Lauren Video Dairy thing it actually does say Mercy said yes to Fatboy just want to say that the user was all together worng when he/she made the edit! The links here [4] MayhemMario (talk) 19:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I know, I've seen it. –Anemone Projectors– 19:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Marc Zammit

Hey thought you might be interested, on this website http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/tvshow_view.php?p=1&uid=5 it shows a Marc Zammit being cast in a Feature role. Not yet sure what that entails just thought it might be something you'd want to keep an eye on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunkyfunkybilbo (talk • contribs) 14:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Does "feature role" mean more than just a minor appearance? –Anemone Projectors– 16:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

i thougt that to... MayhemMario (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

And is this a reliable enough source? I'm gonna add him to 2011 others. –Anemone Projectors– 17:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what feature actually means I'm afraid. I'm guessing it will be more than one episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunkyfunkybilbo (talk • contribs) 17:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Imogen Thomas

Could you re-apply the semi-protection, as the BLP issues have obviously not gone away yet. Thanks, --♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 18:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. I considered it but thought I'd see if it was just a one-off the last time. –Anemone Projectors– 18:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Question: I can understand not including alleged gossip about possible affairs in their articles, as that would fail the BLP policy. However, mentioning that they took out a superinjunction in regards to this would be relevant and not fail the policy and would be backed by multiple sources. Thus, can information about the existence of a superinjunction be added? Silver seren^C 23:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

It's mentioned on Thomas's page, but it can't be mentioned on the page of the person who took out the superinjunction because the superinjunction blocks the media from reporting the identity of that person, so there are no reliable sources for it. –Anemone Projectors– 23:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

That sorta falls into a gray area of WP:OR, doesn't it, as enough would be described by the sources to pretty definitively say it was this person, but we can't just say it is unless a reliable source does and they're all under an injunction not to. Seems like a Catch-22. Silver seren^C 23:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

TBH I don't know what's been reported but if they've given clues without giving a name then yes it's covered by WP:OR. I'd be surprised if they had been giving clues though. –Anemone Projectors– 23:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The Daily Mail gave quite a few clues, actually. If I was more knowledgeable about people in Britain, I could probably figure out who they are. Though it seems Andrew Marr has already admitted to being one of them anyways, so that's one checked off. Silver seren^C 23:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh yeah he's fine. He outed himself. I know there are four celebrities with superinjunctions at the moment, and I saw a report that their identities had been revealed on Wikipedia. That's why I started getting involved in one of them. It worried me and I knew I could remove the edits from the page history. But I have no clue to who the other three might be so couldn't even start to look into those articles. –Anemone Projectors– 23:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, i've been quite quiet on the EE articles lately after I edited Kat's article a few months ago. Anyways, I was wondering if there is anyting I could be doing on the EE articles. I fancy creating a character's article as I have never created an article for an EE character, maybes Michael Moon or anyone you can think of? Its up to you really, I like the idea of doing some work on EE articles.--AcidBrights (talk) 14:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh I'm not sure really. Michael Moon's already created because the page is a redirect to the list entry, and if it became an article it would copy from the list entry, so technically you wouldn't be creating anything. Also we always discuss before we split off a character from the lists and at the moment there's nobody we want to split off, though there are discussions ongoing. But you can work on articles. Storyline sections can always be shorter, out-of-universe sections can always be longer. We have a category for articles needing information, Category:EastEnders articles in need of real-world perspective, and also our to-do list, which you'll find on any EastEnders-related article's talk page in the WikiProject banner. So although I can't think of anything specific, there are lots of ways you can help out. –Anemone Projectors– 15:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Don't Scare the Hare

On 4 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Don't Scare the Hare, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that TV quiz show Don't Scare the Hare has been described as "fantasy based toddler telly with an adult twist"? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Abi Branning EE.jpg

Hey Anemone, can you restore the one version that Gungadin uploaded with the comment: new sparkly, adorable, cuddly picture? Thanks GSorby - Talk! 19:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Are you planning to add it to her article an an image of how she used to look? –Anemone Projectors– 00:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeh cos it's 2007 and it was quite good quality. GSorby - Talk! 10:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't think it's necessary. Do readers need to see how she looked four years ago to significantly increase their understanding of the topic? Would the omission of the image be detrimental to that understanding? –Anemone Projectors– 10:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

I just noticed there's already an older image in it. The one you wan't isn't really better quality, she just looks younger. –Anemone Projectors– 16:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Well yeah it's earlier...the one on there is 2008. GSorby - Talk! 17:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

How do you remember the picture? –Anemone Projectors– 21:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Because when you restored all of the revisions before I remember that one and I couldn't remember the comment so I looked at the history GSorby - Talk! 10:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

ok, well it's done, but only because the other picture's already there :-) –Anemone Projectors– 10:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll save the picture when I get home. By the way, what's up the Vector skin? It's gone all shabby? GSorby - Talk! 11:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

No idea, I don't use it. –Anemone Projectors– 11:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Help!

Yo AP'izzle! It is the time off the month I call for your assistance. Could you restore this last stable version [5] of the List of Hollyoaks characters (2010) article. A few of the characters have gone walkies. (My twinkle has gone funny so I'd have to do a manual repair.) Then as you can see IP's love a good vandal session, so could you protect it? It has been before and proved a big help.Rain the 1 ^BAM 22:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused, why can't you do a manual repair when that's what you're asking me to do? You can just edit the old revision and press save, or view the diff between the old revsion and the current one and use "undo". Meanwhile, I'm unsure if you mean the 7 April revision by you or the 16 April one by AcidBrights. –Anemone Projectors– 00:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

If you had twinkle there is a button that says restore this version. I've learnt something new, I normally find the old version before the changes and past the relevant parts back into the article - which racks me off normally. I genuinely never realised you could just click save on old revisions, I've never thought of reading the text in the red box either. :/ Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

lolllll that's how we had to revert before the undo button was invented ;) –Anemone Projectors– 01:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh I see. Can you put some protection on it then?Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah ok. –Anemone Projectors– 01:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Just gonna hijack Rain's help thread. Are these - [6] [7] - any use to you for The X Factor article? I noticed a citation needed tag in the judges' houses section. - JuneGloom Talk 00:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh thank you, I didn't realise there was a citation needed tag in my GA-nominated article! I shall add those. –Anemone Projectors– 09:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The X Factor (New judges)

Hey Anemone Projectors. I was just messaging you to see if it is a good idea to start to build bridges for the new X Factor judges and who is being link to take over the seats of the judges. E.g. Frankie Sandford has had a lot of attention after meeting with the X Factor producers after digital spy stated here and more sources. Just an idea. :o) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

I know I removed a bit about possible judges, but I guess we could mention who is officially a possibility. But it'll all get removed once the actual judges are confirmed, so is it worth it? I won't remove it if you add it. –Anemone Projectors– 19:02, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Yea, i'll get to it. I think it is important people to know who is actually in talks for the panel. Anyway, thanks for your feedback. :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 19:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Semi-Protect?

No matter how many times I try to say it or undo their edits, people keep constantly adding back stuff saying Nicole and Steve Walsh are the new hosts and Paula's the final judge, although nothing has been confirmed by Fox. Can we semi-protect the article again? Because I'm think that's all we can really do since no one seems to stop and listen...1Dbad (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Steve Jones? Yeah I'll semi it again for a week or so. I protected the UK article too because people are adding Gary Barlow and Frankie Sandford as replacements for Simon Cowell and Cheryl Cole. –Anemone Projectors– 22:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

But I guarantee we'll have an edit request soon to add them! –Anemone Projectors– 22:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Oops! Yeah I meant Steve Jones. xD I dunno why I said Walsh. And thanks for that, really appreciated! I had noticed that with the UK article as well so I'm glad you semi-ed that one too. Both articles really need it with how much vandalism is going on. And I'm sure we will! Haha. At least with the US show we'll find out the hosts and final judge tomorrow, so maybe after that people will leave it alone if we're lucky. 1Dbad (talk) 00:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback and sockpuppetry abuse

Hello, AnemoneProjectors. You have new messages at ApprenticeFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

And also, another user (User:1Dbad) has been edited on Paula Abdul article that she has been announced as the last remaining judge of the U.S. X Factor. ApprenticeFan ^work 23:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean? –Anemone Projectors– 00:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, that user removed on that article and thought that "she was not announced yet". ApprenticeFan ^work 00:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

She is now. But You said it was sockpuppetry. –Anemone Projectors– 00:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

User

Hi. I just wanted to ask a question. There is this user, Fatty2k10 who is continuing to remove sourced stuff (Gary Barlow now X Factor judges) and acting in an agressive manner, how can we stop him doing this? --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 09:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I've warned him for breaking the three-revert rule. I'll block him if he reverts again. –Anemone Projectors– 11:25, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your support :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 11:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I got confused though about Barlow being a judge. I guess we can include him since Cowell said he's definitely going to be one, but his contract isn't signed. But it's confirmed. –Anemone Projectors– 11:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, he must of agreed to do it if Cowell's announced it. The auditions have also been pushed back so they do not clash with Take That's tour. That guy is still being a pain. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Well the user has been blocked. Hopefully they won't sockpuppet and by the time the block ends, they'll have accepted that Barlow is a judge. –Anemone Projectors– 11:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again for your support. So do you think Frankie will get the role over Alesha? I think she probably will as they want Frankie to be the new "Cheryl" and shes had so much media over this yet she hasn't denied anything + Alesha's contract with Strictly.. :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 11:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I can't see Alesha doing it. I don't know what Frankie's like as a person so I don't know if she'd be any good. I'm sure there are better people. –Anemone Projectors– 12:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

There probably is better people to do it, but they are probably looking for someone who is in the public eye at the moment and she's known for her out-spoken opinions. Plus they'll be wanting someone who has a big fan-base and shes known to be the more popular member of The Saturdays. :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh is she outspoken and opinionated? That's a good thing then. Unlike Gary Borelow, right?! –Anemone Projectors– 12:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, that's how she became a huge candidate in the whole thing and when she met with producers they said she was great. I generally don't think Gary is right for the job, although i think he's great; i think he will struggle to say no to people, if you get me? --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

That's what I'm thinking. He'll definitely know what he's doing, but he gives the impression of being a bit.... soft? We'll have to wait and see! –Anemone Projectors– 17:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Article Success

Guess What? Stevie Dickinson is now officially a good article. Congratulations on all your hard work! Make sure that you to review a article one day! (if you havent already) MayhemMario (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh wow thanks. –Anemone Projectors– 18:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

you seem surpised... MayhemMario (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC) D

Did you not think you would get it? It was good! The discussion about Sam's on my talk page I just replied to what yuo said. :D MayhemMario (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't expecting a straightforward pass, I thought someone would review it and pick on stuff like normal. I'm happy to reply to the points you made on the GAR but I'm going out shortly so it'll be much later tonight or tomorrow. –Anemone Projectors– 18:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

User (2)

Sorry to bother you again.

Fatty2k10 is back on Wiki and causing trouble again. He's been adding Tulisa on The X Factor page as a new judge, so I gave him a warning and stop him to stop, yet he reacted in an aggressive manner; here. Thankyou for your time. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 15:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

This user is purely disruptive. I shall send a warning, and the next block will be longer. I've not been around much and may not be today as I'm trying hard to catch up. –Anemone Projectors– 15:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm trying to stay above it all and remove the false stuff he add, but he just will not let. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The user has also removed everything off his talk page also. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 16:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

That's allowed as long as the user has read what was there. –Anemone Projectors– 16:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh right. Sorry, i'm just learning everything. :P --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

One Direction

About the One Direction article, don't you think an AfD would help, because I have provided sources and so what if a single hasn't been released, there are featured in the press etc and that should count as notable? You should start an AfD to see what people think. 82.46.152.122 (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

They're only notable for one event, The X Factor, therefore, their list entry is sufficient. You are welcome to add information there. –Anemone Projectors– 17:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Heather Chasen

completey differnt subject, can you reply to Heather Chasen Talk? Thanks! Also, what do you think of the article? MayhemMario (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes I can, and I already said. –Anemone Projectors– 19:42, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

oh thanks! MayhemMario (talk) 19:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Discreptioncy within Albert Beale and Lou Medeemey's marriage

The article here says that Albert and Lou's marriage began in 1939 and ended in 1970. But Albert Beale died in 1965 which would dissolve their marriage after he died. It also said that Harry Beale was the first legitmate child born to Albert and Lou, but he was born in 1936. So shouldn't their marriage be from 1936-1970 and not from 1939-1970? Arjoccolenty (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Albert Beale says he died in 1965, Lou Beale says he died in 1970. Best place to ask is Talk:Lou Beale or Talk:List of EastEnders characters or WT:EE because I don't know. –Anemone Projectors– 07:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Article Success

Guess What? Sol Levi is now officially a good article. Congratulations on all your hard work! Make sure that you to review a article one day! (if you havent already) MayhemMario (talk) 16:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

No offense and I'm thankful for you doing it but it doesn't feel like an achievement when a member of WikiProject EastEnders reviews an EastEnders article. –Anemone Projectors– 16:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

By the way, you said the lead is messy and could be split into two. That would leave to incredibly short paragraphs. What's messy about it? Also, there are no free images of Tosin Cole or Amanda Fairbank-Hynes, and I feel you shouldn't be bringing this up on a review. –Anemone Projectors– 16:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

And a caption would only say "Sol Levi" which is already above the image. –Anemone Projectors– 17:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

sigh... i can never get anything right... MayhemMario (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

lol you can, aww don't feel like that! You're getting there :-) You can only learn from it, it's constructive criticism :-) –Anemone Projectors– 18:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

he he thanks =) What do you think about Manda and by the way Sam failed. MayhemMario (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I know Sam failed. There's a good chance of splitting off Manda yes, but we should clean up the article before launching it. –Anemone Projectors– 18:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

cool beans MayhemMario (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Changes to the Beale family tree

Ian and Jane are divorced. Arjoccolenty (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Did you see the question I asked at Talk:Ian Beale? –Anemone Projectors– 21:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I answered. Arjoccolenty (talk) 08:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Happy footprints

Hello Anemone, as you know I'm willing to promote Footprints in the Sand (song) to GA, but probably you didn't know that you are the main contributor. Because of this, I'm asking permission to you nominate the article, first to a proper PR, and later to a GAN, to avoid future problems with this. Even it is not a rule, is courtesy notify main authors before doing contentious nominations. Also, since you are also the main contributor of Happy (Leona Lewis song) (by over 100 edits than me) it's pretty clear that I need your permission with the article.

On the other hand, could you help me with a revision of "Footprints" prose? You know that I suck at that, thank you so much. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 06:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Of course you're welcome to do that for both. I did kind of want to do Bleeding Love and Spirit (Leona Lewis album) myself, had planned to do them a long time ago, but you could even nominate them if you want. I'm not sure what kind of contributions I've made to Footprints and Happy, if I really have added lots of information or just reverted a lot of vandalism, but if you nominate and get them to GA standard, would you mind if I listed them on my userpage as articles I'd helped to reach GA standard? –Anemone Projectors– 09:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Of course I won't get mad for that, I got most of the information from Spirit/Echo and Better in Time articles, so you helped to reach thier (upcoming) GA standard ;) Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 23:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Super-injunction article

Cheers for spotting my enormous blp mess up on this article! I thought I'd been so careful too! What a wally- I knew I shouldn't have read the allegations...Benny Digital ^{Speak Your Brains} 12:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

I thought it looked a bit wrong! :-) –Anemone Projectors– 12:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love)‎

Please put your two cents into the jukebox. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 22:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Fatty2k10

Anemone, this user NEEDS to be blocked indef. All he's doing is being abusive to other users. Ta GSorby - Talk! 19:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

They've had a final warning, so really I should wait until they're abusive again. –Anemone Projectors– 19:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Can't Breathe

I fixed what appeared to me to be an obvious cut&paste move by a red-linked user. After that, I noticed that you, just yesterday, had notes in the deletion log about splitting histories. My fixing of the cut&paste move obviously undid that. At this point I'm not totally certain exactly what you split, so I will get out of the way, and if you want to redo your work from yesterday, please go ahead. Sorry for stepping on your efforts. - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh, it's ok because Can't Breathe was a redirect for the Leona Lewis song, which was replaced with the Fefe Dobson song article. I didn't realise that was a cut/paste move rather than a new article. I wanted to retain the redirect to Lewis's album so split the history so that could still be one. The Lewis redirect is at Can't Breathe (Leona Lewis song) and the Dobson is where you put it. So no problems! It's all sorted. –Anemone Projectors– 15:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

User

Hi there mate, sorry for having to bring this to your attention but a user you have blocked in the past, Fatty2k10, is again acting aggressively and inappropriately to myself and other users. He is using both his account and another IP account of User:2.124.196.36 (in which he is swearing and removing requests to follow good faith) to revert changes to articles and to act in an intimidating manner. If you could find time to have a look into this matter i would be very grateful. Many Thanks Yids2010 (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Yids2010, the would-be article owner of Gary Barlow, sees fit to continually revert valid edits (these consist merely of improving the article and making it less cryptic by specifying exactly where the "greatest songwriter" poll was from), while giving no valid explanation whatsoever ([8], [9], [10], [11]). He/she has also vandalised my talk by accusing me of being Fatty2k10: clearly we have no interests in common, other than the fact that Fatty2k10 made one edit to Barlow recently in an attempt to halt Yids2010's vandalism. It should be noted that Virus101 appears to have a similar agenda ([12]), and has also been heavily involved in Take That-related articles. 2.124.196.36 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Well it's certainly right to say where the poll was from, but this edit is not vandalism, it's a perfectly good faith edit. So 2.124.196.36, I suggest you read WP:AGF and stop refering to edits as vandalism. Secondly, please do not edit war! You have both violated WP:3RR and could potentially both be blocked for it. So please take that as a warning. Read WP:BRD. If your edit is reverted and you disagree that it should have been, you should discuss it on the talk page instead of making further edits. This doesn't apply to vandalism, but there has been none in this case. This edit war has been going on for days. So just stop. I don't really care if 2.124.196.36 and Fatty2k10 are the same person, but since Fatty2k10 was warned about his behaviour, it has greatly improved in my opinion. So stop fighting, or I'll fully-protect the article in question. –Anemone Projectors– 23:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm not too familiar with the project: I apologise if that edit wasn't vandalism. But it's clearly not right for him/her to revert my constructive edits with no justification, and to accuse me of being another editor. I know it's not fashionable to side with an IP over a registered user seeing as we are viewed as the "scum" of Wikipedia by most, but you've stated that the source of the poll should be noted, and I thank you for your moderation. 2.124.196.36 (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

It was a virtual "banging your heads together" ;-) –Anemone Projectors– 23:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The X Factor (U.S.) host

Is it really sure Steve Jones will be the sole host for the American X Factor franchise? Also, some sources Nicole Scherzinger is now placed from host to judge after Cheryl Cole was out due to anxiety problems in the United States. [13] ApprenticeFan ^work 15:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

We're still waiting for an announcement by Fox or The X Factor. –Anemone Projectors– 16:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

We have new information that Cheryl Cole has been fired from the U.S. X Factor franchise. Sadly, just three weeks after her role was announced, she was thoroughly devastated throughout American media. I have the sources of Cole's firing on the show: [14], [15], [16], [17] ApprenticeFan ^work 06:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't think those are any more reliable than what we've already seen. In fact, they're not really reliable sources at all, especially the first three. –Anemone Projectors– 09:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

pictures on britains got talent

Someone has added the pictures which you didnt want. I agree with you but am not sure how to remove them? Colinmotox11 (talk) 11:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. The article clearly receives too many unnecessary edits as well. –Anemone Projectors– 12:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Gary Barlow

Hello, Is there a problem with my proposed edit that prevented you from incorporating it?? --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 08:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

I didn't actually look at what you had proposed and how it was different to what was there, but if nobody has done it later today, I will when I'm less busy. –Anemone Projectors– 09:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

No problem at all, I've done it already :-) –Anemone Projectors– 09:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 09:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Head judge

Hi. According to the sun, he has completely took over Cowell and he is now head judge. here :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 22:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

The impression I get reading that is that they're calling him head judge because he's sitting where Simon always sat, not that he actually is the "head judge". I don't imagine Louis would want to move anyway. I don't think any of them can be called "head judge" now. They should just all be equal. In fact, Simon wasn't really a head judge because his vote didn't have any more weight than the others. He was equal as well. Unlike another show I've seen (can't remember which one, but it's old) when one judge had the deciding vote even if it was 2-2. Anyway, I don't see why this should affect the order of the navbox. Louis Walsh has been there the longest, so why not list them in that order? –Anemone Projectors– 22:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Image Deletion

Hey AP, could you please delete the old revisions of File:Tracy_Barlow.jpg, Ta GSorby - Talk! 19:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. –Anemone Projectors– 19:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

BGT list

I've created List of Britain's Got Talent finalists (in the pattern of the X Factor and similar lists, if you want to cast your eye over it. The main thing I wanted was some consistency on how the acts are referred to e.g. some are called Child Singers while other children are referred to as just singers. I will reference the article in due course. I have also added this link to the template, alongside redlinks for individual finalist pages (as we have for X Factor) because there is no other information on the page for each series other than name, age, act and location. 03 md 12:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

OK, good stuff. I will have a look. I don't know if we should refer to people like as "child singers" when we don't refer to people like Susan Boyle as "adult singers". But I suppose it's helpful, so I would go ahead and put it in. –Anemone Projectors– 12:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I was thinking the same, but I've tried to keep them consistent with the main series articles. 03 md 12:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, with the latest series, I remove the "child" part thinking it wasn't necessary, but I realise now that it probably is. –Anemone Projectors– 13:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I've now gone ahead and made a stub for List of Britain's Got Talent finalists (series 5), but I need to spread the word to attract some editors. 03 md 19:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Cool, I think Jai McDowall should be merged there and will bring it up at my AFD! I hope information gets added as nothing was added to the series 3 list and I had to redirect it. It was just empty sections. –Anemone Projectors– 20:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm starting to add information myself, and have posted a message on the series 5 talkpage. 03 md 20:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Jai McDowell proposed deleteion

You are crazy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifore2010 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Question

I've recently been referencing Radio Times online for episode cast details on List of Coronation Street characters (2011), only they seem to delete the page after the week has ended. Is it still a valid reference if you can no longer view it? I've looked at several guideline pages and can't find an answer. Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 19:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I guess so, but it's a bit tricky though. Is it the same details they would print in the magazine? If so, you should be able to convert it, though the page number etc would not be known. In future, you can archive the pages at http://www.webcitation.org/ as soon as you access them, and include "archivedate=" and "archiveurl=" in the reference. Then they will never go dead. –Anemone Projectors– 19:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh thanks for that, I think I've probably seen that before but not taken any notice. Yeah, it's the same sort of details they print in the mag, I just don't know what page they're on or anything. I'll archive in future, thanks for the help :) Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 19:35, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Quite often if a newspaper reference goes dead and we can't find an archive or a replacement, we just remove the url and treat it as an offline reference. The same could be done in this case, I suppose. But yes, do archive in future. It's good to do it anyway as anything can go dead in the future. Though I only do it with sites I know go dead. –Anemone Projectors– 19:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I get the Radio Times and save quite a few, before getting rid of them all at once. If you need page numbers, dates, etc, let me know. - JuneGloom Talk 20:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Brian Friedman

Apologies for removing him as creative director, as it was under the judges in the code I didn't realise it was visible higher up in the infobox. U-Mos (talk) 14:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean but I'll let you off ;-) –Anemone Projectors– 15:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Well...

AP, Mario claims he's been talking to Nick Wilton. "Nick Wilton" says he's got a photo he want to put on Wikipedia from his website. To be honest, I think this is one of Mario's accounts...See on my talk page here, cheers GSorby - Talk! 15:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

I've been suspicious of that account since it started editing. Go to SPI. If it's Mario, he's in for a lengthy block... –Anemone Projectors– 15:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Honest to god here it's not me. Mayhem Mario 17:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

If it's not you, you have nothing to worry about. –Anemone Projectors– 16:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks AP, you belive me right? Actually if I were in your shoes, I would probably be debating.... Mayhem Mario 17:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Well you have to admit it does look suspicious. You created an article and then its subject suddenly appeared as an editor. And you denied having a second account before but it was discovered to be you. So yeah, it doesn't look good for you! –Anemone Projectors– 16:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm really worried AP, what shall I do? GSorby's reported me and there probally find me guilty for doing nothing and then well then.... :'( Also have you read what Wilton has said? Mayhem Mario 17:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

There's not a lot you can do. If it's not you, then you'll be fine. If it is, then you'll be blocked again, which quite serves you right. If you're lucky, it'll be a short block again, but you can always request to be unblocked. As long as you don't do it again. Assuming of course that it is you. But I'm hoping it isn't. –Anemone Projectors– 17:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

It isnt though! I promise! Promise! Promise! PROMISE! Thanks for cheering me up, can we just move this to one User Talk please? Mayhem Mario 18:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

If it's any comfort, I didn't think you (Mario) were Nickwilton001. I'm pretty good at spotting socks and this one doesn't have your MO. - JuneGloom Talk 19:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. :) I was cleared,thank God.Mayhem Mario 20:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

		Original Barnstar
		For believing in me and calming me down during the investigation Mayhem Mario 16:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Celebrity Juice

Hi,

Sorry to bother you, but I had an editing opinion question to ask you. As I am an inferequent editor and don't know many mods, I thought of you.

On the Celebrity Juice page, where I contribute, I am having a few problems. There are certain people like BSBOfficial who are changing the look of the page, by adding a Captains section to each series grid, which I find unnecessary as a simple note would suffice under each series grid. Also Celebrity Juice was part of 24 Hour Panel People. I set up a special section titled "Other Episodes" talking about the special episodeas it was broadcast on the Internet and then in Chunks on BBC as part of Comic Relief on BBC, not ITV2 as Juice is usually aired. It is not part of Series 5 at all. Different Network, Different look. Yet BSBOfficial (who is suspected as being a sockpuppet) keeps on adding it to Series 5 as Episode 4b. (Other panel shows, like 8 out of 10 Cats, or Would I lie to you? credited their appearance on 24PP in a separate block on the Episodes page and not as part of a particular series.)

I'm trying to handle everything but I don't know how to come to a consensus about this particular page without getting into edit wars and without cluttering the page. I was wondering if you could take a look at it and give some Advice for proper page maintenance. Who do you think is right? Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

65.94.246.123 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)samusek2

I've had a brief look at the two and I agree with your version of the page. If he's a suspected sockpuppet, why has nobody started an SPI or requested a block? Sockpuppets should be blocked. –Anemone Projectors– 16:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

It's happening again. Well somethings going on. After a few days rest, now someone else has did a little bit of editing. I think the sockpuppet thing is happening as the person put a note on one of their posts, with BSBOfficial at the end meaning that this could be the same person as earlier this week using another account. Is that what "sockpuppet" means? I don't know how to request a block of a "sockpuppet"? Do you know how? In any regards, I am confused as to what the appropriate thing is to do and if this person's edits are valid, or if I should revert back to my original edits? He has just reverted my reverts. Wold you be able to sort it out with him? Just to reiterate why I didn't like a captains column in the grid is because it would make for "busy grids" with too many columns, when just a note on the bottom will suffice. Once again, I'm sorry to bother you.65.94.246.123 (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)samusek2

I think they've just edited while logged out, maybe they were somewhere they couldn't log in. I don't think it's sockpuppetry as they put their account name in an edit summary to let people know. Well, you two are going to have to discuss the page layout at Talk:Celebrity Juice and try to come to some sort of compromise because you clearly want the article one way and the other editor was the article another way. It's best to discuss first before reverting again, try to reach an agreement first. If you can't agree, there are steps that can be taken. –Anemone Projectors– 17:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

hi question about my block appeal

hi there, i have recently appealed my block as a user here on Wikipedia, however since i couldn't edit my own talk page i had to appeal via email to that email address given for appealing blocks and i was just wondering since you are an admin here you might be able to tell how long it will be before i will hear back from them?, will i receive an email reply or will they write on my talk page?

and finally i mentioned in my appeal that i would apologize and take full responsibly for my actions of late whether that be making invalid edits or abusing you and the other users

I know you have no reason to like me anymore and i perfectly accept that i don't deserve any kind of reply or help from you and you have every reason to be angry with me, but i am going to ask you to accept my apology and i assure you my past actions will not continue and i promise to only make appropriate edits and no longer abuse you and the other users

I would really appreciate it if you could accept my apology and than help me with my queries and then we can start afresh:)

Thank you and Sorry 86.43.186.172 (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC) (Brianwazere)

Hi Brian. To answer your question, I'm sorry I have absolutely no idea how long it takes as I've never known anyone to request an unblock via email before. Also, I don't know how they will reply. Good luck anyway, I hope if your unblock is successful, that you keep your promise and become a productive editor here. –Anemone Projectors– 22:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

I promise i wont let myself down and i was also just wondering is there anyway you could allow me to request an unblock through my user page as it may not be as difficult as an email request, i have no problem writing a brand new appeal if i must:), thank you for accepting my apoligy:) 86.43.186.172 (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Ok, just for this I will allow you to edit your userpage. –Anemone Projectors– 22:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you greatly appreciated:) 86.43.186.172 (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Help

Hey could you delete the previous images of this random image? File:Harry Reynolds.jpg - I uploaded it for a Home and Away character, but no warning came up to tell me the file name existed - and it uploaded it over that one. lolRain the 1 ^BAM 03:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. –Anemone Projectors– 09:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about the fatboy thing, I didn't read the What's on TV ref correctly. :/Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

s'ok –Anemone Projectors– 09:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Please can you delete previous versions of the image for Libby Kennedy? There is a woprrying amount. lolRain the 1 ^BAM 19:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Sure can. –Anemone Projectors– 19:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I thought I'd replied already. Anyway, could you look at my proposal on Jackson Walsh, it needs other soap editors insight seeings as now one edits Emmerdale. I left a message on the talk.Rain the 1 ^BAM 17:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

I cannot believe I was not mentioned in Mario's post on his report page. I've been snubbed by a sock. >_> Anyway can you protect List of Coronation Street characters for a bit, it is just stupid now - IP's changing to their own accord and ignoring sources. Plus I may scream if Bill Webster is moved from regular again..Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Done it. Sorry for your snub! –Anemone Projectors– 08:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Can you check if [18] and [19] are the same people?Rain the 1 ^BAM 21:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

How? I don't have Checkuser access. –Anemone Projectors– 21:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Oops sorry, I thought you did - maybe it was 5albertsq who did. Nevermind.Rain the 1 ^BAM 21:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't think she does either. –Anemone Projectors– 21:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey, could you deal with User talk:87.102.94.125 now they have carried on reverting mark's article.Rain the 1 ^BAM 23:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Mark Brennan (Neighbours)? They were reverted once, and then made two edits, the second of which reverted the first. And they haven't edited since the final warning. If they vandalise again, let me or AIV know. –Anemone Projectors– 23:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Am I the last one to have reverted on Mark? I have pressed rollback twice and manually reverted but each time it doesn't show up.Rain the 1 ^BAM 23:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

No, the IP self reverted so it won't show up on rollback. –Anemone Projectors– 23:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

List of Hollyoaks characters - This one is a pain. It needs protecting as for a good few months now there has been vandalism and specualtion about the status of many characters. But today is another one of those days where there has been a lot of changes...Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Done, protected for a month. –Anemone Projectors– 21:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Could you move Holly Longford to "Holly Cunningham" per Common name please?Rain the 1 ^BAM 19:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done, as I'm sure you have noticed :-) –Anemone Projectors– 20:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou muchly. I'm not sure why I randomly made the Norman redirect either. lol :)Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

To confuse me? :-) –Anemone Projectors– 21:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Britains got talent series 5

Ok, i didnt realise the image had been deleted!! I think though that we need to find another image to put in here as all previous series have a picture of the winner. Colinmotox11 (talk) 11:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, that's only possible if someone takes a photo and releases it with a free licence. It's not about being consistent, it's about pictures being available. Usually, they don't become available until the person has made a public appearance. And we don't actually have one of Spelbound. –Anemone Projectors– 12:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Jim_McDonald.jpg

Hey AP, can you please delete the old revisions for File:Jim_McDonald.jpg? Ta, GSorby - Talk! 16:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Ahh sorry I missed that O.O! Yehh I'll get another Eddie Moon image, what episode date was it? GSorby - Talk! 16:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done, and it was his second episode, think it was last Monday, 6 June? –Anemone Projectors– 16:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Wow, lucky you said now, it goes off iPlayer later :-) GSorby - Talk! 16:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

How's that? GSorby - Talk! 16:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I didn't say now, I said at the time ;-) That's better, but it's still not perfect. It'll do. It's a shame there isn't a promo image like Vanessa's. They released a promo video instead of photos though. –Anemone Projectors– 16:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree, Vanessa is practically the only person who has got a promo pic on her own other than, Lola. Glenda and Danny have one but they both have Roxy and Ronnie in with them.Mayhem Mario 18:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Most characters do do promo photos. Martina and Shenice did as well. –Anemone Projectors– 17:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

You see this is where I come in handy! http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/yy250/GSORBY/dessex.jpg May I? ;-) GSorby - Talk! 17:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Go ahead..Mayhem Mario 18:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

That's perfect but where did it come from? –Anemone Projectors– 17:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

And AP drops the bombshell. :) Mayhem Mario 18:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I found it on Walford Web. GSorby - Talk! 17:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Greg's pic found there to. [20] Mayhem Mario 18:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Michael's pic found there to. [21] Mayhem Mario 18:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Julie's pic found there to. [22] Mayhem Mario 18:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Mario, most regulars are on there. GSorby - Talk! 17:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Manda's pic on there Mayhem Mario 18:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes Mario, most of them are. But we don't need to go replacing screenshots with promo photos. I'd rather they came from a news source, would be interested to know where WW got them from. Usually DS publishes them with a "first look" kind of headline. –Anemone Projectors– 17:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

If I find out where Eddie came from (ie news wise) I'll update the link. GSorby - Talk! 17:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Cool, it's all looking good. I also wonder if we should use a promo image for Fatboy because his style has been the subject of critical commentary as well. –Anemone Projectors– 17:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

P.O. I prefer promo pics as i think there neater and all the actors are smiling (well some arent) why cant we replace them? We did with Vanessa! I also found one for Poppy Meadow if anyone interested.Mayhem Mario 18:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Mario you're jumping to conclusions again ;-)! Poppy won't be needed (yet) and Anemone I'll get one for Fatboy (this time I won;t cock up the rationale :-) ) GSorby - Talk! 17:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes Poppy doesn't need one, she's a two episode character (so far)! Fatboy's promos are from 2010 when the series 1 E20 characters were announced. Try to get one in an Ed Hardy top, if you know what that looks like. There are several on the E20 site. –Anemone Projectors– 17:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh and we used a promo image for Vanessa because it shows her complete outfit, which has CRITICAL COMMENTARY. –Anemone Projectors– 17:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The BBC supply walford web with the images. They have an agreement that they can display them.GunGagdin ^Moan 18:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh cool so we can list them as the source. –Anemone Projectors– 18:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello AP, please may you delete the old version of File:Tina_McIntyre.jpg. A tag has been placed on it for the high resolution image to be deleted, taaa! GSorby - Talk! 00:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

You know, if you tag it you don't have to ask me to delete it because it'll be deleted in seven days, when it's supposed to be deleted. This is how you should be doing it anyway. I only delete the EastEnders ones when you do a new upload because they don't get tagged. –Anemone Projectors– 07:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh okay, ta for telling me :-) GSorby - Talk! 12:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

But I'll do it anyway :) –Anemone Projectors– 12:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

B-day

MayhemMario wants to know when your birthday is. If you could, please, add your date and month to Mario's userpage underneath the title 'Calendar', it would be much appreciated.Mayhem Mario 17:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Can't you use my age userbox to work it out...! :-P –Anemone Projectors– 17:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

yawn.... Um? ..... ? Mayhem Mario 18:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Can you just add it? :)Mayhem Mario 19:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 18 June 2011 (UTC)

I'll add it a couple of days after my birthday :-) –Anemone Projectors– 19:13, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Vaneesa

[23] Just wondering if we could include this pciture in Vanessa's article or veen Harry's as 1) it illastrates Vaneesa clothes once more 2) it's a nice picture (?) ;) Mayhem Mario 20:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

We already have a picture showing Vanessa's clothes so we don't need another. And being a nice picture isn't a good reason to use non-free images. And no, we can't put it on Harry's either. I think you knew the answer to that one already :-) –Anemone Projectors– 19:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Mazza, just go with one picture per article. The one present works fine - in helping illustrate the text.. anymore would be abusing the fair use policy..Rain the 1 ^BAM 19:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

That's one non-free picture. You can use as many free ones as you like. As long as they're in context. –Anemone Projectors– 19:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Original artists

I have noticed this in tables of all too many bios from X-factor contestants and the like, and I agree with your view. It's just fancruft. I'm glad you're doing something about it. ;-) --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Well, we decided last year that the original artist wasn't necessary in the actual X Factor articles, as they're often disputed, or the version performed wasn't that of the original artist. And the same should apply to the contestant pages. And it did for Jedward, I was just reverting really. –Anemone Projectors– 09:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Internet

Hey AP, I saw your edit summary. When I'm at the library, I usually log off 10 minutes before my time's up and log on again, which gives me an extra hour. Dunno if that works where you are. Anyway have a nice break :-) GSorby - Talk! 13:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't know if that'll work. I have 23 minutes right now. Is it worth a try? Will I get those 10 minutes back? –Anemone Projectors– 13:18, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

DOesn't WORK!!! BYE –Anemone Projectors– 13:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh well, at least you know now ;P GSorby - Talk! 16:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Have some cookies!

Hello! 5 albert square has given you some cookies. Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully these have made your day better. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:plate}} to someone's talk page, or eat these cookies on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munchplate}}.

--5 albert square (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Aww thanks :-) from PC 28 at Stevenage library ;-) –Anemone Projectors– 12:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

EastEnders Tree Updates

Jane and Ian are divorced, and Billy and Julie apparently have a granddaughter. Arjoccolenty (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I've added Lola already. I've also done the Beale divorce but haven't uploaded it yet. –Anemone Projectors– 23:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Its been 11 days. You gonna upload it? Arjoccolenty (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Nope :-) Yeah maybe later. Can't right now. It'll be done, don't worry. –Anemone Projectors– 13:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I'm unable to do any tree updates for the time being :( –Anemone Projectors– 13:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Why? Did something happen? 20:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

See the template I've placed at the top of this page. –Anemone Projectors– 12:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Here's to you for making the family trees on EastEnders.

Arjoccolenty (talk) 20:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Adorable, thanks :-) –Anemone Projectors– 12:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Eddie

See I know Eddie is your pet project and I thought I'd give you the interview from Soalife. You better use it! :P So he will be off screen for a while then I take it from the last question...

Soaplife, fortnight ending 24th june, issue 252, "Eddie's family secrets" by Sally Brockway on page 25.

How's Eddie coping with the ice-cold welcome Michael's dishing out? Eddie keeps reaching out to him, as a father does. Michael blames Eddie for his mother's death... She commited suicide when he was six years old. But atleast Alfie's happy to see his uncle.

Is Eddie a single man? He's separated from his wife, so yes, I think he is. There's a spark between him and Carol. He starts off pushing her away but they get closer when he helps out with Liam. Carol thanks Eddie and he kisses her...

What sort of bloke is Eddie? As a younger man he might have been a mirror image of Michael, but he's become a bit more philosophical. He's not as hot headed as Michael. He has a chequered past but he's not a bad guy.

You turned down Eastenders' first invitation to join the show... Yes. They wanted me to play Honey's dad. I didn't do it because of a timing issue but there's much more texture and weight to Eddie's character. He's more interesting. The show's taken over my life now but I'm enjoying it.

You've topped the charts, acted on stage and screen and written your own work... Why go into a soap? It's something I've never done before. If I didn't respect Eastenders I wouldn't be in it. Even so it's been daunting. There are people who've been here for 20 years. It's like going to a new school.

Who's showing you the ropes? Jake Wood [Max] is my mentor but I've only seen him twice. His advice was 'When you get free time, learn your lines.' I'm full of respect for soap actors now as there's very little time for rehearsals.

Tell us about Eddie's sons Anthony and Tyler... He gets on very well with them. They're Michael's half-brothers. Only Tyler actor Tony Discipline has been filming so far and we're having a right laugh.

What's coming up for Eddie? I don't know yet but it's going to be a great adventure for me.

How long are you with the show for? Untill August when I go on tour with All The Fun Of The Fair. Then I'll have a chat with them to see what happens next. Things are pulling me out of Eastenders but emotionally I am here.

The End - Rain the 1 ^BAM 16:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, some of that is repeating what's alraedy there but also some of it can be used :-) –Anemone Projectors– 19:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

I just noticed it's almost identical to this, in fact most answers are identical but there are a few differences, like when he's talking about Carol... –Anemone Projectors– 17:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Ooh, I have a little something for the reception section. Eddie came 1st (with 74% of the vote) in an Inside Soap poll to see which new Moon family member readers were most looking forward to seeing. <ref>{{cite journal|date=18-24 June 2011|title=Your verdict|journal=[[Inside Soap]]|publisher=[[Hachette Filipacchi UK]]|page=97|issue=24|accessdate=17 June 2011}}</ref> - JuneGloom Talk 22:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Out of Eddie, Tyler and Anthony? –Anemone Projectors– 22:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Yep. Tyler came second (14%) and Anthony third (12%). - JuneGloom Talk 23:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure about this. I mean, hardly anything is known about the brothers. Tyler probably only beat Anthony because he's better looking! –Anemone Projectors– 23:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

I think you should include the poll though :p WTF the at the What's on TV interview, I know they are both IPC Media owned, but they just tweaked a few questions and slapped it online, If I'd known I wouldn't have had to type out every Q. lolRain the 1 ^BAM 18:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

I suppose I can include the poll! Yeah I thought that was weird. I notice that the Soaplife website has gone dead so I think they're putting it all on What's on TV (and apparently it was a subsection of the What's on TV website anyway). TV Times is also covered by the same website. They probably put shorter versions of some of their interviews online and longer ones in the magazines. –Anemone Projectors– 18:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Unrelated to Eddie, but I found Sarah Hills' EE profile at the wayback machine - [24]. I noticed Mario had removed all the dead ex links. - JuneGloom Talk 19:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

They're probably all on there. Is is acceptible to add them as external links that way? –Anemone Projectors– 19:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I think so. I've been using the BBC's Neighbours ones. - JuneGloom Talk 19:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Do you use an archive url and leave the original link in or just replace the whole thing with the archive? –Anemone Projectors– 19:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I just use the archive url. - JuneGloom Talk 20:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Sarah Ellis in Inside Soap said: "If there's one thing EastEnders has been missing recently, it's a strong patriarch to go up agaisnt Walford's gobby ladies. Enter David Essex as charming Eddie Moon - whose presence has caused something of a stir among you lot [veiwers].." (Inside soap 25 June - 1 July 2011, issue 25, page 96, "Soap Box" by Sarah Ellis.)Rain the 1 ^BAM 13:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I've actually bought it this week because I have no stupid internet and need something to read ;) but now i have the info here it's a lot easier to copy across! –Anemone Projectors– 13:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

AP I know you probably don't have much time - but can you delete the previous versions of File:Brooke Freeman.jpg - I have uploaded the new image four times and it is not showingt up. :( So maybe that will help.RaintheOne ^BAM 10:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

We discovered that it works if you rename the image, which is VERY annoying, but deleting old revisions doesn't fix it. –Anemone Projectors– 10:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Which I can see you did. Not sure if you have to do the move and then the upload! –Anemone Projectors– 10:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou for the tip, it worked straight away. :) It was driving me crazy last night. lolRaintheOne ^BAM 10:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

EastEnders theme tune

Hello AP. A user, Doctor123Doctor (I think), keeps adding Julia's theme for Lydia when she didn't have it. I've given plenty of warnings but s/he persists. Could you please issue a block is s/he does it again? Thanks GSorby - Talk! 14:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Keep warning and then go to WP:AIV. Unlikely I'll have time. –Anemone Projectors– 14:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, I did it since it was already a last warning and he did the edit again. –Anemone Projectors– 14:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Cher Lloyd

In what way is she not notable. She easily passes the General notability guidelines. Warburton1368 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

She's only notable for one event at the moment, so her list entry is sufficient. This is how it has always been. Stacey Solomon didn't have an article until she won I'm A Celebrity... and Cher Lloyd shouldn't have one until her single charts. –Anemone Projectors– 12:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I think she is notable due to significant coverage in all aspects of the media she has however i respect your opinion on that. Warburton1368 (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Doing It My Way/Ray Quinn (album)

Hi AnemoneProjectors. You might be right about the above page, though evidence was provided at the requested move on the talk page that it is properly titled Doing It My Way. I did some independent searches and it does appear that this is the proper title. But that's not really the issue. Whoever is correct, after a requested move is closed, I think you should start a discussion for the move back and not use administrator tools to undo another admin's action in closing and acting on a formal move request. Of course, you may not have noticed my edit summary pointing to the discussion, nor looked at the talk page, and so you may not have been aware of the reason for the move in the first place. I am assuming the latter but wanted to make sure it was clear this time around.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't aware of the move request. At the time, the page was moved about several times but the majority of Google searches I did showed the title to be Ray Quinn. Including official sources and online stores. Which is why I moved it back again. –Anemone Projectors– 09:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

EastEnders theme tune

Hello AP. A user, Doctor123Doctor (I think), keeps adding Julia's theme for Lydia when she didn't have it. I've given plenty of warnings but s/he persists. Could you please issue a block is s/he does it again? Thanks GSorby - Talk! 14:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Keep warning and then go to WP:AIV. Unlikely I'll have time. –Anemone Projectors– 14:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, I did it since it was already a last warning and he did the edit again. –Anemone Projectors– 14:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Cher Lloyd

In what way is she not notable. She easily passes the General notability guidelines. Warburton1368 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

She's only notable for one event at the moment, so her list entry is sufficient. This is how it has always been. Stacey Solomon didn't have an article until she won I'm A Celebrity... and Cher Lloyd shouldn't have one until her single charts. –Anemone Projectors– 12:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I think she is notable due to significant coverage in all aspects of the media she has however i respect your opinion on that. Warburton1368 (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Doing It My Way/Ray Quinn (album)

Hi AnemoneProjectors. You might be right about the above page, though evidence was provided at the requested move on the talk page that it is properly titled Doing It My Way. I did some independent searches and it does appear that this is the proper title. But that's not really the issue. Whoever is correct, after a requested move is closed, I think you should start a discussion for the move back and not use administrator tools to undo another admin's action in closing and acting on a formal move request. Of course, you may not have noticed my edit summary pointing to the discussion, nor looked at the talk page, and so you may not have been aware of the reason for the move in the first place. I am assuming the latter but wanted to make sure it was clear this time around.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't aware of the move request. At the time, the page was moved about several times but the majority of Google searches I did showed the title to be Ray Quinn. Including official sources and online stores. Which is why I moved it back again. –Anemone Projectors– 09:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

EE Newsleter June 2011

Hi just asking if you want this newsletter. If not tell me, if yes tell me! Mayhem Mario 15:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

So im guessing you dont want the EE news as you called it 'spam'. It's fine. :)Mayhem Mario 14:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)